U.S. Wants British 'Surge' into Southern Iraq
Also in World
War Vet: I Served 40 Months in Iraq, After Which I Didn't Want to Go Back Home
Anonymous
I Volunteered For Obama in 2008, But His Support of Landmines Is the Last Straw
Clancy Sigal
The Great Afghan Gem Heist: How the War Led to the Pillaging of Afghanistan's Precious Stones
Lal Aqa Sherin
Obama's Af-Pak War is Not Just Deadly and Counterproductive: It's Illegal
Marjorie Cohn
Is It Possible to Cobble Together 10 Good Things That Happened in 2009? You Better Believe It!
Medea Benjamin
Afghan National Army: Afghan Police Are Doing More Harm Than Good
Ahmad Kawosh
LONDON - The U.S. plans to urge Britain to launch a "surge" in Basra to combat increasing insurgency in the southern Iraqi region, the Sunday Mirror newspaper reported.
Britain, which has around 4,100 troops in Iraq, transferred control to Iraqi forces in December last year but it could now be asked to step up its role again amid top-level concern about the situation, the paper said.
It quoted an unnamed senior U.S. military source saying: "Three big militias are currently engaged in a particularly bloody battle in southern Iraq.
"U.S. and Iraqi forces are involved in a huge operation to attack an Al-Qaeda stronghold in Mosul.
"But after that, the plan is to turn the coalition's attention on to Basra and we will be urging the British to surge into the city.
"If they do not have enough troops, then they will be offered U.S. Marines to help out.
"The feeling is that if southern Iraq is hugely unstable, it will affect the success of the surge in the north and destabilize the whole country."
"The proposal to go back into Basra is being examined at the highest level in Baghdad."
U.S. military commanders claim that a "surge" of 30,000 U.S. troops since last January is partly responsible for a dip in violence in Iraq.
But unnamed senior British civil service sources told the Sunday Mirror that Britain would be highly reluctant to go back into Basra because of pressure at home to pull troops out.
"We do not have enough troops for a surge ourselves. The hope is that we can train enough Iraqi army recruits in the next year to cope with the inter-tribal warfare going on in Basra," one source quoted by the paper said.
The Ministry of Defense was not immediately contactable to comment on the report.
Recent media reports say that Britain will delay its planned withdrawal of around 1,500 troops from Iraq until the end of this year because of increased attacks in Basra.
The cuts were originally due to come into effect from early this year.
See more stories tagged with: iraq, surge, british, basra
Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from World! Sign up now »
You've chosen to turn comments off for the entire site. Would you like to turn them back on?
Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.
Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.