Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Why Americans Are Tuning out the Disaster in Iraq

By Frank Rich, The New York Times. Posted April 13, 2008.


Most Americans don't want to hear, see or feel anything about Iraq, whether they support the war or oppose it.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

The night before last week’s Senate hearings on our “progress” in Iraq, a goodly chunk of New York’s media and cultural establishment assembled in the vast lobby of the Museum of Modern Art. There were cocktails; there were waiters wielding platters of hors d’oeuvres; there was a light sprinkling of paparazzi. Then there was a screening. We trooped like schoolchildren to the auditorium to watch a grueling movie about the torture at Abu Ghraib.

Not just any movie, but “Standard Operating Procedure,” the new investigatory documentary by Errol Morris, one of our most original filmmakers. It asks the audience not just to revisit the crimes in graphic detail but to confront in tight close-up those who both perpetrated and photographed them. Because Mr. Morris has a complex view of human nature, he arouses a certain sympathy for his subjects, much as he did at times for Robert McNamara, the former defense secretary, in his Vietnam film, “Fog of War.”

More sympathy, actually. Only a few bad apples at the bottom of the chain of command took the fall for Abu Ghraib. No one above the level of staff sergeant went to jail, and no one remotely in proximity to a secretary of defense has been held officially accountable. John Yoo, the author of the notorious 2003 Justice Department memo rationalizing torture, has happily returned to his tenured position as a law professor at the University of California, Berkeley. So when Mr. Morris brings you face to face with Lynndie England — now a worn, dead-eyed semblance of the exuberant, almost pixie-ish miscreant in the Abu Ghraib snapshots — you’re torn.

Ms. England, who is now on parole, concedes that what she and her cohort did was “unusual and weird and wrong,” but adds that “when we first got there, the example was already set.” That reflection doesn’t absolve her of moral responsibility, but, like much in this film, it forces you to look beyond the fixed images of one of the most documented horror stories of our time.

Yet I must confess that, sitting in MoMA, I kept looking beyond the frame of Mr. Morris’s movie as well. While there’s really no right place to watch “Standard Operating Procedure,” the jarring contrast between the film’s subject and the screening’s grandiosity was a particularly glaring illustration of the huge distance that separates most Americans, and not just Manhattan elites, from the battle lines of our country’s five-year war. If Tom Wolfe was not in the audience to chronicle this cognitive dissonance, he should have been.

Mr. Morris’s movie starts fanning out to theaters on April 25. We don’t have to wait until then to know its fate. Sympathetic critics will tell us it’s our civic duty to see it. The usual suspects will try to besmirch Mr. Morris’s patriotism. But none of that will much matter. “Standard Operating Procedure” will reach the director’s avid core audience, but it is likely to be avoided by most everyone else no matter what praise or controversy it whips up.

It would take another column to list all the movies and TV shows about Iraq that have gone belly up at the box office or in Nielsen ratings in the nearly four years since the war’s only breakout commercial success, “Fahrenheit 9/11.” They die regardless of their quality or stand on the war, whether they star Tommy Lee Jones (“In the Valley of Elah”) or Meryl Streep (“Lions for Lambs”) or are produced by Steven Bochco (the FX series “Over There”) or are marketed like Abercrombie & Fitch apparel to the MTV young (“Stop-Loss”).


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: media, iraq, torture

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from World! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Tuning Out Iraq?
Posted by: weslen1 on Apr 13, 2008 10:05 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In the first place, the MSM tuned out Iraq, almost from the beginning. They wholeheartedly embraced every word that came out of the White House even in the light of glaring inconsistencies and outright LIES. After more than 5 years of this, and being ignored by the press, the people are sick of listening to more lies, touted on the MSM as gospel.
The PEOPLE KNOW this "president" couldn't care LESS about public opinion. Same goes for the MSM. The Democratic Congress is the same. The president has private meetings with Republican members of congress, ignoring the Democratic majority and the Democrats, who were put back in the majority to end this endless, costly, in lives and treasure, invasion/occupation of a sovereign country for oil profits for the Republican BASE, continue to fund it. They sit back and keep silent as the Republicans are out there day after day putting the blame on these spineless Democrats for the economy, the housing/mortgage crisis, the high price of gas, the loss of jobs, even as they tout and scream and whine for MORE "free" trade agreements to eliminate MORE American jobs, cry, scream and whine for immunity for telecoms, even as they CLAIM the FISA is SO IMPORTANT WE WILL ALL BE ATTACKED TOMORROW IF NOT PASSED, but NOT as important as immunity for law breaking.
Tuning OUT? There's really nothing to LISTEN TO, except more of the same. The people are tuning out Iraq because we are WISE to the fact we have NO SAY. Haven't had any SAY for 12 years of Republican RULE, Haven't had any SAY for 1 year of Democratic compliance, and WILL HAVE NO SAY ON IRAQ FOR THE FORESEEABLE FUTURE.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Tuning Out Iraq? Posted by: outsideagitator
» RE: Tuning Out Iraq? Posted by: willymack
What For?
Posted by: flapdoodle on Apr 13, 2008 10:14 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is clear that the way things are WE can have no effect on anything our renegade government is doing. Part of their well planned strategy is to go straight ahead with their horrific plans, stand in front of the camera snd tell us how proud they are about being able to get away with it.
Things -such as what used to be our Constitution are now in such a mess that restoring what we had would basically require starting over. But when we are in such an impossible situation to begin with how could we be expected to form a sensible and effective way of correcting all the damage this gang of thugs wrought?
I keep giving up on the whole thing so I can keep living my life as long as it is possible. But I care too much, so I go back again to see if there is any possible hope.- So far None, I'm very sorry to say.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Exactly right! Posted by: olderworker
What, me worry?
Posted by: QQOblivion on Apr 13, 2008 10:57 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Americans are tuning-out Iraq for at least two reasons, maybe more: 1) The reason mentioned in the previous comments: Americans feel they cannot change things, since the president will get EVERYTHING he wants anyway.
2) Americans, knowing deep down of the literal HELL America is putting Iraqis through, and knowing that this war is all a lie, feel ashamed and guilty. Yet, if they ignore the evil being done in their names, maybe they will feel absolved of responsibility. After all, they can't change things anyway. Why worry ourselves over the crap going on over there on the other side of the world?
In any case, among Americans, only soldiers and their families have to suffer and sacrifice. It isn't like the war will affect anyone else. (Oh, but it has already -- Note the recession.)

And to think, Americans, even anti-war Americans, are going to let Bush get away with all these lies AGAIN, as the US prepares for war with Iran.
Fool us twice, shame on us!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: What, me worry? Posted by: outsideagitator
» RE: What, me worry? Posted by: willymack
Americans believe in the myth that they are the good guys
Posted by: PakiBoy on Apr 13, 2008 11:21 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That is the simple fact of the matter.

So only 'mistakes' are made, and that too by 'few bad apples'. It is never the goal of the American Empire to pillage and destroy other countries for the benefit of the ruling elites and whatever crumbs the rest of the country receives as a trickle down effect.

Why else would Americans choose to believe that a tiny Island-nation of Cuba must be put under sanctions?

How else could Americans live with the fact that over 650,000 Vietnames are currently suffering from the the effects of chemical warfare perpetrated by US, and that US refuses to acknowledge, let alone compensate for its war crimes?

How else could the genocidal hag Albright decalre that US sanctions were justified even at the cost of 500,000 dead Iraqi children, and get away with it?

The list of US crimes against humanity and the environment is long and well known. Why do Americans continue to believe that they are the good guys? And it is not that Americans don't know what their governments have been doing since the creation of their Empire...Americans know it full well and are guilty in the crimes of their governments.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» That's not my point Posted by: JimmyVaughan
» RE: That's not my point Posted by: PakiBoy
» RE: That's not my point Posted by: JimmyVaughan
People tune out because they cannot take the pain
Posted by: emccready on Apr 13, 2008 11:48 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
All of the reasons above are very true about why people tuned out. Especially the one about not having to pay a price...("those boys who died are not my relatives and until it happens to my relative things are going fine!")

There are also other reasons. Most people prefer to avoid painful truths... just talking to my sister about the high price of drugs and how customs inspectors in this country will even confiscate Americans' own medications if the expiry date is over when you come through customs ("to protect our pharmaceutical industry") brought the reply from her.. "let's not talk about it, I am getting depressed!"

People like to avoid painful situations and our citizens have learned that shopping and doing other things like having fun, playing video games....walking around with an ipod 24/7 will anesthetize us to realities. - until that is, they hit us in the face and make us pay attention. The government loves to see that... they can get away with everything with a citizenry like this.

The credit card is also to blame because it has given people a false sense of being rich. Self indulgence and get it NOW! is the American way. So instead of living within our means, we pile up thousands of dollars in debt until we are faced with the recession (depression?) that we have already been in for a long time. But of course most people here have allowed Bush to stroke their need to deny the whole thing. Losing your house now? Why weren't you paying attention? Oh, too painful? Well now enjoy the pain of reality!

I have been angry and bitter for so long and have been tempted to tune out as well but have resisted it because SOMEONE has to pay attention! SOMEONE has to protest and try to shake people up!

People are going to have to somehow wake up and decide they too can share the painful realities caused by this Administration (especially those republicans and others who voted for Bush in the first place and did not protest when it was obvious that he really didn't win either race because of voter fraud in Florida and Ohio.) And don't think that future administrations won't keep in place policies that Bush has set precedences with.... It is the duty of the citizenry to keep close tabs on their elected officials of any and all parties.

We as a society will get what we deserve if we fail to learn lessons from the past ....sad to say even well meaning people like myself and others who have screamed about this tragedy since day one are also likely to be sucked down the toilet with those who went along for the ride with a smug smile on their face! America has been immune in the past but time is running out fast! Wake up America!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

it's not that 'we' tune out
Posted by: nor cal surfer on Apr 13, 2008 12:38 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
it's that our media doesn't cover it, the economy runs on it, and our leaders don't give a shit unless it involves penises, vaginas, and 100 dollar bills.

oh, and a solid half of our citizenry have been dumbed down by the (intentional) dismantling of public education.

we are, as they say, cattle. sheep.

watching American Idol on TiVo, so we can skip the commercials.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Not true..MSM carries all the news Posted by: outsideagitator
» Remember Rumsfeld's "unknown unknowns"? Posted by: hurricane hugo
» Confused by numbers? Posted by: JimmyVaughan
» RE: Confused by numbers? Posted by: Timba
» RE: Confused by numbers? Posted by: JimmyVaughan
» The American Sandbox Posted by: Mister_PsyOps
» No, it IS that vast Posted by: hurricane hugo
No, the American people don't want to see the revisionist spew being put out by Hollywood. . .
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on Apr 13, 2008 1:04 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"with full Army cooperation" - right. Everyone knows that that's not being honest. I'd say a better title for this article would have been

The Corporate Press wants most Americans to neither hear, see or feel anything about Iraq, whether they support the war or oppose it.

Realistic movies about the war are unlikey at present due to the heavy top-level support for the occupation by corporate interests in the United States, from military contractors to oil corporations to Wall Street banks. Thanks to the occupation, government contracting is booming - just ask William Keenard at the New York Times corporate board, also a director of the Carlyle Group, how the war has benefited his outside interests. A major, serious conflict of interest at the New York Times? Yes.

Michael Moore:
William Kennard—Carlyle managing director. The former chairman of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), Kennard approved a highly questionable bid by SBC Communications, a Carlyle client, to enter into long-distance markets days before he left office. Two months later, he landed a job with Carlyle.

New York Times:
William E. Kennard was elected to the Board of Directors of The New York Times Company in 2001. Mr. Kennard joined The Carlyle Group, a private equity firm, in May 2001 as a managing director in the global telecommunications and media group. Before joining The Carlyle Group, Mr. Kennard served as Chairman of the U.S. Federal Communications Commission from November 1997 to January 2001.

The American people would love to see an honest movie about Iraq - something like Platoon or Apocalypse Now or Full Metal Jacket, or, more recently, Three Kings - a movie that was honest and that had a good plot and that displayed the truth for all to see.

All that's come out so far are pieces that seem right out of government propaganda texts, or which are pathetically eager to make the U.S. government look like an honest actor in Iraq, plagued by "a few bad apples" - to the point of inducing severe nausea in the viewer.

The same thing happened in Vietnam. "The Green Berets" was a 1968 film starring John Wayne. Apocalypse Now didn't come out until 1979, 4 years after the official exit of all U.S. troops from Vietnam.

Here's a tasty review of "Green Berets":
From the very start you know exactly what kind of film this, exactly who the 'good' and 'bad' guys are, its ridiculously black and white. . . Some of the films set-up is obviously designed to pull at the heart strings and tow the jingoistic line, the young Vietnamese boy and his little dog for example who adds nothing to the story but some soppy sentiment and gleefully bland humour. . The Vietcong/NVA are pantomime bad-guys and are so given no more thought than as cannon fodder. . . The story is predictable, and to call it propoganda is stating the obvious. . .

Sad as it is, when it comes to films I think we have to take a look at what John Milius said, scriptwriter for Apocalypse Now, who had tried to shop the film to Hollywood executives c. 1968:

"Hollywood executives were the last people who were going to get in the middle of that thing. I mean, studio executives are not known for their social courage. . ."

Except obliquley, that is. . . try the third Bourne series movie - it's really all about Iraq, subliminally speaking.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Blood Money Hypocrisy at the MSM TIMES
Posted by: Mister_PsyOps on Apr 13, 2008 5:16 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Frank Rich and his NY Times are at the dirty, deadly epicenter of false-flag 9/11 "war on terror" kick-started by propaganda that has never let up.

For Rich to attribute apathy to Americans as dupes of bloody manipulation for war that main stream media so eagerly facilitated is worse than hypocrisy. It is treachery in service of genocide on the public nickel.

The NY Times has the murder of millions on its account books as it continues to sell the Big Lie that 9/11 with its sham “war on terror” was due to "Al Qaeda" that remains an invention of western monopoly corporate crime for its own ends.

Americans are beginning to tune out the lies – not the disaster that in no way began at Iraq.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

American Palestine
Posted by: colek on Apr 13, 2008 6:13 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Iraq is America's Palestine. A great big giant Palestine that will fester as long as Palestine.

No one has been held accountable for 9/11 or Katrina - why Iraq?

The National bird should be an Ostrich w head in sand.

Americans tuned out because elections are fixed and newsmedia is all propaganda if not outright lies.

This is all about as new as the Patricians and Plebians.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Americans more clued up and concerned than Canadians/Brits
Posted by: Bobsays on Apr 14, 2008 2:06 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When the Brits aren't busy getting drunk, getting into fights or trying to stab each other to death, they are trying to scam other Brits with a quick reno job of their houses. They spend absolutely no time talking about Iraq or Afghanistan. They figure it is America's problem and thus they don't need to sweat it.

As for Canadians, they are also trying to reno their houses. And when they aren't doing that, they sit in coffee shops and go 'yup, yup, yup' and talk about their stupid deficit and not much else. No, contrary to popular myth, Americans are amazingy switched on and engaged with what is going on in the world and blow the pants off the Brits and Canadians for at least having some integrity.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Thank you Frank Rich.
Posted by: davescott on Apr 14, 2008 4:51 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Nicely done.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

avoiding the "pain"
Posted by: zyclop on Apr 14, 2008 11:12 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
as posted by "emccready":
the "let's not talk about it", "I don't want to talk about it" mentality is so prevalent in the American mind that this even spills over into little everyday things.
Almost everything I want to talk about is killed this way by almost everyone I try to communicate with.
So I gave up on all things that matter really.
I, the sheeple !

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

People are trying to live...but our leaders don't want us to.
Posted by: Thetorganization on Apr 14, 2008 11:17 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
First of all, I have to say that this was an amazing article. I'm a college student who will be graduating this year, and I have very fond memories of protesting in 2002 against the U.S. going into Afghanistan & Iraq in 2003. Flash forward to 2008 and it most definetely has seemed that the shit (pardon my french) has hit the fan. Historians will have a dilly of a pickle trying to dissect the past eight years.

But, for me, like many others, I was just trying to live my life. Go to school, get an education, get a good job. And it seems to me that most Americans are on the same type of thing when it comes to these matters. No one really wants to preoccupy themselves with the Iraq war anymore...not just because it has gone so badly, not just because of the brevity of what has happened and the numerous illegalities and falsities leading up to the invasion, but because many are just trying to pay the bills, keep their jobs, and keep their heads above water. Basically, continuing with what has been decreed as the American dream. People can't deal with what has been going on, so they drink themselves to death, shoot up, snort, take numerous anti-depressants, overeat, spend outside of their limits and their means, watch American Idol and Survivor, play video games, party, fuck till they have every STD in the book, and still they can't escape the inevitable. Maybe it's because that in the back of their minds, like the back of mind, they know that something horrible has happened and we are only seeing the beginning. How bad could it possibly get?

The leaders of this country have taken that and go with it, simply based out of fear. As long as Bush and cronies are in power, the people are malleable and will be subject to their will, no matter how many people get killed overseas to protect oil reserves, how many lies are dished out by these war-mongers with a ear-to-ear grin on their faces or how many of our civil liberties get taken away as a result. I honestly look at my friends, my family, and just people around me and feel an overwhelming amount of just sadness and anger. Sad that these people, who had nothing to do with this matter, are being drug along for the ride against their will, and angry that this war has continued for so long and we relatively have no real impact on what happens in the matter.

It's honestly gotten to the point where I have seriously contemplated suicide.

We're taught at a young age in the democratic process, that America is the good guy in the world, that our armed forces could do no wrong, and that no matter what, this country is about freedom and giving that to others. It really has taken the past five years for me and many other to realize that this is just the lie that we're fed into in order to keep the wheels turning. But how long can these lies keep on going? How long can MSM hide the 1.5 million deaths in the Middle east and the 4 million displaced from the public? How long will the people allow themselves to be blindly led into this mess and then close their eyes when the reality of the situation is right in front of our faces?


I honestly try to stay optimistic about the next couple of years...but it's hard to.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

People Tune Out Because
Posted by: Southern Gal on Apr 14, 2008 11:21 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We tried protesting the war before it began, we tried contacting our Congressmen/women urging them not to support and continue to fund the war, we tried voting people out and voting other people in Congress to stop the war, but we still have the war and everything that goes with it. Candidates are spending obsene amounts of money to get elected to the White House and Congress. We have small hope that whoever wins the White House and majority in the Congress will finally listen to we the people and end this war. Would anyone like to make a bet about the status of the war at the end of the next presidential term?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

steph01
Posted by: steph01 on Apr 15, 2008 1:38 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The war goes on becouse the arms merchants and other corporations are making alot of money from it, and because of our govertments (BusH,Chaney and the the other fascists) desire to to establish a capitalist world empire.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: steph01...NO steph1 Posted by: Captainmagic