Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Inside the Bush White House's Nonstop Propaganda War

By Mark Dery, AlterNet. Posted July 10, 2008.


Former White House press secretary Scott McClellan exposes the culture of deception that sold an unnecessary war to the public.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Scott McClellan is having a "Matrix" moment -- the moment when you wake up, with a jolt, from the reassuring fictions of the media dreamworld to the face-slapping reality of unspun fact. Remember that scene in "The Matrix" where Laurence Fishburne parts the veil of illusion -- the computer-generated simulation humanity experiences as everyday reality -- to reveal the movie's post-apocalyptic world for the irradiated slag heap it really is? Like that. "Welcome to the Desert of the Real," he tells Keanu Reeves, a riff on the postmodern philosopher Jean Baudrillard's pronouncement, in his book Simulations, that we live in a "desert of the real" -- an ever-more-virtual reality where firsthand experience and empirical truth are being displaced by media fictions. He offers an example tailor-made for the Bush presidency: "Propaganda and advertising fuse in the same marketing and merchandising of objects and ideologies."

This, in a word, is life inside the Bush administration's Ministry of Truth, as described by McClellan in What Happened: Inside the Bush White House and Washington's Culture of Deception. In his frag 'em-and-run memoir, the former White House press secretary -- whose Secret Service code name, I kid you not, was "Matrix" -- recounts how he and the rest of Team Dubya got caught up in the "permanent campaign," a nonstop propaganda war whose tactical weapons were "the manipulation of shades of truth, partial truths, twisting of the truth, and spin," and whose goal was to stage-manage the media narrative and thus public opinion.

Now that McClellan has broken free from what he calls the "Washington bubble," he can see the "massive marketing campaign" (his words, my italics) to sell the war in Iraq for the steaming heap of dookie it was: a PR operation characterized by a, er, "lack of candor and honesty," as the author so masterfully understates it, having just told us that the administration dropped the trap on chief economic adviser Larry Lindsey for telling the Wall Street Journal that Bush's war would likely cost between $100 billion and $200 billion -- a fatal misspeak at a moment when "talking about the projected cost of a potential war wasn't part of the script." Neither was talking about "possible unpleasant consequences" (the choice of adjective is sheer virtuosity, like a grace note in a Paganini caprice); "casualties, economic effects, geopolitical risks, diplomatic repercussions," and other buzz-killers might jeopardize what advertisers call the "supportive atmosphere" that puts consumers in that impulse-buying mood -- in this instance, buying the dubious case for war from a president who famously prefers faith to facts, a president who listens to his gut. Unfortunately, the trustworthy gurglings of the Bush gut were indistinguishable, in this case, from the offstage urgings of the neocons Colin Powell derided as "fucking crazies."

What Happened is a dyspeptic mixture of born-again confessional and media culpa; it's The Confessions of St. Augustine, as written by Michael Deaver. Four sentences in, McClellan lets us know that today's homily will take as its text John 8:32: "And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." Our pilgrim spends much of his progress bogged down in that Slough of Despond, Washington, D.C., where even a man who is pure in heart and says his prayers by night, like the "fundamentally decent" George W. Bush, can fall prey to the rancorously partisan, win-at-any-cost mindset of the Permanent Campaign Mentality. Narrow is the gate and straight is the way, and lying in wait in the tall grass are the news media, whom McClellan somewhat redundantly insists on calling "complicit enablers." (Personally, I prefer the more precise Enabling Enablers Who Enable Too Much.) The media oversimplify complex issues, batten on scandal, are "too deferential" to power (yet another nail in the coffin of the liberal-media canard, not that it will stay buried), and focus on the horse-race aspects of politics rather than the weighty matters that furrow the American brow, between episodes of "Flavor of Love."

The book ends with some halfhearted bromides, on loan from Billy Graham: "Let the one who is without sin cast the first stone." The organ swells, sobbingly. "It would be difficult if not impossible to find anyone who has lived in this destructive world of Washington ... who is truly 'without sin.'" All together now: "A-maz-ing grace, how sweet the sound/ That saved a wretch like me!"

Of course, the Winston Smith of the West Wing knows too well that, in a media age, "shaping the narrative before it shapes you" is how you win hearts and minds and, not incidentally, sell books. Watching him stay relentlessly on message as he makes the talk show rounds, one can't help but wonder: Is the man still spinning? The White House and its flying monkeys in the right-wing blogosphere and over at Fox News think so: They've launched a counterspin offensive, Richard Clarke-ing him as a shameless prevaricator who will do anything to boost his book sales. (It was ranked No. 1 on Amazon.com shortly after its release, although it had slipped to No. 52 as of this writing.)

McClellan's critics want to make McClellan the issue, a kill-the-messenger strategy not unfamiliar to the man himself, who used it to parry former terrorism czar Richard Clarke's criticisms of the administration's catastrophic bungling of the war on terror.

But if we step outside the tired binary logic of attack pundits and partisan hacks, there's a deeper meaning to this story. Like no administration before it, the Bush administration has mastered what the media critic Walter Lippmann called "the manufacture of consent" -- the use of "psychological research, coupled with the modern means of communication," to muster mass support for elite agendas. Staging photo ops whose choreographed drama and camera-ready visuals (Mission Accomplished!) are intended to play to the emotions and overrule objections; reducing complicated geopolitical issues to black-or-white dualisms (Team America: World Police vs. the Axis of Evil!); stonewalling the media, cherry-picking military intelligence, and parroting the same Karl Rove-approved talking points -- the Bush administration represents the apotheosis of government by spin control.

Sure, sure, truth is the first casualty of war, and politics is just war with a smile and a starched collar. But this is the stuff of which doctoral dissertations on Baudrillard are made. The burgeoning genre of Bush administration tell-alls, of which McClellan's is only the latest, paints a portrait of a White House utterly unconcerned with facts yet fervently attentive to public opinion polls. It is a White House whose solution to every unhappy turn of events -- the Iraqi insurgency, Katrina, a moribund economy, concerns about Rumsfeld raised by retired generals -- is to treat it not as a real-world problem requiring a real-world solution but as glitch in the Matrix -- "a perception problem," to be handled with the Message of the Day and the Theme of the Week.

The moral of McClellan's story is deeper than he knows, deeper by far than some Book of Virtues parable about Washington's "culture of deception." The philosophical takeaway here is the historical shift from the Enlightenment worldview, whose commitment to reasoned debate and empirical truth used to be the cornerstone of our little experiment in democracy, to the faith-based worldview of fundamentalism -- not just the Christian fundamentalism of the religious right, but fundamentalisms of every sort. The Iraq War came about, in large part, because of a harmonic convergence of personal passions, political agendas and ideological crusades, all faith-based rather than fact-driven. Bush, McClellan tells us, is a man who "convinces himself to believe what suits his needs at the moment" and who "to this day ... seems unbothered by the disconnect between the chief rationale for war and the driving motivation behind it, and unconcerned about how the case was packaged." Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz and the other saber-rattling superhawks at the neoconservative Project for the New American Century were on a Mission From God to democratize the Middle East, police the globe as part of the "constabulary duties" of the Last Action Superpower, and, not incidentally, found a star-spangled imperium. And Karl Rove's psyops team, of which McClellan was a part, intuitively embraced the postmodern proposition that media representation is reality -- that the story shapes perception, not the other way round. In the modern age, wrote Walter Lippmann, people are influenced by the mass media "pictures in their heads." As an unnamed Bush aide put it in a 2004 New York Times Magazine article by Ron Suskind, there are those who still live in "what we call the reality-based community," people who "believe that solutions emerge from your judicious study of discernible reality," and then there are those who understand that "that's not the way the world really works anymore. ... We're an empire now, and when we act, we create our own reality."

Of course, somewhere outside the Matrix-like reality of media spin, public perception and the White House "bubble," in what we used to call the Real World (isn't that a reality TV show?), there may be collateral damage. About two-thirds of the way through What Happened, McClellan recounts a wrenching scene I just can't get out of my head. He describes one of the few times the shadow of self-doubt flickered across Bush's mind, during one of the president's visits with wounded soldiers at Walter Reed Army Medical Center. In a dimly lit room, a woman and her 7-year-old son sit beside their husband and father, a veteran with a brain injury so severe he was "clearly not aware of his surroundings." President Bush hugs the mother, tells the boy his dad is "a very brave man," and whispers in the shattered soldier's ear, "God bless you." McClellan writes:

"Then [the president] turned and walked toward the door. Looking straight ahead, he moved his right hand to wipe away a tear. In that moment, I could see the doubt in his eyes and the vivid realization of the irrevocable consequences of his decision."
Welcome to the Desert of the Real, guys.

A shorter version of this article originally appeared in the Los Angeles Times.

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: iraq, bush administration, scott mcclellan

Mark Dery is a cultural critic who teaches in the Department of Journalism at New York University. Dery is at work on Paradise Lust, a book about the culture war, on the Web, between sexual revolutionaries and the morality police.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from World! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
“Scott McClellan exposes” ZERO – Ditto for this Article
Posted by: Mister_PsyOps on Jul 10, 2008 3:33 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
“The Iraq War came about, in large part, because of a harmonic convergence of personal passions, political agendas and ideological crusades, all faith-based rather than fact-driven.”

What a load of unsupported nonsense. The Alternet author even tosses in theorist-philosopher Jean Baudrillard just to make this mush seem deeper than a birdbath.

Anyone with a clue knew that 9/11 “war on terror” of a thousand lies (Center for Public Integrity) palmed off for genocide of a million lives (British ORB report) at the cost of public treasure was a complete criminal hijack of the American nation.

Wars are a racket fought over wealth for power. Full stop. The rest is Big Oil, sanctimonious BS.

McClellan is a hack smarmy “limited hangout” profiting off his PR flack days for an entire media-Washington spin-cycle machine that never stopped lying on behalf of a de facto FASCIST organized Corporate Monopoly Crime state. Put another way: A Kool-Aid State.

Pinning this all on a depraved temp puppet BushCo regime would be convenient for the shallow as well as the gullible. And such an explanation would be especially cozy for democratic and republican sellouts at Washington that perpetrated this latest blood money war with the full aid and comfort of the mainstream media. But that doesn’t come close to accountability for crimes against humanity on the ground.

It never will.

At the risk of being repetitive, the late and great George Carlin said it so virtually anyone could understand FASCISM in the west:

"Forget the politicians. They’re irrelevant. The politicians are put there to give you the idea you have freedom of choice. You don’t. You have no choice. You have OWNERS. They OWN YOU. They own everything.

They own all the important land, they own and control the corporations. They’ve long since bought and paid for the Senate, the Congress, the state houses; the city halls. They’ve got the judges in their back pockets. And they own all the big media companies…They’ve got you by the BALLS.”"
.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Ditto for your post Posted by: Knowmad
» RE: Ditto for your post Posted by: madmax427
» RE: Ditto for your post Posted by: Dboy
Nicely Written Pap ...
Posted by: gazooks on Jul 10, 2008 4:16 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
... leaving all doubts properly in place of the purely predatory nature of the pretenders.

Tear stained cheeks all around, just put it on the national tab.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Beloved George Carlin said it for me, but
Posted by: Last Chance on Jul 10, 2008 4:21 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
wasn't that also true for the Iraqi people under Saddam Hussien, and isn't it also true for the Iranian people under the Mullahs?

The only reason Bush and his corporate puppeteers seem more macho and dangerous is because they have a gigantic high-tech military machine at their disposal to dominate or destroy all the other less powerful tyrants. So, if we're looking for a group of people to blame for all this madness, surely the human species itself, not just Americans, are the true source.

Therefore, when push comes to shove, am I going to demonstrate in defense of a smaller pack of mad dogs against the bigger pack? NO! The human race is suicidally insane, and the only rational thing anyone can do is to follow Voltaire's advice and simply go out "and cultivate our gardens", because very soon that will be our only source of food!

And when you have created your own self-reliance with your friends and neighbors, maybe you won't need to earn enough money to pay taxes, without which, such macho crazy wars cannot be fought.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

How and Why Warmongering Works
Posted by: Roy Eidelson on Jul 10, 2008 4:48 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
From a psychological perspective, it's important to consider how and why White House warmongering has proven so effective despite the tragic disaster that is Iraq today. I examine these questions in a 10-minute online video entitled “Resisting the Drums of War.” It describes how the Bush administration has promoted the misguided and destructive war in Iraq by targeting five core concerns that often govern our lives--concerns about vulnerability, injustice, distrust, superiority, and helplessness. Looking ahead, the continuing occupation of Iraq--or an attack on Iran--will likely be sold to us in much the same way. The video examines these warmongering appeals and offers suggestions for how to counter them. It’s available for viewing HERE.

P.S. For a brief but deeply troubling chronicle of the president’s public warmongering and demonization of Iran, please take a look at my 3-minute online video entitled “Forewarned Is Forearmed: Bush On Iran.” It is available HERE.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Sorghum-laced bullshit!
Posted by: Col. Jackleg on Jul 10, 2008 6:02 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Gimme a break. This and the underlying source material are useless, worthless and gutless. If any of it means a damned thing it should have been presented to a grand jury for indictment purposes but that dog won't hunt and any accountability in Congress is "off the table." We deserve more and better....or do we?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Sorghum-laced bullshit! Posted by: Knowmad
» RE: Sorghum-laced bullshit! Posted by: Lauren
A generation of career-minded, materialistic women...
Posted by: Bobsays on Jul 10, 2008 7:15 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
was the best weapon and worth more than any propoganda campaign. Yep: the media has never had so many women working in it, and their raison d'etre to get there was their willingness to be more compliant and hardworking than the grumpy guys they replaced. And they did their bit by parroting what the powerful wanted to hear. So professional working women played the world. Cute, huh?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Ignore Bobspews as usual... Posted by: Knowmad
Powell
Posted by: Dboy on Jul 10, 2008 9:22 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Powell attempted to disown the "fucking crazies" statement, so don't go thinking he's a hero or anything. He's still the same My Lai Massacre war criminal he always was.

dboy

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

McClellan only tells the truth if you pay him
Posted by: Reader11722 on Jul 10, 2008 11:06 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
McClellan and the Bush administration are only partly to blame. Their zionist puppet-masters also share the blame. Only Israel benefits from these endless Middle East wars. Iraq is the beginning. As we commit war-crimes in Baghdad, the US gov't commits treason at home by opening mail, eliminating habeas corpus, using the judiciary to steal private lands, banning books like America Deceived (book) from Amazon and Wikipedia, conducting warrantless wiretaps and engaging in illegal wars on behalf of AIPAC's 'money-men'. Soon, another US false-flag operation will occur (sinking of an Aircraft Carrier by Mossad) and the US will invade Iran.. Then we'll invade Syria, then Saudi Arabia, then Lebanon (again) then ....

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Ask yourself these questions
Posted by: democracynowiniraq on Jul 10, 2008 8:35 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have read all of McClellan's book except for the 1st few chapters, which describe his personal life. But I wonder:

Since when does a president NOT want the media and public opinion to their side? When did that become an abstract concept? Especially during times of war???

Since when does a president want his subordinates to be sending the public mixed messages? About anything at all??

Since when does a president NOT "sell" or use so-called "propaganda" to forward his agenda?

Since when does a president NOT go before the American people to explain why war is necessary in the first place?

Since when does ANY president, in ANY country, at ANY time, want his council or administration to be disloyal to him??

After having listened to several tapes of Eisenhower, Johnson, and Nixon, I can tell you that they had TWO eyes on the electoral calendar. And I have no reason to believe that Kennedy, Ford, Carter, Reagan, Bush 41, or Clinton were one iota different.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

McClellan's try to buy his way out of accountability for himself.
Posted by: common intelligence on Jul 10, 2008 9:31 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It appears that somehow, all these Johnny come lately spewers "after the fact" are trying to CYA their own compliance with the lies they've alway known. All that is except Cheney, Rove, Rice Wolfy, & Rummy.

But have you even noticed all the BUSH supporting bumper stickers are gone too. The republicans that voted for these drek mouthed pirates are hidding from them having supported the bastards for fear they will be singled out and beatened out of their BMWs.

Everyone that had anything to do with being a supporter or accomplice to the jerks in control are laying low or are pretending to have changed their tune.

The fact is propaganda or not, public opinion or not, what we are feed from the media or what the "polls" are showing doesn't mean jackshit.

Unless these pricks are rounded up and hog tied and pistol whipped to death the agenda is set and on schedule.
And it doesn't seem to make a difference what "We the People" have to say....That is unless we take things into our own hands.....right..
Chicken shit Americans haven't got the balls to take their country back. IT"S GONE SUCKERS!

Already Obama is twisting the "Change" and what we want is going to be different that what we get.

I wonder. Shouldn't we make a new flag for our new country?

"United we stand..United we're NOT"

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» I'm not hiding. I'm right here. Posted by: democracynowiniraq
» RE: Well Done ... Posted by: gazooks
Scott McClellan
Posted by: truthseeker2012 on Jul 11, 2008 3:39 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If Scott donated all sales money to a charity, then and only then would I buy his book, But I refuse to make a rat rich!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Operation MOCKINGBIRD, anyone?
Posted by: Walks-in-Storms on Jul 14, 2008 4:07 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I write dozens of letters, e-mail and otherwise, urging people to "google" Operation MOCKINGBIRD. Please?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement