Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

The Iraq News Black-Out: How the Press Spent Its Summer Vacation

By Eric Boehlert, Media Matters for America. Posted September 5, 2007.


Americans are hungry for news out of Iraq. News directors prefer covering Paris Hilton.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Reposted with permission from Media Matters. See original here.

News that Katie Couric would anchor the CBS Evening News from Baghdad this week created a major media splash. After earlier suggesting that type of assignment would be too treacherous for a single mother of two, Couric did an about-face. She stressed that as a journalist she wanted to get a better sense, a firsthand account, of how events were unfolding inside Iraq; to give the story more context.

It's ironic because if CBS had simply aired more reporting from Iraq this summer instead of joining so many other news outlets in walking away from the story, then perhaps Couric wouldn't have had to travel 8,000 miles to find out the facts on the ground.

Couric's high-profile assignment helps underscore the shocking disconnect that has opened up between American news consumers and the mainstream media. The chasm revolves around the fact that public polling indicates consumers are starved for news from Iraq, yet over the summer the mainstream media, and particularly television outlets such as CBS, steadfastly refused to deliver it. The press has walked away from what most Americans claim is the day's most important ongoing news event.

The media's coverage from Iraq has naturally ebbed and flowed over the four-and-a-half years since the invasion. And escalating security concerns in Iraq have made it both more difficult and more expensive for news organization to operate there.

But the pullback we've seen this summer, the chronic dearth of on-the-ground reporting, likely marks a new low of the entire campaign. It's gotten to the point where even monstrous acts of destruction cannot wake the press from its self-induced slumber. Just recall the events of August 14.

That's when witnesses to the four synchronized suicide truck bombs that detonated in northern Iraq on that day described the collective devastation unleashed to being like an earthquake, or even the site of a nuclear bomb explosion; the destruction of one bomb site measured half a mile wide. A U.S. Army spokesman, after surveying the mass carnage from an attack that targeted Yazidis, an ancient religious community, called the event genocidal. Indeed, more than 500 Iraqis were killed, more than 1,500 were wounded, and 400 buildings were destroyed.

The bombings in the towns of Tal al-Azizziyah and Sheikh Khadar marked the deadliest attack of the entire Iraq war. In fact, with a death toll topping 500, the mid-August bombing ranks as the second deadliest terror strike ever recorded in modern times. Only the coordinated attacks on 9-11 have claimed more innocent lives. Yet the press failed to put the story in context.

Early news dispatches about the attacks (which pegged the early death toll at a smaller, but still remarkable, 175) were posted around 6 p.m. ET on August 14. Yet that night on CNN's Anderson Cooper 360, the hour-long news program that airs at 10 p.m., the carnage from Iraq garnered just a brief report, and that was relegated to the "360 Bulletin," halfway through the program; a report on a playground catching on fire due to spontaneous combustion of decomposing wood chips was given slightly more airtime and, unlike the suicide bombings, prompted a reaction from host Cooper himself: "That's incredible. I never heard of that." Less surprising was the fact that a pro-Bush outlet such as The Drudge Report, as late as 10:30 p.m. that night, was ignoring the massive blast headline, or that Fox News gave the gruesome attack just three mentions all evening.

The next day, as noted by the Columbia Journalism Review, the story was placed on A6 in both The New York Times and the Los Angeles Times, and Page 4 of USA Today. On that evening's NBC Nightly News, the historic massacre from Iraq was not even tapped as the day's most important story. (Ongoing mortgage woes led the broadcast that night.)


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: media, iraq

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from World! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Meeting their Real Customers' Needs
Posted by: EKSwitaj on Sep 8, 2007 1:51 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When it comes to the mainstream media, journalism is indeed a business, but its customers are not the viewers at home. Rather, the customers are the advertisers. While the interests of advertisers often overlap with that of the viewing audience (since more eyes on the news means more eyes on the ads), it's important to remember that they are not identical. No matter how much people want to learn about the situation in Iraq, they're very unlikely to run out and buy a cheeseburger after hearing about an explosion that killed 500 people.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Meeting their Real Customers' Needs Posted by: The Old Hippie
It's not what they say...
Posted by: peacelf on Sep 8, 2007 4:56 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
With the mainstream media it's never been about what they say; it's what they don't say that's important. Those of us who utilize the internet and other news sources already know this, but the reasons for neglect in reporting certain stories goes far beyond war reporting fatigue.

The role of mainstream media in the empire of wealthy corporations is to attract and distract. In other words, get you attention on stories like Paris Hilton, Anna Nicole to distract you from stories like the mounting death toll in Iraq or some corporate malfeasance that might expose the corporate media's own favorable bias toward the wealthy. Such is the state of media in an empire. Indeed, I don't recall hearing the words "empire" or "imperialism" used in the corporate media.

Not even our beloved Keith Olbermann uses these words (that I recall). Nor, have I heard them used on PBS news, one of the few news outlets that provide daily coverage of Iraq and a moment of silence for the fallen soldiers at the end of the program.

Without "imperialism" awareness, news falls into the mundane, another day in america routine. We citizens of the empire walk and talk as if we're any other country any place else in the "free world," when we're anything but. The U.S. is the world's only superpower, and the white male club known as neo-cons at the helm are steering america down the path of total domination, an evil purpose seen only in cartoons like Pinky and the Brain. (Bush, of course, is Pinky and either Cheney or Rove could play the Brain.)

My point is this: we live in an empire and until that awareness and its consequences creeps into the consciousness of nearly ever american, including the so-called journalists who report the mundane, nothing will stop the next president or the one after that, Dem or Repub, from carrying the torch of empire into the next village to pillage and burn.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Here's to Big News Media from Americans.....
Posted by: eosrk on Sep 8, 2007 6:13 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
we're tired of the bullshit news you've been giving us for the past seven years or so, which is probably why all your heavy hitters are sinking.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

No matter what anyone says or does
Posted by: Constitutionalist75 on Sep 8, 2007 6:19 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
the Cheny/Bush Administration is determined to establish a permanent military base in Iraq to dominate the Middle East together with Israel, but no prime time reporter would end their career to say so, least of all the first woman to anchor a TV news show. The Media and George Bush have the same job - to string the people along with false hopes that a return of their sons and daughters from Iraq is only a few montha away, when in fact U.S. strategy is to rule that region forever by whatever means necessary, including World War Three.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: No matter what anyone says or does Posted by: Constitutionalist75
The Bilderbergers are in Control of our/ their Media..
Posted by: TJ-stars4peace on Sep 8, 2007 9:32 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We've noticed this, it is everything and anything but Iraq..

That's due to the Bilderbergers controlling our Media, David Rockefeller and the rest those corporate banking fascist swine...

Go ask Wolf Blitzer or Tim Russert.. or Charlie Rose even about the Bilderbergers and watch them freak and cut to a commercial..or dive under the table or bounce off the walls..

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

TV News
Posted by: improperly_sedated on Sep 8, 2007 11:18 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The TV News is neither a public service nor a business. They have already been taken to court on the first point and won when some ethical reporters on the Fox payroll tried to go after Monsanto. We should all know by now that these talking heads are all just PR flacks for their parent corporations. They don't need to make a profit directly, they need to make their bosses look good so that they can make profits elsewhere.

Maybe that's where we can go after them.

Ever since the Dodge brothers sued Henry Ford for having too long range of a business plan, it has been a matter of settled law in the US that for profit corporations must pursue profit above all else, and that ANY MINORITY STOCKHOLDER can demand this, even when it flies in the face of the long term well being of the company.

By giving tabloid crap to a public that wants real news, they are deliberately taking a hit in their ratings and in their revenues.

We just need a little bit of money to buy stock and a whole lot of money for lawyers.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

even PBS
Posted by: fg on Sep 8, 2007 2:22 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I was taken aback a couple years ago when Charlie Rose--yes, even he--got bent out of shape when a guest contended the national media is doing the work of big business.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What Do You Know Of APEC
Posted by: Nedtheredhead on Sep 8, 2007 7:36 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As a matter of interest as to what coverage US media gave the recent APEC meeting held in Sydney over the past few days, how many readers know what the conference was about, who attended, what it achieved, what security measures were like, and what do the initials stand for. Your president called it OPEC, how ignorant is the rest of the US?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: What Do You Know Of APEC Posted by: vox persona
» RE: What Do You Know Of APEC Posted by: Nedtheredhead
» RE: What Do You Know Of APEC Posted by: Constitutionalist75
» RE: What Do You Know Of APEC Posted by: Nedtheredhead
Something emblematic of the Problem
Posted by: bcgirl125 on Sep 8, 2007 9:39 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
on Fox News Geraldo show today (sept 8). Geraldo was blabbering with some blond news anchor about a vice principal who left her child to die in a hot car. The interview was being held outdoors, and he and the anchor were completely surrounded by a large group of at least 100 9/11 truthers, yelling and waving signs challenging Geraldo to investigate. But he just ignored them and continued on with the sensationalistic, blame-the-working-mother story. At the end of the interview, Geraldo brushed off the crowd with a segue into the Craig sex story (also grossly over-covered) that went something like, "I bet those people are all interested in a story about bathroom sex!"

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Something emblematic of the Problem Posted by: Constitutionalist75
Broadcast Journalism is Dead
Posted by: Tom Degan on Sep 9, 2007 7:06 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Can you hear it? Listen Closley....That faint rumbling you hear in the distance is the sound of Edward R. Murrow and Eric Sevareid doing sommersaults in their graves!

It is worth noting that in the run-up to the worst foreign policy blunder in American history, while the corporate media were banging the drums of war, the only news organizations that got the story right (Knight-Ridder for instance) were those which operated outside of the Washington beltway mentality. Independant journalists like Bob Herbert, Greg Palast and the late, great Molly Ivins who tried to light tiny candles of reason in the dark night of mindless nationalism were dismissed as "unpatriotic". Instead of paying attention to the criminal machinations of their government, the foolish American people were happily being spoon fed near lethal doses of info-taining pornography by the likes of FOX Noise. Just look at the result....

Tom Degan
Goshen, NY
"The Rant" by Tom Degan

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

No wonder the press shitted on Mica when she REFUSED to cover Paris Hilton.
Posted by: maxpayne on Sep 9, 2007 7:20 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
But how surprising can that be considering that throughout the summer of 2001, the media was playing goose chase on the Chandra Levy vs Gary Condit BULLSHIT while at the same time, 20 hijackers were preparing for the BIG 9/11 BOMB. You'd think the media motherfuckers would have learned their lessons by then. But why bother to even watch the television when there is no such thing as real news on the tellies these days? Instead of worrying about the tellies getting worse, you'd better make sure the Internet does not become as corrupt or this planet is history for good !

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Try living in a red state
Posted by: rk_tech68fl on Sep 9, 2007 11:42 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...and you'll understand why the media gets away with under-reporting the Iraq war. It is simply a subject that many people are not willing to engage with intellectually. It's a rarity to even meet anyone who reads beyond the local newspaper...a source which is nothing more than a forum for local squabbles and conservative/libertarian apologists. They walk away pumped up with rightwing boilerplate thinking they are informed, then dial up 'Hannity radio' or O'Reilly TV for affirmation. I have to disagree that people want more coverage on Iraq when it's obvious many want delusion.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Try living in a blue state Posted by: bcgirl125
Corporate Medium
Posted by: frank69 on Sep 9, 2007 12:28 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Anyone who depends upon television for NEWS, isn't playing with a full deck! Walter Cronkite said the same thing more than 40 years ago. In the sixties, Newton Minnow, a member of the FCC, called television "A vast wasteland." It has gotten worse, much worse. It's hard to believe, but, in fact, WE the PEOPLE actually OWN the AIRWAVES! Look it up!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Corporate Medium Posted by: Tom Degan