Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

The Post-Fidel Moment

By Rubrick Biegon, Foreign Policy in Focus. Posted February 19, 2008.


The long era of Fidel Castro is finally over.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Facing imprisonment for treason in 1953, Fidel Castro famously remarked that history would absolve him of his rebellious actions against the decaying dictatorship of General Fulgencio Batista. The prophetic declaration marked a turning point in Cuba's development, culminating in a full-fledged revolution six years later. As Fidel himself now fades into history, Cuba again appears on the verge of change. While the scope of the island's ongoing transformation pales in comparison to the tumultuous events of the 1950s, the reality of new leadership in Havana does create the conditions for a long-awaited warming in United States-Cuba relations.

The long era of Fidel Castro is finally over. On January 20, the octogenarian revolutionary was re-elected to the National Assembly despite not being seen in public for over a year and a half. When the Assembly convenes on February 24, however, it's possible that members will choose to retire the ailing leader by nominating someone else to head the Council of State, the government's executive branch. If not, Fidel may decide to formally announce his resignation from public life, as he has hinted at on a number of occasions.

In a recent letter, Castro wrote that he could no longer stand in the way of the next generation of Cuban leaders. It was a stunning acknowledgement from the man who has outlasted nine U.S. presidents while personalizing Marxist rule in Cuba and personifying the struggle against Yanqui imperialism in the Americas. Having survived Washington's nearly 50-year vendetta, Fidel is set to leave power largely on his own terms, succumbing only to the constraints of his rapidly deteriorating health.

Raul the Reformer

Raul Castro, Fidel's younger brother and longtime heir apparent, has been Cuba's "acting president" since July 31, 2006. At 76 years old, Raul is no spring chicken, nor does he have the charisma of his predecessor. By most accounts, Raul is primed to be a transitional figure, one whose relatively brief tenure will quickly give way to a more thorough -- and contentious -- political realignment. This is not to say that Raul won't leave an indelible mark on Cuban society as Lider Maximo ("Maximum Leader," Fidel's unofficial title for decades). His willingness to address Cuba's economic problems and open paths to public dialogue has already created an atmosphere of budding optimism in the country.

Cuba's political future post-Raul is just one of the many questions facing the country over the long term, issues which include the island's notoriously rocky relationship with the Untied States. Will Raul be succeeded by another dominant leader, such as Vice President Carlos Lage or National Assembly President Ricardo Alarcon? A power-sharing arrangement featuring some sort of collective leadership? Or will Cubans construct an altogether different political system in line with their unique historical experience? Furthermore, what would be required, in both Havana and Washington, for the beginnings of a normalization process to take hold?

These uncertainties aside, the short-term trajectory of Cuba's political economy appears to be settled. The fundamentals of the country's socialist system will remain in place, with Fidel's official departure providing Raul heightened maneuverability to curtail the corruption, inefficiency, and overly-bureaucratic planning that have dogged the Cuban economy for years. On July 26, 2007, Raul gave a major policy speech in which he stated that his government was actively looking for new ways of securing foreign investment without abandoning socialism.

Contrary to Washington's portrayal of Raul as a mere clone of his older brother, Cuba's new leader has emerged as a reformer -- albeit a tepid one. His calls for structural changes to Cuba's economy remind observers of Deng Xiaoping, the architect of China's economic liberalization process, who introduced market mechanisms to "modernize" the country while maintaining the Communist Party's firm grip on power. As noted by veteran Cuba watcher Brian Latell, among others, Raul is an open admirer of the Chinese system. Ultimately, the younger Castro may prove to be more of a Gorbachev figure, releasing economic forces that usher in calls for substantive political change, resulting in trends toward liberal democracy.

Washington's Stubbornness

In a shock to many anti-Castro ideologues, Fidel's prolonged departure has not produced political instability or social chaos, let alone a democratic uprising. It has, however, produced clear openings for change -- both within Cuba, as Raul's reformist gestures have demonstrated, and in the island's relationship with its neighbor to the north. The United States, it would seem, can now engage Cuba without dealing directly with its old nemesis, allowing the superpower to save face as it moves toward a more rational relationship with the island.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: reform, cuba, fidel castro, raul castro, u.s. embargo

Rubrick Biegon, a contributor to Foreign Policy In Focus, holds a Master's degree in International Politics from American University's School of International Service.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from World! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Keep the U. S. from ruining what is good about Cuba
Posted by: truthteller on Feb 19, 2008 12:31 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think one of the reasons that Castro was so heavy-handed with his people is that he felt that was necessary to keep the corporate interests of the U. S. at bay. Remember, the Batista regime was a U. S. and Mafia puppet, corrupt to the core. The fear of a re-emergence of U. S. control has to have been at the forefront of Castro's thinking when events like the CIA overthrow of the Allende government in Chile happened.

When corporate politicians talk about "liberalizing" and "democratizing" Cuba, I think they really have in mind opening up the country to become a wasteful consumer society like we have. This would be such a shame, and totally unrealistic, since our time for acting this way is coming to an end with the onset of peak oil. The fact that Cuba may have found some oil reserves to help themselves out of abject poverty will make them all the greater target for American corporate interests to try and come in and take over and steal their resources for the U. S.

By default, Cuba probably has the most sustainable way of life in the Western Hemisphere, and the lowest carbon footprint per capita. Building Wal-Marts and other U. S. style establishments would be a short-sighted environmental tragedy for them. The World needs less cheap useless plastic crap, not more. Let a more democratic, egalitarian government emerge post-Castro, but not the corporatist-driven fascist state that the U. S. has become. They have a chance to do it right. The powerful in this country need to stay the Hell out of their business.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» ROGER Posted by: rogeralexander
» RE: OGER Posted by: desidid
Hope?
Posted by: Upset on Feb 19, 2008 2:12 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Finally, the last military dictator of Latin America is out of office. However, the young generation of leaders (Raul, now 76) really does not offer any hope.
Why not free and fair elections now?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Hope? Posted by: RedAaron
» RE: Hope? Posted by: radiomorning
» RE: Hope? Posted by: radiomorning
» RE: Hope? Posted by: radiomorning
Cuban Americans had better get with it ...
Posted by: mmckinl on Feb 19, 2008 9:05 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Unless a dialog is started soon they will be on the outside looking in on a rejuvenating Cuba.

The Europeans are already moving in to develop the economy and the Chinese oil money will get things moving.

The longer they insist on isolation for Cuba the more isolated from Cuba's future they will be.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Good!
Posted by: Mr. Heathen on Feb 20, 2008 12:25 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That is my comment.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Castro’s Retirement Offers Opportunity for Change -- in US Policy
Posted by: John McAuliff on Feb 20, 2008 5:31 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Join the campaign to end travel restrictions:

http://www.ipetitions.com/petition/Cubatravelbill/

Blinded by ideology and hobbled by Miami’s special interest politics and donations, the Bush Administration will remain irrelevant to the transition in Cuba dramatized by Fidel Castro’s retirement. It will also miss an opportunity to begin to rebuild America’s reputation in the world.

The real question is whether the Democratic Congress or candidates for President can do any better.

Serious change is underway in Cuba. International journalists have reported a country frankly examining its economic and social problems. The voices of Cubans themselves have been heard in meetings around the country, and in articles and interviews published on the internet. We received an unmediated view of the process from Cuba’s unprecedented release on-line of a two hour meeting where university students challenged Ricardo Alarcon, head of the National Assembly. http://www.rebelion.org/noticia.php?id=63203 http://internalreform.blogspot.com/



President Bush’s advocacy of regime change, instability and disloyalty by the Cuban military and police last October was either one more instance of pandering to the dreams of exiles in Miami or intended to undermine the process of internal reform by heightening Cuban anxieties about US intentions.

Since taking control of Congress, Democratic leaders have offered no challenge to the Administration, despite previous support for ending travel restrictions.

Of the leading Presidential candidates, McCain and Huckabee strive to sound harder line than Bush. Clinton only differs with him on the question of emergency visits by Cuban Americans. Obama offers the beginning of change, supporting unrestricted Cuban American family travel and remittances. Unlike the others, he is prepared to negotiate with Raul Castro without preconditions. http://candidatecubawatch.blogspot.com/

A minimal US response to Fidel Castro’s retirement is reinstatement of the pre 2004 travel regulations of Bill Clinton and George Bush which permitted annual and emergency visits by Cuban Americans. More importantly, it allowed non-tourist purposeful travel by world affairs councils, professional organizations, museums, religious and humanitarian groups, short term study programs, etc.

A more serious step would be to end all travel restrictions so any American could personally evaluate and interact with the transition taking place in Cuba. Only by honoring our own values of freedom, can we actually know what is taking place and provide a supportive atmosphere for Cuban reformers.

An additional benefit will be to our international reputation. Traditional allies in this hemisphere and western Europe see US policy toward Cuba as counterproductive if not obsessed and anachronistic. World opinion was signaled for the sixteenth year when the UN General Assembly condemned our unilateral embargo of Cuba by 184 to 4.

The American people know what needs to happen. Polls show that two-thirds want an end to travel restrictions and normalization of relations. It’s time for our leaders to catch up.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

otto
Posted by: otto on Feb 20, 2008 6:48 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I liked the tone of the article, but found fault with one remark: about the inherent "corruption" of the Cuban economy. In visiting Cuba, I was struck by the great educational system for ALL youth, the great health system - again for ALL; and I have always been amazed by Cuba's ability to export doctors and health care to other countries, in spite of the great poverty. I hear general accusations of corruption, but I would like to hear more specific charges. It seems to me that the extreme poverty comes mostly from the U.S. embargo for 50 years, but still unsuccessful. I found large numbers of Cuban people enthusiastic about their leader, Castro, although I did detect grumbling from many younger people - which I rightly or wrongly atributed to wanting the things they saw on television each day from the U.S. (which is often a form of propaganda lies too!)
As to corruption in the economly and lack of freedom, how can we Americans point the finger at anyone else when we have all that has taken place under the 20 years of Bush-Bush-Reagan?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: otto Posted by: daniel1982
» RE: otto Posted by: radiomorning
» RE: otto Posted by: daniel1982
» RE: otto Posted by: wdednam2002
» RE: otto Posted by: daniel1982
dmrohner
Posted by: dmrohner on Feb 20, 2008 7:06 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We had been hoping that America would admit Cuba to statehood. This has been the obvious outcome since the Spanish Empire fizzled no later than the McKinley administration. But, then, the view was that the island had all those, well you know, blacks and mulattos? Still, Governor Castro would have been something of a novelty at governor's conferences?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Post-Fidel Moment
Posted by: Marysue5252 on Feb 20, 2008 8:36 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The article was deeply flawed, giving the corporate Mafia point of view. The comments by Truthteller and Otto are right on! With the USA's penchant for interfering in democratic elections all over the world (see Chile and Sept 11, 1973; in my country,Canada,it always interferes), and installing corporate-friendly puppets (Pinochet); in Canada, Mulroney/Harper; so Castro had to be heavy-handed, otherwise he'd never have gotten rid of the Mafia who are chomping at the bit to get back in! Alas, the Mafia will get back in. Once again, there will be extremes of poverty and richness, and boys will be selling their sisters to tourists, as it was under Batista! It is to puke!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The Post-Fidel Moment Posted by: daniel1982
Dorothy
Posted by: patricia484 on Feb 20, 2008 11:54 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am in alignment with truthteller, otto, and MarySue5252. I have also been to Cuba and feel that embargo has been inhuman. However, what Cubans did to survive in to Special Period was, and is, incredible and educational for our future. Highly recommend DVD "The Power of Community: How Cuba Survived Peak Oil," (www.communitysolution.org).

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Roger
Posted by: rogeralexander on Feb 21, 2008 12:00 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Facing imprisonment for treason in 1953, Fidel Castro famously remarked that history would absolve him of his rebellious actions against the decaying dictatorship of General Fulgencio Batista. The prophetic declaration marked a turning point in Cuba's development, culminating in a full-fledged revolution six years later. IT HAS

As Fidel himself now fades into history, Cuba again appears on the verge of change. FIDEL WON'T FADE. AND AS FIDEL SAYS, "REVOLUTION MEANS CHANGE."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]