Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Trying to Stop the Other Invasion of Iraq

By Cam Sylvester, The Tyee. Posted November 23, 2007.


Inside Turkey's risky anti-war movement.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

In a country where most homes sport a bondcuk, the blue glass amulet believed to ward off the evil eye, Mehmet is seemingly free of superstitions. Except for one. The number 301 gives him the heebee geebees.

And with good reason. Article 301 of the Turkish Penal code makes the "public denigration of Turkishness" punishable for up to three years in prison. As a prominent member of the anti-war movement in this country, Mehmet knows all too well that the line between political dissent and affronting "Turkishness" is a dangerous one to walk, especially since it wobbles wildly at the government's whim.

"Article 301 is something you think about a lot because people are regularly charged," Mehmet tells me as his wife Zuleyha spoons out tarhana soup at their apartment in Izmir, a port city on the Aegean.

He then lists off those charged of late, an inventory mirroring Amnesty International's, including author and Nobel laureate, Orhan Pamuk, and Armenian journalist Hrant Dink, assassinated in Istanbul in January 2007. When photos surfaced of smiling Turkish police officers posing in front of a Turkish flag with the 17-year-old Turkish nationalist charged with Dink's murder, there were more than a few red faces.

'Whipped up fervor'

These days it's Mehmet's city that's flushed with red. Walk along the Kordon, Izmir's picturesque seawall, and it seems every wall, every balcony, every taxi is waving a Turkish flag. They first appeared on Oct. 29th, Turkish National Day. But by all accounts many more are flying than previous years, and unlike other years, they haven't been packed away after a few days.

"The country has been whipped up into another nationalistic fever," Ozge, another anti-war activist told me a few days ago in Istanbul. "It has happened many times before, and it will happen again."

This time, the impetus was the death of nearly 40 soldiers in rebel attacks by the outlawed Kurdish Worker Party (PKK) over the last month. The PKK, with bases in Iraq, have been ambushing Turkish soldiers since 1984 when they began calling for a separate state for the Kurds, a nation spread over five states, one half of whom (about 15 million) reside in Turkey. Since then an estimated 37,000 Kurds have perished at the hands of the PKK and the Turkish military. In October, the Turkish parliament voted 507 to 19 in favor of a motion giving the government of PM Tayyip Erdogan the thumbs up to invade northern Iraq to hunt down the PKK.

This fed the frenzy, but raised the hackles of the Kurds in Turkey, the semi-autonomous Kurdish government in northern Iraq, the Iraqi national government, and George Bush himself, who dispensed Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice to Ankara, and summoned Erdogan to Washington last week.

Calls to invade

On Saturday, the Kordon was crammed with Turks calling on the government to make good on the motion and invade. Marchers included men carry placards with the photos of dead soldiers, women in burkas (a rare sight in this officially secular country) and children wearing headbands with the words "I follow Ataturk," the revered former leader of the country. The peddlers selling balloon versions of the Turkish flag were doing a brisk business.

Simultaneously, 600 miles to the east in Ankara, anti-war activists were staging a rally in Shihhiye Square. Mehmet and Zuleyha were there, walking that wonky 301 line again with 40,000 other protesters carrying signs that read "Solve the Kurdish Problem in a Political Way," and "Don't Send Our Soldiers There."

Like Mehmet and Zuleyha, most rode the overnight bus on Friday, marched on Saturday, and returned to their homes around the country by overnight bus on Sunday. "Of course, we did have time to have a drink with old friends before we got back on those busses," Mehmet tells me. "I even ran into my sister."

Unions fueling demonstrations

Ironically, the original reason for the march wasn't to demonstrate against the possible invasion.

"The Confederation of Trade Unions of Public Employees, the Union of Turkish Chambers of Engineers and Architects, and the Turkish Union of Physicians had called for this rally months ago because with this government we can always find something to demonstrate against," Mehmet says mischievously.

"Originally we were demonstrating for a new free and democratic constitution. But with all the talk about invading Iraq, we changed the focus of the march to anti-war." And in another ironic twist, by deploying as many as 100,000 troops to the south-east border, the Turkish government seems to have given itself the evil eye.

Invading Iraq would upset the Americans and seriously impact Turkey's tenuous application for EU membership (made more tenuous by the existence of Article 301, which the EU is calling on Turkey to rescind before any membership application can go forward. All previous forays into northern Iraq to chase down the PKK have gummed up in the mountainous terrain. Worse, they've only served to help the PKK recruit more members.

But now that the population is whipped into a nationalistic, anti-Kurd frenzy, Erdogan's legitimacy would suffer if he doesn't invade, or at least put on the show of an invasion by bombing a few PKK bases. He seems to be clinging to the dubious strategy of getting the U.S. to believe he actually will invade, forcing the Bush administration to put further pressure on the Iraqi national government and the semi-autonomous Kurdish government to clamp down on the PKK.

Catch 301?

Still, if Erdogan really did want to ward of this evil eye of his own making, he does have a bondcuk available: the negotiated settlement called for by Mehmet's anti-war colleagues. Such an unlikely outcome would, of course, raise an interesting legal question: if Erdogan's government publicly questioned its own policy and turned its back on adopting the tediously inept logic of the blunt military solution, would it then have to charge itself with the denigration of Turkishness under Article 301?

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: iraq, turkey, kurdistan, article 301, labor movment

Cam Sylvester, a professor of international relations at Capilano College in North Vancouver, is traveling and researching in Turkey.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from World! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Turkey should be an example
Posted by: Democritus on Nov 23, 2007 4:28 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Turkey is an Islamic nation with a secular government. No imam can make political statements from the mosque. Ataturk is revered in Turkey as George Washington is revered in the United States. Turkey could be an example of how separation of religion and state should work.

Turkey also desperately wants to join the EU, even though only 2 per cent of the country is in Europe, the rest being in Asia. Toward this end, Turkey has abolished capital punishment and instituted other reforms insisted on by the EU nations.

If rule 301 is the only thing blocking EU membership, then Turkey should rescind it. If the PKK is attacking on Turkey's borders, then, as a NATO ally, the United States should put pressure on Iraq's government to help halt these raids. Turkey would be a valuable member of the EU. What the Turks need is support from other countries in their membership application and help against the Kurdish radicals. Unfortunately, Nency Pelosi's trying to condemn Turkey for a 1915 charge of genocide against Armenians has not helped cement relations between our two countries, relations that will help combat the rise of radical Islamists.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Turkey is not an ISLAMIC STATE
Posted by: Turiye on Nov 23, 2007 5:19 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Turkey is a secular Democracy, with total separation of church and state. I would actually like to see a photo of a TURKISH woman in a Burqa, indiginous to Afghanistan.
If from Far east side of Turkey it is an odd site to even see a woman in a niqab and abaya.
The persons murdered, 37,000, were Turkish citizens , not Kurds, the Kurds that were murdered were PKK, an internationaly branded terrorist group, whose offshoot group is responsible for terrorist attacks in Iran, PJAK.
The PKK were armed with weapons from the US, the "lost weapons", yeah.
The evil eye is called 'moshallah', not bondcuk, in Turkey at any Pazar, you will find for 10 cents things called incik bondcuk cheap little bracelets and things that children like for a jewelry surprise, or whatever you choose to call it. Speak to the people whose families were murdered by PKK, little more research would have helped in this article.
Many nations in the EU support Turkeys right to be admitted.
Read the 'New World Order" by Kemal Ataturk and understand this countrys government, with truth, not from a villager.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

No stopping it..
Posted by: messedup on Nov 23, 2007 6:22 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Considering that the U.S. is using the same chaos theory tactics as Israel does, why anyone would to even think the U.S. wants stabililty in the middle east is beyond me.

All we do is take turns selling weapons to the countries of the middle east, depending on which one we say is our ally buddy at said time.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Let us talk about AMERICA
Posted by: AMERICAN VETERAN on Nov 23, 2007 7:42 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
After all, it is where I/we live.

I will correct this statement and apply it where it is absolutely accurate:

"the line between political dissent and affronting "bushness" is a dangerous one to walk, especially since it wobbles wildly at the government's whim.

This filthy, lowlife bastard and its puppet master, cheneyscum have done the VERY SAME THING in the USA.
Do you think it's having you head in the clouds to believe that they have murdered disenters?
I do NOT.
I sincerely believe that these scumbags HAVE MURDERED AMERICAN CITIZENS to cover as many of their crimes against America as possible.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement