Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Cusack and Scahill Go After War Profiteers on Amy Goodman Show

By Amy Goodman, Democracy Now!. Posted May 24, 2008.


A conversation about privatized war with John Cusack, producer of the new film, War, Inc., and Blackwater author Jeremy Scahill.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

John Cusack's new filmWar, Inc., takes on issues few in Hollywood today would dare to: war profiteering, mercenaries, political corruption and embedded journalism. A political satire, the film stars Cusack as Hauser, a hit-man for hire who is deployed to the fictional country of Turaqistan to kill a Middle Eastern oil baron. Hauser's employer is Tamerlane, a secretive for-profit military corporation headed by a former U.S. vice president played by Dan Aykroyd. We also speak to Democracy Now! correspondent Jeremy Scahill, author of the bestselling book Blackwater: The Rise of the World’s Most Powerful Mercenary Army.

Any Goodman: John Cusack joins us now from London, where he's shooting a new film. In addition to starring in War, Inc., he also co-wrote and produced the film. His other Iraq War-themed film is Grace is Gone. It came out last year, and it's coming out on DVD next week.

We're also joined by Democracy Now! correspondent, Jeremy Scahill. His book, Blackwater: The Rise of the World's Most Powerful Mercenary Army, is coming out next week in paperback.

John Cusack, welcome. Thank you for taking time from making your new movie. Talk about the genesis of this film, War, Inc.

John Cusack: Well, hello, and thanks for having me on the show. I'm a great admirer of it.

I think, probably like a lot of the great journalists that you've mentioned and the other guest you have on the show, Jeremy Scahill, I think I was probably trying to put the Iraq fiasco into a larger context and maybe put it through a different sort of lens and tell a different narrative than I think the corporate narrative that we've been getting about the Iraq War and explore some of these themes.

When we hear these words like "privatization," you know, what does that mean? In the case of the Iraq War, it meant outsourcing what you would imagine to be the very core functions of government and the very thing that makes you a state, to turn that into a for-profit business. And we've gone so far down the rabbit hole now, where actually torture is being outsourced. So it's strange and savage times. So that was really kind of the genesis of it.

And there's also a climate where people were telling Americans to watch what they say and the hypocrisy and the stench of lies was so intense it would make your eyes water. So, as a filmmaker and citizen, you think, well, how do you contextualize this? And so, that was really why I wanted to make it.

Juan Gonzales: Well, John Cusack, obviously you're dealing with weighty and tragic situations, but you've chosen satire. Why the satire approach?

John Cusack: Well, I think all satire or absurdism does is take current trends to the logical conclusion, you know, if you follow it a couple weeks or a couple years down the road. And some would argue, I think rightfully so, that we're already there. So I think at times you have to put a different lens on it in order to kind of process the information. And, you know, there's a great tradition of satire mocking power elites -- whether they be kings or corporate kings -- and shaming them and naming things and calling things what they are.

Amy Goodman: John Cusack, what about Hollywood in this time of war? Your assessment of your industry?

John Cusack: I don't know. I think that there are individuals out there who are trying to do good work, and so I don't like to lump people into a kind of groupthink -- I don't like to sort of think that way. Obviously, the industry really wants to make money and protect itself, and I think, like the rest of the country, people have been, I think, kind of zonked spectators just going along this conveyor belt and not really wanting to face what this particular administration has done to the Constitution and to the very idea of America and democracy. So I think a lot of people are numb and kind of checked out.

Amy Goodman: Jeremy Scahill, your book Blackwater has had such an important effect, and actually it's as if a part of this film, we're watching the -- sort of what it looks like on film. You wrote a really positive piece about War, Inc. and its importance, especially in the Hollywood commercialized climate we're in today.

Jeremy Scahill: Well, first of all, John Cusack is really to be commended for this. I mean, he and I have had a dialogue ongoing over the years. It's kind of funny. When you talk to a lot of unembedded independent journalists who have been to Iraq, almost all of us started receiving calls from John Cusack shortly after the invasion of Iraq began. And John was calling people not because he was saying, "Hey, I'm going to do a movie," but because he wanted to know what was going on. And so, he was calling me, he was calling Naomi Klein, he was calling other people who had been in and out of Iraq and was trying to gather information.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: war, iraq war, blackwater, privatization, erik prince, john cusack, grace is gone, inc.

Amy Goodman is the host of the nationally syndicated radio news program, Democracy Now!

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from World! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Stop Changing Their Reality....
Posted by: Captainmagic on May 24, 2008 5:33 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Dear John. Would you kindly desist from trying to change their reality, as it lends itself to the notion that they might be actually looking in our direction when in fact the opposite is so. They do not need to pay any attention to anyone else but their bottom line and you my friend and a "WHOLE" lot of others, are not on that bottom line. In other words you are all """"inconsequential"""" to their greater good. All the laws of your land now hold no water as you have no power in their reality...Just say it is so and "Magic". It is not happening. John you are not happening and neither is anything else happening in the reality of the White Bu$hCo House. Because, they said so. Isn't that true...No!...but hey, who are you...well, who are you?...and stop waving that piece of paper in front of my face thank you. It has no relevance in my reality....I have proved to you on multiple occasions that you just don't count.
When monkey boy sheriff proclaimed the now famous. Fool me once shame on me. Fool me twice..you know how it goes..did you know he was reciting it directly from the new book of your congress.....your houses are actually this F@#Ked up. Both of them!!!! But then... that,s a totally different reality, .......isn't it!

Captain OUT

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I heart John Cusack
Posted by: helenwheels on May 24, 2008 9:06 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And every celebrity that takes advantage of their popularity and name to speak out against the war and this madministration. IT's not easy: They get bombarded by hate mail, vilified by the rightwing fascists, and some even lose major career opportunities (see Tim Robbins & Susan Sarandon). It's people like John Cusack who will get the truth out into the mainstream media, eventually. Why do I so totally disagree with Captainmagic? Well. Because even if the shrubco doesn't consider we lefties a threat, we are one.

Before you pooh-pooh any progress, remember that any movement/change takes years. And think about 2 years ago, when Sean Penn was lucky to get a comment into the mainstream media. Remember, not so long ago when you couldn't say anything bad about the shrub, and now you've got a major network (MSNBC) with its #1 star, Olbermann, giving the shrub what for and calling him out on his crimes on a regular basis. You've got guys like Dan Abrams taking on KKkarl Rove & his lies. That's about a 180 from 4 years ago, isn't it?

And, why would you NOT do something? The reason people like John Cusack create what they do is to not only get a message across to others, but the enjoyment of DOING something, whether or not it changes things, is amazingly empowering. What people like Captain OUT think is that you can't fight city hall, so go home and die.

Call me crazy, but I'd rather be out there doing something, no matter how futile it seems, than sitting around waiting for the other shoe to drop.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: I heart John Cusack Posted by: Lauren
» RE: I heart John Cusack Posted by: helenwheels
» RE: I heart John Cusack Posted by: Lauren
» RE: I heart John Cusack Posted by: helenwheels
Iraq War Redux: Confessions of a Bush 43 admirer turned hater
Posted by: HughScott on May 24, 2008 9:41 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I haven’t always disrespected President Bush. Quite the contrary, after the Twin Towers fell, I was one of his biggest fans. He made me proud to be an American.

Because of George W.’s soul-stirring leadership (who could forget the bullhorn speech to firefighters and cops at the smoldering Twin Tower site?), I flew a small Stars & Stripes on my car antennae, hung a bigger flag on my house and displayed a “United We Stand” poster in the front room window.

When we attacked Afghanistan, I was an enthusiastic Bush cheerleader and couldn’t wait to see Osama bin Laden get the justice he deserved. Then something odd happened.

Instead of capturing the evildoer, cleaning up Afghanistan, hunting down Al Qaeda, concentrating on homeland security and rebuilding our economy, the president and his advisors began a steady drumbeat about the “imminent” threat posed by Iraq.

In the winter of 2002, the tension escalated when Vice President Cheney went on “Meet the Press” and said Saddam Hussein was developing an atomic bomb. Well, being a former USAF pilot and SAC combat crewmember familiar with nuclear warfare, the Veep’s charge got my attention big time.

Because of that potential horror―atomic Armageddon―Cheney’s televised warning captured my imagination and I agreed with his conclusion completely. The idea of nukes in the hands of a madman like Saddam Hussein was totally unacceptable.

My alarm increased even more when President Bush alleged in his 2003 State of the Union message that Iraq was buying uranium from Africa as well as aluminum tubes for making centrifuges to concentrate the U235. The assertions were my last straw and put me firmly in the White House camp, as they did Congress. I never wavered. I was 100% for attacking Iraq, totally gung ho—all the way, USA.

When the invasion began in April 2003, you couldn’t have pulled me away from my TV set with bomb threats or offers of free gold. Being a retired person, I had the luxury of sleeping in during the day and staying up all night, riding with our troops on CNN as they roared out of Kuwait in a mighty wave of steel and raced north towards Baghdad and victory.

Talk about great television!

Or so I thought at the time.

My euphoria evaporated a few weeks later when I realized that Bush had jumped the gun instead of giving U.N. weapons inspectors more time looking for Saddam's so-called WMDs.

Our occupation that should've been liberation also upset me. I’m not an expert on the Middle East, but it didn't compute in my brain that the way to win hearts and minds in Iraq is by breaking into homes, scaring the crap out of woman and children with M16s, shouting orders in pidgin Arabic, hauling away traditional weapons like the AK47 along with blindfolded relatives suspected of being Baath Party loyalists, whom we financed in the war against Iran.

How angry would you get if Iraqi soldiers in a white pickup truck stopped in front of your house tonight, broke down your door, aimed AK47s at your family and demanded to know if you were a Republican and owned a shotgun?

Would not such treatment make you want to retaliate with pipe bombs and Molotov cocktails? God, I hope so. If not, the American Revolution was fought in vain.

------------------------------------------

Hugh E. Scott, Vietnam vet, lifelong registered Republican, John Kerry backer in 2004, ARDENT Obama supporter and the editor of www.PhonyFighterPilot.com -- the only website about George W. Bush that presents irrefutable, smoking-gun proof of White House corruption.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It's about time...
Posted by: Maxemum on May 24, 2008 10:02 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
someone actually tried to tell America what the war in Iraq is really all about.

http://forums.freep.com/index.php

Issues and Election 2008

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

From 911 to Afganistan to Iraq
Posted by: ronheri on May 24, 2008 11:08 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The neocons and the shadow government (power-elite) are behind 911, (view Loose Change, and Terrorstorm) on You Tube. That was their first step in abolishing our Constitution. The invasions of Afganistan and Iraq were built on total lies. There is no doubt there are people around the globe who hate our government; not the American people, or our freedom or culture, but the imperialistic policies this administration pursues. Bush and Cheney delayed a real 911 investigation for over a year, and then refused to testify unless they could as a team and not under oath. I wonder why? If a new administration in November will conduct a fresh, Honest investigation into the events of 911, America will be on the road back to where we belong...a beacon of truth and honesty for all. Reopen an investigation into 911...justice must be served.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

yarn, another war movie, yay (sarcasm)
Posted by: TheJibreelaMonsters on May 24, 2008 4:55 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A few days ago I've seen a article about how Hollywood has become a Pentagon Propaganda Machine and now I see another Hollywood anit war movie? Alright like Outkast ATLleas album Andrea Big Boy Patton said it best "you got me bent like elbows." Let me see how much hype this is going to get before it debut in the box office and flops telling a story that ya'll AltNeter have been telling for months. When will Hollywood go back to making movies about babes, fast cars and getting high? Stick to what works and this is not it.
Harold and Kumar has done a better job: because it was just funny like the rest of the anit war movement, a flipping joke.

p.s. Bin Laden was almost right when he said "Americans do not have the stomach for war" and Thank God you guys are the minority.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» I know I'm funny Posted by: TheJibreelaMonsters
» were is the bread lines? Posted by: TheJibreelaMonsters
» live from the Hallaburon Black Hole Posted by: TheJibreelaMonsters
» I did my time Posted by: TheJibreelaMonsters
» Do they give purple hearts when Posted by: meetmeineleusis
HOLLYWOOD, oh yes I must celebrate celluloid stars for acting the way they should as citizens....
Posted by: Turiye on May 25, 2008 12:01 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
....of the USA. They are celebrated as grand heros. We in America swoon when a supposed celebrity acts with conscience as any decent Citizen should. Why? No one interviews you or myself do they for marching in the cold, rain and elements. Calling Congress daily, getting petitions signed and delivered to the proper persons. We should expect this of an actor just as of ourselves as an axiomatic truth. No cheers, no adulation just because they are doing what is required. From the celebrities I have seen that are 'Political Activists' their duties as citizens are evanescent. I am, you are, we all are to be shown the same deference for our acts as any other.
Cusack may well be true to his word, I cannot know, I know that young writers and actors are getting screwed by the renowned of these 'A' listers by never allowing the new kid on the block a chance to showcase their talents and dedication to ending this illegal occupation by the use of Indies and Docs nobody will pay to see Joe Schmoe when it is Brad Pitt instead.
If they are true to this cause piss off with the interviews and just be a Patriot, unknown and unheralded as we all are.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: HOLLYWOOD....... Posted by: Smiggsy
Movie will tank
Posted by: Grandma Crabby on May 25, 2008 7:22 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm very glad they made this movie but it will surly be a box office flop. No one wants the truth. The truth is too scary.


VideoProductionTips = Learn Internet Video

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Movie will tank Posted by: Lauren
» RE: Movie will tank Posted by: TheJibreelaMonsters
The Contract Renegotian Board
Posted by: tatamchwh on May 25, 2008 9:49 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
During the Second World War, we had the Contract Renegotiation Board to keep an eye on excessive profiteering. The fact that we no longer have that board reveals the moral bankruptcy of the present administration.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Whatsat you say? No Hollywood ending, no box office receipts?
Posted by: Sojourner on May 25, 2008 8:32 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The depressives on this thread with their gloom and doom throwing peanut shells haven’t a clue about what it means to take a risk. Guess what? There’s no guarantees. If you always have to win, win, and win big, become a gangster—or an oil trader.

But no one’s soul is for sale, so your wealth can only numb your pain.

I thought it had become self-evident that the US hasn’t been in deeper do-do than today since the American Civil War. To do nothing, to try nothing is bad enough.

To curse those who are trying to do something—I can’t think of an insult sufficient—I’d like to say inhuman, but the cop out is all too human—how about, “barbaric.” So, yes, thank you barbarians for proving how we got into the mess we are in today and how far we have to go.

And to those who resist, like Cusak and Scahill, may your work be blessed.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Jeremy ~ John I apologise for the crack about lampooning being innefectual.
Posted by: Nightstallion on May 26, 2008 12:18 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It ain't necessarily true, I simply don't think making fun of these brutish louts is the answer. Although, I do remember a lampoon done by the late William S. Burroughs that really tickled me pink:
CYCLOTRON SHIT, THAT'S WHAT MY HUMAN DOGS EAT AND I LIKE TO RUB THEIR NOSES IN IT!" I guess I can squirrel that around to mean Oil War too.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]