Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

John McCain Adores the War and Ignores the Warriors

By Aaron Glantz, AlterNet. Posted May 2, 2008.


He doesn't care if we're in Iraq for a hundred years, but when it comes to the veterans who've served over there, the senator is AWOL.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Everyone knows McCain is a former prisoner of war, but did you know he refuses to support a bipartisan effort to modernize the GI Bill and has voted against nearly every effort to increase funding for healthcare and disability benefits for wounded soldiers? Did you know that Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America (IAVA) gave him a D+ when they scored his voting record (whereas Obama got a B+ and Clinton an A-). Do you know that he voted with the interests of Disabled American Veterans (DAV) only 20 percent of the time?

Take a moment to look at his record:

In 2005 and 2006, McCain voted against expanding mental healthcare and readjustment counseling for service members returning from Iraq and Afghanistan, efforts to expand inpatient and outpatient treatment for injured veterans, and proposals to lower co-payments and enrollment fees veterans must pay to obtain prescription drugs.

"There was an effort to increase the budget for veterans' healthcare beyond what President [George W.] Bush had requested as part of his budget," DAV spokesperson Dave Autry explains. "The idea was to increase funding for veterans' healthcare by cutting back on tax breaks for the wealthy. The proposals were pushed by Democrats and opposed by Republicans in almost straight party-line votes."

In other words, John McCain's votes indicate he would rather give tax cuts to the rich than care for wounded veterans (Neither McCain's campaign office, nor his Senate press secretary responded to telephone and email inquiries for this story).

McCain's vote also helped defeat a proposal by Democratic Sen. Debbie Stabenow that would have made veterans' healthcare an entitlement program like social security, so that medical care would not become a political football to be argued over in Congress each budget cycle.

Up until recently, these votes hadn't haunted John McCain. Reporters habitually rehashed his story of heroism four decades ago without looking at his voting record in the present. But now that he's the presumptive Republican nominee for president, a coalition of veterans groups, liberal activists, and Democratic PACs have decided to target McCain over his failure to support S.22, a bipartisan effort to improve the GI Bill.

The bill, by Sens. Jim Webb, D-Va., and Chuck Hagel, R-Neb., would bring back WWII-era measures that provided vets with full college tuition along with room and board. Right now, those vets who try to use the GI Bill to attend school are eligible to receive only $1,100 a month for a maximum of three years. It is an amount that doesn't come close to covering the cost of a modern college education.

So far 57 senators have signed on as co-sponsors. But the bill remains three votes short of the supermajority necessary to kill a filibuster.

"It's time for Sen. McCain to stand up for veterans and be a leader," the chairman of VoteVets, Iraq war veteran Jon Soltz, said in a statement. "The success or failure of this bill largely rests on his shoulders. He is the de facto leader of the Republican Party. If he signs onto the bill, it will pass and become law. If he doesn't support it, he needs to explain why he doesn't."

Earlier this month, VoteVets launched an on-line video and petition drive targeting McCain. The four-minute video was produced by Brave New Films (which brought us Outfoxed and Iraq for Sale) with funds from retired Gen. Wesley Clark's WesPAC. It features four veterans of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan testifying on the problems they've faced with the current G.I. Bill.

"When I enlisted, I was under the impression that my college would be paid for, that I would have everything taken care of," Iraq war veteran Joshua Drake says in the video.

"The current G.I. Bill is inadequate," the former Navy corpsman added. "It hasn't kept up with the cost of inflation or the cost of tuition or the cost of books ... If I could talk to John McCain, I would try to appeal to him as a fellow veteran."

On April 29, more than 100 Iraq and Afghanistan war veterans held a press conference on Capitol Hill with the same message, in an effort to turn up the heat on McCain and other lawmakers.

McCain's response has been to propose his own, less expansive version of the GI Bill. Last week, he introduced a bill entitled the Enhancement of Recruitment, Retention, and Readjustment through Education Act, which is co-sponsored by Sens. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., Richard Burr, R-N.C.

Their bill would modestly increase the amount of money available to veterans using the GI Bill from $1,100 to $1,500 a month (still less than the cost of tuition at many public universities and still for only three years). The bill would also close some bureaucratic loopholes that cause GI Bill benefits to count as income, which disqualifies many needy veterans from student loans.

In announcing his bill, McCain made no mention of the more ambitious effort being championed by Webb and Hagel or the increasing attacks leveled at him by partisan and veterans organizations.

"We have an obligation to provide unwavering support to our nation's veterans, and that is precisely what this legislation does," McCain said in a statement (he was out campaigning and did not attend the press conference announcing the bill). "Men and women who serve their country in uniform deserve the best education benefits we are able to give them."

Veterans groups were unimpressed.

"Sens. McCain, Graham and Burr are shortchanging our veterans and undermining America's heroes as they reach for the American dream," said VoteVets's Soltz. "Frankly, it hurts to have two veterans, like Sens. McCain and Graham treat us like this. We would expect that they would have more honor than that."

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: education, mccain, hypocrisy, gi bill

Aaron Glantz is the author of two upcoming books on Iraq: The War Comes Home: Washington's Battle Against America's Veterans (UC Press) and Winter Soldier Iraq and Afghanistan: Eyewitness Accounts of the Occupations (Haymarket). He edits the website WarComesHome.org.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from World! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
True "Pentagon" Patriot....
Posted by: CatDad on May 2, 2008 1:08 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
voted against nearly every effort to increase funding for healthcare and disability benefits for wounded soldiers?
------------
Most seriously wounded soldiers cannot be churned back into the war machine/combat operations....It's better to spend those billions that would be "wasted" on these costs and disability benefits on weapons, military operations....and don't forget more money to no-bid contracts to politically connected corporations...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: True "Pentagon" Patriot.... Posted by: JSquercia
j_toman@hotmail.com
Posted by: jtoman on May 2, 2008 3:40 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I cannot believe there is only one comment to this article. This man is a traitor to all the military --in being a 'politician'. A self serving whatever. Must have lost his mind as a POW. He cares less about other POWs if any one cares to look to history.

He cares less about those injured and maimed by any war and wishes others to go thru what he had to endure. Yet he was a traitor to his fellow military and he will be a traitor to all America. He is not in tune with his own soul and he wants us to be in constant war for the good of the economy and a banking government that will pay him back for his injuries and he is now being paid him well. Such an a....

But America deserves him as they could care less about history or any truth anyway.
To bad. You all deserve what you get. After all you still VOTE in some democracy. Right??

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: j_toman@hotmail.com Posted by: patfr
They are expendable
Posted by: solrev on May 2, 2008 6:04 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In my profession we annually budget for expendable tools, tools which will wear out. I am sure; someone budgets chalk for teachers as an expendable tool in education. The higher one goes up the military chain of command the more those below are seen as expendable tools. Disabled vets are the worst case they are no longer able to fight, so they are just expendable tools of the trade. It is just good business to not waste money on expendable tools. The author mislabels the education benefit, as a 3-year education vet benefit. It is not 3 years it is 36 mos. or 4 school years. The state of Illinois will pay vets tuition and some fees at state colleges or universities a program started in the Nam era. Without such a state program it would be difficult to get an education on the GI bill. In Illinois, state institution costs for tuition, fees, books, and room and board is probably between 12 to 20 thousand dollars a year (9 mos.), depending on how well you want to live. A federal program for tuition and fees at state institutions plus the cost of living stipend, just for expendable tools not likely.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Recruiters LIE
Posted by: JSquercia on May 2, 2008 6:16 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I sympathized with that Vet who said he thought everyting would be paid for . I enlisted in the Navy during Korea and was told that I would receive a dayand a half worth of College for every day in the Service . What this meant to me was I could even go to graduate school based on my four year enlistment . Only later did I learn there was a limit of 36 months . That figures out to 4 years based on 9 months per year . That is of course where McCain's 36 months comes from .
AS they have admitted recruiters routinely LIE
to get enlistments

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

REAL patriotism
Posted by: HughScott on May 2, 2008 8:39 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have a family history of honorable military service going back to the American Revolution. As for me, I'm a Vietnam veteran.who spent 10 years in the active duty Air Force. Before that, I took three years of high school ROTC and at Texas A&M (Class of '56), I was in the Fighting Aggie Corps of Cadets.

Because of that background, bad-mouthing U.S. military personnel and veterans is against my nature. For that reason last year, I defended the patriotism of General Petraeus after MoveOn.org (which I belong to) labeled him General "Betrayus." I have since changed mind.

Petraeus is a politician, not a patriot. The same goes for John McCain. My reasoning is simple. Real patriots speak the TRUTH about their country and not what the White House tells them to.

Hugh E. Scott, lifelong registered Republican and ARDENT Obama supporter.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: AL patriotism Posted by: Opinionator
These Republics refuse to put $$$
Posted by: Quannah on May 2, 2008 9:15 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
where their mouths are! They talk the talk, but when it comes to actually funding something that will truly help the returning vets, they can't be bothered. Hypocrites, all!

And as an aside... a soldier died yesterday in Afghanistan. Unfortunately, something this administration and the MSM deems not newsworthy in itself. But this soldier was on his 7th deployment... 7TH DEPLOYMENT! Between Iraq and Afghanistan.

We need to stop this madness.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

For all you McCain fans
Posted by: willymack on May 2, 2008 10:22 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Google "John McCain's conduct during the Vietnam war". There are about 422,000 entries on the subject (that's four hundred and twenty two THOUSAND; this is no typo). The stories on our "war hero" aren't good. Even if the material is 99% bullshit, that STILL leaves over 4000 pieces of information that are probably true. As stated before, the news ain't good, and make mcsame look a lot like his hero, prezdint AWOL. This two-bit phony must not be allowed into the White House, even if we have to hold our noses when we vote in November.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

McCain is a spoiled brat turned political opportunist - just like GW Bush
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on May 2, 2008 10:49 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Take a look at his bio: http://www.nndb.com/people/914/000023845/

Just like GW Bush, he was born into a wealthy and privileged family, and was also a very mediocre playboy student. It would be unfair to claim that all children of wealthy families are incredibly incompetent and yet are given positions of authority that they are completely unsuited for, but, yes, it's been known to happen.

". . .at the US Naval Academy, he gained a reputation as a ladies' man, complained that he was picked on by his commanding officer, and graduated 894th out of 899 in his class.

His father was a four-star admiral in the US Navy, as was his grandfather. The first Admiral McCain was commander of all US carriers in the Pacific during World War II, stood at attention on the USS Missouri when the Japanese surrendered, and died of a heart attack four days later. The second Admiral McCain was CINCPAC of all US forces in Vietnam. A McCain ancestor served on George Washington's staff during the Revolutionary War, and after the family had relocated to Mississippi several McCains fought for the Confederacy in the Civil War. His mother, a wealthy oil heiress, has been described as "the Auntie Mame of Navy wives."


During the Vietnam war, his plane was shot down, and he was captured, imprisoned, tortured, and forced to sign false statements. However:

"Nobody sane questions that McCain went through hell in Vietnam, or belittles his torture and abuse. For his military service, McCain won the Silver Star, Bronze Star, Legion of Merit, Purple Heart and Distinguished Flying Cross. But other American prisoners of war who cooperated with their Vietnamese captors to a lesser degree than McCain faced prosecution for violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, and were given less than honorable discharges."

That's not unlike Bush, who got a silver spoon deferment to the Texas Air National Guard, and managed to get away with snorting a lot of coke and pounding a lot of whiskey while going on extended leave - not quite the same level of dereliction, tho.

His more recent political career highlights include trying to pressure federal regulators to let his savings & loan crook buddies off the hook in the 1980s. His "maverick" reputation is soley due to his staged attacks on Clinton for bills that Republicans wanted anyway - case example being the 1996 Telecon Act, which he very publicly opposed.

Bogus prosecution of fraud as a precursor to running for higher public office? What about his more recent behavior?

"He has been a solid supporter of most of the Bush-Cheney agenda, from the PATRIOT Act to the war in Iraq to his opposition of gay marriage and legal abortion. He briefly questioned whether the nation could afford Bush-Cheney tax cuts for the wealthy, but has since said that in retrospect he thinks it stimulated the economy...

Practically speaking, the difference between GW Bush and McCain is little. They have different images, but their actual policies would be almost identical.

The same, by the way, goes for Hillary Clinton and Barak Obama. Different images, similar sponsors - except that Barak Obama is somewhat more populist in his approach and in his funding sources, while Clinton caters and panders more to the big money lobbyist crowd. Gas tax breaks... ye gods. How about free movie tickets? Free beer? Maybe auction off a few seats on McCain's Sweet Talk Express? Lap dances and complimentary whiskey for all the reporters (yes, for both the men and the women - don't ask who will be doing the dancing)? The downward spiral continues...where will it end?

Gamblers and bookies are salivating over this one, let me tell you. . .

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Obviously,
Posted by: kentigereyes@yahoo.com on May 2, 2008 12:15 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
there is no money to be made by helping the veterans. mccain is a politician, what else do you expect. I am begging the United States of Arrogance to NOT put this way-too-old warmonger in the White House. I have no love for bo or hrc, but this jerk will have us in Iran faster than "w" got us in Iwrack, unless the despicably evil "w"/DICKY regime beats him to it. TFL, Ken

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

God
Posted by: sp00n67 on May 2, 2008 1:28 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Mc Cain was a pilot cause he had connections just like GWB so GWB would have been a war hero for similars reasons or just for taking the physical. Being in a POW camp doesn't make you an experienced World leader just because some folks have sympathy for you. Picture Vladimir Putin and Mc Cain discusting our future? What Country would you bet on would end up on top? That's scary. Barack has the Brains necessary to do the job and hasn't sold us out like the other two have.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Why Would Anyone Expect McCain to do the Right Thing?
Posted by: mcartri on May 2, 2008 4:15 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
After McCain came back from Vietnam, his first wife, Carol McCain, was thrown through the windshield of her car. She was disfigured and lost 4-inches of her height because of multiple operations. What was John to do for the mother of their three-children? Well, he chased after a 15-yr. younger, not disfigured multimillionaire woman, did the adultery thing, divorced Carol and married Cindy one-month later. I wonder if McCain skipped the "In sickness and health" part of his wedding vows the second time? Again, why would anyone expecy McCain to do the right thing?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

WHY are We ONLY discussing McSame?
Posted by: madmax427 on May 4, 2008 9:40 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am still amazed that We can jump on McCain on topics like this and let Obama & Hillary slide. It does not matter WHICH one of the three names are useed, THEY ALL qualify for the positiion!

We are ONLY discussing the Candidates that have been approved by the 'Powers that Be', have ALLOWED Us to 'chose' from!

Until WE CHOSE Our OWN candidates, NOTHING will 'Change' or get Better!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Ron Paul for president
Posted by: Dark Night on May 6, 2008 12:17 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I, for one, will write in Ron Paul for president. He is 100% for OUR country and OUR people. He is not rich and he is not in the pocket of anyone. We need "Dr. NO" in the White House!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement