Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Iraq is a Mass of Contradictions; Oil is at Their Center

By Ben Lando, UPI. Posted July 28, 2007.


Iraq's government is in the eye of a storm of deadlines and benchmarks and pressure from within and abroad. At some level, it's all about the oil.
oilwell
oil well
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Iraq's government is in the eye of a storm of deadlines and benchmarks and pressure from within and abroad. At some level, it's all about the oil.

The Parliament is to take next month off as key parties criticize the government and vow to withdraw. Washington, dragged by the Democratic Party, is looking for success or troop withdrawal. Iraq's citizens face more violence and poverty and less electricity and fuels.

"We are still struggling to find a political resolution on a whole number of issues," Iraqi Ambassador to the United States Samir Sumaida'ie told reporters Wednesday during a briefing at the embassy. "We're still searching for a common vision that will help us to deal with critical issues such as the constitution and its amendments, Kirkuk, federalism and to the extent that it will be applied outside Kurdistan, applied or not applied outside a Kurdish area, oil law and revenue sharing."

All are linked, he said.

Iraq's constitution, passed in 2005, was vague on certain issues now being targeted for amendment, including control over oil.

The constitution called for a referendum on disputed northern territories by the end of next year, including the oil-rich city of Kirkuk. Iraq's Kurds claim the city and other territories belong in the Kurdistan Regional government's semi-autonomous region. Turkomen and Sunnis dispute it and the outcry over its fate has sparked talk of delaying the referendum, which the KRG refuses.

In Baghdad, parliamentarians are at a standstill over legislation splitting up revenue, most of which comes from the sale of oil, and a law governing the exploration and development of the crude. Iraq has 115 billion barrels of proven oil reserves, the third largest in the world, and last year sales of it funded more than 93 percent of the federal budget. Disputes over the oil rally around whether the central or regional/local government should control key oil fields. This dispute over federalism is inherent in the holdup of the revenue sharing law. More than four years after liberation from Saddam Hussein, the government of Iraq struggles to function.

"A gap still exists between the different parties and their way of looking at this," Sumaida'ie said. "Intensive effort is going on to try to resolve this."

Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki's coalition government is weakening. The Iraqi Accordance Front, the largest Sunni bloc in the Shiite-dominated coalition (with a heavy Kurdish partnership), has issued a list of demands to be met. Maliki has one week or the bloc will withdraw its members. The Kuwait News Agency reports IAF leader and Iraqi Vice President Tarek al-Hashemi has submitted his resignation.

The Sadr Movement and Fadhila Party, two smaller Shiite parties with a large citizen support base, have already withdrawn from the coalition. The anti-Maliki sentiment is not solely related to his push for an oil law, but the law is a major lightning rod.

"The law is discussed in the Parliament and in the Parliament there are various groups and of course there are differences," Oil Minister Hussain al-Shahristani told UPI during a telephone interview from Baghdad Wednesday morning. "Like any other issue it will be debated and we try to close the gaps and reach compromises."


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: iraq, oil

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from World! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
The US Invasion of Iraq Boosted the Value of Big Oil's Reserves by Billions.
Posted by: yellow on Jul 29, 2007 1:10 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
According to UK Reporter Greg Palast, the very last thing that big oil wanted was the destruction of OPEC. They all profited together. The neo-conservative ideological obsession with destroying the Saudis in their imaginary "Clash of Civilizations" was the last thing on the minds of the far more practical men of big oil. Iraqi oil privatization was stopped cold by such figures as Phil Carroll, ex-CEO of USA/Shell and appointed by Bush in 2003 as key policy planner for the Iraqi Oil Ministry.

According to Palast OPEC price hikes were no problem for big oil. "It has been a very good war for big oil", writes Palast, "courtesy of OPEC price hikes. The five oil giants saw profits rise from $34 billion in 2002 to $81 billion in 2004, year two of Iraq's 'transition to democracy'. But this tsunami of black ink was nothing compared to the wave of $120 billion to come in 2006: $15.6 billion for Conoco, $17.1 billion for Chevron, and the Mother of all earnings, Exxon's $39.5 billion." Palast credits Saudi supply restraint with the biggest role in the profit taking.

OPEC price increases also increase the value of the oil majors' own substantial private reserves. In 2006, after the first three years of the US invasion and occupation of Iraq, the value of the reserves owned by Exxon-Mobile rose to $666 billion, those of Chevron to $390 billion, BP to $558 billion, Shell to $506 billion, and Conoco to $243 billion. All top five oil majors collectively saw their reserves grow to almost $2.4 trillion while the Saudis state reserves, which consist of about 25% of the world total, grew to nearly $8 trillion. And the profits keep growing.

It is very difficult to conclude that this is not a war about oil.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Iraq's contradictions are Amerika's -Western class contradictions.
Posted by: Perfectclue on Aug 3, 2007 3:46 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Until we come up with some universal principles, opposed to class standards, double standards, class elites, class hierarchies, subordinated and reproduced by class oligarchy, reproducing class nationalism and class Empire, we cannot fight efffectively against imperialism, if the source is the same contraditions within all class societies, whether traditional religious patriarchical class regimes, or the more corrupt, imperial Western class patriarchies, whose democracies were complete failures, because they allowed class principles to deform, then destroy democracy, into the corporate fascism and Empire it is today.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Iraq was always about the oil...
Posted by: Bearzerker on Aug 3, 2007 11:59 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
... as the old adage says...
follow the money... as it makes more sense than any WMD argument ever will!

Time to pull out of Iraq and go after the real cause of our nightmares... namely BushCo, and Usama Bin Laden... and all the henchmen from both camps... line em all up and shoot em for treason!

what a nightmare Prime Minister Brown is inheriting, but he's the only one so far that is making any sense! He has my support, for any decision needed, as the WH is a lame duck power center now

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]