Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Blood Money: U.S. Bank Funds Korean Project That Will Destroy Native Community

By Daphne Wysham, AlterNet. Posted April 21, 2007.


Do the money managers not know that poor villagers are being detained, beaten and even killed to protect their investments? Or do they not care?
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

"When you share love's warmth, it returns even warmer. Together we can move the world."

So says the website of the South Korean-based Pohang Iron and Steel Co., or POSCO, an image of two beaming children and a bucolic mountain backdrop framing the message. American investors are among those sharing in the "warmth" of POSCO's profits, up 44 percent in the first quarter.

POSCO, the world's fourth-largest steel company, has apparently fooled many U.S. investors into believing this saccharine façade: The Bank of New York, a U.S.-based investment firm, is POSCO's trustee and largest shareholder, holding 22 percent of its shares. Another U.S. investment firm, Capital Research & Management (Capital Group Companies), one of the world's largest and most publicity-shy investment management companies, is No. 2, with a 4.4 percent share in POSCO.

Yet POSCO has been accused of marshaling police who jailed and beat striking union members -- one to death -- in its home country of South Korea, and it now stands poised to engage in even more violent tactics in India's eastern state of Orissa.

There, in the coastal village of Jagatsinghpur, farmers have railed against eviction orders for the past 22 months. Today, over 1,000 Indian officers -- 20 platoons -- of state police have encircled the villages where the POSCO site is planned in an attempt to repress the growing resistance. Farmers have formed "self-sacrifice squads" -- 500 men and women are prepared to die rather than move. Today, the Jagatsinghpur villagers have barricaded themselves behind bamboo fences in a desperate bid to protect their land.

In recent months, over 15 people were killed after police fired on protestors refusing to move to make way for an Indonesian chemical plant in Nandigram, West Bengal. Like the proposed POSCO site, the Nandigram village was one of hundreds of Indian "special economic zones" -- or SEZs -- neoliberal dreamlands where land rights, environmental and labor protections, and other laws are all but eliminated to attract foreign investors.

Similar massacres have taken place in SEZs in Kalinganagar and Kashipur, also in Orissa, and elsewhere. It is for this reason that the Jagatsinghpur villagers are demanding the immediate removal of the paramilitary forces and police from the vicinity of the proposed POSCO site, says Debjeet Sarangi from Living Farms, an organization working with farmers on sustainable agriculture in Orissa. And, he adds, they are asking for solidarity in their call that no project should proceed against the wishes of the local people.

The $12 billion POSCO project in Orissa is the largest foreign investment project ever in India. POSCO plans to take over 8,000 acres of fertile farmland to build a massive steel, automobile and ship-building complex, complete with its own power plant and port, displacing over 30,000 people. The POSCO project is the largest in the history of South Korea's overseas investment.

POSCO is very likely viewing its new operations in Orissa as a way of escaping pressures from unions for higher wages and better working conditions in its home country. At a strike at a South Korean POSCO facility in July 2006, one union member, Ha Joong Keun, was beaten to death by riot police, another suffered a miscarriage and scores of others were injured as a result of police brutality. POSCO used its political and economic clout to shut down the Pohang Construction Local Union affiliated with the Korean Federation of Construction Industry Trade Unions (KFCITU) during the strike. Approximately 25 Korean union members still languish in jail: Their crime, demanding a livable wage and a 40-hour workweek from POSCO.

The Orissa state government claims that it has already acquired 1,100 acres from their owners. Their government's environmental impact assessment claims that "89 percent" of the land is government-owned and only 11 percent is occupied. But that claim is visibly and historically false. Decades ago, villagers purchased land ownership rights from their king. Today, their descendants, mostly tribal farmers, have made their homes and livelihoods in the rich soil near the coast, growing betel nut and cashew crops. A 1956 law strongly restricts the sale of tribal lands to nontribals. In a bid to open up Orissa's vast mineral wealth to foreign investors, the state government is trying both to undo that law and dispute the ownership rights that date back decades.

POSCO has already invested $6.2 billion in the Orissa project, roughly equivalent to its profits in 2005, one year before striking Korean workers unsuccessfully demanded higher wages. BHP Billiton Ltd. of Australia, the world's largest mining company, has invested another $2.4 billion.

These corporations and their investors have a larger stake in POSCO's profits than their Korean peers; for example, the Korean national pension fund owns 2.9 percent of POSCO shares, South Korean Telecom owns 2.8 percent shares and South Korea's Pohang University of Science & Technology owns 2.7 percent. The remainder of shareholders in POSCO are small mutual funds, primarily based in the United States and Luxembourg.

If the police move in to Jagatsinghpur, to lay the groundwork for POSCO's profit-making venture, American shareholders may feel that "warm" feeling of high returns on their investments. What they won't see -- but should -- is the lives destroyed and the blood shed for that growing profit margin.

Editor's note: a correction was made after this story was originally posted.

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: free trade, human rights, posco, foreign direct investment, new economy

Daphne Wysham is a fellow at the Institute for Policy Studies in Washington, D.C., where she is the director of the Sustainable Energy & Economy Network.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from World! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
A poorly stated problem without a solution.
Posted by: Lincoln fan on Apr 21, 2007 7:06 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In my opinion, this article is an emotional diatribe with very little factual backup. India is a Democracy and like the U.S. has apparently made zones for commerce to develop and hopefully raise the people from poverty. Whether the government is doing that wisely or unwisely remains to be seen.

It's no secret that all businesses have one purpose, to make a profit. It amazes me that people expect them to do other things, that is not what they are designed to do. We don't expect charities to make a profit and it would be scandalous if they did. Why then expect a business to be charitable?

The only way that corporations can be controlled is by law. If you don't think that corporations should invest in non=union enterprises get a law passed that makes it illegal to do so. If you think that corporations shouldn't invest in enterprises that ruin the environment get a law passed that forbids it.

To single out this one bank and its management as an inhuman monster is not only wrong, it's not effective. All corporations are inhuman monsters and they are running amok. We can't just write an account of each incident where they're harmful to humans and expect that to solve the problem: it won't. We have to take action to bring all businesses under the control of "we, the people".
Bob Reichenbach,
Director, The Lincoln Initiatijve.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Who cares about South Korea when our kids are dying in Iraq.
Posted by: HughScott on Apr 21, 2007 9:17 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Pardon my French, people, but I am goddamned sick and tired of AlterNet's obvious reluctance to address the most important issue of our time -- perhaps in U.S. history -- Bush's insane war of choice.

Every day, one article on AlterNet should be devoted to Iraq so we can educate ourselves about the neocon war criminals in Washington and the hardships they are causing our troops in the Middle East and the wounded who have come home.

For example, how many AlterNet readers know that GIs in Iraq are wearing helmets that have inferior liner pads?

The BEST liner-pad system for offsetting brain trauma caused by roadside bombs is manufactured by Oregon Aero Inc. But instead, the U.S. Army has been supplying its soldiers with pads made by a GOP-connected company that produces skateboard helmets.

Shamefully for a nation that seems unbothered by a war that requires no shared sacrifice except U.S. military personnel and their families, some GIs in Iraq are removing the inferior pads and pounding them with a hammer to make the material softer and more wearable, which reduces protection against explosions.

To learn more about the UNKNOWN helmet liner scandal, visit my website, King-George.biz -- the only one with hardcopy proof of White House corruption.

Hugh E. Scott, a mad-as-hell Vietnam veteran.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

One more gripe from a pissed-off veteran.
Posted by: HughScott on Apr 21, 2007 9:58 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Since April 15, AlterNet posted 50 articles, of which NOT ONE addressed the problems GIs are experiencing in Iraq and after returning home. Who runs this website anyway -- Karl Rove?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement