Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Israeli PM Olmert Undone by the Militia He Promised to Destroy

By Robert Fisk, Independent UK. Posted May 4, 2007.


Ehud Olmert is under intense pressure to step down after a blistering report on his leadership during the "Second Lebanon War."
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

So it has come to this. All those bodies, all those photographs of dead children -- more than 1,400 cadavers (we are not including the 230 or so Hizbollah fighters and the Israeli soldiers who died) -- are to be commemorated with the possible resignation of an Israeli prime minister who knew, and who cared, many Israelis suspect, little about war. Yes, Hizbollah provoked last summer's folly by capturing two Israeli soldiers on the Lebanese-Israel border, but Israel's response -- so totally out of proportion to the sin -- produced another debacle for the Israeli army and, presumably now, for its prime minister, Ehud Olmert.

Looking back at this terrifying, futile war, with its grotesque ambitions to "destroy" the Iranian-supported Hizbollah militia, it is incredible Olmert did not realize within days that his grandiose demands would founder. Insisting the two captured Israeli soldiers should be released and the militarily powerless Lebanese government should be held responsible for their capture was never going to produce political or military results favorable to Israel. One would have to add that Tzipi Livni's demand for the prime minister's resignation sits oddly with her support for this preposterous war.

A close reading of the interim report of Judge Eliahou Winograd's report on the summer war -- to which Olmert himself only granted the title the "Second Lebanon War" a month after it had happened -- shows clearly that it was the Israeli army which ran the military, strategic and political campaign. Again and again in Winograd's report it is clear that Olmert and his defense minister failed to challenge "in a competent way" (in the commission's devastating phrase) the plans of the Israeli army.

Day after day, for 34 days after 12 July, the Israeli air force systematically destroyed the major infrastructure of Lebanon, repeatedly claiming it was trying to avoid civilian casualties, while the world's press watched its aircraft blasting men, women and children to pieces in Lebanon. Israelis, too, were savagely killed in this war by Hizbollah's Iranian-provided missiles. But it only proved the Israeli army, famous in legend and song but not in reality, could not protect its own people. Hizbollah fighters were told by their own leadership that if they would just withstand the air attacks, they could bite the Israeli land forces when they invaded.

And bite they did. In the final 24 hours of the war, 30 Israeli soldiers were killed by Hizbollah fighters and their land offensive, so loudly trumpeted by Olmert, came to an end. During the conflict, a Hizbollah missile almost sank an Israeli corvette -- it burnt for 24 hours and was towed back to Haifa before it was able to sink -- and struck Israel's top secret military air traffic control center at Miron. The soldiers captured on the border were never returned -- pictures of them, still alive, are flaunted across the border at Israeli troops to this day -- and Hizbollah, far from being destroyed, remains as powerful as ever;

And so one of Washington's last "pro-American" cabinets in the Middle East is now threatened by the very militia which Olmert claimed he could destroy.

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: lebanon, israel, palestine, olmert

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from World! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Unique
Posted by: Julian on May 4, 2007 3:27 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Is Israel the only state in the world in which a PM can be made to stand down not for committing a war crime but for failing to commit it effectively?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» unfortunately, not Unique Posted by: brasilaron
Careful what you gloat about
Posted by: kepstein7777 on May 4, 2007 4:28 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Olmert is being criticized from the right in Israel. It's not about war crimes or Lebanese casualties.

Hizbollah is claiming victory, and the Left appears to be celebrating Olmert's downfall. It's kind of like the munchkins cheering because the Witch of the East is dead, or the hippies cheering because LBJ didn't seek another term.

If the Israelis throw him out, do you think they'll replace him with Gandhi or Mother Teresa?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

From a former Knesset member
Posted by: wawa on May 4, 2007 4:40 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Azmi Bishara wrote:

I am a Palestinian from Nazareth, a citizen of Israel and was, until last month, a member of the Israeli parliament...

...When Israel was established in 1948, more than 700,000 Palestinians were expelled or fled in fear. My family was among the minority that escaped that fate, remaining instead on the land where we had long lived. The Israeli state, established exclusively for Jews, embarked immediately on transforming us into foreigners in our own country.

For the first 18 years of Israeli statehood, we, as Israeli citizens, lived under military rule with pass laws that controlled our every movement...


...More than 20 Israeli laws explicitly privilege Jews over non-Jews. The Law of Return, for example, grants automatic citizenship to Jews from anywhere in the world. Yet Palestinian refugees are denied the right to return to the country they were forced to leave in 1948. The Basic Law of Human Dignity and Liberty -- Israel's "Bill of Rights" -- defines the state as "Jewish" rather than a state for all its citizens. Thus Israel is more for Jews living in Los Angeles or Paris than it is for native Palestinians.

Israel acknowledges itself to be a state of one particular religious group. Anyone committed to democracy will readily admit that equal citizenship cannot exist under such conditions...



...In addition to speaking out on the subjects above, I have also asserted the right of the Lebanese people, and of Palestinians in the West Bank and Gaza Strip, to resist Israel's illegal military occupation. I do not see those who fight for freedom as my enemies.

This may discomfort Jewish Israelis, but they cannot deny us our history and identity any more than we can negate the ties that bind them to world Jewry. After all, it is not we, but Israeli Jews who immigrated to this land. Immigrants might be asked to give up their former identity in exchange for equal citizenship, but we are not immigrants.

During my years in the Knesset, the attorney general indicted me for voicing my political opinions (the charges were dropped), lobbied to have my parliamentary immunity revoked and sought unsuccessfully to disqualify my political party from participating in elections -- all because I believe Israel should be a state for all its citizens and because I have spoken out against Israeli military occupation. Last year, Cabinet member Avigdor Lieberman -- an immigrant from Moldova -- declared that Palestinian citizens of Israel "have no place here," that we should "take our bundles and get lost." After I met with a leader of the Palestinian Authority from Hamas, Lieberman called for my execution.

The Israeli authorities are trying to intimidate not just me but all Palestinian citizens of Israel...Our community leaders joined together recently to issue a blueprint for a state free of ethnic and religious discrimination in all spheres. If we turn back from our path to freedom now, we will consign future generations to the discrimination we have faced for six decades.

Americans know from their own history of institutional discrimination the tactics that have been used against civil rights leaders. These include telephone bugging, police surveillance, political delegitimization and criminalization of dissent through false accusations. Israel is continuing to use these tactics at a time when the world no longer tolerates such practices as compatible with democracy.

Why then does the U.S. government continue to fully support a country whose very identity and institutions are based on ethnic and religious discrimination that victimize its own citizens?

full article at
http://electronicintifada.net/v2/article6858.shtml

public service message from WAWA:
http://www.wearewideawake.org/

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The mother of all ironies.
Posted by: HughScott on May 4, 2007 4:59 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The cloning of national leaders would explain Olmert's failure. A Bush 43 knockoff with no officer training background, Mr. Prime Minister rushed into Lebanon with flawed intelligence data, an ill-prepared army and no viable exit strategy.

Like America in Iraq, Israel got its ass kicked and the two kidnapped IDF soldiers are still being held captive by Hezbollah. The mother of all ironies.

Hugh E. Scott, editor of King-George.biz -- the only website with hardcopy proof of White House corruption.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Omert Not to Blame
Posted by: vkobaya on May 4, 2007 6:57 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The one responsible is the Village Idiot-in-Chief.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Cheering Hippies
Posted by: boing007 on May 4, 2007 7:11 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
... the hippies cheering because LBJ didn't seek another term.

Sorry, brother. I didn't cheer when LBJ said he wouldn't run for President in 1968. I shuddered because I knew that Richard Nixon was just itching to take his place and the Vietnam War was going to continue indefinitely.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Stereotyping
Posted by: boing007 on May 4, 2007 7:25 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Careful what you gloat about.
Posted by: kepstein7777 on May 4, 2007 4:28 AM
Hizbollah is claiming victory, and the Left appears to be celebrating Olmert's downfall. It's kind of like the munchkins cheering because the Witch of the East is dead, or the hippies cheering because LBJ didn't seek another term.

I wish people like you would stop pretending that all lefties, progressives, environmentalists, whatever, think and react in a kneejerk manner to political events. I'm not celebrating Olmert's downfall, although he appears to be a pretty lame Prime Minister. I'm worried that someone worse might replace him, like Netanyahu.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The long slow backtrack to reality
Posted by: rwa on May 4, 2007 8:33 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
For a long time Fisk insisted on including the "fact" that the Israeli soldiers were captured inside Israel. At last he concedes "on the border". But why does he still blame Hezbollah for starting the Israeli war on Lebanon?
Certainly having two soldiers captured provoked Israel, but why start there? Having hundreds of civilians kidnapped by Israel provoked Hezbollah into capturing two soldiers. Furthermore, it is now known that the invasion was planned and ready to go, so the pretext, whether on the north of the border or not must have been provoked. Yet Fisk clings to his signature spin.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bibi can't wait for Olmert to go
Posted by: DaBear on May 4, 2007 11:35 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You think Bibi will allow a vacuum if Olmert finally goes? Not a chance, he or some other neocon will jump in and the shit will fly with even more ferocity.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Iran, Saudi Arabia, Israel and GW Bush's covert support for Mideast terrorists
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on May 4, 2007 12:24 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There were some odd things going on in the Israeli assault on Lebanon that seem to revolve around both the local issues of Israeli, Palestine and Lebanon, as well as around the larger-scale issues, like Bush's desire to start a war with Iran.

From this perspective, Bush, Cheney, Rummy, and Rice were hoping that the Israeli-Hezbollah conflict would expand into a larger regional war that would allow the US to attack both Syria and Iran - US troops would be fighting in those two countries if it was up to them. This seems to be why the Saudis condemned Hezbollah and supported Israeli actions.

See The Redirection: Is the Administration’s new policy benefitting our enemies in the war on terrorism?
by Seymour M. Hersh Mar 5 2007


To undermine Iran, which is predominantly Shiite, the Bush Administration has decided, in effect, to reconfigure its priorities in the Middle East. In Lebanon, the Administration has coöperated with Saudi Arabia’s government, which is Sunni, in clandestine operations that are intended to weaken Hezbollah, the Shiite organization that is backed by Iran. The U.S. has also taken part in clandestine operations aimed at Iran and its ally Syria. A by-product of these activities has been the bolstering of Sunni extremist groups that espouse a militant vision of Islam and are hostile to America and sympathetic to Al Qaeda...

This is the same kind of thing (covert support for Islamic militant fundamentalists) that was involved in the biggest US covert operation ever, the CIA/Saudi/Pakistani ISI program that funded the Afghani mujahedeen in Soviet-Afghan war - a program that gave Osama bin Laden his training, and which resulted in the Taliban and in Al Queda...

On the other hand, the local results of the war in Lebanon was the economic crippling of that countries economy - the destruction of roads, factories, etc. was a deliberate attempt by Israel to destroy a local economic rival. It was an air war against a civilian population, followed by a disastrous ground invasion that seemed to most observers like an attempt at ethnic cleansing in Southern Lebanon by Israeli military forces.

The fact that Bush, Rice etc. gave so much verbal support for Israel is yet another example of the Bush Administration's continued support for war criminals and reflects their attitude towards other war crimes, for example the slaughter carried out in Falluja by US military forces acting on instructions from Rumsfeld, Cheney and Bush, (where far more people died than did in the entire Israeli-Lebanon war)

Rumsfeld: Fallujah Offensive 'Will Deal a Blow' to Terrorists, Nov 2004

Rumsfeld, Bush, Blair and Cheney are all candidates for war crimes trials - right up there with Pinochet and Saddam.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Still no hope for peace
Posted by: rwa on May 4, 2007 1:42 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is entirely possible that by the time this editorial hits the streets, Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert will have resigned.

If so, good riddance. Like the previous Israeli prime minister, this one has done little for peace, justice, security or prosperity in our region. On the contrary, every Israeli step seems designed to make things worse.

It is not necessarily Olmert’s fault. In a country where we are told again and again that a majority wants peace with the Palestinians based on a two-state solution as the necessary first step towards peace with all Arab countries, there is a remarkable lack of politicians willing to run on exactly that ticket.

Rather, Israeli leaders are elected for their ability to fight and defeat Arabs. Israeli leaders’ popularity rises and falls in step with the degree to which they are successful in that venture. Hence Olmert’s demise.

So while it is good riddance to one Israeli leader, it is with sadness that the Arab world surveys his likely successors. Not one of them — whether former PMs Ehud Barak or Benjamin Netanyahu (imagine!), current Foreign Minister Tzipi Livni or former chief of staff Ami Ayalon — offers the slightest bit of encouragement.

Not one has indicated that s/he is ready to take the necessary steps to reach a proper settlement with the Palestinians (and indeed the Syrians). Not one has indicated that s/he is ready to once and for all dismantle the illegal settlement project in the West Bank, including East Jerusalem, or the Golan Heights.

Not one countenances that there should be a just solution to the Palestinian refugee problem, including, but not limited to, the choice for these refugees to return. Not one, therefore, offers any hope for any peace any time soon.

And while we in the Arab world can only envy and marvel at the solid independence of an investigative commission that publicly takes its political leaders to task for failing their own people, we can only despair at the fact that Israeli political leaders are judged to have failed their people for not winning an illegal and insane massacre against a neighbouring country, rather than for having entered into that madness in the first place.

Or for failing to make the peace that is the only kind worth having: a just one.

http://www.jordantimes.com/thu/opi nion/opinion1.htm

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I'm sorry, but Palestinians need to move on
Posted by: Ydotheyhateus on May 4, 2007 8:27 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
with their lives. They need to leave Eretz Israel that they have occupied for few hundred years and move back with the rest of Arabs.
Why do these Palestinians want to live in miserable conditions? Palestinians commit incredible acts of terrorism against a people who have already suffered 2K years under Christian Europe, and now they can't even have a home-land?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Move on to where pray? Posted by: moflard
» Are you serious? Posted by: moflard
» RE: Are you serious? Posted by: Ydotheyhateus
» You Posted by: brasilaron
» have you forgotten... Posted by: brasilaron
» RE: have you forgotten... Posted by: tashi
» yup Posted by: brasilaron
» RE: yup Posted by: yellow