Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Connecting the DOP Dots

By Sean Gonsalves, AlterNet. Posted March 9, 2007.


Kucinich isn't the first to call for a Department of Peace -- the notion has been around since the days of Thomas Jefferson -- and it's time to put those ideas into action.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Of course the people don't want war. But after all, it's the leaders of the country who determine the policy, and it's always a simple matter to drag the people along whether it's a democracy, a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism, and exposing the country to greater danger. -- Nazi commander of the Luftwaffe, Hermann Goering

Back in the 1940s B.G. (Before Goering) they used to call it the War Department. Now, it's the "Defense Department," which is kinda ironic considering that our current SecDef is presiding over a pre-emptive war launched under false pretenses against a nation that had nothing to do with 9/11.

It was one big Neo-Con job with Scooter the latest "friendly-fire" casualty of Bush hawks out-of-balance world view. All yin. No yang.

And no Department of Peace (DOP), as Thomas Jefferson's homies, Benjamin Banneker and Benjamin Rush, were calling for way back in 1782.

Banneker, a celebrated African-American inventor and scientist, and Rush, a medical doctor who signed the Declaration of Independence and helped expedite the Lewis and Clark expedition, proposed a Peace Department, while the first GW talked about the need to establish a West Point-like Peace Academy.

A century and a half later, Dr. King posed two prophetic questions. Nonviolence or nonexistence? And, where do we go from here? -- which, was the title of his last book and a powerful critique of the war of his time.

Last week, I said not enough peace advocates are focusing on the details of the most important war-and-peace question: how do we get from 'here' to 'there?'

Thankfully, there's organizations like The Peace Alliance, made up -- not of mere idealists -- but forward-thinking realists who support Congressman (and presidential candidate) Dennis Kucinich's legislation to establish a DOP.

The basic idea is to "establish nonviolence as an organizing principle of American society, providing the U.S. President with an array of peace-building policy options for domestic and international use," explains Matthew Albracht, managing director of The Peace Alliance.

If you're not familiar with long and successful history of nonviolent methods or just love chugging down gallongs of Hater-ade, you'll be rolling your eyes and asking questions like: Aren't there existing agencies whose duties include components of the DOP legislation? - as if that weren't true of the Department of Homeland Security before Bush created it.

The Peace Alliance short answer to these ahistorical inquiries is: "The establishment of the Environmental Protection Agency by Richard Nixon did not begin our commitment to the environment, yet it raised it to a much higher level of national priority. And so should it be with the interests of peace."


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: department of peace

Sean Gonsalves is a Cape Cod Times staff reporter and a syndicated columnist.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from World! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
DOP, DOD, and DOO: but Only the Dead Kill
Posted by: channing on Mar 10, 2007 8:28 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A Department of Peace could only evolve out of an HONEST realignment of Department of Defense into "defense", and a new Department of Offense, for things like illegal wars of aggression, covert overthrows, etc.,... Only an honest dialog of current uses of American military operations will begin to reconcile the public to a DOP.

The movie, "300", and just about every-other film put out by the American mainstream cultural establishment is too busy glorifying every barbaric script of human history to bother considering an evolutionary approach to global civilization: "History was always written by the violent, therefore, that's how we'll write it", or some similar mantra.

But, "Only the Dead Kill", is my take on history. All those "glorious" conflicts, all those dead commanders, all those dead governments... they all have one thing in common, they're all DEAD, and this one's now dying. What I've been waiting for is the entire "War Generation" to die, that the living will one day rise up past the killers of humanity in all their disguises and actually create a potential human discourse that deals with death for what it is, the ultimate failure of the living.

Kucinich is of course right to propose a DOP, but Dennis is not "GLORIOUS" in America because his ideas and values don't validate the violent-greed that defines what it means to be important to our country's "values". The real "wussies", the ones who have to kill and steal to prove their "rightness" and "power", will stand up to a DOP with "courage", and "we will not be defeated" defeatism, even if they have to kill us to stop this "peace-crap".

The "Torch of Liberty" will run them over sooner or later. One day, it will be common knowledge on Earth that humans used to have a "war generation" who ruled it, back in the day when people glorified violence, death and destruction, when the global plight of a nearly extinct "humanity" continued killing itself, and then making glorious movies about it for show in the vast arena called, "cinema". We, the "Free" WON that "long war", eventually, the war against the DEAD, the KILLERS, and the WAR GENERATION.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Peace as a way of being.
Posted by: zipp28 on Mar 11, 2007 1:33 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Good context and considerations Sean, thank you! I would add that the even larger aspects to this DOP idea would be the over-all needs of the culture to find clarities about what peace is and what peacefulness can bring forth. That last aspect would be for sure anti present cultural reality, that is the considerations pertaining consequences of ideas, and actions. Consequences of actions. Forward thought and what would be the results there-of.
Cultural shifts need be comprehended and instigated so that peacefulness is a way of being as apposed to being the opposite of the ways and means of solutions at present and in our history. We indeed are a "hungry- for- violence" people and we indeed must find all ways that will change that dynamic for peacefulness to be a real and lasting value.
One such would be to find the courage to be honest at all times. In so doing each person has the opportunity to reach deep inside self to then collaborate experience and knowledge and find that honesty with self will allow a feeling of worthiness inside the larger picture of the whole, what ever that picture's details......we have unfortunately been racked over the coals these last years for the opposite of that self affirmed conviction. Peace is a way of being. This commentor is about to see my 65th year and this cultural manifestation of warfaring has been the way of being the entire time I've lived, either in posturing for it, with it or in heavily preparing for it or in doing it. Always with the exact same results: broken social and psychic realities that either get fixed somewhat or not and a few who are able to demonstrate what it is to live inside the maw of gluttony. Peace as a way of being will allow humans to comprehend that the mind (our Minds) are the metaphysical realities of the univesiality and that the physical that we think (presently) is life and the whole of the universe has real limitations and that thought, comprehension and ideas, (that have no limitations) would enable life regenerations to be with the profoundness that they are with life as a whole.....that is thought has to do with life regeneration as against life as an acquisition process.....life itself is not fleeting, power certainly is. Our numbers as a life form and our ecologocal tranformative behaviours are now catching up with us. Tommorrow cannot be modeled on yesterday, therefore we must become thoughtful, honest and creative.......Peaceful as a way of being. The DOP, make it so in each of us. The DOP, make it so, of humanity at large!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Peace Is Cost Effective
Posted by: hbw on Mar 12, 2007 11:35 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Forget about the body counts for just a moment.

I wish I had time to research the cost-benefit figures, but it is analogous to the drug rehabilitation versus incarceration conflict: Every dollar spent on rehab saves X dollars that would have been spent on law enforcement and prisons. Every dollar spent on peaceful solutions saves Y dollars otherwise spent on violent ones. It just makes sense.

But the Military-Industrial Complex about which President Eisenhower warned us now IS the government, and the system works to sustain it. If there is not some multi-billion-dollar white elephant involved that will put dollars in the pockets of defense executives, neither major party wants to hear about it. It really is all about the Benjamins, and I don't mean Banneker and Rush.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]