Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Iraq Sets the Stage for Possible U.S. War with Iran

By Peter Galbraith, The New York Review of Books and TomDispatch. Posted September 24, 2007.


The contest of control over Iraq between the U.S. and Iran is the largest potential crucible of disaster for the planet between now and January 2009.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

[This essay appears in the October 11, 2007 issue of the New York Review of Books and is posted here with the kind permission of the editors of that magazine.]

1.

In his continuing effort to bolster support for the Iraq war, President Bush traveled to Reno, Nevada, on August 28 to speak to the annual convention of the American Legion. He emphatically warned of the Iranian threat should the United States withdraw from Iraq. Said the President, "For all those who ask whether the fight in Iraq is worth it, imagine an Iraq where militia groups backed by Iran control large parts of the country."

On the same day, in the southern Iraqi city of Karbala, the Mahdi Army, a militia loyal to the radical Shiite cleric Moqtada al-Sadr, battled government security forces around the shrine of Imam Hussein, one of Shiite Islam's holiest places. A million pilgrims were in the city and fifty-one died.

The U.S. did not directly intervene, but American jets flew overhead in support of the government security forces. As elsewhere in the south, those Iraqi forces are dominated by the Badr Organization, a militia founded, trained, armed, and financed by Iran. When U.S. forces ousted Saddam's regime from the south in early April 2003, the Badr Organization infiltrated from Iran to fill the void left by the Bush administration's failure to plan for security and governance in post-invasion Iraq.

In the months that followed, the U.S.-run Coalition Provisional Authority (CPA) appointed Badr Organization leaders to key positions in Iraq's American-created army and police. At the same time, L. Paul Bremer's CPA appointed party officials from the Supreme Council for Islamic Revolution in Iraq (SCIRI) to be governors and serve on governorate councils throughout southern Iraq. SCIRI, recently renamed the Supreme Islamic Iraqi Council (SIIC), was founded at the Ayatollah Khomeini's direction in Tehran in 1982. The Badr Organization is the militia associated with SCIRI.

In the January 2005 elections, SCIRI became the most important component of Iraq's ruling Shiite coalition. In exchange for not taking the prime minister's slot, SCIRI won the right to name key ministers, including the minister of the interior. From that ministry, SCIRI placed Badr militiamen throughout Iraq's national police.

In short, George W. Bush had from the first facilitated the very event he warned would be a disastrous consequence of a U.S. withdrawal from Iraq: the takeover of a large part of the country by an Iranian-backed militia. And while the President contrasts the promise of democracy in Iraq with the tyranny in Iran, there is now substantially more personal freedom in Iran than in southern Iraq.

Iran's role in Iraq is pervasive, but also subtle. When Iraq drafted its permanent constitution in 2005, the American ambassador energetically engaged in all parts of the process. But behind the scenes, the Iranian ambassador intervened to block provisions that Tehran did not like. As it happened, both the Americans and the Iranians wanted to strengthen Iraq's central government. While the Bush administration clung to the mirage of a single Iraqi people, Tehran worked to give its proxies, the pro-Iranian Iraqis it supported -- by then established as the government of Iraq -- as much power as possible. (Thanks to Kurdish obstinacy, neither the U.S. nor Iran succeeded in its goal, but even now both the US and Iran want to see the central government strengthened.)

Since 2005, Iraq's Shiite-led government has concluded numerous economic, political, and military agreements with Iran. The most important would link the two countries' strategic oil reserves by building a pipeline from southern Iraq to Iran, while another commits Iran to providing extensive military assistance to the Iraqi government. According to a senior official in Iraq's Oil Ministry, smugglers divert at least 150,000 barrels of Iraq's daily oil exports through Iran, a figure that approaches 10 percent of Iraq's production. Iran has yet to provide the military support it promised to the Iraqi army. With the U.S. supplying 160,000 troops and hundreds of billions of dollars to support a pro-Iranian Iraqi government, Iran has no reason to invest its own resources.

Of all the unintended consequences of the Iraq war, Iran's strategic victory is the most far-reaching. In establishing the border between the Ottoman Empire and the Persian Empire in 1639, the Treaty of Qasr-i-Shirin demarcated the boundary between Sunni-ruled lands and Shiite-ruled lands. For eight years of brutal warfare in the 1980s, Iran tried to breach that line but could not. (At the time, the Reagan administration supported Saddam Hussein precisely because it feared the strategic consequences of an Iraq dominated by Iran's allies.) The 2003 U.S. invasion of Iraq accomplished what Khomeini's army could not. Today, the Shiite-controlled lands extend to the borders of Kuwait and Saudi Arabia. Bahrain, a Persian Gulf kingdom with a Shiite majority and a Sunni monarch, is most affected by these developments; but so is Saudi Arabia's Eastern Province, which is home to most of the kingdom's Shiites. (They may even be a majority in the province but this is unknown as Saudi Arabia has not dared to conduct a census.) The U.S. Navy has its most important Persian Gulf base in Bahrain while most of Saudi Arabia's oil is under the Eastern Province.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: iran, war, iraq, united states

Peter W. Galbraith, a former US Ambassador to Croatia, is Senior Diplomatic Fellow at the Center for Arms Control and a principal at the Windham Resources Group, a firm that negotiates on behalf of its clients in post-conflict societies, including Iraq. His The End of Iraq: How American Incompetence Created a War Without End is now out in paperback.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from World! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Your Choice
Posted by: Tom Degan on Sep 24, 2007 3:30 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Iranian threat?

The question is just screaming to be asked:

If you were forced at gun point to pick a country to live in, and you could only choose between Iran and Iraq - Where would you live?

Kind of a no-brainer, huh?

Tom Degan
Goshen, NY
"The Rant" by Tom Degan

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Easy. Posted by: Scientz
» RE: Your Choice Posted by: ShoShenQ
» IRAQ is safer Posted by: Ky Lake Dave
Galbraith's position is racist and disgusting
Posted by: citizenjoe on Sep 24, 2007 5:07 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Galbraith is one of the important ideologues for the DLC- the conservative, corporate democrats. This article sees Iran as the principal enemy of the USA-- exactly the position of the Bush administration. Galbraith is critical of Bush because he thinks Bush is incompetent in opposing the rise of Iranian power and influence. Like the conservative Democrats (I assume Galbraith is one of them), he sees Bush as an incompetent imperialist. Galbraith wants the Dems to be competent imperialists. To this end, Galbraith opposes a war with Iran. He thinks we can make a deal with them that will stabilize Iraq and allow the USA to overcome Iran gradually. He fails utterly to see that American imperial policy is the cause of Iranian hostility and he means to maintain that policy and do a better job of it than Bush. Galbraith's position is imperialist, supremacist and racist-- at the level of fundamental assumptions he is the same as Bush. Galbraith's position implies that if we CAN NOT make a deal with Iran, then we will have to attack them to stop them from becoming a great nuclear power. He is different from Bush on tactics, not on fundamental goals. He does not oppose attacking Iran if it is in the US imperial interests.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Iraq+Iran = a nice gift for the house of Saud!
Posted by: greentime on Sep 24, 2007 5:33 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And fulfillment for the radical christian base. This is what I always thought it was about.
Anyone?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

AmericKKKan Amnesia!
Posted by: williameon on Sep 24, 2007 6:17 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sit back in your chair and relax
We will lull you to sleep
And then
Terrorize and Torture you
Plant seeds of hate into your head.
Endless mind numbing,
Proper-gander.
Accept less while they steal more.
The Cor-‘pirates’ stole everything they own from you
Now they want your body too.
The last free countries on earth
Are the ones we are destroying now.
AmeriKKKlan humanitarian aid is shaped like a Bomb!
To Blast you into subsistence.
Basturd Cards for everyone.
We love ya to death,
Then rob you blind.
Homogenized Politicized
BU__! SH__!

Oil greases the Wheels
Of Amerian politics.
Bankers-R-US,
Run the SHOW.
They own you.
Summit to us or we will sig our attack dog AmeriKaKa on you
Usury are Us.
Pay the vig,
To the Corpirates.

The AmeriKKKlan dream
Is alive and well
In
Dick The Heartless
Chainey’s
Mind.
Submit and die.
What has he got to loose?
He's dead already!
A Corpirate Zombie,
Spewing Hate.
Let him mesmerize you
As
Your children are marched into a
Very Expensive
Shiny
New
Corpirate
Meat grinder
And?
Don’t forget!
Pay
The Bill.



Oh, what a wonderful world it could be?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: AmericKKKan Amnesia! Posted by: Knowmad
Galbraith's position is racist and disgusting
Posted by: citizenjoe on Sep 24, 2007 6:31 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Galbraith is one of the important ideologues for the DLC- the conservative, corporate democrats. This article sees Iran as the principal enemy of the USA-- exactly the position of the Bush administration. Galbraith is critical of Bush because he thinks Bush is incompetent in opposing the rise of Iranian power and influence. Like the conservative Democrats (I assume Galbraith is one of them), he sees Bush as an incompetent imperialist. Galbraith wants the Dems to be competent imperialists. To this end, Galbraith opposes a war with Iran. He thinks we can make a deal with them that will stabilize Iraq and allow the USA to overcome Iran gradually. He fails utterly to see that American imperial policy is the cause of Iranian hostility and he means to maintain that policy and do a better job of it than Bush. Galbraith's position is imperialist, supremacist and racist-- at the level of fundamental assumptions he is the same as Bush. Galbraith's position implies that if we CAN NOT make a deal with Iran, then we will have to attack them to stop them from becoming a great nuclear power. He is different from Bush on tactics, not on fundamental goals. He does not oppose attacking Iran if it is in the US imperial interests.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Creation of a Never Ending War was the purpose in the first Place.
Posted by: james2021 on Sep 24, 2007 6:49 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Military Inducstrial complex cannot make money from PEACE, only the Unending State of War allows them to make obscene profits. Also gives Dumbya the ability to control the USA from Washington. King George is following the Repugwican plan to a T. And we stupid fools elected this Dictator. TWICE.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» DID WE REALLY ELECT HIM Posted by: Krain61
Who knew..?
Posted by: TJ-stars4peace on Sep 24, 2007 7:37 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thanks I would have never figured this out for myself..!

Jeeze Louise..!


The corporate fascist bankers and corporations want this war David Rockefeller wants to destroy America and create his one world fascist banking wet dream and he's gonna get it..!

Who cares how many millions upon million die not the Bush family..!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Michaelflyfisher
Posted by: Michaelflyfisher on Sep 24, 2007 7:50 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why isn't Bush as upset about the Saudi weapons and military support for the insurgents? Could it be the family commection to Bin laden or is it just the fact that the OIL is there and we already get it.

There is pletty of unsolicited information that Saudi's are deeply engaged in supporting Bin Laden and the Telaban. See the book "Three Cups of Tea" for Mortenson's early identification of the Saudi's supporting radical islamic schools all over Pakistan and Afghanistan.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

We know nothing
Posted by: motamanx on Sep 24, 2007 8:46 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We know nothing about Iran, just as we knew nothing about Iraq. We cannot trust those such as Peter Galbraith to tell us, either.

We are getting ready (again) to fight a war based on myth and conjecture. Moreover, it is illegal to stage "pre-emptive" strikes. Hitler used to try that, with bad results for him. That is why we have the United Nations Charter, an agreement written, and signed, by the US. It is the very reason for the UN!

Look how the Iraq War turned out. Based on Cheney's lies, how could it have turned out otherwise?

Can't anything to be done to stop these idiotic moves by this administration?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Spoof: Canada Sets the Stage for Possible China War with U.S.
Posted by: Iconoclast421 on Sep 24, 2007 11:11 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's been 4 years since China invaded Canada. China accuses the US government of arming Canadian insurgents. US-made weapons are found in Vancouver and Toronto. US president denies any involvement. However he does admit that he does not have the resources to stop everyone who takes it upon themselves to travel across the northern border illegally. Some of these people may have brought arms with them. The vice president reportedly stated that "perhaps China should have thought of that before they invaded? I expected more from Sun Tsu and Confucius."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» oops Posted by: Iconoclast421
"The United States cannot now undo..."
Posted by: leafsong1 on Sep 24, 2007 12:40 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"President Bush's strategic gift to Iran."
I would add "...without invading Iran."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

WW III
Posted by: unity1 on Sep 24, 2007 4:34 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I couldn't continue reading this long article, the voices the tone the words, I've heard them all before, but what I am not hearing is the very real threat to world stability (sic) the threat of WW III

Do you americans not realise that if your nation bombs Iran that your nation will have set in motion a chain of events that will most likey almost probably result in WW III and that this war will not be fought in the ME alone but in your own nation

do you not realise that your president, your government and all the institutions who support this move, will be putting YOUR families in grave danger, that they are calling for war a war that will certinaly involve Russia and China as allies to Iran who will not hesitate to bomb you where you live - do you not see this

at least it will give star wars a run for its money to see if things work, meanwhile you will pay with your lives and you will be paying the price of your governments blood lust

I just wish you would all wake up and realise how close you all are to being part of WW III

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

If they can do/try it in Burma...
Posted by: Aussie Kim on Sep 24, 2007 6:22 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
a country that no one in power even thinks about, much less actually helps...

...then they can one day do it in Iran.

Leave them alone to have their own revolution because as Iraq and Afghanistan clearly demonstrate, invasions to "bring democracy" do NOT work.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

YES !
Posted by: ShoShenQ on Sep 24, 2007 9:56 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
lets carpet bomb the Aliens !

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Underlying Motivation?
Posted by: herbal on Sep 25, 2007 12:17 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is great to see this subject of Iran invasion explored. Nuclear war is being threatened against Iran by none other than Democrat Hillary Clinton. To get a better idea of why this work is so important, please watch this hair raising video footage of Hillary addressing AIPAC (3 min.), Hillary's "No options left on the table..." nuclear threat.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZVWagtd8uwM&mode=related&search=

Then consider more AIPAC footage:
Rev. Hagee the self-described Christian Zionist. rapture cultist: www.youtube.com/watch?v=EDRxmqOn7x4&mode=related&search=

President Jimmy Carter, for all his past failings, has broached a critically important imperative. He has taken on the Israeli lobby and broken the ice for Rabbi Michael Lerner and all mainline Christians who repudiate the cult of the religious right.

Rabbi Michael Lerner heartily endorsed Carter's 'Apartheid' book and, has endured condemnation by fundamentalist but political Zionists for his commitment to peace work.
"The Israel Lobby (excerpt from Tikkun newsletter)
"In this Issue Tikkun Editor Rabbi Michael Lerner responds to the recent publication of The Israel Lobby by John Walt and Stephen Mearsheimer by giving an in-depth analysis of one of the most important issues in U.S. politics today: The power of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) to control the relationship between the United States and Israel.

"He comes to one conclusion: AIPAC is bad for the Jews, bad for the U.S., and bad for the world and he tells why.
This is not only a Jewish issue. Lerner presents ideas for how the Network of Spiritual Progressives can become the interfaith alternative to the Israel Lobby and shows that it can only do so with the help of non-Jews as well as Jews.

"Walt and Mearsheimer are speaking at a series of Tikkun forums. The first was held September 19th in Berkeley, California at 2345 Channing Way at 7:00 p.m. (reservations through Cody's bookstore)."

Editorial comment: Will US foreign policy continue to be directed by AIPAC under Hillary Clinton? Will she follow through with her campaign threat? The threat to Iran will not end when democrats win the White House.

All the candidates need to be asked if they have accepted donations from foreign agencies and lobbies like AIPAC. It is time to join with the Jewish peace activists here and in Israel, and not fear the Lukid Zionist backlash of AIPAC. Israelis are deeply divided over war and peace issues; we simply don't get their news past the US corporate media censors. Hillary Clinton represents a travesty of an added 4 to 8 years of worse world hegemony than Bush Jr. Let us not forget her perfect Bush agenda voting record up until the day her campaign began!

Jimmy Carter's Palestine, Peace not Apartheid chronicles and documents years of personal involvement and committment to peace and the wanton betrayal of good work by the Bush Administration and a potential betrayal by an ambitious Hillary Clinton. Its a plain truth read and a solid gift for the peace effort.

An nuclear invasion of Iran would ensure the defeat of the United States, it is fair to predict. The world would bring the economy to its knees with an easy to orchestrate boycott of US goods and services, given the worldwide outrage that would ensue. OPEC would switch its exchange currency from $USD to the Euro and interrupt flow of oil to North America. Certainly Iran would inherit control of Iraq and its minority Sunni people, thanks to the Bush Administration's execution of Saddam Hussein and destruction of his pro-western Baathist regime. He was, after all, our rascal.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

USA is Winning much to the dismay of Progressives. Who are you rooting for?
Posted by: Ky Lake Dave on Sep 25, 2007 7:58 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The surge is working. The streets are safer. 3119 of our military have died so far in Iraq. These brave volunteers and the ones still fighting for our country and our countrys interest are doing a great job. We are hoping and praying they will be home victorious soon. (Well some of us are hoping they are victorious). If we give up now the 3119 have died for nothing. Bin Laden will be proved correct by his prediction that the American people do not have the stomach for war. Our military will come home with heads hung low and humilated. Just like Vietnam. Millions of Iraq will be murdered and Iran swoop in to take over Iraq.
A friend of mine just returned from Iraq. He was working there as a contractor for the last 2 years. He brought home good news of the events in Iraq. He showed me literally hundreds of photos. Most of Iraq Men Women and Children hugging and tossing flowers at the U.S. Military. He said the Iraq people love americans. He just shakes his head at the news reports he sees on TV and tells me he just does not know what war they are covering. He told me that if you turned a corner and the street was empty and quiet, then the insergents were about to attack. The Iraq people could not warn the Military for fear of repercustions from insergents. But they signal the Military by deserting the streets as a warning.
Since our troops liberated Iraq women rights have soared.
Women can now VOTE. DRIVE A CAR. OCCUPY A JOB, GO TO SCHOOL, and even BECOME AN ELECTED OFFICIAL.
President Bush has done for Iraq Women what President Lincoln did for the American Slaves. He has FREED them.
What dissapoints me about our President is that he is completely ignoring Illegal Immigration. Illegal Aliens murder 12 people per day.

Americans killed in Iraq war 3119 to date.
Murdered by Illegals since war began 19600.
So more Americans are MURDERED by Illegals six to one over Insergents.
WOW
Iraq is safer than Iran any idiot knows that but maybe Iraq is safer for Americans than AMERICA.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» WHAT'S THE MATTER BRYCE, Posted by: Constitutionalist75
Reliance on propaganda is shirking responsibility.
Posted by: herbal on Sep 25, 2007 11:44 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This address covers a speech by John Pilger, an Australian war corespondent about the distortion and commissions of spoiled journalists. It places the burden of enquiry on the individual. One must dig for truth and confirmation of every attitude that is promoted by the media:

http://www.alternativeradio.org/programs/PILJ002.shtml

This is a letter today I recieved from my friend who works for a Catholic relief organization in Jerusalem. They minister to the remaining 10% of the Christian Arab Palestinan population that remains in Palestine and who recieve the same treatment as the Moslem Arabs. Yes, there is persecution of Christians by Israelis in the refugee camps and elsewhere in Israel:
Dear L.
Hope you are all well. How is your mom? Please give her my very best wishes.

I was in Rome in April and I had a chance to meet some people from Iraq who are living the day to day existence.

I told one of them, a woman, that she ought to write some of her stories down.

It is really dangerous for them to talk to anyone about what is happening to them because it could cost them their lives.

I don't know how one might give them a voice in safety.
write back and take care
...am

He marked this as private correspondence so I deleted his name. He also has to be careful as free speech does not exist in Israel.

Only the naive think all is ducky when glowing reports of 'progress' before appropriations requests hearings are presented. We allow ourselves to be suckered by war profiteers to avoid accountability for our own complicity in genocide.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

All these megalomaniacal idiots
Posted by: Constitutionalist75 on Sep 26, 2007 11:36 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
like Bush, Cheney, Putin, Amadinijad, various corporate CEOs, and others around the World, are each dreaming of their own ever-expanding empire to express their rage at the limitations of life on Earth - and as such they are all suicidal wackos and should be locked away so the rest of humanity can work out our problems in peace.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]