Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Flush with Profits from the Iraq War, Military Contractors See a World of Business Opportunities

By Jeremy Scahill, Indypendent. Posted August 13, 2007.


Since launching the "global war on terror," the administration has funneled billions of public dollars to "private contractors" and more than doubled the size of the occupation with these hired guns.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

If you think the U.S. has only 160,000 troops in Iraq, think again.

With almost no congressional oversight and even less public awareness, the Bush administration has more than doubled the size of the U.S. occupation through the use of private war companies.

There are now almost 200,000 private "contractors" deployed in Iraq by Washington. This means that U.S. military forces in Iraq are now outsized by a coalition of billing corporations whose actions go largely unmonitored and whose crimes are virtually unpunished.

In essence, the Bush administration has created a shadow army that can be used to wage wars unpopular with the American public but extremely profitable for a few unaccountable private companies.

Since the launch of the "global war on terror," the administration has systematically funneled billions of dollars in public money to corporations like Blackwater USA , DynCorp, Triple Canopy, Erinys and ArmorGroup. They have in turn used their lucrative government pay-outs to build up the infrastructure and reach of private armies so powerful that they rival or outgun some nation's militaries.

"I think it's extraordinarily dangerous when a nation begins to outsource its monopoly on the use of force and the use of violence in support of its foreign policy or national security objectives," says veteran U.S. Diplomat Joe Wilson, who served as the last U.S. ambassador to Iraq before the 1991 Gulf War.

The billions of dollars being doled out to these companies, Wilson argues, "makes of them a very powerful interest group within the American body politic and an interest group that is in fact armed. And the question will arise at some time: to whom do they owe their loyalty?"

Precise data on the extent of U.S. spending on mercenary services is nearly impossible to obtain -- by both journalists and elected officials--but some in Congress estimate that up to 40 cents of every tax dollar spent on the war goes to corporate war contractors. At present, the United States spends about $2 billion a week on its Iraq operations.

While much has been made of the Bush administration's "failure" to build international consensus for the invasion of Iraq, perhaps that was never the intention. When U.S. tanks rolled into Iraq in March 2003, they brought with them the largest army of "private contractors" ever deployed in a war. The White House substituted international diplomacy with lucrative war contracts and a coalition of willing nations who provided token forces with a coalition of billing corporations that supplied the brigades of contractors.

There's no democratic control

During the 1991 Gulf War, the ratio of troops to private contractors was about 60 to 1. Today, it is the contractors who outnumber U.S. forces in Iraq. As of July 2007, there were more than 630 war contracting companies working in Iraq for the United States. Composed of some 180,000 individual personnel drawn from more than 100 countries, the army of contractors surpasses the official U.S. military presence of 160,000 troops.

In all, the United States may have as many as 400,000 personnel occupying Iraq, not including allied nations' militaries. The statistics on contractors do not account for all armed contractors. Last year, a U.S. government report estimated there were 48,000 people working for more than 170 private military companies in Iraq. "It masks the true level of American involvement," says Ambassador Wilson.

How much money is being spent just on mercenaries remains largely classified. Congressional sources estimate the United States has spent at least $6 billion in Iraq, while Britain has spent some $400 million. At the same time, companies chosen by the White House for rebuilding projects in Iraq have spent huge sums in reconstruction funds -- possibly billions on more mercenaries to guard their personnel and projects.

The single largest U.S. contract for private security in Iraq was a $293 million payment to the British firm Aegis Defence Services, headed by retired British Lt. Col. Tim Spicer, who has been dogged by accusations that he is a mercenary because of his private involvement in African conflicts. The Texas-based DynCorp International has been another big winner, with more than $1 billion in contracts to provide personnel to train Iraqi police forces, while Blackwater USA has won $750 million in State Department contracts alone for "diplomatic security."

At present, an American or a British Special Forces veteran working for a private security company in Iraq can make $650 a day. At times the rate has reached $1,000 a day; the pay dwarfs many times over that of active duty troops operating in the war zone wearing a U.S. or U.K. flag on their shoulder instead of a corporate logo.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: iraq, war profiteering, mercenaries, contractors

Jeremy Scahill, an independent journalist who reports frequently for the national radio and TV program Democracy Now!, has spent extensive time reporting from Iraq and Yugoslavia. He is currently a Puffin Writing Fellow at The Nation Institute. Scahill is the author of Blackwater: The Rise of the World's Most Powerful Mercenary Army.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from World! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Terror Alert - RED
Posted by: Lincoln fan on Aug 13, 2007 8:40 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is one outrage that Orwell never dreamed of in "1984".

It's not too hard to imagine an army of third world soldiers, paid with our tax money, using equipment that we paid for, controlling us if we dare to dissent.
These are the corporations that control both of our politiacal parties. The people of the US had better haul in their politicians before it's too late.
Bob Reichenbach,
Director, The Lincoln Initiative.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Terror Alert - RED Posted by: gathaiga
» RE: Terror Alert - RED Posted by: El Hombre Malo
kajamian
Posted by: Kajamian on Aug 14, 2007 2:01 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When our volunteer army comes home, they turn in their weapons and many go back to their former civilian careers. But these overpaid security contractors answer only to their respective employers. They still have their weapons. And they've become used to acting as a law unto themselves on behalf of their clients. Boys and girls, can you say "fatal epidemic road rage"???

I am struck by two visions:
(1) our soldiers standing around watching Iraqi citizens carrying away furnishings & fixtures from any unguarded building in Baghdad
(2) armed blackshirt mercenaries threatening American citizens standing waist deep in water carrying a loaf of bread in New Orleans.

I remember soundbites:
"Hey! Boys will be boys"
"Democracy is messy - peoople have freedom - including the freedom to act badly"
"We will not tolerate violation of the law - regardless of the circumstances."
"Shoot to kill only if necessary"

Boys and girls, can you match the statements with the correct pictures??

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: kajamian Posted by: footman
How to make money
Posted by: TT5 on Aug 14, 2007 3:08 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Money

Money

Money

It's a rich man's world;=))

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

$$$
Posted by: TT5 on Aug 14, 2007 3:12 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
People die

but...

Money flyes=P

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: $$$ Posted by: MAD
A fungus, by any other name...
Posted by: DZ on Aug 14, 2007 3:39 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why hold to the silly "contractor" convention? They're mercenary armies, pure and simple. Let's call them by their true name.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Well...
Posted by: DZ on Aug 14, 2007 3:40 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Well...simple, if not pure...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

on what authority was immunity granted - it's so like executive privilege
Posted by: Suzon on Aug 14, 2007 5:30 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
as espoused by King George - being above the law is the cornerstone of the British monarchy.

The American Revolution was only a blip to those who through generations have sided with Hamilton instead of Jefferson. In Britain, the Chartist reforms of the 1840s were relatively meaningless. Similarly, the recent "reform" of the House of Lords only changed the looks of things, not the substance.

Giving "stay out of jail" cards to mercenaries is utterly unjustifiable!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Coalition Of The Killer Billers?
Posted by: starhelix on Aug 14, 2007 5:54 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hey Jeremy,

This was an excellent article.

In short, wars are no longer being fought for principle. It appears they're being fought almost exclusively for profit. Perhaps, it was always thus. But, the sudden emergence of a global war fighting industry is very disturbing. No one seems to notice the potential for evil profit-making intent to get out of control. Nobody voted for the Iraq invasion and occupation. Nobody voted for the building of "enduring" bases in other peoples' countries. And nobody voted for the outsourcing of our national defense and intelligence operations. You can't have a democratic republic with private control of large parts of your war-making capacity. Why aren't the candidates for president being asked about this serious problem and what their future administrations would do to correct it?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

this is how the Roman Empire fell
Posted by: zooeyhall on Aug 14, 2007 6:35 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Check out any serious history book on the fall of the Roman Empire. Most historians of the Roman Empire agree that one of the main reasons for its fall was the hiring of foreign mercenaries for the army. Many people think the Roman Empire fell like a fortress because of attacks by the barbarians. Truth is, the Roman army became almost exclusively manned by barbarian mercenaries. Eventually only the generals and higher officers were actually Roman. Native Romans didn't want to fight in the army, so the government took to what we today would call contracting.

The trouble with this policy was that these barbarian hirelings had no concept of loyalty to the Roman state and its traditions. While they were good fighters, their loyalty went to their commander. Eventually they became involved in bumping-off one emperor after another, infiltrating higher and higher levels of the state. When the barbarians outside the empire finally got around to actually attacking it, these mercenaries frequently aided them. After all, they were their kinsmen.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Americas best and brightest
Posted by: scott balogh on Aug 14, 2007 6:55 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Who are these individuals who make up the army of mercenaries? I do not know anyone employed by these security companies. I wonder if they are the nations best and brightest like the US military enlistees. Given enough power and money, there will be endless numbers of willing, best and brightest to kill, if they must, for their employers.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Clear some things up.
Posted by: Axiom69 on Aug 14, 2007 8:24 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Just for the record I spent almost a year in Tikrit, Iraq. I never saw any "contactors" used in combat operations. Not all of them even have combat type roles. We had contactor radio repair techs, logisticians and truck drivers just to name a few. The military has found that it's cheaper to outsource alot of the support jobs to civilians as opposed to recruiting, training, housing and paying a soldier to do it. Most of the "hired guns" that you read about are guys that escort supply convoys from point A to point B or they are body guards for local VIP's. They are not out there patrolling the streets or kicking in doors.
Think about this... If there really are 400,000 contactors in Iraq and you do away with them, who will their replacements be? Can you spell D.R.A.F.T.?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

by any other name...
Posted by: orwellwasn'tdreaming on Aug 14, 2007 9:15 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It gives the phrase "soldier of fortune" a whole new dimension, doesn't it?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: by any other name... Posted by: Xynyx
About those pay offers:
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on Aug 14, 2007 2:53 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Let's see: Army pay:

"Military basic pay has a wide range. For example, the most senior officers’ (i.e. the Chairman and Vice-Chairman of the Joint Chiefs) basic pay is limited to a maximum of $12,666.60 per month, while an enlisted service member with less than four months of service earns $1,178.10 per month. Military Annual Pay is capped by law at Level III of the Executive Pay Schedule at $152,000 annually."

Now, a quick web search for Iraqi contract jobs turns up lots of juicy offers - but here's a real choice example:Wanted: AJAX Developer for Iraq, $20,000 per month, July 2007

Here you go:
Description Title: Web Developer (must have secret clearance)
Job Type: 3 month contract (could go shorter)
Salary: $20k per month
Location: Iraq
Start date: ASAP with 2 weeks training (one in Washington DC and another in Ft. Bening GA)
# of Openings: 1

Summary:A principal Department of Defense agency is looking for programmers, developers or coders to code, support field deployment and maintenance of a new database application which will be used by Army units in Iraq. Scope These are full-time positions (12/7) located at one of the major US Bases in IRAQ. Deployment will be period of 3 months."

Needs a BS or an AS...and pays more than the Joint Chiefs of Staffs! (they get their payoff when they retire to Lockheed et al and start lobbying for arms deals).

Hog heaven. Of course, the real money goes to the shareholders and CEOs via their cost-plus, no-bid contracts.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: About those pay offers: Posted by: footman
It's time
Posted by: willymack on Aug 14, 2007 5:45 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
To take many remedial steps to salvage our teetering nation, not the least of which is to defang our military-industrial complex which one of the last REAL Republicans (Dwight Eisenhauer) warned us against so many years ago.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Police departments get salvaged military hardware
Posted by: condor60s@hotm on Aug 15, 2007 1:05 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I can 't remember where did I read it,even helicopters sit
a secret warehouses ,all types of equipment....

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This is how the truly wealthy work....
Posted by: jeffrey7 on Aug 15, 2007 9:05 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
'Hired Muscle' is nothing new. Back in the early part of the last century,big business hired folks called 'Strike Breakers' of hunt down baet up, maim,and kill Union Organizers. Later they gave the job to the police,along with the right to carry guns,that's our 'on the payroll' thugs.
We used for hire fighters in the Revolution, Civil War,WWi WW2,Korea and Vietnam. We use them now in Iraq and at home after Katrina.Their orders have always been the same, 'Kill any one trying to take,use or remove anything of real value.
It's time we broke this cycle of outsourced violence. The Government currently pays for these operations,hiding it as expenses paid to company's like Haliburton. Some of us remember them as the company that was guilty of TREASON, while Dick Cheney ran them, for selling arms to Iran.
I feel there's enough people,around the World, here at home that are totally sick of wealthy corperarions reigning down tyranny upon the populace. It's time for a new gonernance that controls these corperations and their bullshit rather than go along with them because they're contributors.
It's time to 'Think Outside the System'.
Draft Jeffrey7 for Prez

www.youtube.com/RevJeffrey7

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

MARK MY WORDS
Posted by: Socrates on Aug 17, 2007 3:15 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Mercenaries qualify for their jobs because they are the lowest of the low form of human scum. They kill for the money and for no other reason. MARK MY WORDS: this will come back to haunt the US. For a few dollars more, they would be only too happy to turn on their first employers ... especially after they're laid off when their dirty job is finished.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: MARKED Posted by: leafsong1