It's Asymmetrical Warfare, My Dear Watson

You're familiar with the story about Sherlock Holmes and his assistant Watson's camping trip, right? They set up their tent and go for a hike in the woods. Exhausted, they return to camp as night falls. First Watson hops in his cot. Holmes gets under his covers and stares up at the cloudless night sky. "My dear, Watson. Do you see what I see?" Watson stares at the stars. "Oh yes, the Milky Way is quite prominent tonight." "No. Look closer."

"Now, I see it. The Big Dipper...."

"No, no. It's elementary, Watson. Someone stole our tent!" Since I first started writing about U.S. policy in Iraq ten years ago, I keep having the someone-stole-our-tent moment over and over and over again. And the hits just keep on rollin.'

Have you been reading these stories about how "the surge" seems like its working. The violence in Baghdad seems to be subsiding. Even Sen. John Sununu (R-NH), who just led a delegation to Iraq, said the Bush push to secure Baghdad "appears to be working," according to the Associated Press.

I suppose his words are supposed to carry some weight because the good senator is of Palestinian descent. He's one of "them." That kind of stuff works on some folks -- like trotting out Colin Powell and Condi every now and then to explain why yet another nation full of backward dark-skinned people need to be bombed -- I mean, "liberated" -- from barbarism and welcomed into civilization.

Or maybe Sununu is trying to make up for P.O-ing anti-abortion conservatives for his role in getting Justice Souter on the Supreme Court. Not knowing him personally, it's hard to say why a smart guy like Sununu would say something so foolish without adding a huge caveat.

Of course, the violence is subsiding. This is a guerrilla war! Guerrilla War 101: "When guerrillas engage a stronger enemy, they withdraw when he advances." That's right out of Mao Tse-tung's classic treatise On Guerrilla Warfare.

"When the invader pierces deep into the heart of the weaker country and occupies her territory in a cruel and oppressive manner, there is no doubt that conditions of terrain, climate, and society in general offer obstacles to his progress and may be used to advantage by those who oppose him. In guerrilla warfare we turn these advantages to the purpose of resisting and defeating the enemy.

"Guerrilla warfare basically derives from the masses and is supported by them, it can neither exist nor flourish if it separates itself from their sympathies and co-operation. There are those who do not comprehend guerrilla action," Mao wrote way back in 1937.

The good news is: Gen. David Petraeus, who understands guerrilla warfare, is now in charge of our forces in Iraq. A few weeks ago the general said something straight out of a Sean Gonsalves column. "Any student of history recognizes that there is no military solution to a problem like (guerrilla insurgencies) in Iraq."

Then, this past Sunday the AP reported on Gen. Petraeus' new leadership, illustrating what the fear-induced fools in right wing radio land and the soft-handed talking heads who play tough guys on TV "news" shows can't seem to get through their history-challenged heads.

Petraeus "has revamped the counterinsurgency strategy, designed to win back not only the turf but public support. ...To set the tone, Petraeus has made several high-profile forays into public markets in Baghdad and elsewhere ... smiling and greeting bystanders with simple Arabic phrases" -- the kind of Arabic phrases that, if someone were to suggest they be taught in American schools, would trigger conservatives to decry to evil influence of political correctness and multiculturalism.

This business of treating Iraqis like human beings instead of evil incarnate as fantasized by jingoists here in the States "carries some risk to U.S. troops ... but the U.S. command seems prepared to take the chance. The new motto: "The more you protect the force, the less secure you really are."