Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Fund Health Care, Not War

By Norman Solomon, AlterNet. Posted June 19, 2008.


The old claims of a justified war in Iraq have melted away. So have promises of a humane society back at home.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Speaking in a time of war, Martin Luther King Jr. said: "Somehow this madness must cease."

Forty-one years later, young soldiers are returning to the United States from terrifying zones of carnage. The old claims of a justified war have melted away. So have the promises of a humane society back home.

Statistics about the war dead tell us very little about human realities. And familiar downbeat numbers about health care -- 47 million Americans with no health insurance, perhaps an equal number woefully under-insured -- tell us very little about the actual consequences or other options.

"The shocking facts about health care in the United States are well known," Yes! Magazine noted in the autumn of 2006. "There's little argument that the system is broken. What's not well known is that the dialogue about fixing the health-care system is just as broken."

That's an apt description. For all the media focus and political rhetoric on health care, the mainline discourse is stuck in a corporate-friendly rut. But there are signs that a movement for a rational, humanistic health-care system in this country is now gaining strength.

A few hours after writing these words, I'll be at a large demonstration in San Francisco. The lightning rod for this historic June 19 protest is a national meeting of America's Health Insurance Plans, an outfit that cheerily pitches itself as "a national trade association representing nearly 1,300 member companies providing health benefits to more than 200 million Americans."

As it happens, this meeting of America's Health Insurance Plans got underway just as news broke that the congressional "leadership" has devised a formula to fully fund more war. "Democratic and GOP leaders in the House announced agreement Wednesday on a long-overdue war funding bill they said President Bush would be willing to sign," the Associated Press reported. The bill would "provide about $165 billion to the Pentagon to fund military operations in Iraq and Afghanistan for about a year."

There's a lot of profit in death. Under the guise of national security. And under the guise of health care.

Today, across the United States, people are dying because they don't have access to health care. But policy solutions are available. In Congress, about 90 co-sponsors are backing H.R. 676, a bill to provide "comprehensive health insurance coverage for all United States residents." Call it whatever you like -- "single payer" or "improved Medicare for all" or "universal health care with choice of providers and no financial barriers." What it adds up to is the policy option of treating health care as the human right that it is.

In the latest edition of "Health Care Meltdown," author C. Rocky White identifies himself as "a conservative Republican who has always held an entrepreneurial 'pull yourself up by your own bootstraps' free-market philosophy." A longtime physician, White describes "the frustration I began to experience while trying to provide compassionate, quality health care in the context of a market in which the accustomed rules of business economics don't apply."

Dr. White immersed himself in research on health-care policy and finance. Then he pored through reams of the latest data on the tradeoffs of reform options. "No matter how I turned the cube," he writes, "the answer never changed. That answer was nearly impossible for me, a free-market Republican, to accept."

Here are Dr. White's two key conclusions in his own words:


  • "Until we remove the motive of profit from the financing of health care, we cannot and we will not resolve our current health care crisis."


  • "Any group that proposes reform policy that maintains the use of for-profit insurance companies in a so-called free market is being driven by one single motive -- to protect the golden coffers of their share of the $2 trillion cash cow!"


Dr. White adds: "To continue down this road is paramount to suggesting that we privatize our fire and police services and turn them into for-profit organizations. You do that and people will die -- just like they are dying now under our current health-care system!"

Grotesquely, the insurance and hospital industries at the center of health care in the United States are, in effect, profiting from priorities that condemn many people to death and many more to avoidable suffering.

Meanwhile, corporate enterprises continue to make a killing from U.S. military expenditures now in the vicinity of $2 billion per day.

During a wartime speech in 1969, the Nobel Prize-winning biologist George Wald said: "Our government has become preoccupied with death, with the business of killing and being killed."

The preoccupation continues.

"When machines and computers, profit motives and property rights, are considered more important than people," Martin Luther King observed, "the giant triplets of racism, extreme materialism, and militarism are incapable of being conquered."

Still, somehow, this madness must cease.

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: war, insurance, health care, defense spending, health care reform

Norman Solomon's latest book Made Love, Got War: Close Encounters with America's Warfare State (PoliPointPress) is available now. For more information go to www.madelovegotwar.com.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from World! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Simple : Say ~ Medicare for Everybody !
Posted by: mmckinl on Jun 20, 2008 12:54 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Now, wasn't that easy ...

And instead of pouring 17% of our GNP into Healthcare we can reduce it to 10% and still spend more than any other country on earth!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Follow the money!
Posted by: jlohman on Jun 20, 2008 3:20 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Medicare-for-all makes sense, but Medicare can't give campaign contributions while the insurance industry can. Public funding of campaigns is the only answer, and at the same time we'd eliminate the subsidies to special interests that drive up taxes. It is beyond me that conservatives can support our corrupt political system.

It never ceases to amaze me, the amount of energy that can go into a project just to avoid doing the right thing. The best, simplest, least costly, most effective thing we could do is expand what has been working so well for years, Medicare. You get sick, you get care, and the caregiver gets paid. Nothing could be simpler.

"America will always do the right thing, but only after everything else fails." Winston Churchill

Jack Lohman
MoneyedPoliticians

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

One Expense or Another
Posted by: morrishart on Jun 20, 2008 5:02 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I cannot support the government's war, yet neither can I, in good conscience, support government healthcare. I can't afford the government I have now, and like virtually all govenment-supported entitlement programs (which this will become), government healthcare will grow to monstrous proportions. I'm reminded of P.J. O'Rourke's oft-quoted line, "If you think health care is expensive now, wait until it's free."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: One Expense or Another Posted by: JSquercia
» RE: One Expense or Another Posted by: CatDad
We can't afford not to!
Posted by: jlohman on Jun 20, 2008 6:31 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
O'Rourke got it wrong...

The truth is, we can't afford not to have a Medicare-for-all system. It would be the best thing that could happen to our businesses, jobs and nation's economy. We are already paying for it, we just aren't getting it. We are paying double what other countries are paying, yet 45 million are uninsured and another 50 million under-insured. The insurance bureaucracy drains 31% of health care dollars without ever laying hands on a patient.

We all all paying these costs anyway, in cost-shifting, bankruptcy costs, and when the employers add their costs to the product price and we reimburse them at the cash register. Jobs are leaving the country, and we are building more cars in Canada because employers pay an annual $800 per employee there versus $6500 in the US.

When are we going to get smart? Only when the politicians quit taking money from insurance, health care and pharmaceutical interests.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

universal means all of us
Posted by: nadine sellers on Jun 20, 2008 6:44 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Health care is not an entitlement it is a natural health policy for an ailing nation.

The health status of each citizen is of concern to all taxpayers. consequences of ill health include poor judgment, skewed decision making and political blindness.

poor nutrition and lack of prevention affect millions who will end up in the legal and institutional system anyway..and incur billions of tax dollars in the curative end of health care anyway.

when factoring the above indirect costs, add the educational and criminal failure which influence society anyway...

never had insurance, hope never to need it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

CommonDreamer
Posted by: CommonDreamer on Jun 26, 2008 8:12 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We desperately need this reform...but in order to pay for it, we need to means test everything...get rid of tax breaks for wealthy CEOs' health insurance....etc. We need to stop subsidizing tax breaks (this includes the regressive mortgage tax break and the SUV tax break which is insane)...for the wealthy. Not to punish, but rather to use the money where it makes the most sense. A healthy populace that does not fear bankruptcy for healthcare is the best insurance we can have as a nation. We must concentrate on the median and under population, which has been summarily bankrupted by nearly every policy this administration has enacted, and healthcare is the most important issue aside from wages in order to build a strong society again.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Mad Martin
Posted by: edith on Jul 15, 2008 6:16 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
King had lockjaw however when it came to the millions of murdered and imprisoned innocent people caught up in the Soviet oppression during the Cold War. For such a "bright" person, he lacked compassion for the millions of Vietnamese and Chinese who lived in the prison camp regimes run by Peking and Hanoi during the Vietnam War. His closest advisors were pro-Soviet. This was an opportunist who rode to fame on the backs of the real heroes of the civil rights movement: the students of SNCC and the CORE who risked life and limb to desegregate the South and register voters.By the time of his death, King was largely irrelevant to pretty much everyone. Malcolm X had some very right on comments about King's impeding the progress of black people. An assasin's bullet made this failure into the media-made icon he is today. Fortunately most schoolkids in the US, particularly black schoolkids, basically don't know why they get a day off in January. Too bad the truth about King is not taught in our PC-run schools. But then you would expect them to teach about the struggle against Communism in an objective manner. That would be expecting too much.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement