Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Anti-Occupation Politicos Gain Clout in Iraq

By Robert Dreyfuss, The Nation. Posted January 17, 2008.


Iraqi nationalists, opposed to the U.S. presence, are slowly gaining ground.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

On January 13 an emerging Sunni-Shiite nationalist bloc in Iraq signed a groundbreaking agreement aimed at ending Iraq's civil war, blocking the privatization of Iraq's oil industry and checkmating the breakaway Kurdish state. It's a big step forward, and it could change the face of Iraqi politics in 2008.

For the past two years, Iraqi nationalists--opposed to the US occupation, opposed to Al Qaeda and opposed to Iran's heavyhanded influence in Iraqi affairs--have struggled to assert themselves. The nascent coalition contains the seeds of true national reconciliation in Iraq, but it has emerged independently of the United States. Unrelated to the constant American pressure on the government of Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki to meet various reconciliation "benchmarks," the new coalition is designed either to sweep Maliki out of office or force him to join it.

Enormous obstacles stand in the way of the Sunni-Shiite coalition, and Iraq is just as likely to descend into a new round of intense civil war as it is to stabilize under a new ruling bloc. Still, it could work, but there's a big if--if the United States steps back and gets out of the way.

Since the rigged Iraqi elections of 2005, the United States has supported a shaky and now utterly discredited four-party coalition in Iraq. Two of those parties are the ultra-religious Shiite parties, the Islamic Dawa Party and the Islamic Supreme Council of Iraq (ISCI), both strongly supported by Iran. The other two are the Kurdish warlord parties, the Kurdistan Democratic Party (KDP) and the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan (PUK). During that time, Iraq's two prime ministers, Ibrahim Jaafari (2005-06) and Maliki (2006-2008)--both from Dawa--have staunchly refused to open the door to increased Sunni Arab participation in the government. But now that coalition is falling apart, and its partners are increasingly at odds with one another.

The potential collapse of the Shiite-Kurdish pact that has ruled Iraq under the American occupation has created a freewheeling search for competing alliances among the myriad political factions that have emerged since Saddam Hussein's overthrow.

Partners in the new, twelve-party alliance include nearly all of the Sunni Arab parties, including the Sunni religious parties and the secular National Dialogue Front; the secular Iraqi National List of former Prime Minister Iyad Allawi, a secular Shiite; two big Shiite parties, including Muqtada al-Sadr's bloc and the Fadhila (Virtue) Party; a faction of the Dawa Party; and assorted smaller groups, including independents in Iraq's Parliament. Among its goals, say its leaders, are to ensure that Iraq's "oil, natural gas, and other treasures [remain the] property of all the Iraqi people," opposing both the proposed new oil law that would open the door to privatization of the oil industry and the illegal oil deals signed by the Kurdish regional government. Another goal, they say, is to block the Kurdish takeover of the oil-rich region around Kirkuk in Iraq's north. And, they say, the new coalition will "overcome the narrow circle of sectarianism" by uniting Sunnis and Shiites.

What's more, there are reports of talks involving the remaining Sunni resistance groups--those that have not joined the American-sponsored Awakening movement and the so-called Concerned Local Citizens groups--in a broad-based national reconciliation effort. According to the Arab press, six Sunni resistance factions have been meeting in England in preparation for a proposed conference in Cairo with representatives of the Iraqi government and political parties. A parallel effort is under way at meetings in Beirut. And French President Nicolas Sarkozy, currently touring the Middle East, has renewed his country's offer to bring Iraq's warring political factions together. Sarkozy suggested "hosting in France, far from the heat of passions and on neutral ground, inter-Iraqi roundtable talks that are as large as possible." It's unclear whether Sarkozy's proposed conference would include representatives of the armed resistance, but it's possible. (An earlier offer by France to host similar talks got the cold shoulder from Maliki and no encouragement from the United States.)


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: iraq, nationalists

Robert Dreyfuss is the author of "Devil's Game: How the United States Helped Unleash Fundamentalist Islam" (Henry Holt/Metropolitan Books).

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from World! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
What Did We Expect?
Posted by: Sissy on Jan 18, 2008 4:24 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why wouldn't the "politicos" be signing up against the U.S.? What we brought upon that nation was unconsciensable. We totally destroyed their infrastructure, killed a million of their innocent citizens, built bases that some candidates say will house American troops for a hundred years and "come off" like we did them a huge favor. What did Bush say some time ago? "The Iraqi's should thank God every day that the Americans came". Good Lord, what criminal arrogance.

Do you know what "gets me" more than anything in this whole debachle? When we in America puff up ourselves and say "we need to get them over there so they don't come over here". How dare we? Who in hell do we think we are that we can go into another country without just cause and totally destroy them? It is no wonder that there is much glee over the death of these kids who gallantly fight under this country's flag.

I am most ashamed.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: What Did We Expect? Posted by: nochicagoboys
Our own Founding Fathers were prelude to Iraqi Nationalists
Posted by: nochicagoboys on Jan 18, 2008 5:27 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Now we're calling them Iraqi nationalists. Up to now, we called them insurgents.

From everything I've read and understand, the reason this war (i.e., occupation) seems without end is because from the day Paul Bremer was named Director of Reconstruction and Humanitarian Assistance, the United States has attempted to create a totally non-regulated, laissez-faire, free-and-unrestricted market economy in Iraq. It's been an experimental lab, basically. The "insurgents" are essentially the citizenry who were more-likely-than-not laid-off from their (pre-invasion) jobs and positions, while Bremer sent in no-bid contractors, with a total foreign workforce, and attempted to impose upon Iraq a system that left them without a voice in their country's reconstruction. Unemployment, with no hope in the future, turns ordinary citizens into insurgents, or "extremists", as our press likes to label them.

If the United States would leave, the Iraqi people would be free to establish their own brand of market presence. This would bring economic security, and an end to the violence and mayhem. Our occupation only exacerbates the problem. The sooner we leave, the sooner stability will come to their country.

By-the-way, the same disaster capitalism could happen in the United States, assuming Iraq can be counted as a success story for the neocons (along with Iran, if this administration -- or possibly the next -- has its way). Just witness the harrowing problems that persist after Katrina. Neocons love a good disaster. It makes their job so much easier.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Robert Dreyfus's 'The Devil's Game' is a must read
Posted by: Ydotheyhateus on Jan 18, 2008 6:20 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
He explains how the US has nurtured, supported, enouraged the Islamist radicals since WW2 as a force against Arab nationalism and against the rise of socialism/communism in muslim countries.

While retards like Kristol and other neocons are on every MSM from Fox News to NPR, people like Dreyfus, Robert Pape et al get no exposure.

No wonder we americans are so ignorant.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

On schedule
Posted by: solrev on Jan 18, 2008 6:38 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
First the Iraqi nationalists and then a united Islam, a nice plan. American nationalists could be a big help to the Iraqi nationalists, but first we have to take our own land back.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: On schedule Posted by: nochicagoboys
» RE: On schedule Posted by: RedAaron
We are winning the war!! The "surge" is a grand success!!!
Posted by: xvictor on Jan 18, 2008 7:32 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Don't those ignorant, rebellious Iraqi insurgents know that????

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Finally
Posted by: warriornation on Jan 18, 2008 9:59 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As a Palestinian American it's great to see that an Arab nation is finally standing up to America. I'm not being anti-American, but Presidant Mubarrak of Egypt and the King of Saudi Arabia have brown nosed America for along time and the Arab citizens have suffered. It's great to see that Iraq realizes that it's time to slow the bleeding down a little bit and not let Iraq become New America.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]