WORLD  
comments_image -

Bush Changes Course, Lifts Veto Threat on GI Bill

This is a major victory for veterans.
June 20, 2008  |  
 
Advertisement
 

For anyone following the fight for a new GI Bill, progress seemed to slow to a crawl recently. After the House and Senate overwhelmingly passed the veterans' education benefit as a part of the war funding supplemental, reconciling their two versions of the legislation faced serious and unexpected roadblocks. And even if Congress got the GI Bill to the president, the threat of a Bush veto was always looming.

Last night, all that changed. A critical agreement was reached between leadership in the House of Representatives and the White House on the fate of the war funding bill.

In a very rare reversal of opinion, the Bush administration withdrew its long-held objections to a new GI Bill that would fully fund the cost of a public college education for Iraq and Afghanistan veterans. The bill agreed on includes the entire World War II-style GI Bill that IAVA has been championing for over a year. The final bill will also allow service members who stay in the military to transfer their education benefits to their spouses and children. This is another great, bipartisan step toward providing our veterans with the benefits they have earned.

And the forward momentum continued today, when the House again voted in favor of the new GI Bill, supporting the bill by an overwhelming margin of 416 to 12. You can see the complete roll call here.

The next (and hopefully final) steps in the GI Bill fight will be for the Senate to sign off on this version of the supplemental and get this hard-fought legislation to the president's desk. You can follow these last steps at www.GIBill2008.org.

This Sunday, June 22, will mark 64 years since President Franklin D. Roosevelt signed the original GI Bill into law. Thanks to this accord between House leadership and the administration, there is now a real chance that we could see a new GI Bill signed within days of this anniversary. As FDR said in his signing statement,

[The GI Bill] gives emphatic notice to the men and women in our armed forces that the American people do not intend to let them down.
Though we still have a way to go, I believe that the fight for this new GI Bill will be remembered as a great example of Washington choosing patriotism over partisanship.

Paul Rieckhoff is the executive director and founder of Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America, and a veteran of the war in Iraq, where he served as a platoon leader with the Third Infantry Division.
submit to reddit

-
Email
Print
Share
LIKED THIS ARTICLE? JOIN OUR EMAIL LIST
Stay up to date with the latest World headlines via email
See more stories tagged with: veterans, gi bill, iava
Alternet Special Coverage - Occupy Wall Street
Advertisement
Most Read
Most Emailed
Most Discussed
On REDDIT
On DIGG
 
loading most read content ..
Advertisement
Listen to The AlterNet Radio Hour with Naomi Klein, Sarah Posner and Dean Baker!

By Joshua Holland | AlterNet

 
 
San Francisco Police Department Releases 'It Gets Better' Video

By Tara Lohan | AlterNet

 
 
Occupy Protesters Mic-Check Palin During CPAC Speech

By Adele M. Stan | AlterNet

 
 
Apple, Accustomed to Profits and Praise, Faces Outcry for Labor Practices at Chinese Factories

By Amy Goodman, Juan Gonzalez | Democracy Now!

 
 
Could Santorum Actually Beat Romney? And Would the Obama Campaign be Ready?

By Steve M. | Booman Tribune

 
 
Bill Moyers: The Economy Has Been Engineered to Screw Over Millennials (With an AlterNet Shoutout!)

By Staff | AlterNet

 
 
Maher: Conservatives Are the Ones Dividing the Country

By Sarah Seltzer | AlterNet

 
 
In Kansas, Is Catholic Church Trying to Destroy A Victim's Advocates Organization?

By Julie Cain | Ms. Magazine Blog

 
 
Obama vs. the Concern Trolls on Nonsense "Religious Liberty" Issue

By Digby | Hullabaloo

 
 
At CPAC, Santorum Surges Despite Idiotic Claims; Romney Poses as 'Severe' Conservative; Gingrich Makes War on GOP

By Adele M. Stan | AlterNet

 
 
 
Reverend Billy Talen
 
 
 
loading ...
POWERED BY DIGG'S USERS
 
[ page served from web 1 ]