Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

The American Ghosts of Abu Ghraib

By Sam Provance, Consortium News. Posted April 6, 2007.


In this first-person account, former Army Sgt. Sam Provance -- one of the heroes of the Abu Ghraib scandal -- describes what he learned when he attended a special screening of the documentary "Ghosts of Abu Ghraib."
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Editor's Note:

Former Army Sgt. Sam Provance was one of the heroes of the Abu Ghraib scandal, the only uniformed military intelligence officer at the Iraqi prison to testify about the abuses during the internal Army investigation. When he recognized that the Pentagon was scapegoating low-level personnel, he also gave an interview to ABC News.

For refusing to play along with the cover-up, Provance was punished and pushed out of the U.S. military. The Pentagon went forward with its plan to pin the blame for the sadistic treatment of Iraqi detainees on a handful of poorly trained MPs, not on the higher-ups who brought the lessons of "alternative interrogation techniques" from the Guatanamo Bay prison to Abu Ghraib.

The Congress, which was then controlled by the Republicans, promised a fuller investigation. Provance submitted a sworn statement. But Congress never followed through, leaving Provance hanging out to dry. Then, in February 2007, he went to a special screening of the documentary, "Ghosts of Abu Ghraib," and learned more than he expected about why the scandal died.

***

For those of you who have not heard of me, I am Sam Provance. My career as an Army sergeant came to a premature end at age 32 after eight years of decorated service, because I refused to remain silent about Abu Ghraib, where I served for five months in 2004 at the height of the abuses. Share this article

A noncommissioned officer specializing in intelligence analysis, my job at Abu Ghraib was systems administrator ("the computer guy"). But I had the misfortune of being on the night shift, saw detainees dragged in for interrogation, heard the screams, and saw many of them dragged out. I was sent back to my parent unit in Germany shortly after the Army began the first of its many self-investigations.

In Germany, I had the surreal experience of being interrogated by one of the Army-General-Grand-Inquisitors, Major General George Fay, who showed himself singularly uninterested in what went on at Abu Ghraib.

I had to insist that he listen to my eyewitness account, whereupon he threatened punitive actions against me for not coming forward sooner and even tried to hold me personally responsible for the scandal itself.

The Army then demoted me, suspended my Top Secret clearance, and threatened me with ten years in a military prison if I asked for a court martial. I was even given a gag order, the only one I know to have been issued to those whom Gen. Fay interviewed.

But the fact that most Americans know nothing of what I saw at Abu Ghraib, and that my career became collateral damage, so to speak, has nothing to do with the gag order, which turned out to be the straw that broke this sergeant's back.

After seeing first-hand that the investigation wasn't going to go anywhere and that no one else I knew from the intelligence community was being candid, I allowed myself to be interviewed by American and German journalists. Sadly, you would have had to know German to learn the details of what I had to say at that time about the abuses at Abu Ghraib.

Later, Republican Congressman Christopher Shays, who was then chair of the House Subcommittee on National Security, Emerging Threats, and International Relations, invited me to testify on Feb. 14, 2006, so my sworn testimony is on the public record.

On June 30, 2006, dissatisfied with the Pentagon's non-responsiveness to requests for information on my situation, the Committee on Government Reform issued a subpoena requiring then-Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld to produce the requested documents by July 14. I heard nothing further. I guess he forgot. I guess Congress forgot, too.

Thanks largely to a keen sense of justice and a good dose of courage on the part of pro bono lawyers and congressional aides, I made it through the next two and a half years of professional limbo, applying my computer skills to picking up trash and performing guard duty. Instead of a prison sentence, I was honorably discharged on Oct. 13, 2006 and began my still-continuing search for a place back in the civilian world.

Producers for Rory Kennedy's documentary "Ghosts of Abu Ghraib" were among the journalists who interviewed me -- discreetly -- in Germany. On Feb. 12, 2007 I attended a screening of that documentary. What happened there bears telling.

Surreal event

Walking into the fancy government building to see the documentary proved to be a bizarre experience. Hardly in the door, I saw a one of the guests shaking his head, saying in some wonderment, "The young woman at the front desk greeted me with a cheerful smile; Abu Ghraib? she said. Right this way, please."

The atmosphere did seem more appropriate for an art show than a documentary on torture. People were dressed to the nines, heartily laughing, and servers with white gloves were walking about with wine and hors d'oeuvres.

I managed to find one other person who was also in the film, former Gen. Janis Karpinski, with whom I shared the distinction of having been reduced in rank because we refused to "go along to get along."


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: iraq, torture, abu ghraib

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from World! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
and you're OUR soldiers as well
Posted by: orwellwasn'tdreaming on Apr 6, 2007 6:10 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I consider Sgt. Provance, Spec. Joe Darby, and Gen. Karpinski among the greatest heroes of this hideous "war". Ever since I heard their stories, I've wanted to find a way to express to them--and to CWO Hugh Thompson, who exposed the massacre at My Lai 4--my admiration and gratitude for their guts and ethics. It takes *real* bravery to withstand mob psychology and to risk one's career to do what's right; very few of us are that courageous.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Effete Lindsey Graham A Disgrace To The Closeted
Posted by: mrtshw on Apr 6, 2007 6:22 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Lindsey Graham's Distinguished Military Career

Lindsey Graham: National Guard Lawyer

Most South Carolinians who are not on life support are awaiting the effete Graham's outing as a gay homophobe which would , of course, be anti-climatic as he's already admitted to being a GOP politician.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

so sorry
Posted by: progressivetype on Apr 6, 2007 7:48 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have had several bumper stickers on the back of my car since the occupation began. The sticker that seemed to inflammed people the most is "GOD FORGIVE AMERICA" This is a heartbreaking article on so many levels, especially in the light of all the lives ruined and dreams destroyed by the empty love of war by cowardly men who have never seen combat. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vc1ARRgbRN0
As Jack Lemmon said at the end of the film "Missing" about the CIA led coup in Chile in the 1970's, "Should God forgive America?"
I trust that what Martin Luther Kings said will be of some comfort: "The arc of history is long, but it bends toward justice."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I Am Both Saddened and Heartened
Posted by: Bab5nutz on Apr 6, 2007 9:06 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am saddened because authorities think that torture is an acceptable methods of getting information in the 21st century. People being tortured will say anything to make the pain stop.
But, I am heartened because there are still people around who are willing to put everything on the line to do the right thing.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

bedrocklib
Posted by: bedrocklib on Apr 6, 2007 9:49 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thank you for your courage. Most people have no idea what torture does to the torturer. It is our children who will bear these scars. You are a ray of hope in a very dark world.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

gratitude
Posted by: Janet4784 on Apr 6, 2007 10:18 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thank you, sir, from the bottom of my heart, for your courage and integrity in speaking up about Abu Ghraib. You are a hero.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Lindsay Graham's southern good old boy charm
Posted by: ear3 on Apr 6, 2007 10:37 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Lindsay Graham's recent behavior has been despicable, and in light of his earlier apparent criticism of practices that went outside the UCMJ, invites speculation as to what changed for him.

Back in the dark days of 2004-5, I latched on to any criticism of US Iraq policy from the Republican majority w/hope. The critical evaluations of Pentagon policies by Graham, along w/Senators McCain and Warner, seemed to offer the possibility that Abu Ghraib, Guantanamo, etc. could at least become the subject of wider public discussion. Not controlling the agenda in Congress, the Democrats had to rely on some momentum from the other side of the aisle in order to push any issue forward.

Sgt. Provance's statement that early on Graham initiated contact w/him and offered a sympathetic ear seems to indicate that Graham's critical public statements were more than just "maverick" posturing. But it became clear last year w/Graham's support for legislation denying habeas corpus petitions to Gitmo detainees that his maverick days were over. The Sgt.'s stomach-turning description of Graham's smarmy performance at the documentary screening only confirms this.

I'd be interested to hear whether any one has sources detailing the reason's for Graham's turnaround; whether it was a concession to rejoining the partisan phalanx in advance of a Democratic comeback, or that he cut a deal w/the administration and/or future party leaders (McCain-- Graham 2008?), or that he was never a genuine critic to begin with?

Revisiting Abu Ghraib w/Democratic control of Congress could be a tricky issue. I'm sure there's reticence among Democrats to tackle an issue that could easily be demagogued as an "attack on our troops", particularly when there is a veritable buffet of corruption, scandal, and malfeisance to choose from. But recent reports from Iraq point to how critical it will be to get some sort of accountability in place for US detention policy. 2000 more troops called up for MP duty to cover the "surge" in detentions (have they been/will they be specifically trained for guard duty?); 35% surge in detentions in the last month or so (from 14,000 up to 18,000), and predictions of more than double that w/the escalation in full effect.

And if nothing else, then justice for people like Provance and Karpinski.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Thank you for your courage
Posted by: mzbuz on Apr 6, 2007 10:39 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I cannot thank you enough for your courage in speaking out. And I know what you mean when you speak of "people really don't care". apparently they really don't. Even people in my own family simply shrug their shoulders. That really floored me! But, in all fairness, this is just one thing among the many sins of this country that are largely ignored. Maybe because it is just too awful to admit to such horrendous behavior by countrymen. So we engage in Orwells' "double think". The ability of people to push way down into our subconscience things that we cannot admit without admitting our own culpability for allowing such things to happen. And, of course, they can't imagine themselves being subjected to such things as torture, so it's totally abstract for them, when they admit it at all. I didn't want to even read this article because I knew it would make me angry and depressed. And then I thought "You should be angry and depressed! You can't let that anger and depression go ever!" So I read it and now I'm angry and depressed. And RIGHTEOUS! This is a righteous fight! So once again I resolve to renew my speaking out to neighbors, friends and family! They don't won't to talk about it but I will not relent! And again, thank you for not relenting either. God might forgive America but I have a strong inkling that those to whom we have done such things will not.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The American Ghosts of Abu Ghraib
Posted by: pfm on Apr 6, 2007 10:54 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You're kidding, the overwhelming majority of Americans have long forgot about Abu Ghriab, that's last year's news, we're attuned to the daily dose of the politically correct propoganda which we will conveniently forget by tomorrow to be ready for the new, News Flash.......

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Torture DOES Get Accurate "Confessions", Except When It Doesn't
Posted by: Pittsburgher on Apr 6, 2007 3:08 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
First, I would like to thank Sgt. Provance for his courage. Years ago, I was told to always try to behave in a fashion which would allow me to look at myself in the mirror and respect whom I saw. You, sir, will be able to hold your head high.

I am absolutely fascinated reading of the returned British sailors and marines' "confessions". Will this be spun as our own allies being cowards, or will perhaps people realize that under duress most human beings will confess to almost anything in order to save their lives? lThe deepest fear, they recalled, came on the second day, the day they were flown to Tehran, blindfolded and forced against a prison wall while their Iran captors fiddled with weapons, cocking rifles to make them fear for their lives.

I am certainly sympathetic to anyone who "confesses" because they were told that if they did not they would face seven years in prison, or who feared death. But, from their own accounts, it would appear that the sailors and marines were treated much less badly than our prisoners. How can anyone still pretend that any form of coerced "confession" will obtain accurate or helpful information? Apparently it will work as long as it is "us" torturing/threatening and not "them". Sadly, I am sure there are already those who will be explaining how in fact that is the case.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

cottontail
Posted by: cottontail on Apr 6, 2007 9:54 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'll wager none of the British soldiers were subjected to torture by the Iranians.
Any takers, Rush?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Medals of Courage
Posted by: TerryS on Apr 7, 2007 1:27 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sam Provance, Janis Karpinski, and Joe Darby
all deserve medals of courage. The pressure
to conform and "cooperate" I'm sure was
overwhelming, yet they stood their ground.
They will be remembered by History as heroes.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Ghosts of Pat Tillman..
Posted by: precisionphoto1 on Apr 8, 2007 11:12 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As history proves, the U.S. Army uses "Acts of Omission" as a prime tool of evasion when backed into an otherwise undeniable corner. While unethical, that ploy is not illegal. Perjury, however, is, and it becomes outlandishly hideous when combined with acts of omission to make a terrible trifecta...

Lies, acts of omission, and stalling to avoid telling the truth.

With open eyes we can see it all. Example: The shift of blame and deflection of guilt as exhibited by the rain of legal hell that fell down upon the heads of the "grunts", while the two-star and above officers and civilian equivalent kept "right on rollin with hardly a blip noted in their daily routine.

Facts: The Army lied about Jessica Lynch.
The Army lied about Pat Tillman.

Regardless of one's venue, gender, political persuasion, religion, or any other forum for debate, these circumstances are absolutely, unquestionably, point-blank irrefutable.

By no means does the Army have a lock as the Grand Master of Screw Jobs. The Navy is good at it too. Read about the U.S.S. Iowa scandal...then read about Tailhook.

No. #1 Damage Control Item: Get bottom feeders aligned to take the fall, i.e., the junior grades are sacrificed for the "Top" echelon.

And if B-I-G damage control is needed, a One Star General (Karpinski) is expendable.

After completing 28 years, 7 months, and 16 days of faithful and trustworthy service to this nation via the United States Air Force, I figured I"d use my freedom of speech for the first timein this fashion to support a worthy cause after having it supressed/sanctioned/captioned for so many years.

There's nothing like Sen. Kerry's persona here...Let's just say I'm not a "company man".

Qualifier: In every respect the men and women ini our Services who are non-policy, non-decision makers are exceptionally outsanding in every way, particularly in the areas of loyalty and dedication. Having no control over what shakes and moves, they are subservient to the direction of their leaders to the point of death.

Yet, those same leaders turned their backs on the troops and sucessfully squelched them by orchestrating the full weight of the United States Justice Department to bear down.

One by one, the subordinates fell, and fell hard.

Oddly enough, through all of this the Army, who perceives itself to have mastered the art of damage control, continues to not see or ignore the most important facet of damage control: Cut your losses early. Like in shut up now and stop lying trying to get out of trouble. You only make it worse for later.

It all can't be theory. Each cold, hard fact states to the contrary, totally and in full. That such a travesty is allowed without the real wrongdoers are not being held accountable.

Army Cpl. Charles Graner received 10 years imprisonment at Ft Leavenworth. General Sanchez, who approved the use of torture at Abu Ghraib, retired from the Army honorably and receives a near six-figure retirement stipend annually.

Yet there is no shared guilt even though inmate torture was not only sanctioned, but encouraged by elements purposely hidden from BGen Karpinski.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Ghosts of Pat Tillman..
Posted by: precisionphoto1 on Apr 8, 2007 11:14 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As history proves, the U.S. Army uses "Acts of Omission" as a prime tool of evasion when backed into an otherwise undeniable corner. While unethical, that ploy is not illegal. Perjury, however, is, and it becomes outlandishly hideous when combined with acts of omission to make a terrible trifecta...

Lies, acts of omission, and stalling to avoid telling the truth.

With open eyes we can see it all. Example: The shift of blame and deflection of guilt as exhibited by the rain of legal hell that fell down upon the heads of the "grunts", while the two-star and above officers and civilian equivalent kept "right on rollin with hardly a blip noted in their daily routine.

Facts: The Army lied about Jessica Lynch.
The Army lied about Pat Tillman.

Regardless of one's venue, gender, political persuasion, religion, or any other forum for debate, these circumstances are absolutely, unquestionably, point-blank irrefutable.

By no means does the Army have a lock as the Grand Master of Screw Jobs. The Navy is good at it too. Read about the U.S.S. Iowa scandal...then read about Tailhook.

No. #1 Damage Control Item: Get bottom feeders aligned to take the fall, i.e., the junior grades are sacrificed for the "Top" echelon.

And if B-I-G damage control is needed, a One Star General (Karpinski) is expendable.

After completing 28 years, 7 months, and 16 days of faithful and trustworthy service to this nation via the United States Air Force, I figured I"d use my freedom of speech for the first timein this fashion to support a worthy cause after having it supressed/sanctioned/captioned for so many years.

There's nothing like Sen. Kerry's persona here...Let's just say I'm not a "company man".

Qualifier: In every respect the men and women ini our Services who are non-policy, non-decision makers are exceptionally outsanding in every way, particularly in the areas of loyalty and dedication. Having no control over what shakes and moves, they are subservient to the direction of their leaders to the point of death.

Yet, those same leaders turned their backs on the troops and sucessfully squelched them by orchestrating the full weight of the United States Justice Department to bear down.

One by one, the subordinates fell, and fell hard.

Oddly enough, through all of this the Army, who perceives itself to have mastered the art of damage control, continues to not see or ignore the most important facet of damage control: Cut your losses early. Like in shut up now and stop lying trying to get out of trouble. You only make it worse for later.

It all can't be theory. Each cold, hard fact states to the contrary, totally and in full. That such a travesty is allowed without the real wrongdoers are not being held accountable.

Army Cpl. Charles Graner received 10 years imprisonment at Ft Leavenworth. General Sanchez, who approved the use of torture at Abu Ghraib, retired from the Army honorably and receives a near six-figure retirement stipend annually.

Yet there is no shared guilt even though inmate torture was not only sanctioned, but encouraged by elements purposely hidden from BGen Karpinski.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]