Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

The Third Siege of Fallujah

By Dahr Jamail and Ali Al-Fadhily, IPS News. Posted July 21, 2008.


The two sieges of Fallujah in 2004 destroyed 75 percent of the city. Now, amid crumbling security, the U.S. is poised to do it again.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

FALLUJAH, Jul 21 (IPS) -- U.S. and Iraqi forces are preparing another siege of Fallujah under the pretext of combating "terror," residents and officials say.

Located 69 km west of Baghdad, the city that suffered two devastating U.S. attacks in 2004 has watched security degrade over recent months.

"Ruling powers in the city fighting to gain full control seem willing to use the security collapse to accuse each other of either conspiracy (in lawlessness) or incapability of control," Sufian Ahmed, a lawyer and human rights activist in Fallujah told IPS.

"They suddenly changed their tone from saying that the city was the safest in Iraq to claiming that al-Qaeda is a serious threat. Fallujah residents know their so-called leaders are using security threats to terrify them for their own political interests."

In the face of U.S. military claims of improved security, violence has been rising by the day this month. The city has now been placed under tight curfew while U.S. and Iraqi military forces prepare for a new offensive, according to the local Azzaman daily.

Iraqi security forces have established new checkpoints around the city and are forbidding movement of people and traffic. Pick-up trucks are roaming the city warning residents that al-Qaeda has once again infiltrated Fallujah.

Iraqi police officers insist that the situation is under control despite the "occasional incidents that take place all over Iraq."

The indications on the ground belie these claims. "The Americans and their allies transferred our leader, Colonel Fayssal al-Zoba'i from his post because they have bad plans for the city," a major in the Fallujah police force told IPS. "He has all the right to keep his post because he was the one who led us to defeat the insurgency while the Americans failed. They (the U.S. military) seem to have a plan to destroy the city again."

Iraqi police and troops from other areas are being deployed in the city in what police officials say is a build-up for a huge offensive. U.S. occupation forces are on the ready in nearby bases.

The government in Baghdad has made it clear that direct U.S. military involvement is critical for an "imminent offensive" in Fallujah, sources in the Iraqi military have been quoted as saying in Iraqi media.

The two U.S. sieges of the city during 2004 led to the destruction of approximately 75 percent of the city, thousands of civilian deaths, and the displacement of hundreds of thousands of people, according to the Fallujah-based Iraqi NGO Monitoring Net for Human Rights.

Some officers in the Fallujah police believe Iraqi politicians are using the threat of "terror" for election purposes, ahead of provincial elections scheduled for October.

"The resignation of Colonel Fayssal is not yet definite," another police officer, speaking on terms of anonymity, told IPS. "But I agree that the Americans and the Islamic Party are planning something bad for the city before the provincial elections."

The officer added, "We learned that such plans could not be conducted in a quiet atmosphere, so politicians are adding gas to the fire just to make sure they win the elections. We, policemen and citizens, will be the victims as usual." Residents fear parties will use the violence to accuse one another, and perhaps sabotage the election itself.

A police spokesman told IPS that "the media is exaggerating things once more" in speaking of another military operation in the city. The spokesman declined to give his name.

Everyone IPS spoke with in the city expressed fear of an impending attack.

There are meanwhile no signs of improvement of any other kind in Fallujah. Walls now divide the city into sectarian sections, with poverty, unemployment and suffering on all sides.

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: iraq, iraq war, iraq occupation, fallujah, al-qaeda

Dahr Jamail is an independent journalist who reports from Iraq. Ali, our correspondent in Baghdad, works in close collaboration with Dahr Jamail, our U.S.-based specialist writer on Iraq who travels extensively in the region.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from World! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
motown67
Posted by: motown67 on Jul 21, 2008 12:15 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Iraqi paper Azzaman had two articles on this topic as well, saying there was going to be a crackdown on Anbar. The Iraqi security forces are now saying there's not going to be anything like that. There are no extra troops for a crackdown. Anbar's main Army division, the 1st, is getting ready for operations in Diyala, and there are still on-going crackdowns across the South. The report that there has been an increase in attacks in Anbar is also false. Since the beginning of July there have only been 12 attacks, and in June there were only 7. Violence is much more prominent in places like Baghdad and Mosul. See: http://musingsoniraq.blogspot.com/

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

See? The surge worked!
Posted by: Crazy H on Jul 21, 2008 12:18 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
American style democracy has come to Iraq:

"their so-called leaders are using security threats to terrify them for their own political interests."

"politicians are using the threat of "terror" for election purposes"

"...are planning something bad for the city before the provincial elections."

"...politicians are adding gas to the fire just to make sure they win the elections. We, policemen and citizens, will be the victims as usual."

"the media is exaggerating things once more"

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Dahr Jamail always looks on the dark side
Posted by: MEPiston on Jul 23, 2008 7:49 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Mr. Jamail is certainly not an unbiased source. He takes a hard core Sunnist position, constantly placing the Iraqi government and U.S. actions in the worst possible light. Compared to Mr. Jamail even Patrick Cockburn is virtually a Maliki cheerleader. Whatever he writes must be understood through the emotional decision he made years ago to aggressively and emotionally oppose anything and everything the U.S. does in Iraq.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The forgotten war
Posted by: sicntired on Jul 25, 2008 10:40 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It seems the only people that care about what's actually happening in Iraq are the Iraqi people.That would be a good thing if the Americans didn't blow up everyone that dares raise their voice.It would seem that corrupt Iraqi officials use US military might to enforce their own personal agendas.The Iraqis either shut up and do whatever they're told or suffer the consequences.This is Viet Nam all over again without the 6 oclock news showing the down and dirty.Once again,the American government is proping up an unpopular and corrupt regime.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The forgotten war Posted by: umrayya
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement