Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

The Weapon No One Can Stop

By Mike Davis, Tomdispatch.com. Posted March 29, 2007.


The car bomb has proven globally to be an almost invincible weapon of the ill-armed and underfunded, as well as the one weapon of mass destruction that the Bush administration has totally ignored.
032907story
032907story
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Despite heroic reassurances from both the White House and the Pentagon that the six-week-old U.S. escalation in Baghdad and al-Anbar Province is proceeding on course, suicide car-bombers continue to devastate Shiite and Sunni neighborhoods, often under the noses of reinforced American patrols and checkpoints. Indeed, February was a record month for car bombings, with at least 44 deadly explosions in Baghdad alone, and March promises to duplicate the carnage.

Car bombs, moreover, continue to evolve in horror and lethality. In January and March, the first chemical "dirty bomb" explosions took place using chlorine gas, giving potential new meaning to the President's missing weapons of mass destruction in Iraq.

The sectarian guerrillas who claim affiliation with "al-Qaeda in Mesopotamia" are now striking savagely, and seemingly at will, against dissident Sunni tribes in al-Anbar province as well as Shiite areas of Baghdad and Shiite pilgrims on the highways to the south of the capital. With each massacre, the bombers refute Bush administration claims that the U.S. military can "take back and secure" Baghdad block-by-block or establish its own patrols and new, fortified mini-bases as a realistic substitute for local self-defense militias.

On February 23rd, for instance, shortly after the beginning of the "Surge," a suicide truck-bomber killed 36 Sunnis in Habbaniya, west of Baghdad, after an imam at a local mosque had denounced al-Qaeda. Ten days later, a kamikaze driver ploughed his truck bomb into Baghdad's famed literary bazaar, the crowded corridor of bookstores and coffee houses along Mutanabi Street, incinerating at least 30 people and, perhaps, the last hopes of an Iraqi intellectual renaissance.

On March 10th, another suicide bomber massacred 20 people in Sadr City, just a few hundred yards away from one of the new U.S. bases. The next day, a bomber rammed his car into flatbed truck full of Shiite pilgrims, killing more than 30. A week later, horror exceeded itself when a car bomber evidently used two little children as a decoy to get through a military checkpoint, then exploded the car with the kids still in the back seat.

In a demonstration of a tactic that has proven especially deadly over the past year, a car-bomb attack on March 23rd was coordinated with an assailant in a suicide vest and almost killed Deputy Prime Minister Salam al-Zubaie, whose tribal alliance, the Anbar Salvation Council, has accepted funding from the Americans and been denounced by the jihadis.

When it comes to the development of suicide vehicles, however, the most alarming innovation has, without doubt, been the debut in January of truck bombs carrying chlorine gas tanks rigged with explosives. Of course, "dirty bombs," usually of the nuclear variety, have been a longtime obsession of anti-terrorism experts (as well as the producers of TV potboilers), but the sinister glamour of radioactive devices -- scattering deadly radiological waste in the City of London or across midtown Manhattan -- has tended to overshadow the far greater likelihood that bomb-makers would initially be attracted to the cheapness and ease of combining explosives with any number of ordinary industrial caustics and toxins.

As if to emphasize that poison-gas explosions were now part of their standard arsenal, sectarian bombers -- identified, as usual, by the American military as members of "al-Qaeda in Mespotamia" -- unleashed three successive chlorine suicide-bomb attacks on March 16th against Sunni towns outside of Falluja.

The two largest attacks involved dump trucks loaded with 200-gallon chlorine tanks. Aside from the dozens wounded or killed by the direct explosions, at least another 350 people were stricken by the yellow-green clouds of chlorine.

As in April 1915, with the first uses of chlorine gas on the Western Front in World War I, these explosions sowed widespread panic, underlining -- as the bombers no doubt intended -- the inability of the Americans to protect potential allies in al-Anbar Province, the heartland of the Sunni insurgency. (The recent discovery of stocks of chlorine and nitric acid in a Sunni neighborhood of west Baghdad will hardly assuage those fears.)

The shock waves from the March dirty bombs also rattled windows on the Hudson River, where New York Police Department (NYPD) experts warned the media that poor security at local chemical plants raised the danger of copy-cat attacks using stolen ingredients.

An anonymous senior official in the department's Counter-Terrorism Bureau told Reuters that "the NYPD expected would-be attackers targeting New York to try to import the tactic." At the same time, New Jersey's two Democratic Senators -- Robert Menendez and Frank Lautenberg -- complained that the Bush administration was coddling the chemical industry by blocking New Jersey and other states from implementing tougher safety regulations.

Meanwhile, back in Iraq, the chlorine clouds and the truck bombs have deflected U.S. troops into a massive, desperate hunt for the "makeshift car-bomb factories" that Major General William Caldwell, chief spokesman for the Surge, claims proliferate in the gritty suburbs and industrial estates that ring Baghdad.

The image of a clandestine car-bomb industry, by the way, is rich with irony. Baghdad's factory belt contains hundreds of state-owned and private factories that once manufactured canned food, tiles, baby clothes, transit buses, fertilizers, commercial glass, and the like. Since the American invasion, however, the plants are idle, if not derelict, and their once integrated Sunni-Shiite workforces are bunkered down, jobless, in increasingly sectarian neighborhoods. Unemployment in greater Baghdad is variously estimated in the 40-60 percent range.

It is unlikely that the current raids -- using troops who would otherwise be securing streets and "winning hearts and minds" -- will uncover more than a tiny fraction of the city's bomb "factories." Indeed, the car bomb -- even more than the roadside bombs (IEDs) that are filling the Humvee junkyards -- has proven globally to be an almost invincible weapon of the ill-armed and underfunded, as well as the one weapon of mass destruction that the Bush administration has totally ignored. None of the American commanders in the field in 2003-2004, much less the imperial daydreamers in neoconservative think-tanks back in Washington, seem to have foreseen the ubiquity of its use.

According to a national cross-sectional cluster sample survey of mortality in Iraq since the U.S. invasion, carried out by epidemiologists at Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health and Iraqi physicians (organized through Mustansiriya University in Baghdad), an estimated 78,000 Iraqis were killed by several thousand vehicle bombings between March 2003 to June 2006.

Moreover, as I explain in my newly-published history of the car bomb, Buda's Wagon, there is little hope for any technological fix or scientific miracle that will allow reliable detection of a stolen Mercedes with 500 pounds of C-4 in the trunk or a dump truck laden with chlorine tanks and high explosives idling in one of Baghdad's colossal traffic jams. (Checkpoints? Just a synonym for target of opportunity.)

In the meantime, the bombers are obviously wagering that if they can sustain current levels of carnage, the Shiite militias will be forced back onto the streets to protect their neighborhoods (as the American troops can't), risking a bloody, all-out confrontation with U.S. forces for the ownership of the vast Shiite slum of Sadr City and other Shiite areas in eastern Baghdad.

On the other side, Lieutenant General David Petraeus, counterinsurgency expert and mastermind of the Surge, must shut down the car-bombers by the beginning of the summer or face a likely popular revolt in Sadr City. With each explosion, his chances of success diminish.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: war in iraq, car bomb

Mike Davis is the author, most recently, of Buda's Wagon: A Brief History of the Car Bomb. He is also the author of Planet of Slums (Verso 2006), and, with Justin Chacon Akers, No One is Illegal (Haymarket 2006).

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from World! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Lesson #1
Posted by: NoPCZone on Mar 29, 2007 12:27 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A retired Secret Service agent was interviewed once and made the statement that anybody willing to die could get to the President no matter how the Secret Service arranged things, This from someone who was in Dallas in 1963 and at both attempts on President Ford.

The same is true in warfare- someone willing to die can be far more destructive than someone trying to fight and live. The fact that these individuals have been driven to such extremes by desperation, hatred or whatever is a tragic thing.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Lesson #1 Posted by: SteveO
Middle East Rule of Thumb: When fighting Islamic insurgents, think like them.
Posted by: HughScott on Mar 29, 2007 12:32 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So far in Iraq, we have been one step (in some cases more) behind the insurgents. Does anyone really believe they will hang around Baghdad and be killed or captured?

Of course not. The bad guys have left town, to carry out their terrorist operations in outlying areas, which begs the question, "Why the hell are our GIs in the city when they could be chasing down insurgents in rural Iraq, a more combat-suitable environment?"

In sum, there is no reason why Iraqi soldiers can't pacify Baghdad on their own -- right now. Assuming, of course, they want to.

Hugh E. Scott, editor of King-George.biz -- the only website with hardcopy proof of White House corruption.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Bad guys? Posted by: xi_people
» RE: Bad guys?......YUP Posted by: Captainmagic
» You nailed it, Brotherjonah Posted by: HughScott
Good!
Posted by: Temporary on Mar 29, 2007 12:44 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
» RE: Good! Posted by: pingoo
» RE: False-Flag Operations Posted by: sdoboze
» The weapon iraqis can stop Posted by: White middleclass male
The Big Ka-BOOM!
Posted by: Tom Degan on Mar 29, 2007 2:40 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Special thanks to Jello Biafra for the title of this posting.

What scares the hell out of me is the fact that it's only a matter of time before this sort of thing becomes a regular occurrance on our shore. Car bombs were used frequently over the years by organized crime to get even with certain people who had fallen out of grace with THE FAMILY. Again, it's only a matter of time, folks.

John Lennon's famous 1971 anti-war anthem has been parodied by the left over the years by the so-called "left for being sentimental and child-like. Truth be told: he originally wrote it with the ears of children in mind. But lately, it's been ringing in my ears, as well:

Imagine all the people living life in peace.

Tom Degan
Goshen, NY
"The Rant" by Tom Degan

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The Big Ka-BOOM! Posted by: Conservasaurus
» my take on it... Posted by: brotherjonah
I dunno
Posted by: gjames on Mar 29, 2007 6:42 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I've been against this war from before the beginning, but now I am beginning to think: if the US withdraws, is this what we are abandoning some 20 million Iraqi civilians to?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Will it be better if we DON'T leave? Posted by: brotherjonah
» RE: I dunno.....no not abandonment Posted by: Captainmagic
Misplaced cries!
Posted by: Conservasaurus on Mar 29, 2007 6:44 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This article raises the possibility that the same could be a common occurance in this country.. and it always amazed me that no one has actually tried this.. In subways, shoulder held missiles at airports etc.. or have they???

When one sees the possibilities, it becomes apparent how misplaced the cries of the far left is regarding the security measures taken to safeguard this country. Maybge there is something to the fact that we have been free of another attack!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Misplaced cries! Posted by: pingoo
» RE: Misplaced cries! Posted by: Conservasaurus
» It has happened Posted by: SteveO
» RE: It has happened Posted by: Conservasaurus
THE DAUGHTER OF NECESSITY IS THE MOTHER OF INVENTION
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Mar 29, 2007 7:22 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Not all countries have big tanks, scary planes & huge bombs but they do know how to survive. They can't match anything we have by way of weapons. But they are resourceful and willing to die for their cause. Car bombs are cheap, maintain a steady climate of fear, and do alot of damage.To say that The Commander in Chief put his troops 'in harm's way' is an understatement. maybe a misstatement. He doesn't seem to care. Thanks, ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The double entendre of "car bomb"
Posted by: amacd on Mar 29, 2007 7:35 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's beyond ironic that the term "car bomb" accurately means both the indiscriminate killing of a few dozens of human beings at a time by 'radical' terrorists putting a bomb in a car's truck, which Mile Davis means in this column, and also the slower, less shocking and accepted means of corporate approved 'growth' in car and oil sales faux-profits, without accounting for or even looking at the negative externaltity costs of their global warming 'car bombs'.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Car bombs or not, with neocons running Gulf War 2, we will never win in Iraq.
Posted by: HughScott on Mar 29, 2007 9:57 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
“Military insanity” is ignoring history and sending white Christian soldiers into the Middle East to impose a Western-style democracy. But then, George W. and his imperialist neocon cabal don’t read history books. They only care about writing new ones.

Consider the following extract from my 2004 nonfiction book, “George Dub-ya Bush, THE PHONY FIGHTER PILOT.”


Why didn’t Bush’s advisors see the insurgency coming? I’m not an expert on the Middle East, but I do have good common sense. And it didn’t compute in my brain last year that the way to win hearts and minds in Iraq was by breaking into Baghdad homes, terrifying women and children with M16s, shouting orders in pidgin Arabic, hauling away traditional weapons like the AK47 along with blindfolded relatives suspected of being Baath Party loyalists, whom we financed in the war against Iran.

How angry would you get if Iraqi soldiers in a white pickup truck stopped in front of your house tonight, broke down your door, aimed AK47s at your family, confiscated your shotgun, and demanded to know in broken English if you were a Republican? Would not such treatment make you want to retaliate with pipe bombs and Molotov cocktails?

God, I hope so. If not, the American Revolution was fought in vain.


Hugh E. Scott -- Vietnam vet, ex-USAF pilot, registered Republican and Goldwater conservative with a family history of honorable military service going back to 1776. Also the editor of King-George.biz, the only website with hardcopy proof of White House corruption..

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Not Much Time Left
Posted by: Thomas Mendip on Mar 29, 2007 10:07 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The neocon dimwits who envisioned this war never thought about this possibility. Car bombs are cheap, easy, and ridiculously effective; they kill soldiers, and terrify civilians.
What more could a terrorist want. Ultimately, to anyone with a passing knowledge of history, this was predictable. A simple, reliable weapon (like the AK-47) always trumps complicated, more destructive, but less reliable weapons.
It is utterly irrational, absolutely illogical, outright loony, but it is human nature--people will tolerate the most egregious, outrageously heinous behavior from the most brutal of dictators, provided he is ONE OF THEIR OWN; but let a foreigner intervene to save them, and they will fight tooth and nail to preserve their status as oppressed.
This should be known as the Dracula Effect. Modern Romanians hold Vlad Tepes, the 15th century prince who was the inspiration for Dracula, as a national hero. Never mind that he was a psychotic lunatic of such outrageously ghoulish proclivities as to make Hitler look sane and safe; all of that is forgotten in the soft, nostalgic glow that suffuses his achievements--he defeated the Turks (always important!); made the streets safe to walk; eliminated crime (except his own); got the trains to run on time, etc, etc, etc. We know the rest, all the idyllic images people conjure up of life under a nasty dictator who kept the steets clean.
I've wondered how long it would be before the Iraqi people ventured into their blood soaked, body strewn streets one morning and asked how they got into this mess. They'll ask how their previously spotless boulevards got splattered with body parts, and they'll wax nostalgic for their "beloved" Saddam. And who took him away, the only thing keeping the chaos at bay? Those nasty Americans. (Saddam was a least an Iraqi!)
And that will be the tipping point. Each new bomb chinks at resolve; each new body widens the breach, until they will finally have had enough. And they will then ask, more likely demand, that we leave.
We have never had much choice here: we can only solve this mess by becoming what we came to kill--we will have to be Saddam, be as brutal, as callous, as wretchedly barbaric; or, we will have to leave and let them solve this themselves. Either way, we fail.
I guess we have two years before those scales tip irretrievably away from us. If, in those two years, we don't somehow bring peace to this place, we've lost it. And we will then have to deal, for decades, with the repercussions of this stupid venture through out the middle east.
Given that Dubya has neither sufficient testicular or cerebral development to be either courageous or intelligent enough to get out, and the Democrats in congress seem content to flounder about, still in a stupor induced by the fact that they WON, this wretched abomination of foreign policy will be dumped on the desk of the next president.
I don't envy Hillary or Obama (it won't be a Republican).

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

We can stop car bombs-
Posted by: WitchyNy on Mar 29, 2007 11:00 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is simply the only way desperate people feel they can fight back.
If they did not feel so desperate-if they had an intact social structure-car bombs would not happen.

We need a world government. How-
We need to give the United Nations the power it is supposed to have.
We need to get rid of Bush and Co.-and the huge profit-based corporations that now control everything. We need an environmental and justice based-not profit based-world.

911 was a giant car bomb-it happened because those people felt they were driven to it. They felt they had nothing to lose. The only difference was- this time it happened in America.

War is never the answer.
Violence only leads to more violence and
"Poverty is the worst form of violence"-Ghandi.
When will we ever learn?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: We can stop car bombs- Posted by: JMorse
» RE: We can stop car bombs- Posted by: brunowe
» RE: We can stop car bombs- Posted by: JMorse
» RE: We can stop car bombs- Posted by: brunowe
» RE: We can stop car bombs- Posted by: JMorse
» Rubbish Posted by: brunowe
» RE: ubbish Posted by: Graeme
Speaking of car bombs and stupid neocons, read what Barry McCaffery said yesterday...
Posted by: HughScott on Mar 29, 2007 11:08 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Gen. McCaffery is a PNAC signatory who makes his living promoting neoconservatism.

I heard him say yesterday on CNN that a withdrawal deadline 18 months from now would lead to chaos. That's not what the Iraqis believe. After Barry's CNN appearance, I posted the following news bulletin and my reaction on King-George.biz -- the only website with hardcopy proof of White House corruption.


TOKYO, March 24 (Reuters) - Iraqi Vice President Tareq al-Hashemi said that U.S.-led coalition forces should be able to withdraw from his country in a year and half at the latest, a Japanese newspaper reported Saturday.

"Personally, I think Iraqi security forces will complete reforms and training in a year or a year and a half," Hashemi was quoted in an interview with the Mainichi Shimbun daily. "After that, the coalition troops will no longer be needed."


Ironically, Hashemi's timeframe matches the deadline for withdrawal passed in Congress by the House Democrats -- legislation George W. has promised to veto. So why is he being so stubborn? (ANSWER: Idiotic neocon imperialism)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» the puppet cutting his own strings? Posted by: brotherjonah
Another reason for leaving Iraq NOW
Posted by: HughScott on Mar 29, 2007 1:20 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yesterday, the king of Saudi Arabia, Al Qaeda's beeding ground, said he wants U.S. troops out of the Middle East ASAP.

Does he know something Bush doesn't?

Stupid question.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Sounds OK to me, Brotherjonah Posted by: HughScott
But we spend Billions on High Tech Weapons
Posted by: JSquercia on Mar 29, 2007 1:40 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Strange isn't it we still spend BILLIONS on High Tech Weapons which are useless in situations like Iraq . They do however rake in the profits for outfits like the Carlyle Group and the Militery Industrial Complex .

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It's about time someone filled the void on the car bomb mess.
Posted by: maxpayne on Mar 29, 2007 3:03 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thanks for the article. The next time you hear another "Saddham had WMDs", take a printed copy of this article and smack it in their faces saying, "AND BUSH HAS HAPPILY CREATED MORE CAR WMDS ! HAPPY NOW ?!?!?"

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

if you smack them on the nose with a rolled up paper...
Posted by: brotherjonah on Mar 29, 2007 4:45 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
they go away... works with polar bears and tigers too,

True story....

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

ATTENTION AlterNet pals: Follow Brotherjonah's suggestion and visit stratfor.com
Posted by: HughScott on Mar 29, 2007 5:46 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Here's the latest report on http://www.stratfor.com.

Iraq: Sunnis Versus Shia in Tall Afar
March 29, 2007 2245 GMT

The Iraqi government admitted March 29 that local police were involved in the massacre of some 70 Sunnis in the northern Iraqi city of Tall Afar. Though Tall Afar has seen militancy of various stripes in the past, this is the first case of sectarian violence in the city. This incident gives Muqtada al-Sadr's movement an opportunity to exploit the situation to its advantage to counter the pressure it is currently under and advance its position.


Bush's surge will work alright -- surge death squad killings outside Baghdad. We should've left Iraq yesterday.

Hugh E. Scott, editor of King-George.biz -- the only website with hardcopy proof of White House corruption.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Setting a date for withdrawal might be what's needed.
Posted by: bohdan on Mar 29, 2007 6:18 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If this isn't a "civil war" as the Administration claims then with a set deadline it might also mean that the "insurgents" won't need to blow up American soldiers because they will be leaving anyway by such and such date.

If it is a civil war that Americans are forced to "clean up" then whatever day Americans think they will leave won't make a difference, it'll still go on anyway no matter what delusional picture the Administration might paint.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Red Belt with two black stripes? Posted by: brotherjonah
What goes around comes around.
Posted by: Neiljohn on Apr 1, 2007 2:25 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
At last the penny droppeth with a great metallic clang, for years the irish americans, or is that the american irish, funded to ongoing activity of the provo's in ireland and mainland britain, where the car bomb became the terror weapon of choice, yes the m-16 ak47 and barrett 0.5 were used to target police/mil, but the terror weapon we grew up with was the car bomb, what goes around comes around....

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

the same idea taken further
Posted by: Don Garb on Apr 1, 2007 9:29 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The suicide bomber is effective because it's hard to believe that someone would choose to end their own life in such a way. But it happens and we've gotten used to it. Now we have the combination of someone choosing to end their life, PLUS wreck their nice car. To the materially obsessed, this is truly inconceivable!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

conclusions of report...
Posted by: rockpicker on Apr 3, 2007 9:23 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...by Brigadier Ceneral Barton K. Partin, on investigation of the Oklahoma City bombing.


"The Murrah Federal Building was not destroyed by one sole truck bomb. The major factor in its destruction appears to have been detonation of explosives carefully placed at four critical junctures on supporting columns within the building. The only possible reinforced concrete structural failure solely attributable to the truck bomb was the stripping out of the ceilings of the first and second floors in the "pit" area behind columns B4 and By. Even this may have been caused by a demolition charge at column B3.

It is truly unfortunate that a separate and independent bomb damage assessment was not made during the cleanup, before the building was demolished on May 23 and hundreds of truck loads of debris were hauled away, smashed down, and covered with dirt behind a security fence. When the picture at Tab 4 was made, all evidence of demolition charges had been removed from the buildin


g site (i.e., the stubs of columns B3, A3, A5, A7 and the demolished junctures at the header with columns A3, A5 and A7.

All ambiguity with respect to the use of supplementing demolition charges and the type of truck used could be quickly resolved in the FBI were required to release the surveillance camera coverage of this terribly tragic event."

What do you say when it's your own government causing the terror?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement