Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Can Bush Attack Iran With Oil at $140 per Barrel?

By Jim Lobe, IPS News. Posted July 7, 2008.


Forswearing military action against Tehran would ease the upwards pressure on world oil prices.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

If U.S. President George W. Bush wants to boost Republican chances of holding on to the White House and keeping Democratic gains in Congress to a minimum in the November elections, he might consider taking an attack on Iran before the end of his administration "off the table."

Of course, that's probably the last thing Bush -- and his particularly belligerent vice president, Dick Cheney -- will do.

But there's little doubt that forswearing military action against Tehran should ease the upwards pressure on world oil prices -- which hit a historic high Monday of more than 143 dollars per barrel before falling back to 140 dollars -- and thus offer at least some reprieve to the U.S. consumer at a time when record gasoline prices appear to be driving widespread popular dismay with the state of the U.S. economy.

"(I)f this administration truly wanted to spare Americans further pain at the pump, there is one thing it could do that would have an immediate effect," wrote Michael Klare in this week's Nation magazine and author of a new book, "Rising Power, Shrinking Planet: The New Geopolitics of Energy". "(D)eclare that military force is not an acceptable option in the struggle with Iran."

While oil analysts say that prospects of a continuing decline in the dollar no doubt played an important role in recent price jumps, they also pointed to last week's pointed reaction by the commander of Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, Gen. Mohammed Ali Jafari, to recent U.S. and Israeli threats to attack Tehran's nuclear facilities, as well as his assessment that those threats should be taken seriously, as a major factor.

In addition to retaliating against any regional powers, presumably including Israel, which take part in such an attack, Jafari warned that Tehran would "definitely act to impose control on the Persian Gulf and Strait of Hormuz," after which, he added, "the oil price will rise very considerably, and this is among the factors deterring the enemies."

Indeed, even without an attack, continuing tension involving Iran's nuclear program will almost certainly contribute to a continued rise in oil prices to as high as 170 dollars a barrel in the coming weeks and months, OPEC's president, Chakib Khelil, said during a conference in Madrid.

World oil prices have risen by nearly 50 percent since the beginning of 2008 and nearly doubled over the past year. Analysts have argued over how much of that increase is due to structural factors in the world economy -- such as growing demand in middle-income countries and the depreciating dollar that would tend to make the price increase permanent -- and how much is related to worries about possible supply disruptions arising from the kind of conflict that has plagued the Niger Delta region in Nigeria, terrorist attacks by al Qaeda in the Gulf, economic or other sanctions against key oil-producers, or war.

The latter risk factors, according to some analysts here, could account for as much as 50 dollars of the total current price, although most believe that the figure is about half that.

How much is due to the uncertainty about Iran is also a matter of considerable debate. Many point to the unprecedented 11-dollar one-day spike in oil prices -- from 128 dollars to 139 dollars a barrel -- that took place Jun. 6 after Israel's Deputy Prime Minister Shaul Mofaz warned that an Israeli attack on Tehran's nuclear facilities was "unavoidable" if international pressure did not succeed in persuading it to freeze its uranium enrichment program.

While that incident offered the most spectacular suggestion of a relationship between threats against Iran and the price of oil, most analysts believe the effect is somewhat more modest, albeit still quite real.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: iran, neocons, bush, oil, cheney

Jim Lobe is the Washington bureau chief for Inter Press Service. His blog on U.S. foreign policy, and particularly the neo-conservative influence in the Bush administration, can be read at http://www.ips.org/blog/jimlobe/.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from World! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Sounds like a great idea....
Posted by: Obijuan on Jul 7, 2008 1:11 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The way I see it, attacking Iran will benefit the same folks our war in Iraq is benefiting, and then some. How wonderful would it be for our oil interests to have oil skyrocket in price? Just another excuse to gouge the American lower classes.

This sounds like the best reason to attack Iran. In fact, it sounds like the same reason they attacked Iraq.

obi

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

How about taking the Iraqi occupation for oil and the ban/over-regulation/phoney-patenting off 1st.
Posted by: maxpayne on Jul 7, 2008 1:12 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm not saying go to war with Iran. I'm saying that in addition to taking war against Iran off the table, let's do the rest. There are plenty of excellent ideas out there to get us all the hell off dependency on fossil fuels and nuclear but thanks to banning some of them such as hemp, slapping phoney patents on electric cars and solar technologies as was the case in the 1980s, and Big Business/Religion/Government filing frivolous lawsuits against non-monied scientific geniuses along with allowing schools to "FAIL" students who actually make new scientific discoveries or even inventions that could give Big Oil/Coal/Nuclear a run for their money, both parties caving in to Big Auto/Oil in further rigging the market to push fuel inefficient vehicles down everyone's throats while overtaxing and overpricing fuel efficient ones and lying about gas guzzlers being "stronger", it's no coincidence that crude oil remains at an all time high. Besides, the LIGHT SWEET crude oil is hitting diminishing stages and sour heavy oil is going to be far more expensive to extract and refine and even then it will be of poorer quality and ultimately expensive.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Next President
Posted by: Tom Degan on Jul 7, 2008 2:02 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"The fundamental question is, 'Will I be a successful president when it comes to foreign policy?' I will be, but not until I'm the president, it's going to be hard for me to verify that I think I'll be more effective."

George W. Bush
Wayne. Michigan
June 27, 2000

Yes, children, he really said that!

Just think of what President Obama (please, God) is facing come January 20. The poor guy is going to be spending ninety percent of his time dealing with the mess that was left for him by George W. Bush.

Attacking Iran is just one more headache the next president will have to deal with. The big question is, will they attack before or after the elections - or maybe even Election Day! Don't put it past these devious knuckleheads. If seven and a half years of close study has thought us anything it is that these people are capable of anything.

My goodness! This is turning out to be an interesting year, is it not? And to think that it is barely half over!

Tom Degan
Goshen, NY
Barack Obama: Buyer's Remorse?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Bush was right Posted by: Ydotheyhateus
» RE: The Next President Posted by: Dboy
Dead Eye executes the coup de grâce!
Posted by: williameon on Jul 7, 2008 3:21 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Decider and Dead Eye come in their pants: Mission Admonished!

Oil up 500%
Military up 50%
CIA up 50%
Prison Population up 50%
NATIONAL Debt up 50%
Taxes up 50%
Outsourcing up 50%
Privatization of U.S. Government and Military 70%
The Dollar down 55%

Who owns and runs the U.S.A.?
The Corpirates!
1000 Billionaires and
250 Million Schmocks!

With surplus food Supplies down to ZERO (0)
With Mono-saint-co releasing The Terminator Genes and
The Midwest under water
America starves.
Good thing we are so fat.
We can all eat Blubber

Dead Eye executes the coup de grâce
BOMB IRAN

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Can US attack Iran for fuel $140
Posted by: sadashivan on Jul 7, 2008 3:31 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Democrats will resist bush step to attack. US lost economy (food-fuel crisis, fall of dollor and jobs) and credibility and can not afford any more.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

No Offence meant, but...
Posted by: chuckjs on Jul 7, 2008 3:41 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Most of the articles I read, and comments on them, speak like the American public are the only people in the world suffering from the failed, idiotic policies of their own government.

You people think you have it so bad with $4 a gallon gas when it is somewhere around $6- $8 a gallon in Europe. Here in my home town the price is somewhere around $6 a gallon.

As my subject line says no offence but, get over yourselves. I am quite sorry for this but it is time to wake the hell up and realize the world does not revolve around the USA and it's people. And your stinking government foreign policy has a far more detrimental effect on the rest of the world than it does on you!

Keep up the good work of destroying economies and countries and you will find yourselves a very isolated country before too long.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: No Offence meant, but... Posted by: Tom Degan
» RE: No Offence meant, but... Posted by: richholland
» RE: No Offence meant, but... Posted by: mr. joshua
» Your sad Euro-ass is... Posted by: Bobsays
» RE: Your sad Euro-ass is... Posted by: thedigitalfrenzy
» Bobby, Bobby, Bobby... Posted by: DuncanIdaho
» RE: No Offence meant, but... Posted by: VZEQICVA
» None taken Posted by: EinMD
» RE: No Offence meant, but... Posted by: vssmith
» RE: No Offence meant, but... Posted by: kelly.nickell
War, war war
Posted by: kingharvest on Jul 7, 2008 4:54 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is astounding, this talk of war in the US. Guns and war. Does anyone think of anything else. You have a leader who plans to "go to war," not declare it, but just do it. And a nation sits on their hands in a sort of odd wish fulfillment. You will let him attack yet another nation and offer it up as proof that everything you said about your leader is true. But listen, is there another nation on the face of the earth that is fighting on two fronts, let alone three! Get up, stand up.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: War, war war Posted by: mr. joshua
Bush's Reality
Posted by: Last Chance on Jul 7, 2008 5:02 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Everyone knows there is no way the Republicans can win an honest election, but that didn't stop them in 2000 and 2004. But this time so many millions of voters absolutely detest them that even electronically slanted voting booths might be overwhelmed by a voter landslide. So, what to do? Ah, of course! Extend the Iraq War to Iran and beyond by Israeli action, declare a national emergency, postpone the elections indefinitely and rule by decree! Then, impeachment would REALLY be off the table!

So, are Bush and Cheney the kind of men who would do something like that? Ask John Hagee, Bush's Armageddonite minister of his Christian faith. He will explain the Book of Revelations and remind us, if we forgot, that "The Kingdom of God is not a democracy."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Bush's Reality Posted by: Grandma Crabby
» wouln't put it past them. Posted by: EinMD
Not a problem: strategic reserve topped up
Posted by: Bobsays on Jul 7, 2008 6:04 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why do you think oil is so high? Because getting the strategic reserve topped up pushes up demand and thus price. Once the reserve is in good order, the president will give the 'go' order.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

"What a coincidence" - Hugh Masekela (Coincidence - Chisa - 1967))
Posted by: boing007 on Jul 7, 2008 6:26 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sounds like collusion to me.

And, to quote the great ska/punk U.K. band, The Specials, the fact that Europeans pay a higher price for gasoline than North Americans "doesn't make it all right".

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

"What a coincidence" - Hugh Masekela (Coincidence - Chisa - 1967))
Posted by: boing007 on Jul 7, 2008 6:26 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sounds like collusion to me.

And, to quote the great ska/punk U.K. band, The Specials, the fact that Europeans pay a higher price for gasoline than North Americans "doesn't make it all right".

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Pre emtive strike in order !
Posted by: reelectnoone on Jul 7, 2008 7:16 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
No, not military, congressional. Congress needs to pass a resolution to block any premeditated military action against Iran by the US or Israel with promises to cut any funds to Israel if the do attack Iran.

Then they have to have the balls to back it up by cutting funds to follow through...and more. Impeachment.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Pre emtive strike in order ! Posted by: mnascimento
» Nonsense Posted by: Last Chance
Light at the end of the tunnel?
Posted by: beeden on Jul 7, 2008 7:25 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
While much is made of China and India using oil, we forget how uneconomical military vehicles are; the tanks, hummers, helicopters, and then there are the ships and planes, massive amounts of fuel being used, some for operations but others for less dangerous missions.It is a logisitical nightmare for the military to supply and coordinate the supply and resupply of provisions for troops throughout the many bases, hence the need for oil.
Imagine though the day there is no oil, the military can't leave, the troops don't arrive, the invasion can't happen, the occupation will not occur, unless we resort to horseback, camel trains, sailing ships, zeppelin balloons. Is it possible that with the passing of oil as the means to disperse and mobilise a military and occupying force that the world may lose the power to wage wars on an international level?
Though missiles still have the capacity to destroy at a distance, without the capacity to occupy, what purpose would be served? With the possibility of enhanced alternative electrical mass transit systems and a reduction in individual vehicle theology the end of oil may offer the world new peace initiatives, as populations realised there was more to be gained through the peaceful resolution of differences rather than the maintenance of violent cycles of dispossession.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bush to destroy with pre-emptive strike Iran...to steal their oil
Posted by: coldham on Jul 7, 2008 7:45 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Iran has always been an evil-doer. They will perish and their entire nation shall be vanquished. After that, we will take their oil and repopulate their nation with Settlers. There is not enough room to go about in Palestine. A New Babylonian empire is envisioned. May God bless them all.

By the way, the 2008 election is already rigged. The republicans will win.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Blather and Hype Posted by: Last Chance
BUSH DOES AS HE PLEASES
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Jul 7, 2008 8:46 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Joe Biden had said that he will start impeachment proceedings if Bush attempts to attack Iran without Congress. Beyond that, there is no controlling him. In George's world there are no consequences. He has yet to pay his dues for anything. He'll attack Iran if he wants to. His reasons don't matter. He has the entire world afraid of something or other. What a rush that must be. He's just a mean selfish child. Lovin' every minute of it. ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

USA policies suck
Posted by: Grandma Crabby on Jul 7, 2008 9:14 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The good old USA has had TERRIBLE energy policies over the years.

I got my drivers license around the time of the Arab oil embargo of the 70's. There were plenty of good ideas back then for renewable energy and more efficiency, but none of them were implemented.

INSTEAD....

Greedy capitalists and politicians have ensured us policies guaranteed to stifle invention and innovation, reward spoiled gluttony and fart upon all of the land.

Jimmy Carter had solar panels with a solar water heater installed in the white house.

Ronald Reagan had them ripped out.

End of story.

Luv,
Granny

VideoProductionTips = Learn Internet Video

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Damned hippies! Posted by: EinMD
IMPEACHMENT NOW!!!
Posted by: Col. Jackleg on Jul 7, 2008 9:14 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What the hell are the Dipocrits waiting for? Does any member of Congress, other that Kucinich, have a clue about the sorry state of American foreign policy and the catastrophic economy? If this was on Clinton's plate he would have been hung, drawn and quartered long ago BUT Bush and his neocon-felons behave as though annointed by principles of honor and decency and their collective high crimes and misdemeanors are "off the table." If nobody will stand tall, its time to take all of this to the streets and it begins with ordering an ample supply of body bags. Yes folks, it is that dire and we have nobody to blame but ourselves! Regrettably, November '08 will produce more of the same because there is no groundswell to stop it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» /agree Posted by: EinMD
What to do with Iran is a moment to grow up
Posted by: Bobsays on Jul 7, 2008 9:45 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
For Generation Y and X. Because, surprise, surprise, you are facing the generational moment that last hit the WWII folks. Yup. I know it feels better to disappear into a chat room and watch some porn, but outside in the real world there are some big things that need doing. So, I don't think Bush cares much if you can't find an extra buck or two to drive your over-large heap to the Wall Mart. As Axl Rose once said: "Welcome to the Jungle!! Wake Up!"

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Some of us Posted by: EinMD
Answer
Posted by: EinMD on Jul 7, 2008 10:13 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yes.

War Powers Act

The War Powers Act of 1973 (Pub.L. 93-148), also referred to as the War Powers Resolution, is a resolution of the Congress of The United States of America that stated that the President of The United States of America can send troops into action abroad only by authorization of Congress or if the United States of America is already under attack or serious threat. The War Powers Act requires that the president notify Congress within 48 hours of committing troops to military action and forbids troops from remaining for more than 60 days without an authorization of force or a declaration of war.

Bottom line is, Bush doesn't need Congressional authorization to attack Iran because in 1973 Congress abdicated that authority to the President in what I am sure will be referred to in the year 2009 as "the stupidest thing ever done by Congress". All he needs to do is send them in November of 08 and sit back and watch the fireworks.

Because AFTER we allow him to attack it's a little late to say "Sorry... our bad" and recall the troops. Once you start murdering another country's citizens they tend to take a dim view of you.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Democrats about to join in OK'ing war on Iran
Posted by: chorton on Jul 7, 2008 11:37 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
All the discussions of why the Democrats will oppose a war on Iran are contradicted by the fact that Congress has before it a resolution, H.Res. 362, that effectively calls on Bush to institute a land, air and sea blockade of Iran, an act of war. This bill, which was introduced in late May and now has 220 co-sponsors (!) managed to build support (over 100 co-sponsors) with NO MEDIA COVERAGE AT ALL (!) until Daily Kos reported it on June 19.

There have now been editorials and columns about it in a few newspapers, including the Seattle Post-Intelligencier and Newsday, but it has STILL not been reported by ANY of the networks or national newspapers, except for the CBS website which ran a column, probably not aired, featuring sponsoring congressman Ackerman's denial that it means what it says. The bill is due to be voted on this week under a rule for "non-controversial" resolutions which allows for just 20 minutes' debate!

For statements on this resolution, google "Kucinich Iran 362" and "Ron Paul Iran 362".

Then barrage your Congressperson, your Senators (who have a companion bill coming up) and editors and news directors about this, and post this information on whatever blogs and lists you have access to.

Then, we need to reflect on how this big one got past us.

1. The alternative press is good at picking up the news that is withheld by the major media and broadcasting it. Evidently it doesn't have the assets in place to pick up a story if NO ONE in the major media reports on it. We urgently need to figure out how to change that. Probably we need our own correspondents and a way to support them.

2. The people - readers of the Times and listeners to NPR right along with those who get their news from FOX - will be completely sandbagged by this de-facto war authorization, and getting it reported on sites like AlterNet won't change that fact. A story like this needed to reach at least 100 million people back in May. How can we develop the capability of doing that?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Would Bush allow Israel to attack Iran?
Posted by: Garvagh on Jul 7, 2008 11:39 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The primary al-Qaeda problem is to be found in Afghanistan and in adjoining area of Pakistan.
Iran helped the US plan and carry out the overthrow of the Taliban, and Iran offered to help the US to assess any threat posed by Saddam Hussein and to deal with it. In both instances, Iran was pursuing relative stability in the region and hoping to avoid unnecessary turbulence. Bush rewarded Iran by including the country in his absurd "Axis of Evil" and by trying to destabilize the Iranian government even though he must be aware that Iranian cooperation is needed to achieve any serious stability in Afghanistan.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Remember Enron's energy scam in California?
Posted by: Ghoulman on Jul 7, 2008 11:43 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
... Enron traders were even taped on the telephone laughing about old ladies dieing due to the lack of power they created... for profit.

Blood for oil really means blood for money.

The Enron guys created a crisis (paging Naomi Klein!) by having power plants THEY NOW OWNED to turn off, thus creating a power shortage in California. This allowed the price to go through the roof. The entire thing was manufactured.

The White House has only intensified it's saber rattling at Iran, while all other sources of info show Iran is playing fairly with regards to their nuclear program. At the same time, the White House has the Treasury (Paulson) drop the value of the $US. This is the direct cause of the high cost of oil, energy, and the chance of people expiring in this summers record heat and next winters cold.

How much do you wanna beat Dubya, Rove, Cheney, and the rest of the ex-oil guys are laughing while they and their 'sponsors' in the oil world get fabulously rich? Guess Bush/Cheney owed them something since Iraq didn't work out? Is this desperation? Why does the Wall Street Journal lie about the true cause of the oil crisis today? Speculators? Baaaaloney.

It's all very, very, suspicious. That's all I'm saying.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

William Engdahl, financial and oil and NWO expert discusses this on
Posted by: fifthworld on Jul 7, 2008 11:50 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
the Global Research News Hour (1st hr.) today on www.republicbroadcasting.org -- just check the archives for today 7/7 for that show. Very interesting as to why the prices...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Cost-benefit
Posted by: solrev on Jul 7, 2008 1:07 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A stable Middle East would probably bring oil prices down but not as much as a strong dollar would. In any case the cost of war does not play a part in Bush’s arithmetic. If Bush had the military manpower to open up a third front, he would have done it by now.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The American Pirates
Posted by: 220vBrain on Jul 7, 2008 1:24 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What really riles me, is that 99% of Americans think we are justified,entitled,and so self important, that we have the right to pillage,burn,sack,plunder,loot,steal,murder,
sell everything from anywhere in the world as we so please. We are Americans, and no one can tell us what to do. We are bigger,stronger,smarter,
faster,wealthier,and better looking,and sexier, than anyone else on the planet.It is our right, NO! it is our duty, to show the rest of the world just how backwards, and low browed they are.
So we will use our Manifest Destiny and devine right to rule the world, and everything it has to offer, Bar none! The world is our oyster, and the population of the planet can grovel at our feet hoping for any tid bit, scraps, or alms that we might be willing to toss their way. But, do not dare ask for too much! Because it is all ours. No one but us, has any claim to anything of any worth or value.
WE own it all, and you had better understand that right here and now!
It is high time that the world REALLY understands just who is the BIG BOSS MAN of everything, and that we are the Death Dealers
and wave a Pigs Skull and Crossed Bones flag over our Capital. We annoit ourselves in your blood, and raw resources, to scantify ourselves.
So now I hope you understand where you stand, and how you compare to us, WE, the truly wonderful,remarkable, beneficial benefactors supreme of all the world, and you had also better get your heads on straight as to who you should say thanks to, for WE AMERICANS are in control, and are saving you from yourselves. You are just too stupid to realize it!

When the world has finally had enough of the USA's bullcrap, and unites against us, and kicks our greedy selfish butts for good, the blubbery slovenly American society can wonder in dismay; "WHAT DID WE EVER DO TO DESERVE IT?"
Am I the only USA citizen who is sick to death of us and our machinations?
I beg, I plead, Please somebody stop our madness before we kill the globe and everything on it! And take down that damnable
flag too and burn it!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The American Pirates Posted by: symcokid
LIES, DAMNED LIES, IRAN
Posted by: david.model@senecac.on.ca on Jul 7, 2008 2:28 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Here we go again. It's Iraq all over again. The U.S. is ratcheting up the fear that Iran will soon pose a nuclear threat to the United States. Both the House and the Senate are in the process of passing resolutions that accuse Iran of destabilizing the Middle East, proceeding with the development of nuclear weapons and delivery systems, violating the NPT Treaty, and funding groups that are attacking U.S. troops who are supporting the legitimate government of Iraq.

These charges are straight from Alice in Wonderland when Alice remarked that "Nothing would be as it is because everything would be what it wasn't". Every charge levelled against Iran is either specious or is a mirror image of U.S. guilt.

For example, it's the U.S. who is the major violator of the NPT treaty and who is destabilizing the Middle East. American presence in Iraq has rendered it impossible to create a legitimate government there.

Most dangerous of all are the lies that American leaders are propogating about the nuclear threat in Iran. The reports of Genaeral ElBaradei, the Director of the IAEA, reveal that "All nuclear material remain under agency containment and surveillance" (Feb. 22, 2008), and "In the last four months, in particular, we have made quite good progress in clarifying the outstanding issues that had to do with Iran's past nuclear activities" (Feb. 22, 2008).

Congress and the President are of one mind; Iran poses a threat to the security of the United States in the same way that the Sandinistas did when President Reagan warned that Managua was only a two day march from Brownsville, Texas.

http://www.stateofdarkness.com

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: LIES, DAMNED LIES, IRAN Posted by: symcokid
An attack on Iran will not serve U.S. strategic interests
Posted by: ChristopherF on Jul 7, 2008 4:06 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Military action against Iran will cause U.S. taxes to soar and oil prices to skyrocket as the U.S. enters a recession, finances wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, negotiates bloating budgets, tackles trade deficits, and addresses an ever increasing national debt. Higher oil prices will further strengthen Russia and possibly push the economies of oil importing countries into recession, including the U.S' European allies.

Any attack on Iran will alienate the pro-American and pro-democratic Iranians, rally internal support behind the otherwise unpopular regime, provide a pretext the regime to crack down on civil liberties and the dissident movement, strengthen the fundamentalists to pursue their bellicose agenda without opposition, and legitimize the regime's need to acquire greater security against the "Great Satan."

The Islamic Republic could retaliate to a U.S. attack by expanding the conflict into a full war that threatens to engulf the region, escalate terrorist attacks or directly attack forces and strategic locations, undermine current efforts in Iraq, Afghanistan and other likely American points of interest in the Persian Gulf, attack Israel or incite proxies like Hezbollah to expand the war, and target oil fields and infrastructure in countries such as Kuwait, Dubai, Bahrain, and Saudi Arabia to further destabilize the region.

Another U.S. attack on a Muslim nation will undermine America’s credibility among our oil producing allies and will cause jihadist recruitment or retaliation to increase exponentially worldwide. As such, resorting to military action before considering all tools available at Washington's disposal prevents the U.S. from most effectively satisfying long term strategic interest goals in Iran and the Middle East. Bottom line, there is far too much at stake for the U.S. to enter into another war in the Middle East, especially since the U.S. military is the world's largest importer of oil.

http://usiranalliance.org

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Iran Needs Nukes for Self Defense
Posted by: sofla100 on Jul 7, 2008 4:19 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Actually, Iran is likely developing a nuclear weapon. Washington and Tel Aviv know this, because they would both have to do the same thing in Iran's position. Well, for Israel, they already have nukes and they want a monopoly. For the USA, it will be much more difficult to boss the Iranians around if they have nukes. The USA invaded Iraq with impunity, imagine if Saddam had nukes. The lesson for Iran is they must immediately develop them. But, is this a bad thing? No, not at all. A stronger Iran is good for the Middle East and will serve as a check on Israeli power. And, Iran is not about to give or allow weapons to be sent to terrorists, as they don't want themselves to be blown away either. The bottom line, in the region, Israel, Pakistan, India, Turkey, and of course the USA all have nukes available. If I was an Iranian citizen and my leaders were not developing them, given the situation of the region and American troops on our borders, I would consider my leaders irresponsible. As for America trying to stop Iran, it will never work and will of course backfire. America just needs to accept all this and deal with it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

More expensive oil is a goal
Posted by: pomes on Jul 7, 2008 4:41 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why, oh why, would Bush want the prices for his beloved oil industry to go DOWN? While Iraq burns, Exxon-Mobil is posting record profits.

Cmon guys you aren't THAT naive.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Follow the money
Posted by: Gaubladt on Jul 7, 2008 4:46 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The problem with speculators is that they are allowed to use their money to influence the outcome. The author alluded to speculators who anticipate war with Iran. But, these people who invest so much may loose their shirts if we don't go to war with Iran. They have lots of money. And they have a good reason to use it to leverage us into a war. I wouldn't be surprised if the owners of Fox and CNN were among the speculators. I wonder if there is any way to find out how they invest.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Follow the money Posted by: pomes
Again We Are Experiencing Technical Difficulties Communicating in The UK
Posted by: opmoc on Jul 7, 2008 6:27 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Has Our Queen Told George Bush To Stick All His Missiles Up His Arse - And That She Does Not Approve of His Unruly Behaviour?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What does the Will of the people say, or matter?
Posted by: common intelligence on Jul 7, 2008 7:17 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
With an inept congress that is in collusion and a "Slower than steam off off shit" legislative process,........well it seems nothing matters or concerns the PIRATES that have taken over the United States.

As well, with a bunch of stupid ass troops that allowed themelves to be coerced into re-upping their enlistments during the Independance Day hoopla in Iraq, as reported on Fox News and othe CON Media propaganda sources, It doesn't appear WE THE PEOPLE have any say so as to what happens.

Thank the Supreme court for reaffirming Our Rights to Bear Arms.
We're going to need them.

Got Ammo?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Yeah Right
Posted by: GreyFoxThree on Jul 7, 2008 8:41 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
LOL, Of course he can. Dictator Bush doesnt care what a gallon of Gas costs, he probably doesnt even know what a gallon of gas goes for. All he cares about is Global Domination.

JT
Ultimate Anonymity

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Iran, gas prices, WWIII Bush doesn't care...Cheney either...
Posted by: TJColatrella on Jul 7, 2008 9:22 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This increase in Oil prices is one of the biggest swindles in world history and Bush and Cheney are in on it up to their necks...

As a matter of fact that's why they have been talking up an attack upon Iran whether they do it or not just to feed more and more money into the Speculators and Oil Companies pockets...

We know this is all market manipulation and I don't think any amount of hardship on the American people would bother Bush or Cheney one bit...

Also they believe that an attack upon Iran will help McCain's chances and they'd do it just for that...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Gas cheaper in the EU
Posted by: zyclop on Jul 7, 2008 9:47 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
isn't that the truth.
And with that comes another hurt.
The US of A are too poor to pay for all that infrastructure that Europeans take for [as] granted.
This country would go broke just by trying to emulate the European Standards in almost everything.
Sure, everyone has a house and a truck and a plasma TV.
On credit !!!
And that is it !!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bush Doesn't Want to Lower the Price of Oil
Posted by: thornwolf on Jul 8, 2008 3:56 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Not when things are just getting good for his oil-soaked benefactors. The price of oil is probably Bush's biggest success. This is the crown jewel in his corporate legacy, the Legacy of Greed. The high price of oil is precisely what the oil companies have paid so much for.

Too bad for them they didn't count on what would happen if they pushed it too far. I'm already developing a plug-in electric commuter car. I know I'm not the only one, and I'm not referring to the industrial mummy known as Detroit.

Another great benefit for the rest of us is that no longer can we afford to ship produce thousands of miles from grower to consumer. Eat local! If something is out of season, do without it until it's back in season.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]