Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Women Under Attack: The Talibanization of Iraq

By Bay Fang, Ms. Magazine. Posted May 9, 2007.


Throughout much of recent history, Iraq was one of the most progressive countries in the Middle East for women. Now women are under systematic attack.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Yanar Mohammed returned to Iraq from Canada in 2003 because she thought the veil of tyranny had finally been lifted from her native country. She and two other women started the Organization for Women's Freedom in Iraq (OWFI), with the goal of fighting for women's rights.

But since those days, her OWFI cofounders have fled the country, and Mohammed herself has received numerous death threats for her work. OWFI, one of the few remaining nongovernmental organizations left in Iraq, has been forced to operate in complete secrecy.

"We live in a state of continuous fear -- if our hair shows on the street, if we're not veiled enough at work," says Mohammed, 47. "It's a new experience for women in Iraq. After four years, it's turned into Afghanistan under the Taliban."

Throughout much of recent history, Iraq was one of the most progressive countries in the Middle East for women. These rights diminished somewhat after the 1991 Gulf War, partly because of Saddam Hussein's new embrace of Islamic tribal law as a way of consolidating power, and partly due to the United Nations' sanctions against the regime. Still, as bad as it was during Saddam's time, women's well-being and security have sharply deteriorated since the fall of his regime.

Furthermore, extremists in both Sunni and Shiite areas have taken over pockets of the country and imposed their own Taliban-like laws on the population. Women college students are stopped and harassed on campuses, so going to school is a risk. Islamist "misery gangs" regularly patrol the streets in many areas, beating and harassing women who are not "properly" dressed or behaved.

Zainab Salbi also grew up in Iraq, experiencing firsthand the oppression of Saddam Hussein's dictatorial regime as the daughter of Saddam's pilot. When Hussein was toppled, she too began traveling back to Iraq to work for women's rights.

"The violence during Saddam's time was ... committed by the government, Saddam's family, people in power. Now the violence is ... being committed by everyone around you," says Salbi, who founded the group Women for Women International in 1993. That organization now operates in nine countries, including Iraq, to help women survivors of war and civil strife rebuild their lives.

But today, most of her friends have left the country. Women for Women International keeps its locations secret and takes all sorts of security precautions. Salbi herself stopped traveling back to her homeland two years ago. "At first I was able to say I knew 10, 20 women who had been assassinated," she says. "Now, I've lost count. ... They are pharmacists, professors, reporters, activists ..."

"Often, the first salvo in a war for theocracy is a systematic attack on women and minorities who represent or demand an alternative or competing vision for society," wrote Yifat Susskind, Iraq coordinator of the international human- and women's-rights organization MADRE, in a report she authored on "gender apartheid" in Iraq. "These initial targets are usually the most marginalized and, therefore, most vulnerable members of society, and once they are dealt with, fundamentalist forces then proceed towards less vulnerable targets."

In some parts of Baghdad, like the Shiite slum of Sadr City, religious courts following strict interpretations of sharia law have become the de facto authority. "We used to have a government that was almost secular. It had one dictator," says Yanar Mohammed. "Now we have almost 60 dictators -- Islamists who think of women as forces of evil. This is what is called the democratization of Iraq."

Women make up 31 percent of the Iraq National Assembly, but nearly half of the women parliamentarians ran on the list of the Shiite alliance -- the group with major U.S. support -- and they have had to toe the conservative line of their party. Some of the women parliamentarians could be forces for moderation and progress, but the dangerous political environment of targeted assassinations has prevented them from being very outspoken.

Increased violence against women in the streets has had a parallel effect on the increase in domestic violence, including "honor" killings. In response to the rise in domestic violence, OWFI has set up women's shelters in four cities around the country. If the shelters cannot protect a woman, an "underground railroad" network helps her escape the country and set up a new life.

For those remaining in Iraq, a recent survey by the United Nations Development Programme shows one-third live in poverty and 5 percent in extreme poverty -- a sharp deterioration from before the 2003 invasion. Women generally have a harder time finding work in Iraq, and years of war have left an estimated half million widows in the country, according to OWFI.

The few women activists still in Iraq feel that time is running out. "Both violence and progress often start with women," says Salbi. "A classic example was with the Taliban -- they started with violence against women, and everyone looked the other way ... but eventually everyone suffered. We need to take this moment to raise the world's attention. Iraqi women are holding up, but they can't hold it on their own -- they need us to help."

For the rest of this story, get the Spring issue of Ms. magazine, available now on newsstands or by subscription at www.msmagazine.com. For more information on organizations assisting women in Iraq, and how you can help, visit the websites of Global Fund for Women, MADRE and Women for Women International.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: iraq, taliban

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from World! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
a sad confirmation of what we already knew
Posted by: Ames on May 9, 2007 12:34 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's a well researched and documented fact that those who fare worst, both during and post war, are women and children. While this article will no doubt bring out the usual trolls denouncing Islam and/or feminism, it says some incredibly important things about the way in which this war is being handled, and the priorities with which the US operates in Iraq. They care nothing for the citizens, despite the rhetoric of 'freeing' Iraqis, and this is plain to anyone who can see clearly.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Often, the first salvo in a war for theocracy is a systematic attack on women and minorities
Posted by: icha on May 9, 2007 2:03 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I find this observation really meaningful to us in the United States right now:

"Often, the first salvo in a war for theocracy is a systematic attack on women and minorities who represent or demand an alternative or competing vision for society...These initial targets are usually the most marginalized and, therefore, most vulnerable members of society, and once they are dealt with, fundamentalist forces then proceed towards less vulnerable targets."

The erosion, or, better said, attack by these idealogues
on women - with measures to many to enumerate here - and mounting immigration restrictions and raids are all enacted by the same supremicist crusaders who advance their policies using thinly veiled, and sometimes blatant, theological arguments. One of the many problems is that they are very violent; the resistance is not as much. They have a monopoly on violence, control the armed forces and civillian police. How do we become strong enough to stop their violence without resorting to the same level of depravity? We're all too divided along class, race, and gender lines to make a movement work.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

RE: I've wondered.....not hard
Posted by: Captainmagic on May 9, 2007 6:55 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Your a funny guy.....No all you should do is LEAVE..easy ain't it!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

RE: Let me help you
Posted by: Ydotheyhateus on May 9, 2007 8:23 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The fact that you got yourself stuck in a hell-hole like Iraq shows that you are just another dumb cannon-fodder for the American Empire.
But don't think too hard 'cause you may forget how to pull the trigger when you need to, so let me help you out here: When in Rome, do as the Romans...don't get it? Smack the b***h next time when she comes up to you, as that is what she is used to.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

RE: I've wondered
Posted by: leafsong1 on May 9, 2007 8:25 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You are an enemy of the human race; a war criminal, a man with no honor, an utterly incompetent soldier who does not deserve to wear the uniform, let alone to walk the world a free man. What should you do? You should do the world a favor and kill yourself.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

RE: I've wondered
Posted by: mcubed on May 9, 2007 10:08 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Are you her equal?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Iraqi women are highly educated and had almost equitable status in Iraqi society until our war
Posted by: sarahk on May 9, 2007 10:40 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Iraqi woman will talk to you as an equal because she believes she is equal to men. The Iraqis have a long history of (almost) equitable treatment of women. Throughout the 50's, 60's, 70's and 80's, Iraqi women were equal participants in Iraqi society working as doctors, educators and politicians. Most of them are highly educated and it has been very hard for them to lose their employment, their families, their children, and even their freedom to walk the streets safely. Most are now terrified to leave the house. They are in danger from US soldiers, International Mercenaries and from the new extreme Islamic groups that did not exist in Iraq before our war.

Please be aware of how strange it is to see an IRAQI woman wearing a black hijab like the Saudi Arabian women instead of western clothing. Iraqi women for over 50 years have worn western clothing. Even though the woman you wish to beat has to wear the black veils instead of the western clothing she wore most of her life, she wears the veil out of fear of you and the extreme Islamist that have moved into Iraqi.

The removal of Saddam has lead to a power vacuum that allowed these radical groups who have ties to the extreme Wahabism of Saudia Arabia to arise.
This does not mean that Saddam was benevolent. He was just focused on other ways to be evil. Before he came to power, Iraqi women had won many concensions from their secular government during the 50's. When Saddam came to power, his secular government was so busy focusing on mass killings of Iranians and Shia tribes, that they never got around to stomping out the rights of women. Because the government was simply not focused on removing women's rights but instead focused on other types of brutality, women were allowed some breathing room in the society.
Remember the Iraqi woman who spoke to the US reporter. She said," Under Saddam women just had to be terrified of Saddam and his men. Now, women have to be terrifed of all men as they are all potential Saddams."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Dude -
Posted by: LeftWright on May 9, 2007 11:43 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Try to not breathe the depleted uranium dust and keep paying your life insurance.

Your next of kin will be grateful.

Come home, man, you (we) have no business illegally occupying Iraq and it NEVER had anything to do with the phony "war on terror."

BTW - If you really are interested in ending the "war on terror" get your buddies to help you invade and occupy the CIA headquarters in Virginia, we'll bring the beer and pizza. We can end this "endless war" in one weekend, bro.

Are you 1st Armored? You're on one of the billion dollar bases, yes? Take lots of pics and post them everywhere, we'd all like to see what we're paying for.

Can I send you all some books or dvd's, I have some that will really open your eyes.

The truth shall set us free. Love is the only way forward.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

You've been at war too long, Babychild
Posted by: sarahk on May 9, 2007 11:45 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am worried that you may have been in combat too long. With prolonged combat (over 6 months), the human conscience begins to break down, fear takes over and extreme violence begins to appear. With some soldiers being in combat for up to 4 years now, many of you are long past the normal breaking point. This is an inhuman situation for you and the civilians you encounter.
Our VA hospitals are already filled with many guilt-racked veterans who are haunted by their actions long-ago in far-away places.
I don't have any easy answers. This is a horrific war with no good outcome in sight. Try to hold on to your humanity. It will make the rest of your life worthwhile. I hope you can come home mentally and physically whole.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

You make me ashamed to be a military wife
Posted by: Beck on May 9, 2007 2:17 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What a stupid thing to show up out of the blue and write. Find something to do. I know army regs forbid women sunbathing with bikini tops, although men can be shirtless. Maybe there's something to ride around with the MPs and look for.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

RE: I've wondered
Posted by: ankhet on May 10, 2007 9:51 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You ARE her equal - remember those god-given human rights?

What happens between her and the men in her clan does not give you permission to add to it. Ideally, you should work to correct it, to make it fit those god-given human rights. You might show those misogynists how to treat a fellow human being with the same god as yours.

It's a conflict, and not an easy one for you to deal with on a daily basis. But you decide how you relate; it's your right. Blind conformity is not a virtue anywhere.

That raises another question: how would your fellows in the forces treat you if you didn't "bitch smack" her?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: I've wondered Posted by: bison2
RE: I've wondered
Posted by: susan28 on May 12, 2007 10:25 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
if she's a freethinker she probably views you as an equal because you are, and if she's a conservative, she probably views you as an equal (or inferior) because you're an infidel, and thus next to her (or below her) on the totem pole.

sadly many Muslim women support sharia and don't want to be "saved" from it - submission can be very sexy afterall - and would themselves take up arms to defend it if need be, and as for the ones who value their freedom like the heroic women in the article, unfortunately the only thing standing between them and sharia hell was a fascist dictatorship, as this article states. we knocked them out of the frying pan and into the fire.

i think the comment that they went from having one dictator to many dictators summed it up nicely. unfortunately "none of the above" wasn't an option.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

"Often the first salvo is..."
Posted by: Ian MacLeod on May 9, 2007 3:13 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is pretty much what I wanted to say, but I'll add this for clarity: THIS IS WHAT'S HAPPENING HERE, NOW, IN THE U.S.! Women, especially young women, are under attack via their right to control their own bodies and lives by the Radical Right - what almost everyone VERY wrongly refers to as "fundamentalists Christians". They are Not fundamentalists, nor are they CHristians, unless you want to consider Jim Jones a Christian offshoot too. They are theocratic demagogues, they are liars, and they are violent. Some, too, are simply opportunists who would worship thee old god that Carthage fed it's children too if it were politically expedient.

And it isn't just women: they go after ANYONE who's unable to fight them. After they get enough of the government under their control, their targets become anyone who won't play their "Hate These People Or Else" game, because most people can't fight a government in courts where the richest ones win; the government can attack forever, eventually running almost ANYONE'S resources out. Then they lsoe. It also helps them that many judges are also right-wingers who owe their jobs to the right and know it.

It's exactly the same damned game except they say "Jesus" here where they say "Mohammed" over there. AND DAMMIT, YOU BUNCH OF HEAD-IN-THE-SAND CHICKENSHIT, GREEDY, LAZY IDIOTS, THEY'RE WINNING!

Ian

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: "Often the first salvo is..." Posted by: Ian MacLeod
Good article, but...
Posted by: H_H on May 9, 2007 4:01 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...it seems like a distraction from the victimization of white women in the US. Let's not feel superior to those Iraqis when things are exactly as bad (if not, worse) in this country.

After all, white women in the US can't even get ripping drunk at frat parties without worrying about whether someone is going to touch their behinds(!) The women in this society definitely have it worse than anyone else and frankly, we need to fix things in our own country first. At least Iraqi women don't suffer from poor body images as a result of seeing skinny fashion models in magazine ads, so they have it pretty good by comparison.

I'm looking forward to Beck's commentary after the short bus brings her home from school today.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Hugh Scott’s swan song: “Adios, AlterNet bloggers.”
Posted by: HughScott on May 9, 2007 5:24 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
During the past five months of AlterNet commenting by yours truly, the hits on my nonprofit website, King-George.biz, increased more than I could ever have imagined -- as the following numbers show:

DEC 2006 ..... 23,196
JAN 2007 ...... 49,898
FEB 2007 .... 123,543
MAR 2007 .... 463,691
APR 2007 .... 634,595

Rather than AlterNet posting, I have decided to use other methods of publicizing King-George.biz, which features President Bush’s falsified biography, the one I found in 2004 on a U.S. State Department website and reported to the Boston Globe. For starters, I will write personal letters about the “Bogus Bush Bio Caper” to all Democrat members of Congress.

I also want to finish my second nonfiction book about Shrub titled, “LIAR-in-CHIEF,” and promote the first one, George Dub-ya Bush, THE PHONY FIGHTER PILOT, published in 2004.

Finally, I need more time for other creative endeavors of mine -- such as writing novels, cartooning, painting and sculpting -- plus enjoy the company of my wife of 49 years, Jean, my 13-year-old grandson, Dustin, his mother, Julie, and other Scott family members. And, of course, I will continue my participation in MoveOn.org (I’m a four-year member).

Good luck to all of you. It’s been fun.

One more time --- Hugh E. Scott, editor of King-George.biz, the ONLY website with hardcopy proof of White House corruption.

PS: If you enjoy science fiction novels, visit the website for my 122,000-word thriller, The Last UFO (TheLastUFO.com) and read the first two chapters. Set in 1996, the story is based on classified CIA photographs of a flying saucer I stumbled across in Washington, D.C, while serving as an Air Force intelligence officer. Seriously.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Ms. now a tool of and mouthpiece for the neo-con imperialists?
Posted by: MartianBachelor on May 9, 2007 9:05 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This article sounds like further justification for staying in Iraq, and just about any other place in the mid-east one cares to mention until the traditional practice of Islam is wiped from the face of the earth. It's just a rerun of all the feminista harping about the Taliban in Afghanistan during the late-90's, which made going there to wage war a slam-dunk after 9/11 -- not that it did any good in turning up Osama-Been-Forgotten. People are always going to find refuge in religion during times of social chaos.

So many women in need of rescuing and protecting, so few recruits and Pentagon appropriations...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A great big, fat lie. If women are being abused it is by the Americans and their
Posted by: albrechtkrausse on May 9, 2007 12:36 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
allies the British (who are known to have spanking fetishes.) Islam is a religion of peace. Thusly, the Taliban (or any ultra-orthodox follower of the 'religion of peace') must be the ultimate peaceful people. If any women are being abused it is a remnant of colonialism, arbitrary borders, Christianity, and evil white people. Or is a direct result of the current, white occupiers. Moslems cannot exploit or abuse women per se (most are brown people and therefore cannot commit crime.)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Oooh, spank me harder....... Posted by: moflard
» Spanked by upperclassmen Posted by: moflard
» RE: Spanked by upperclassmen Posted by: morticia
» P.S. Posted by: morticia
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement