Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

War Psychiatry and Iraq Atrocities: How Killing Becomes a Reflex

By Penny Coleman, AlterNet. Posted August 22, 2007.


Modern American military training methods can turn off the switch that controls a human being's inherent aversion to killing.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

In 1971, Lt. William Calley was sentenced to life in prison for his role in the massacre of some 500 civilians in the Vietnamese hamlet of My Lai. In response to Calley's conviction, Vietnam Veterans Against the War (VVAW) convened the "Winter Soldier Investigation." Over a three-day period, more than a hundred veterans testified to atrocities they had witnessed committed by U.S. troops against Vietnamese civilians. Their expressed intention was to demonstrate that My Lai was not unique, that it was instead the inevitable result of U.S. policy. It was a travesty of justice, they claimed, to focus blame on the soldiers when it was the policy makers, McNamara, Bundy, Rostow, Johnson, LeMay, Nixon and the others who were truly responsible for the war crimes that had been committed.

In 2004, the release of the Abu Grahib photographs broke the unforgivable silence in the mainstream press about atrocities committed by American soldiers in Iraq. Haditha followed, then Mahmoudiyah, Ishaqi, and at this writing, countless other instances of savage, homicidal violence directed at civilians have been reported. The July 30 issue of the Nation included an article, "The Other War," by Chris Hedges and Laila Al-Arian, which used interviews with 50 combat veterans to make the case that American soldiers are using indiscriminate and often lethal force in their dealings with Iraqi civilians. These veterans, the authors report, have "returned home deeply disturbed by the disparity between the reality of the war and the way it is portrayed by the U.S. government and American media." I would wager that they are more deeply disturbed by the reality itself than the way the media reports it, but certainly government and media distortions are another layer of betrayal. In a letter protesting that article, Paul Rieckhoff, president of Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America, made an argument parallel to that of VVAW, namely that "(a)nyone who wants to write a serious piece about the ethical lapses of the U.S. troops should start and end the article by putting blame where it belongs -- on the politicians who sent our troops to war unprepared and without a clear mission" (the Nation, 7/13/07).

I'm not suggesting that American soldiers take no responsibility for their actions. Like Rieckhoff, I would argue that we must balance outrage at criminal and sadistic acts with the insistence that we "guard against blaming this new generation of veterans for the terrible and tragic circumstances" that led to those acts. And I agree that, once again, the architects have been given a free pass and that the soldiers, who are doing exactly what they have been trained to do, are taking the blame. But I want to focus on an aspect of the situation that is never addressed in the mainstream media, and not often enough elsewhere: specifically that American troops are trained to act in criminal and sadistic ways.

Military training has been part of the experience of millions of young American men since the Revolutionary War. Prior to the Vietnam era, however, that training consisted largely of practicing military skills and learning to manage military equipment. It is only in the last half century that training has evolved into an entirely new phenomenon that makes use of the principles of operant conditioning to overcome what studies done over the last century have consistently demonstrated, namely, that healthy human beings have an inherent aversion to killing others of their own species.

Operant conditioning holds that organisms, including human beings, move through their environment rather haphazardly until they encounter a reinforcing stimulus. The experience of that stimulus becomes associated in memory with the behavior that immediately preceded it. In other words, a behavior is followed by a consequence, and the nature of the consequence, reward or punishment, modifies the organism's tendency to repeat the behavior. Today's recruits are intentionally and methodically subjected to a training regimen that is explicitly designed to turn them into reflexive killers. And it is very effective. It is also carefully concealed. The military would prefer to keep their methods out of sight because of the moral and ethical discussions, not to mention the legal restraints, which public scrutiny and constitutional debate might impose. Or so I would like to believe.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: iraq, troops, atrocities

Penny Coleman is the widow of a Vietnam veteran who took his own life after coming home. Her latest book, Flashback: Posttraumatic Stress Disorder, Suicide and the Lessons of War, was released on Memorial Day, 2006. Her blog is called Flashback

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from World! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
You mean...
Posted by: TT5 on Aug 22, 2007 12:54 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
how LOSING becomes a reflex:)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: You mean... Posted by: Dboy
And the first step is violent video games for kids
Posted by: xbj on Aug 22, 2007 3:42 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Any parent that lets their kids have and play these these games, through either crappy suvervision or worse yet, approval, is absolutely negligent and will be paying for their negligence down the line. Whether their kids come home in a box the press can't take photos of, or whether they visit their kids in weekends in prison.

Well-deserved retribution. Nothing remotely heroic about it either.

Merely pathetic.

Wise up America. You are allowing your children to be programmed for useless miserable death to make rich bastards richer than any human has a right to be.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» just what are you saying? Posted by: Iconoclast421
» violent video games Posted by: Dboy
Conditioning Begins At Home
Posted by: EKSwitaj on Aug 22, 2007 6:11 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
While clearly the psychological reprogramming performed on these soldiers is something much more intense than anything civilian populations will experience, there are many aspects of civilian culture that prepare soldiers to accept it. If we lived in a society in which women were respected and rape were treated like the horrific form of torture it is, soldiers-in-training would not be so willing to accept the misogynistic constructions with which they are presented; they would be shocked by the idea of feeling contempt towards women. And let's not forget how the images on the nightly news and the words of our "leaders" contribute to the othering of populations in nations on which we make war.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

IT's all about the training baby.
Posted by: Axiom69 on Aug 22, 2007 6:17 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How many people can hit a 90mph fast ball? Not many but our baseball players are trained and have their reflexes honed to do so. How many people can handle a car at 190mph? Not many. The same is true for all our professions whether it be doctors, firemen, tightrope walkers or pilots. The truth of the matter is that soldiers are trained and have their reflexes honed to do one thing. Kill. That's why we have soldiers. That's what they do. They are not here to help with floods or hurricanes. When not on the battlefield they are used for other things but their primary mission in life is to kill the soldiers of America's enemies. Teddy Roosevelt said "people sleep peacefully in their beds at night because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf".
Is this the path to a perfect utopian world? No. Until the world is a perfect utopia we will need these soldiers. The alternative is to surrender to and be ruled by whatever nation does have soldiers. I'm not sure who said it but I beleive it was Thomas Jefferson who said "Those that beat their swords into plow shares will plow for those that didn't" The fact of the matter is that we need these soldiers and they need to be trained to do their job. That is to kill. How do you turn it off? I have no clue. That's a question for the shrinks that have the "training" to deal with such matters.
The first Rambo movie, titled "First blood" actualy has an interesting sub plot about the problems faced by some soldiers trying to adjust back into civilian life. Too often this country forgets about those that have served it once their usefulness has ended. We owe it to our men and women in uniform to provide them with the best tools available to make the transition back into the "civilian world" once they leave the service of this nation. As far as atrocities on the battlefield? All wars have had them but it wasn't until the age of mass media exposure did it come into our living rooms. Now everyone can see first hand the true horrors of war. How do you stop atrocities from happening? You don't. You train to prevent them but as long as there is war there will be atrocities. It's part of war.
I am a realist. PLEASE don't leave comments about how we could stop war and create the perfect utopia by getting rid of all guns or doing away with armies or impeaching George Bush. It is a FACT. We are human and will always be killing each other.
As far as the "Winter Soldier" hearings that the author mentioned. I do believe that it was proven that 4 of the 5 that testified for Kerry were frauds. That they had never even been in combat. Maybe I have it mixed up but I believe that's the case.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: IT's all about the training baby. Posted by: SatanicJamboree
It's true..
Posted by: messedup on Aug 22, 2007 6:59 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When I was younger we trained ourselves to be killers. We'd grab some guns and go through the forest killing indiscriminately, anything that was not against the law to kill under the circumstances.

The younger you start them the better.

Although I lost my taste for killing innocent creatures as I became "aware", I killed an animal recently and saw the blood, and it was a rush. I wanted to do it again.

Training humans to kill eachother is not particularly pretty but most every government is training their people to do it so when you turn on the television even you can be reminded on an almost daily basis that it is "ok".

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: It's true.. Posted by: Axiom69
» RE: It's true.. Posted by: messedup
» RE: It's NOT true.. Posted by: henderson
» RE: It's true.. Posted by: drmeow
skeptic
Posted by: robedal on Aug 22, 2007 7:48 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
One might think from the opening paragraph (Lt. Calley sentenced to life) that in fact he did some serious time. In fact the sentence was just a publicity tactic. As soon as the furor died down, his sentence was continually reduced, and in fact he only did a short period of house arrest.
Psychology is only one of several disciplines that the U.S. has turned into "Nazi science". It is no wonder that the trigger happy rabble of U.S. troops are are a danger to themselves and their allies as well as the enemy. "Friendly fire" be it bombing, shooting, fragging .... is a a characteristic of the behaviour of U.S. military personnel. The treatment of Calley sent a clear signal that genocidal behaviour will not be seriously punished. Although the U.S. has not set up concentration camps yet, in every other aspect they have outdone the S.S.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: skeptic Posted by: Axiom69
» RE: skeptic Posted by: Dboy
Opinion
Posted by: Opinion on Aug 22, 2007 8:25 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Just FYI....

"Ain't no use in calling home, Jody's on the telephone.
Ain't no use in going home, Jody's got your girl and gone."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Law of the Jungle
Posted by: shangrilalad on Aug 22, 2007 8:46 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Anyone who lies to you to gain an advantage is not your friend. Liars prosper by taking advantage of others for their own gain. We all lie sometimes, but for some it’s how they make their way in life. Some lie intending to steal your money, others lie to ruin your reputation, but the worst liars lie to steal your life, liberty and pursuit of happiness. Their lust for wealth and power would turn you into a slave.

Our government, with the support of the Monopoly Media, lies and has lied to you every day of your life. When our leaders get caught in a lie, they say “You don’t, can’t understand . . . the world is complicated, and we’re doing what’s best for all of us.” If you believe that, you’re already a slave.

Nobody hates us because of our freedom, they hate our tyrannical government’s unprovoked attacks on their countries, for killing their people, and for stealing their wealth and natural resources. Both of our political parties are committed to wars of aggression, because that’s the way the tyrants who rule our country gained their wealth and power. And they always want more.

Our leaders are not doing what’s best for any of us, they are doing what’s best for them. Or so they think.

If the time comes when it all falls apart, let’s make sure none of them escape to enjoy their wealth and power.

They imposed WAR and the Law of the Jungle on the world.

Those who live by the sword, die by the sword.

Those who live by the Law of the Jungle, die by the Law of the Jungle.

.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

All the killing....
Posted by: Michael Boldin on Aug 22, 2007 9:11 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think we also need to remember that killing is - for lack of a better word - morally wrong.

Aggressive war was once punished as a war crime back at Nuremburg, and I believe that this aggressive war holds some serious moral and legal implications for all those involved.

Calling the killing of someone "self-defense" after you've gone into their home or on their property with a gun pointed at them is absurd......

That's my rant. Read on if you'd like:

"Collateral Damage is Murder" - click here

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: All the killing.... Posted by: henderson
Aftr Iraq, soldiers will need to be armed with legal training as well...
Posted by: fearless flower on Aug 22, 2007 9:13 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I support the maintenance of a trained military force in my country. But I am abhorred by how that force has been misused in Iraq. If the average soldier understood the meaning of "illegal war of aggression", we wouldn't be in Iraq now!

If we are going to turn soldiers into killing machines, we better make damn sure their training includes understanding the definition of legal warfare, as set forth in our Constitution and International Law. Our Constitution demands we abide by the "Supreme Law of the Land" that includes honoring any foreign treaties we have signed. In case anyone has forgotten, that includes the Geneva Convention banning torture and the use of weapons like depleted uranium and cluster bombs, both of which have been used in Iraq, not to mention the targeting of civilians.

War is a horrible thing and our Founding Fathers knew this. That's why they made it a laborious process to go to war, involving debate and evidence-gathering so that all the circumstances and consequences and alternatives could be thoroughly considered first. The evidence is indisputable now that our President personally manipulated and fabricated the justification to go to war in Iraq, deceiving Congress and interfering with their responsibility to come to a decision based on reliable evidence. George Bush's "Macho-ization" of the presidency has had disastrous consequences and turned our once respected Republic into the equivalent of a diabolical out-of-control Lone Ranger. A sign I saw at a rally lays things out very well: "Impeachment: The Cure for Mad Cowboy Disease!"

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Not all Basic is like this...
Posted by: Arkham42 on Aug 22, 2007 9:21 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
While the amount of operant condition that goes on on the firing line is very intense, a lot of the crap that you might see in "Full Metal Jacket" has gone by the wayside. Most of the really bad cadences are not allowed anymore, especially now that Basic is Co-Ed. They were really trying to change this when I went through back in 1990.

In fact, while this article brings up many good points, as a 17 year Active/Guard member, I must say it just pushes the stereotype that we are all mindless drones who do what we are told. Many/Most of us know a lot of what we are doing is wrong but it isn't because we've been brainwashed to do it, we do it because we don't want to go to Leavenworth for Derilection of Duty! You are a sort of indentured servant in the military and too often you have to do things you know are wrong simply because someone above you orders it. How many people are going to throw away their job and family to be sent to prison if they have the choice, especially if they think they can use the excuse, "I was just following orders."

So yes, the main point of this article is if you don't want atrocities, give the military a mission it's trained for and it can win. Clear goals is what it is all about. As Churchill said, "Peacekeeping isn't a job for a soldier; unfortunately only soldiers can do peacekeeping."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Orders go from the top down, prosecution goes from the bottom up...
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on Aug 22, 2007 1:00 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
From the article:
"It was a travesty of justice, they claimed, to focus blame on the soldiers when it was the policy makers, McNamara, Bundy, Rostow, Johnson, LeMay, Nixon and the others who were truly responsible for the war crimes that had been committed."

Let's update this:
" It was a travesty of justice, they claimed, to focus blame on the soldiers when it was the policy makers, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Cambone, Bush, Miller, Sanchez, Pace, Abizaid, Bremer, Rice, Powell, and the others who were truly responsible for the war crimes that had been committed."

See Chain of Command:
How the Department of Defense mishandled the disaster at Abu Ghraib.
by Seymour M. Hersh, 2004

"The Pentagon’s impatience with military protocol extended to questions about the treatment of prisoners caught in the course of its military operations. Soon after 9/11, as the war on terror got under way, Donald Rumsfeld repeatedly made public his disdain for the Geneva conventions. Complaints about America’s treatment of prisoners, Rumsfeld said in early 2002, amounted to “isolated pockets of international hyperventilation.”

Rumsfeld is the one who belongs behind bars - along with the rest of this corrupt administration.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

American Mercs to Protect the Ruling Elite
Posted by: sofla100 on Aug 22, 2007 5:57 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
American soldiers, as exemplified by the war in Iraq, are pawns of the countries ruling elite. Let's face it, Iraq has some of the largest known oil reserves in the world under her sands. That's why American soldiers are there. It's all about protecting the profits of large corporations and the well-to-do. The fact that so many of America's soldiers come from her underclass just shows you how easily deceived these people are. Throw a little John Wayne, a little Rambo, a little 911 at them, and you can get them to do anything. This never was about self-defense, not the way soldiers and wars are conducted and waged now. The more quickly, and brutally, they can kill (the women and children first) the more medals and ribbons we'll give them. As for when they (soldiers) return home, used up and with mental problems, there will be nothing for them. Few, if any services, they are now just used up cannon fodder.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Bodysnatchers are here
Posted by: JayHaden on Aug 23, 2007 4:13 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If Ms. Coleman has hit the mark, and I think she has, what explains our need to hang little yellow sticky bows on our cars and pickups? What explains our need to defer to veterans' opinions on matters of war (or anything else)? What explains our big yawn when faced with the deaths of 650,000 Iraqis? What, in other words, has infected the rest of us? Brainwashed soldiers are damaged humans, intentionally damaged by a system that has lost its own humanity. When and how did it happen that a very large number of Americans identify with the dark side of our brainwashed sons and daughters? Is it simply because they are our children, right or wrong? Or, are we feeling guilt because we let them run with scissors and then turned the other way when they learned how to use sharp objects for killing? It is little wonder the military refuses to provide proper medical care for mentally scarred vets. It's better to let them rot or die of their own hand than to let war's evil little secrets spill out into our adoring neighborhoods. The final question is: have we reached the tipping point? Are too many of us pod people already? Has the oligarchy figured out -- through the NRA, a pandering media, yellow ribbons, violent video games and movies, fear mongering, and just plain lying to the public -- how to infect all of us with the killer instinct? Making the world safe for our own consumptive habits. We may have been unfair in our treatment of returning Vietnam vets, but at least it was because we still had a shred of humanity left in us.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The road to genocide
Posted by: hilaryuk on Aug 26, 2007 9:21 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The American military is merely specifically putting into practice what the likes of Hitler learnt long ago. He knew that the German people would not offer even tacit consent to the murder of the Jews unless they had been conditioned to believe that German Jews were less human than "Aryan" Jews. A similar process was used to facilitate the mass killing of Romanies (Gypsies), homosexuals, Slavs and the mentally ill. The world learnt the lesson well and even the state of Israel uses a variation to justify its policies. No doubt, Bin Laden tells his followers a similar story.

The plain truth is that mass killing has never been possible without the killers being encouraged to dehumanise the victims. In a world that has industralised the slaughter of humans it is impossible to continue the old myths of glory and heroism, so identifying the enemy as less human than you is the only effective strategy. Violent video games etc. may have some marginal effect on a few, but the true poison is the mundane daily diet of establishment crap that constantly narrows the definition of who is truly human. It works even with progressives on sites such as these - some say openly that they only really care about US deaths in Iraq.

Of course, there is a catch in the strategy - soldiers come home eventually and may have some difficulty in switching off their conditioning.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I support your war of terror! - Borat
Posted by: Dboy on Aug 28, 2007 6:25 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Shell the town and kill the people.
Drop the napalm in the square.
Do it on a Sunday morning
While they're on their way to prayer.

Aim your missiles at the schoolhouse.
See the teacher ring the bell.
See the children's smiling faces
As their schoolhouse burns to hell

Throw some candy to the children.
Wait till they all gather round.
Then you take your M-16 now
And mow the little fuckers down.



Why does ANYONE take this 'war on terror' idea seriously? I even notice people here on Alternet talking about it as if it is real.

Dboy

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]