Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Olbermann: Bush Is Just Trying to Play Us With 'Troop Withdrawal' in Iraq

By Keith Olbermann, Countdown. Posted September 8, 2007.


Bush says his new goal is to have the presidential candidates "comfortable about sustaining a presence" in Iraq, contradicting every rationale for his Iraq policy he's offered.
Olbermann's Special Comment on Bush's Iraq Visit
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

The following is MSNBC Countdown host Keith Olbermann's special comment addressed to President Bush.

And so he is back from his annual surprise gratuitous photo-op in Iraq, and what a sorry spectacle it was. But it was nothing compared to the spectacle of one unfiltered, unguarded, horrifying quotation in the new biography to which Mr. Bush has consented.

As he deceived the troops at Al-Asad Air Base yesterday with the tantalizing prospect that some of them might not have to risk being killed and might get to go home, Mr. Bush probably did not know that, with his own words, he had already proved that he had been lying, is lying and will be lying about Iraq.

He presumably did not know that there had already appeared those damning excerpts from Robert Draper's book Dead Certain.

"I'm playing for October-November," Mr. Bush said to Draper. That, evidently, is the time during which, he thinks he can sell us the real plan, which is "to get us in a position where the presidential candidates will be comfortable about sustaining a presence."

Comfortable, that is, with saying about Iraq, again quoting the President, "stay ... longer."

And there it is. We've caught you. Your goal is not to bring some troops home, maybe, if we let you have your way now. Your goal is not to set the stage for eventual withdrawal. You are, to use your own disrespectful, tone-deaf word, playing at getting the next Republican nominee to agree to jump into this bottomless pit with you, and take us with him, as we stay in Iraq for another year, and another, and another, and anon.

Everything you said about Iraq yesterday, and everything you will say, is a deception, for the purpose of this one cynical, unacceptable, brutal goal: perpetuating this war indefinitely.

War today, war tomorrow, war forever!

And you are playing at it! Playing!

A man with any self respect, having inadvertently revealed such an evil secret, would have already resigned and fled the country! You have no remaining credibility about Iraq.

And yet, yesterday at Al-Asad, Mr. Bush kept playing, and this time, using the second of his two faces.

The president told reporters, "They (General Petraeus and Ambassador Crocker) tell me if the kind of success we are now seeing continues, it will be possible to maintain the same level of security with fewer American forces."

And so, Mr. Bush got his fraudulent headlines today. "Bush May Bring Some Troops Home."

While the reality is, we know from what he told Draper, that the president's true hope is that they will not come home; but that they will stay there, because he is keeping them there now, in hope that those from his political party fighting to succeed him will prolong this unendurable disaster into the next decade.

But, to a country dying of thirst, the president seemed to vaguely promise a drink from a full canteen -- a promise predicated on the assumption that he is not lying.

Yet you are lying, Mr. Bush. Again. But now, we know why.

You gave away more of yourself than you knew in the Draper book. And you gave away more still, on the arduous trip back out of Iraq hours in the air, without so much as a single vacation.

"If you look at my comments over the past eight months," you told reporters, "it's gone from a security situation in the sense that we're either going to get out and there will be chaos, or, more troops. Now, the situation has changed, where I'm able to speculate on the hypothetical."

Mr. Bush, the only "hypothetical" here is that you are not now holding our troops hostage. You have no intention of withdrawing them. But that doesn't mean you can't pretend you're thinking about it, does it?

That is your genius as you see it, anyway. You can deduce what we want. We, the people, remember us? And then use it against us.

You can hold that canteen up and promise it to the parched nation. And the untold number of Americans whose lives have not been directly blighted by Iraq or who do not realize that their safety has been reduced and not increased by Iraq, they will get the bullet points: "Bush is thinking about bringing some troops home. Bush even went to Iraq."


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: bush, white house, keith olbermann, iraq policy

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from World! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Withdrawal?
Posted by: TT5 on Sep 8, 2007 12:26 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Might quite frankly be a bit too late for that. Too much damage has already been done!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» But then again! Posted by: TT5
» RE: But then again! Posted by: Dboy
» RE: But then again! Posted by: Gisele
» RE: But then again! Posted by: Dboy
» RE: But then again! Posted by: Brooklynbrenda
» RE: But then again! Posted by: Dboy
Brilliant
Posted by: vox persona on Sep 8, 2007 12:45 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I love Olberman's Special Comments. Between his biting dissent of BushCo in all its arrogance, and Daily Show's Jon Stewart's brutal satire, we see we see some of the best America has to offer by way of opposition to the imperial militarism of a regime installed by one vote in a Republican stacked "Supreme Court", who blew all their credibility when they actually stopped the counting of votes in order to coronate our supreme dear leader. I can't decide if Bush is just trying to run out the clock, or if there is some nefarious scheme to use a false flag attack to finalize the consolidation of power now that 'signing statements' and executive orders (neither of which are written in Article II) have greased the skids to more easily declare Martial Law. I don't put anything past this crowd, and feel lied to so much that I use their words as a negative barometer of truth, beginning with candidate Bush campaigning against 'nation building', saying that we cannot be the world's policeman. The mack daddy of all lies was when he repeatedly promised that 'given authorization' (again, not in the Constitution), war in Iraq would be fought only as a 'last resort'. Were any other resorts even tried? A last resort cannot be the first thing you try. He destroyed a country, single handedly unleashed a latent civil war, set our troops up as targets (his 'bring'em on' taunt made them into magnets for the most vicious elements in the world), destroyed alliances with his my way or the highway stance, made us the pariah, shredded the Constitution (starting with the 4th Ammendment, Article I Section 8, and Article II), stacked the mining commission with the biggest polluters and every environmental agency with the biggest lobbyists, and is trying to privatize every facet of government......I could go on and on but I'm getting carpal tunnel. What's not to like?
I don't believe a thing these guys say. Bush is the worst thing that's ever happened to this country, believe him at your own risk. God help us all.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The How and Why of Successful Warmongering
Posted by: Roy Eidelson on Sep 8, 2007 2:44 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
From a psychological perspective, it's also important to consider how and why this warmongering has "worked" so effectively. I've tried to address these questions in a 10-minute online video entitled “Resisting the Drums of War” that I recently completed. It examines how the Bush administration has promoted the misguided and destructive war in Iraq by targeting five core concerns that often govern our lives--concerns about vulnerability, injustice, distrust, superiority, and helplessness. Looking ahead, the continuing occupation of Iraq--or an attack on Iran--will likely be sold to us in much the same way. The video examines these warmongering appeals and how to counter them. It’s available for viewing HERE.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Get an editor
Posted by: Dr T on Sep 8, 2007 3:36 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
An old friend, who also appreciates Keith Olbermann, sent me a very thoughful reply in response to his latest editorial:


Saw & heard Olbermann's recent rant....I seldom miss his show. BUT, brevity is clarity, especially with commentary....2 minutes should be PLENTY.  You never saw Eric Severeid flap on like that. He just leaned into your living room, bad bottom teeth and all, and told you what was what --- and he was fucking GREAT. Olbermann needs an editor who won't back down, who can trim and hone and shape that hour into a masterpiece every goddam night. Right now it's all Keith, and that's HIS tight writing throughout, obviously. But he is also just chock full of himself, and that detracts from the impact of the show in its entirety.

I am not making these judgements off the top of my head, without portfolio. TV news is what I did for years, including being the producer of thirty minute and hour-long news shows, and also reporting & writing editorials. And not just in Rochester...in Boston at WBZ-TV, and at KRON-TV Ch 4 in San Francisco too.  It was back in the day, of course, but it was also back when news was NOT fluff, nor funny, nor pretty. And although technically it cannot even come close to the slick stuff they do now, the content was much more measured, more carefully vetted, with much more real news in it as well. The reason: it was NOT expected to make any money! It was a station or network's loss leader, their showcase for what was real and important to the community. All that is gone now, and I am boring myself with this diatribe, so will stop here.

Keith's show is good, and VERY ambitious. I'd like to see it REALLY break away, like Moyers has done with his FRONTLINE stuff.  All it would take is two tons of money, loads of talent, and real commitment on the part of the NBC network and its corporate owners.

First thing to go? Edward R Murrow's stolen "Good night and good luck" signoff, and the copy thrown at the lens. How totally sophomoric and trivializing.

Keith...get over yourself. You're just not there yet....and those are VERY big shoes.  

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Get an editor Posted by: Dboy
» RE: Get an editor-I agree Posted by: bookie
» RE: Get an editor Posted by: VannaLaRoche
» RE: Get an editor Posted by: AKRASS65
» RE: Get an editor Posted by: peacefullaim
» Olbermann needs more than an editor Posted by: Conservasaurus
» RE: Conservasaurus = smoking crack Posted by: Conservasaurus
» RE: Conservasaurus = smoking crack Posted by: Conservasaurus
» RE: Get an editor Posted by: TruthBeTold
» RE: Get an editor Posted by: Dboy
» RE: Get an editor Posted by: Conservasaurus
» RE: Get an editor Posted by: Wacre
» RE: Get an editor Posted by: Conservasaurus
» "Too many notes, Herr Mozart"? Posted by: Sojourner
talk is cheap (and non-threatening to power)
Posted by: Dboy on Sep 8, 2007 3:56 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We can talk as much as we want to, as long as we do not possess the power to take action.

This was yet-another great rant by Olbermann; he's been impressing me quite a bit lately. But I do fear for his safety. This government is much more dangerous that we realise. They will let nothing, and certainly not Olbermann, from throwing a wrench into their plans for world domination.

I'm thankful we have people like Olbermann out there to spot these little imperfections in the Matrix that popup now and then. This particular one tell me that Bush's last year in office is all about positioning Iraq so that the illegal occupation will be continued by the next president. So the thing to ask now is which candidates, both republican and democratic are most likely to agree to continuation of the occupation? In my mind, any Republican except Ron Paul would continue on present course. On the democratic side, Hillary and Obama are most likely to continue the occupation as well. Hillary because she's the corporate candidate, and basically a neocon. And Obama, because his number one financial supporter is the Israeli lobby. The only way to clean up this country and turn it back into America again is to elect a true reformer with integrity. The only candidate that can do it is Ron Paul.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» anti-Amerikkan? Posted by: LMNOP
» RE: anti-Amerikkan? Posted by: Conservasaurus
» RE: anti-Amerikkan? Posted by: LMNOP
» RE: anti-Amerikkan? Posted by: Conservasaurus
the people
Posted by: sre on Sep 8, 2007 4:51 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
They all have their lattes, SUVs, and cell phones. The people of this country are the most complacent in this world. There will be no action against this president, or his agenda. The people won't wake up until too late. Get out while you can. Move far away.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: the people Posted by: Dboy
» RE: the people Posted by: LMNOP
We are a shameful nation the USA
Posted by: scott balogh on Sep 8, 2007 6:50 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We the people allow and deserve this shanghai-ing. We do not care enough to do what must be done today to turn our fate around. We will continue to be mostly apathetic to the abuse of power we are experiencing at the hands of the ruling plutocracy. What needs to happen is a class revolution replete with the guillotine. Talk IS cheap. Who holds the power over the military? Bush's bosses, that's who. The congress, the supreme court and the executive branch are all under the control of the same faceless power mafia. Find them, destroy them then take back the government. No more campaign donations either. Are we brave enough or hurting enough to do what MUST be done?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: We are an angry nation, beware! Posted by: LeftCoastProgressive
Bush lies
Posted by: frank69 on Sep 8, 2007 6:53 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Remember, whatever Bush says he will do, He actually WILL DO JUST THE OPPOSITE!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

AKRASS65
Posted by: AKRASS65 on Sep 8, 2007 7:05 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Keith Olberman is brillant. He is extraordinarily intelligent, knows his facts, speaks the truth with the back up of the facts, shows great humour, outstandingly articulate. Has astounding courage, to " SAY IT LIKE IT REALLY IS"

Keith is the real deal, I live just to watch his show. Now with all that said, he is also so very HANDSOME and that simile, WOW. Wish we had more Keith Olbermann's

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Olbermann is only saying what I've been saying all along
Posted by: sausage on Sep 8, 2007 8:30 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Regardless of what We the People of the United States do or say or think:The United States will never leave Iraq until and unless either one of two events happen: Either a battlefield defeat of American forces in detail, meaning high U.S. casualties followed by a mass surrender, and considering the weapons and training of the Iraqi "insurgents," whoever they may be at any given time, a high unlikely scenario; or a general mutiny of all, or at the very least a sizable majority of army and marine units now in Iraq. Also a highly unlikely scenario

There are two overriding principles guiding both the openly bellicose Congressional and administration Republicans and the overtly pacifistic militarists among Congressional Democrats: oil and a permanent America military presence in the Middle East.

After losing our puppet dictator the late Shah of Iran in 1979, the American counterbalance, and covert ally, to Israel in the region, the United States has long sought a permanent and safe base from which to project military power. Our politicians call it "bringing stability to the region." And, of course, the object of our affection, Saudi Arabia, would make a good permanet base, had it not been for "religious" considerations: We must not let our Saudi clients, who happily sell oil to Israel now that the Shah is history, look too much like the puppets they really are to the wider Islamic world.

Face it, the United States for better or worse, much worse because the current occupation is a Clifornia-sized boat anchor on the economy, is stuck in Iraq for the foreseeable future.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Our Troops our Families, His family no show..no go..!
Posted by: TJ-stars4peace on Sep 8, 2007 9:16 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Keith some of us as myself have family already on their 4th, that's 4th deployment since 9/11, to either Afghanistan to overthrow the Taliban and get al-Qaeda and also Iraq to topple Saddam and assist in the occupation, he's my first cousins husband who also served in the first Gulf War as well..

This time was the only time that he was less than Gung-Ho about going, and he has also served our nation at the very top seeing Dick Cheney everyday for a while and involved in the recovering of our F-117 stealth fighter pilot along with many others but a true hero, father of three still very young children and this 4th deployment has of course been extended...

We should all realize by now that Bush intends to see no end to this conflict and that in reality long before there is any real with drawl of American troops from Iraq we will ignite the entire region and possibly most of the world with an attack upon Iran..!

Iraq as bad as it's been and wasteful and costly in money and even more so lives and limbs was just the pre-game show for the main event...

Our only hope was Impeachment, and this Congress has failed this nation and due to this failure I foresee millions upon millions of needless deaths and ruin and a change in the balance of power in this world in which America is never again the leader, hard to imagine for some I know but when you believe you are invincible is when you are heading for a fall...

As we see President Bush is more concerned with the Money dirty green paper he will garner abusing and molesting the English language when he leaves office than he is with our Troops...

Our Troops our brothers and cousins and fathers and sons and even now daughters and sisters and for God sakes mothers as well..

Not one member of the Bush immediate extended family has served in Iraq not one..not one...!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Another empty gesture
Posted by: mgloraine on Sep 8, 2007 10:06 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Being right and telling the truth allows us to feel morally superior to the aggregation of pimps, thieves, murderers and other walking excrement heaps which comprise the Bush Crime Family, but it doesn't shift control of the situation away from the Scumbag-In-Chief.

Congress' refusal to interrupt the war while the graft still flows indicates that they have become elements of BushCo as well. Congress will not act on behalf of the People because the People are not giving them big fat kick-backs - the profiteer corporations which run the White House are.

Since all branches of the federal government are now owned and operated by BushCo and the Imperial Corporate Conspiracy, the righteous indignation of voters and taxpayers serve only to amuse the corpulent idlers lounging around the lavish mansions of government. They all have a good hysterical laugh at the antics of American and Iraqi peasants blowing themselves to bits every day. It's okay! They're all expendable since they're all non-wealthy, and many if not most are even non-white!

The sight of liberals and dark-skinned people shaking their fists in impotent rage at the massive edifice of Corruption which has supplanted Constitutional Checks and Balances is what Little Dick Cheney and his Dick-Squad get out of bed for every afternoon.

So while I concur and sympathize with everyone who is horrified by the bloodshed and wants it stopped, all of our talk is clearly not changing anything. And it won't.

If there is not some legal mechanism available for citizens to dislodge a criminal organization from the White House, then it looks like time for we peasants to grab our sickles, pitchforks, and torches and converge upon Frankenstein's Castle to seize the scoundrels and haul them away in chains.

Or we can continue to flap our gums as BushCo prepares to attack Iran, Pakistan, Syria, Lebannon, Libya, etc. They have plans to continue until the Russians and Chinese retaliate against the US mainland. Think of all the money they'll make in the mean time though! Enough to move to Dubai or some undisclosed location before the bombs fall on New York!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Who needs a Peasant uprising? Posted by: LeftCoastProgressive
» RE: Another empty gesture Posted by: Lector
» RE: Another empty gesture Posted by: peacefullaim
This is all blather
Posted by: ReallyBearish on Sep 8, 2007 11:22 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The war's going to end, not with a bang but a wimper. The end will come as it did in the old Soviet Union when they went bankrupt and couldn't pay to continue the cold war.

We make less than we did back in the 1960s and print lots of dollars to pay foreigners to make stuff for us. That's coming to an end. When the financial system freezes up, the troops will come home regardless of the situation in Iraq.

Politicians will be running against Bush for the next 30 years. Anyone even faintly associated with this administration, family or party will lose. That isn't good. Politicians should have to work to be elected.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

We're Winnin' In Anbar
Posted by: cashelboylo on Sep 8, 2007 9:20 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
To the tune of The Streets of Laredo

The direction of the fightin's beginning to shift
The good news is givin' me quite a lift
There's still horrific attacks in Iraq
But shoot, we're winnin', we're hittin' 'em back

Incremental gains day by day in Anbar
The news on my surge, it ain't bad by far
High casualty rates will likely continue
Our expectations are coming out true

We're holdin' the airport here in Al Asad
Sure the rest of Iraq is lookin' quite sad
Terrorists and insurgents mount terrible attacks
You can trust me to keep giving you all the fac's

We're takin' Iraq back one street at a time
And after all I've got plenty of time
You can't get me out, I'll keep decidin' fine
You can't replace me till two thousand and nine

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

We're Winnin' In Anbar
Posted by: cashelboylo on Sep 8, 2007 9:24 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
To the tune of The Streets of Laredo

The direction of the fightin's beginning to shift
The good news is givin' me quite a lift
There's still horrific attacks in Iraq
But shoot, we're winnin', we're hittin' 'em back

Incremental gains day by day in Anbar
The news on my surge, it ain't bad by far
High casualty rates will likely continue
Our expectations are coming out true

We're holdin' the airport here in Al Asad
Sure the rest of Iraq is lookin' quite sad
Terrorists and insurgents mount terrible attacks
You can trust me to keep giving you all the fac's

We're takin' Iraq back one street at a time
And after all I've got plenty of time
You can't get me out, I'll keep decidin' fine
You can't replace me till two thousand and nine

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Isn't it obvious? The piece of shit is going to 9-11 all of you, all over again.
Posted by: xbj on Sep 8, 2007 9:51 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"I'm playing for October-November," Mr. Bush said to Draper. That, evidently, is the time during which, he thinks he can sell us the real plan, which is "to get us in a position where the presidential candidates will be comfortable about sustaining a presence."

There's only ONE way the son of a bitch human pile of shit and his bosses, handlers, and cronies in warcrimes can pull that one off, and it's going to involve faking yet ANOTHER "attack" from "Al Qaeda", this time with "Love from Iran" written all over it, in bad grammatically incorrect Arabic (even though Iran's laungauge is FARSI) with a discernible neocon/Israeli accent. Could be bio; could be nuclear; doesn't really matter, the end result will be the same; panic from coast to coast and stupid Chinese made "American" flags (hopefully poisoned) on every car as far as the eye can see as the nation once again rallies behind an idiot puppet for war criminals standing on dead bodies in a biohazard suit with a bullhorn.

I won't be here; yep I finally pulled it off, made the plunge, and have flushed my Nazi Amerikan citizenship and domicile along with its horrific and justly deserved future.

As for the rest of you? God knows you've been warned for days, weeks, months, years, even decades. This is your last warning, I'm done. From now on I'll prophecy from OVER the border.

Hasta la vista, Baby. It really IS all over now, Baby Blue.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

You can only be played if you are stupid.
Posted by: nzo on Sep 9, 2007 1:03 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Just because you're fed it doesn't mean you have to swallow it. Impeach the bloody w*nker!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

BUSH and the WMDs.
Posted by: yellow on Sep 9, 2007 7:02 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have recently heard on the Randi Rhodes show on Air America Radio that George Tenet back in September, 2002 when he was still CIA director briefed Bush that there was no WMDs in Iraq. His sources were Naji Sabri, the Iraqi Foreign Minister, and others in the Iraqi Foreign Ministry. Bush dismissed this information as worthless and refused to include in the following months National Intelligence Estimate. According to former CIA officials, Bush seemed had made up his mind to invade Iraq and simply cherry picked evidence to suit his political goals at that particular time.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: BUSH and the WMDs. Posted by: Schroeder
What so MANY of us have been saying all along, with the reward of MSM mockery
Posted by: Ian MacLeod on Sep 9, 2007 10:56 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
He intended from the very first to maintain our presence there in numbers capable of attacking ANY other country in the M.E. He's also using the Iraq occupation to slowly grind down and destroy the US military, leaving only Blackwater (the ultra-Right Christian cult-run mercenary corporation) and other similar outfits to follow orders in a case of nation-wide martial law. They WOULD follow orders, unlike the military, who would be able to refuse orders, but not actually oppose, say, citizen roundups... excuse me, I mean roundups of traitors (dissenters, protesters and real journalists like Bill Moyers, etc).

Anyhow, we're stuck there as long as the Republicrats in Congress are IN the Congress, period. And the only way that will change is when there are noi lobbyists allowed, and the pay for a senator or representative is no more than double the poverty level, elections are funded by the government and air-time is required to be donated equally by the media. I figure they will vote to remove these positions as capitalistic opportunities about a week after Hell freezes over, shortly after we leave Iraq.

Ian

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Mr. President....you're all alone now....
Posted by: eosrk on Sep 9, 2007 11:15 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...dosen't feel good, either, dosen't it. You've manage to turn an world whom were trying to get itself together, and turned it into a madhouse...only difference now is about every country has a nuke in their backyard now.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

dick
Posted by: rtmyth on Sep 9, 2007 1:40 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The power elite, the next president , and the Congress will be overjoyed to have the Bush wars continue. It is what they want. It is profitable and gives them absolute control over the masses. I expect things to get worse, not better, for the masses,in the future.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

THE MILITARY-INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX
Posted by: Raymond Emerson on Sep 9, 2007 1:41 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
may well be much more powerful than we had ever guessed. I think the old phrasing of military industrial complex needs to be changed to financier-military-industrial complex. Bush is a mere hireling of the powers that financed his election. He is a Kleenex. He will soon be thrown away. The important thing is to keep everything they want flowing their way.

That means we must keep a continued presence in Iraq. The war in itself is profitable enough. But the oil in Iraq, once it is drilled by the west, will give the U. S. and, concomitantly, its oil companies a hammerlock on world oil production. There is too much money to be made to give up now.

What we need to be watching for is which of the candidates for president is going to back the complex. Probably the only way to stop this is with campaign finance reform. Candidates get bought. We're not doing the buying. Worse than that congress gets bought. When the president, honestly, trys to present a legitimate campaign finance bill to congress, the COMPLEX calls in all of their markers in congress and the bill goes down to defeat. Learn your history. It has happened before.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

HARRYSBOY
Posted by: SicfkOfBush on Sep 9, 2007 4:33 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Let's recognize that the Bush plan is to keep troops in Iraq at the highest level on the excuse that they are needed to maintain some measure of order. Should a level of order be finally attained the pressure to bring the troops back will die down. He will then keep the troop level as it is. His plan is then to attack Iran. After bringing Iran under control, all of the mideast is outflanked. Syria and the gulf states will be under his control. Cheney has already started the plan by his verbal attacks on Iran. I also see a plan during the war with Iran to declare a state of emergency and a cancelling of 2008 elections.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: HARRYSBOY Posted by: Constitutionalist75
Remember how we got here.
Posted by: ErHoff on Sep 9, 2007 8:28 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The excrement that is the Cheney Bush Crime syndicate knew what they were doing when they demolished the WTC on 11 September 2001, heck that false-flag op gave them unlimited power over the most expensive military in the world, they killed the reason-based decision making process. They handed out fear-filled Kool-Aid to the gullible and ignorant masses. And still right-wing nut jobs on both sides of the isle in congress can't see good enough reason to impeach?

If we really want to protect the American kids, should we consider putting IEDs under the cars used by military recruiters going into High Schools and Malls to mind Feck our innocent children? No that would be like the war: illegal.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bush the slimebag
Posted by: blitzmesser on Sep 15, 2007 5:38 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Being "comfortable" with withdrawel of troops?
Wsht the hell is Bushturd talking about.
Comfort?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]