Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

It's Time To Demilitarize US Policy in Africa

By Bruce Dixon, Black Agenda Report. Posted March 1, 2008.


Since the end of the Cold War, the U.S. has fomented no less than fourteen wars in Africa -- enough is enough.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

It's time to demilitarize US policy toward the African continent. Since the end of the Cold War in 1989, Republican and Democratic administrations alike have provided military aid, military training, military assistance and arms transfers to at least 50 out of 53 African nations, and fomented no less than fourteen wars. Bipartisan US policy until now has been about arming Africans, and keeping the continent hungry, sick, desperately poor and permanently at war with itself. Thanks to our policy of flooding the African continent with arms, the price of an AK-47 assault rifle is lower on the African continent than any place else on earth.

Of the nine countries where armed conflicts are now in progress, US-supplied arms and training are a factor in every one. In the Ethiopian civil war, in the invasion of Somalia by Ethiopia, in Chad, in Morocco and Western Sahara and Sudan, in the continuing Algerian civil war and of course in the Congo's holocuast, which has accounted, conservatively, for six million dead since about 1996, the highest death toll of any conflict since World War 2. The US has equipped, trained and supplied every one of the national armies that have invaded and occupied parts of the Congo, from Kenya and Uganda to Rwanda, Burundi, Angola and even Namibia. US arms are also in the hands of non-government gangs and private armies that ravage and depopulate whole regions to facilitate the extraction of the coltan for our cell phones and computers, the titanium for our aircraft, and the uranium for our nukes.

America's militarized foreign policy on the African continent does not benefit Africans. The inauguration of AFRICOM, the US military headquarters for the African continent, was met with universal condemnation and scorn by ordinary Africans across the continent, and their governments. Africans don't want US arms, they don't want US intervention, and they don't want US bases.

African opposition to US military presence was the reason Bush did not set foot in the continent's most populous country, Nigeria or in South Africa during his recent visit, and why he stayed only a matter of hours in Kenya, Tanzania and Burundi. Not one African country has dared the wrath of its people by requesting to host AFRICOM. But the ring of US bases, from Mombasa to Djibouti on the east to Angola and the Gulf of Guinea on the west, continues to grow. US forces regularly fly bombing missions over Somalia in support of the Ethiopian invasion.

America's foreign policy elite, its multinational corporations, the Pentagon and its constellation of military suppliers and mercenary contractors know what they want. They want the coltan, the oil, the gold, and the diamonds. They want to privatize every state and social resource, down to the water supplies. They want to tie African agriculture to genetically engineered American crop varieties, and collect royalties for the use of these "patented" plants. They want to prevent African nations from spending their own wealth from their own resources on health and education infrastructure, on food subsidies, on growing jobs and healthy internal economies. And they want to keep Africa a war-torn hell on earth, because it's good for business. If you're not a "failed state" yet, they'll make you one.

On the other hand, Africans know what they want for themselves. They are keen observers of the US political scene, and well aware that the next president may be a man with more direct ties to the African continent than most of us. Africans are waiting for the American people, especially African Americans to speak up and support their demands for the US to keep its bases, its military "assistance" and its arms to itself. How long will they have to wait?

It's time this year to build a from-the-ground-up movement to hold the little clay feet of the Congressional Black Caucus to a higher standard on Africa policy, on African demilitarization, and on African debt, pressing the US and international bodies to cancel the debts and loan-shark interest owed by African nations, many of which have already been repaid several times over.

The Jubiliee Movement is one such effort on the part of hundreds of churches and community organizations to do just that.

Next year a new administration will be in the White House. Should we wait and see what its elite advisers, its policy wonks and campaign contributors and contractors convince it to do in Africa? Or should we make it plain what ought to be, what must be done?

For now, a good start would be calling your Congressman, and a random member of the Black Caucus about the Jubilee Act now before that body.

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: pentagon, africa, military

Bruce Dixon is editor of The Black Commentator.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from World! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Setting The Hook In Third World Countries
Posted by: johnjmccarthy on Mar 1, 2008 6:45 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
http://www.ratical.org/ratville/JFK/ST/STappendix3.html

After you read Appendix iii you may want to read the entire book, THE SERET TEAM, The CIA AND ITS ALLIES IN CHARGE OF THE UNITED STATES AND THE WORLD, a free download on the Internet.

Over 200,000 copies of this book were removed from the bookstore shelves of the "land of the free and home of the brave".

This is exactly how the hook was placed in 50 of the 53 African Nations.

It has been the modus operandi of the CIA since 1953.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Nope
Posted by: g50 on Mar 1, 2008 10:21 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I don't really ever go for Dixon's stuff, so no surprise I disagree here as well.

AFRICOM will be a critical force for empowering the African Union to address security issues on the continent. It brings risks, but with risk also comes the promise of reward - greater stability, the prospect of rolling back violent repression, and in time improving the quality of life.

Security is a precondition for freer political institutions and broader economic integration.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Nope Posted by: no1kstate
» RE: Nope Posted by: g50
» RE: Nope...models Posted by: Captainmagic
Get the US out of Africa
Posted by: logansafi on Mar 1, 2008 10:45 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is an important article by Dixon. Just days ago the French moved their troops back into Chad under the flag of the European Union, and today, many in France, Britain,and the US are demanding that 'something be done', namely that the US should be directing supposedly a 'humanitarian' military operation in Darfur. Many liberals have been caught up in supporting these interventions, same as they were when Yugoslavia was being disassembled.

An alternative approach is simply to demand that the imperialists stay off the continent altogether. That's, in short, how to save Africa. Dixon is demanding just that and is point on in his analysis. We need to dismantle the US military not campaign to try to rationalize for the public that it is somehow needed for 'humanitarian' reasons in Africa.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Others
Posted by: tiredangry on Mar 1, 2008 11:41 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Greg Palast and John Perkins are two other authors that have touched on this subject. John Perkins has written about how this goes on on the global scale, and Greg Palast is an investigative reporter who writes about malfeasance wherever he finds it. They both have websites and Greg Palast especially has videos of investigations and interviews on youtube.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

what about the french
Posted by: Joe on Mar 1, 2008 12:25 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
and other european coutries. they have had a greater influence for the negative than the United States has in Africa

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: what about the french Posted by: no1kstate
» RE: what about the french Posted by: Quannah
» RE: what about the french Posted by: Quannah
» RE: what about the french Posted by: Quannah
» RE: what about the french Posted by: no1kstate
» To: g50 Posted by: Quannah
It's already a done deal
Posted by: Quannah on Mar 1, 2008 4:32 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I saw Bush in a press conference during his recent trip to Africa. He was trying to quell the rumors that the US wants to build military bases in Africa. He was talking to an unconvinced crowd in Ghana, telling them "The US has no plans to build a military base in Ghana. And that's the truth."

In Bush-Speak that means it's already a done deal!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Why stop at Africa?
Posted by: jg on Mar 1, 2008 10:45 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's Time To Demilitarize US Policy in Africa

Yes. Of course. But remember that the US Government has practiced this "disaster capitalism" all over the world since the end of WWII. I refer you to the work of Naomi Klein. It's Time To Demilitarize US Policy EVERYWHERE

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Key Word is...OIL!
Posted by: Quannah on Mar 2, 2008 9:43 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Africa has oil. And it isn't being "exploited" by anyone yet! THAT is the reason Bush has for putting military bases there.

This "humanitarian" slant to the story is a cover. There isn't anybody with working synapses that believes Bush is a humanitarian! What a joke! It makes a good cover for what they really want - OIL. Pure and simple.

And because China has already gained some ground there and has fostered goodwill by building roads and schools and hospitals, Bush doesn't want them to end up with the "spoils." Therefore he will bully those impoverished countries into giving him what he wants. That's his modus operandi.

Hopefully the good people of Africa won't let him get away with stealing their resources.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The Key Word is...OIL! Posted by: donl51