Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Al Qaeda's Godfather

By Rolf Potts, The Believer. Posted January 11, 2007.


The inspiration behind much of today's violent jihadi culture was a shockingly dopey tourist.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

With the global rise of political Islamism, many pundits have recently begun paying closer attention to the writings of Egyptian scholar and Muslim Brotherhood publicist Sayyid Qutb (1906-1966), whose radical Milestones and thirty-volume In the Shade of the Koran are said to be masterpieces of jihadist thought and persuasion. These writings, which some analysts consider to be an ideological influence on violent Islamist movements such as al-Qaeda, contain an uncompromising anti-Western slant that Qutb supports with observations from his travel experiences in the United States.

In these classic jihadist works, Qutb is never all that specific about how and where he went about assembling his presumed expertise on American culture, but biographers note that he spent a majority of his 1948-50 U.S. sojourn as a scholarship student at Colorado State College of Education, in the high-plains town of Greeley. Moreover, not long after his return to Egypt from the United States, Qutb attempted to sum up his expatriate experience in "The America I Have Seen," a short travel memoir that appeared in the November 1951 issue of Egypt's Al-Risala magazine.

As travel reportage, "The America I Have Seen" doesn't exactly provide the reader with a vicarious window into living in the United States. Structured as a series of short, thematic arguments, Qutb's essay primarily attempts to prove that America--despite its great wealth and scientific genius--suffers from a corrosive moral and spiritual primitiveness. This thesis might have carried some rhetorical weight had Qutb backed it up with evidence from his own experiences, but--oddly--the Egyptian traveler didn't have many direct encounters worth sharing. Of the fifty-four brief sections in "The America I Have Seen," only eight allude to specific real-life observations; the other sections consist of broad generalizations and secondhand anecdotes. Perhaps his most memorable direct recollection is described as follows:

In summary, anything that requires a touch of elegance is not for the American, even haircuts! For there was not one instance in which I had a haircut when I did not return home to even with my own hands what the barber had wrought, and fix what the barber had ruined with his awful taste.

Qutb's exasperation with American barbers humanizes him in an unexpected way: In spite of his relentless didacticism, we realize that our skeptical Egyptian exchange student was really just a querulous sojourner in an unfamiliar land, compulsively judging everything he saw through the rosy, idealized lens of his home culture.

Indeed, biographers have implied that Qutb's experience in the United States is what convinced him to reject Western values, but "The America I Have Seen" is clearly the memoir of a man who traveled to America seeking evidence for conclusions he'd drawn before he ever left Egypt. Never deviating from the Muslim fundamentalist assumptions he set forth in Social Justice in Islam (written before he visited the U.S. and published in 1949), Qutb's travel essay reflects the stereotyped sentiment--commonly encouraged by the Egyptian prejudices of his day--that America's material culture was morally inferior to the spiritual civilization of the Arab world. In fact, were one to strip the political cloaking from his essay, it's apparent that Qutb's experience of America was characterized by an oddly familiar combination of superficial experiences, paranoid conjectures, and passive culture shock.

In other words, before Qutb returned to Egypt to write his most influential and incendiary Islamist treatises (for which he was ultimately hanged by Egyptian president Gamal Nasser in 1966), the man who would one day influence terrorists passed his time in America as the most banal of interlopers: a tourist.

The anthropological and sociological study of tourism is a fairly recent phenomenon. Fifty years ago, social scientists largely regarded tourists as irritating aberrations in what were otherwise "pure" research environments. As anthropologist Erve Chambers notes in his 2000 book Native Tours, "so long as the idea of culture remained bound in place and time… phenomena such as tourism could rarely be viewed as more than an unwelcome intrusion upon the neat categories and orderly distinctions with which anthropologists were wrestling."

This notion began to change in the 1970s, when sociologist Dean MacCannell published The Tourist: A New Theory of the Leisure Class (1976), and anthropologist Valene L. Smith edited an anthology entitled Hosts and Guests: The Anthropology of Tourism (1977). Both books examined the complex social and cultural aspects of travel, and treated tourism as a historically valid expression of human behavior and society. Two decades later, when globalization became a buzzword and cross-cultural travel began to take on new meanings, academic interest in tourist behavior intensified even more.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: al qaeda

Rolf Potts is the author of Vagabonding (Random House, 2003). His essays have appeared in Salon, Slate, National Geographic Traveler, and the 2000 and 2006 editions of The Best American Travel Writing.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from World! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
know
Posted by: rsaxto on Jan 11, 2007 2:06 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We know what ugly americans are like; now we know what ugly egyptians are like.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: know Posted by: Xynyx
He's right about the haircuts.
Posted by: kepstein7777 on Jan 11, 2007 3:20 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The other dude's not far off about NYC in the 80s. If you weren't mugged, pickpocketed, or panhandled, the overpriced food, transportation, etc. would get you. Groups of punks and nut-jobs would be fighting on streetcorners and everyone would just walk by as if they were invisible. You couldn't walk two blocks in Midtown without a sales pitch from a pusher. I doubt it's much different now, but it was definitely like that back then.

And it's not a huge revelation that dumb tourists come from places besides the US. Isn't that what Borat is all about?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: He's right about the haircuts. Posted by: animalleaderisgreat
Who's REALLY to blame for terrorism: CO Barbers
Posted by: kwalla on Jan 11, 2007 4:16 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I've long secretly suspected it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Soccer riots? Posted by: karma_ran_over_dogma
» Witness: Raider Nation Posted by: eddie torres
Army brat anthropology
Posted by: Bic Pentameter on Jan 11, 2007 6:09 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I probably lived in twenty houses by the time I graduated from high school. From time to time I would encounter someone that I had known years earlier in some far away place. Someone I knew in Taiwan showed up in Belgium, for example.

There was a near-ritual among kids. Like the frustrated victim of culture shock in this article, we would regale each other with stories about the wonderful place we last inhabited, and rail about the lousiness of the current locale. Inevitably, though, some of us would end up in one of those fabled spots - only to find that the kids regaled each other with stories about how wonderful some of those other places were - and how lousy this one is.

None the less, we usually managed to have great experiences in each of those places, and only leave with a heavy heart, ready to begin anew the longing for the last place and loathing for the current. I spotted this trend early enough, but that wasn't enough to break it. There was after all, an adjustment to make with each move.

The epiphany came, though, with the realization during puberty, that this also afforded numerous opportunities to re-invent myself and arrive at each new spot a little older, wiser and more experienced, if you will. A chance to escape aspects of the role I to which I was consigned in the social setting of the previous school. A chance to do it differently with people who didn't know me.

By the time we arrived in France, I was enthralled within days, and practically shook my head at the kids who were still griping and wishing they could go back to wherever. One kid longed for a New Jersey 7-Eleven and lime slurpies.

Eventually I had to tell people I was from the US, and some thought I was making it up. I even did ten weeks at a scholl where I was the only native speaker of English - and had to show my ID card to a few of my classmates.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What about the CIA's role?
Posted by: MonkeyBoy on Jan 11, 2007 6:55 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Another article on the "blowback" theory. Sorry, I'm not buying it.

The CIA under Poppy's watch is responsible for Al-Qaeda.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Way to miss the point Posted by: Boomerang
Excellent article!
Posted by: Jimsabis on Jan 11, 2007 6:58 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is the type of writing that Alternet should be producing! Well written, well researched, thoughtful and engaging. I actually learned something and came away with motivation to read more about the topic. Very well done on all points!

This is the quality combination of research and writing that should be applied to the Dawkins/Harris topic. Very, very impressive.

Thank you Alternet and Mr. Potts.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: xcellent article! Posted by: DaBear
» RE: xcellent article! Posted by: Boomerang
Perhaps American Movies contribute
Posted by: brotherjonah on Jan 11, 2007 7:35 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Some of what was discussed alluded to "a cowboy" "the fasted to pull his gun was the one who survived."
This reminds me of every western which portrayed Texas after the civil war. When Reconstruction laws were enforced by the Army and the whole state was not yet readmitted to the Union and everybody lived under Martial Law. That would be the reality.
The most famous, in Texas at least, Reconstruction law to survive until the present, and only modified in 1991 is the prohibition against carrying short arms, like pistols and revolvers. Concealed or openly. Strecht Verboten. Unless you also packed a badge, you didn't legally pack a pistola.

The John Wayne mythology of gunfights in the streets of Texas town was just that.

But even Americans "just know" that it was true.
In American movies we are portrayed as violent. And the point is not lost on Arabs or anybody else in the world, but in American movies Arabs are portrayed as terrorists.

Arab or Muslim is used as a synonym for Terrorist.

My own brother, who consistently votes R, breathlessly informs me of something he learned in Church, from a preacher who has never been anywhere near the Arabian peninsula, and apparently studies Islam by watching Fox, that Arab children are given dolls which immortalize and make heroes of terrorists. Kind of a GI Jihadi.

From my limited studies of Islam, I would assume that just ain't so. Dolls would be graven images.
Strech Verboten.

and it does sound a whole lot like the GI Joe doll, but maybe I am being overly suspicious.

The halloween ritual mentioned, sounds like the Fundamentalist doctrine, which is very accurate.

And to tie these themes together, view American horror movies which like Halloween parts 1 through however the literally Hell many sequels they made of it. Sex, violence and Satanic rituals, all played out in what would seem to an outsider to be literal confessions on the Big Screen.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

SERIOUS questions about the integrity of Don Hazen, Alternet’s Executive Director
Posted by: aburritt on Jan 11, 2007 9:07 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I just ran into an eye-opening column a couple days ago entitled “Ethics Problems at Alternet” written by Al Giordano about Don Hazen in 2002. Hazen is the current executive director of Alternet. Giordano is editor of Narco News Bulletin and considered by many as one of the finest front line journalists working today. It was his successful NY State court battle, concluded at the end of 2001, which secured important internet press freedoms. Giordano is a well-know champion of “authentic journalism,” and his readers know that he is a relentless and fearless journalist who deals with facts.

Giordano’s long article, which can be found by Googling “Al Giordano and Alternet” makes a number of serious charges against Hazen. These charges include Hazen’s theft of royalties from writers, his blacklisting of writers, his lying to Giordano when confronted about trying to sell stories written by other writers without permission, and his asking his staff to post bogus positive “reviews” of Alternet publications on Amazon.com. Now, over FOUR YEARS after Giordano published this column, Mr Hazen is still the executive director of Alternet.
According to Giordano, the only response Hazen has made to his questions and before writing the column was to lie and attack him personally, (Giordano also mentions Hazen’s brazen attack on Jeff Cohen and FAIR in what appears to be an attempt to secure more donor funding for his own operation.)

The hypocrisy of all this is amazing: Unlike the folks at Halliburton or the Bush Administration, for example, Alternet is a website which day in and day out publishes articles and opinion demanding transparency and honesty from others, whether it be the government, big business or the corporate media. And yet this very same website is being directed by someone who, according to a highly reliable veteran journalist noted for his uncompromising integrity, has violated a whole mass of basic journalistic principles and ethics and so far has gotten away with it.

Read the article by Giordano and make your own judgment. (Again, just Google “Al Giordano and Alternet.”) There is also a growing exchange of posts concerning this issue in the comments section to “Will Bush Provoke a Constitutional Crisis?” published on 1/7 here at Alternet. It begins with the post, about half way down, entitled “Hmm....Alternet not such a nice buncha kids, hmm?” which first brought this article to my attention, and then develops into an exchange mostly between staff member Joshua Holland, several supposedly posters who are supposedly unconnected with Alternet (make your own judgment about that after reading this exchange,) and myself.

After reading this material, I’d be interested in hearing from other Alternet readers how all of this sits with them. My opinion is that Mr Hazen owes readers and supporters of Alternet a detailed explanation which sticks to the facts and is not loaded down with Ad Homonym attacks on those requesting such an explanation.

If these charges are indeed true, and Don Hazen has never responded to this story to my knowledge, then I think that Don Hazen as executive director of Alternet destroys the inherent credibility of Alternet, makes a mockery of its professed political mission, and should be forced to resign sooner than later. So far as I know, there is no statute of limitations on basic journalistic integrity and ethics within any credible news organization that I’ve heard about. I’d be interested in hearing comments from others about this.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Agendas and Return-On-Investment Posted by: eddie torres
» Relevance? Posted by: Boomerang
Intolerant jerks come from everywhere
Posted by: drblack on Jan 11, 2007 9:44 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is interesting that these essays reflect an attitude that many rural Americans had also expressed when comming into contact with more populous areas.
Also many whites wrote similarly about Black culture pre-civil rights.
A Open mind coupled with tolerance and acceptance (these being non-existant in most neoCON-fundamentalist people. Not all.) is so important in todays global culture.
John Barnes two sci-fi novels "AMillion Open Doors"and "Earth Made of Glass" are excellent examples of culture clash.
Most people may feel discomfort with the norms in other cultures but to condemn them is so reactionary and neoCON.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Sexually Disfunctional, Abused, Depressed, Schzoid, Sociopaths
Posted by: albrechtkrausse on Jan 11, 2007 10:51 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Many of the leaders of the so-called Islamic movement are just plain nuts, to use a highly specialised psychological term. I might add that so are many of the crazed, fundamentalist Mormon, Jew, and Christian movements (and cult leaders) are also nuts. Most of these leaders of the Islamic groups are not camel traders or country folks but have been exposed to the West (studying and living in it), come from rich families, and have been educated. Sure the actual suicide bomber is usually an idiot, brainwashed since a child, and from a poor area but the leaders and the perpetrators of the complex operations are educated and well-off. The problem is that they are 'nuts'. For whatever reason: coming to leave in the West at a young age and being not accepted, not able to function properly with women, watching their mother be abused by father (or left for another favourite wife), seeing family killed in war, seeing elder brother each the family fortune, or whatever. Many of them are just plain nuts and not able to be happy or content they are seeking revenge on society, 'the West', the jews, women, or whatever. Similiar to serial killers and rapists.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Prudish Attah?
Posted by: B.Wildered on Jan 11, 2007 10:53 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
An interesting article. 1950's Greeley seems like a very strange place to find licentiousness. "Belly Dancing" had a long history in the Arab world before then.
But what a rotten red herring smell comes off that closing paragraph. Attah's behaviour in Florida is the opposite of prudish. His "social network" in that state involves gambling, boozing and strippers. Either the "shy student" in Germany had a personality change in the USA or a double using his ID.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Prudish Attah? Posted by: kittynboi
» RE: Prudish Attah? Posted by: Aussie Kim
» RE: Prudish Attah? Posted by: Boomerang
Crucial part of Qutb's book Milestones
Posted by: Earthian on Jan 11, 2007 11:03 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This part of Qutb's book speaks about the right of Muslims for self-determination, especially the ending: ("Jahiliyyah" refers, roughly, to mainstream Western culture.)

>>Next we must invite everyone to Islam. Then we must show jahiliyyah the low state it is really in, compared to the lofty and bright horizons of Islamic life, which we wish to attain.

This cannot come about by going along even a few steps with jahiliyyah, nor by severing relations with it and removing ourselves to a separate corner; never. The correct procedure is to mix with discretion, give and take with dignity, speak the truth with love, and show the superiority of the Faith with humility. But we must always bear in mind that we live in the midst of jahiliyyah, that our way of life is nobler that that of jahiliyyah, and that the change from jahiliyyah is great, and a bridge is not to be built across it so that the people on the two sides may mix with each other, but also so that the people of jahiliyyah may come over to Islam, whether they reside in a so-called Islamic country and consider themselves Muslims or are outside the Muslim world so they may come out of darkness into light, get rid of their miserable conditions, and enjoy the blessings that we have tasted—we who have understood Islam and live in its atmosphere. If they do not respond to our call, then we shall say to them what Allah commanded His Messenger, peace be upon him, to say: "For you your way, for me mine."

p. 119, 120 Sayyid Qutb, Milestones

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

God Article, Unfortunate Title and missing the context
Posted by: globaljustice on Jan 11, 2007 8:56 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sayyad Qutb was a secularist who turned into an Islamist because of being held in jails for ten years. His movement only gained momentum when the West brutally crushed Arab socialism and Nasser; indeed anyone could have predicted this as Islamism was the only possible alternative to secular socialism in Egypt and the Arab world as a whole. Qutb's most famous book, In the Shade of the Quran, is seen as the leading work of modern Muslim jurisprudence and philosophy not only by the Muslim Brotherhood, but many suni Muslims. It is certainly one of the most influential texts in modern Muslim philosophy and provides part of the debate about Muslim political philosophy with which the Muslim world is now struggling.

All this is not to say that anything you say is inaccurate or that it's not worthwhile to talk about how Qutb's travels in the U.S. influenced his poltical thought (you are far from the first to suggest this). But to present him as some lunatic fringe when he is actually very much within the mainstream (as opposed to real loonies like ibn Wahab) is not a fair depiction. The real question is why Qutbism was prefered by the U.S. to Nasserism when they supported the Muslim Brotherhood (which may otherwise have died out altogether) in the time of Anwar Sadat. Sadat was assassignated by the Brotherhood for his efforts, but this still didn't stop the U.S. support for the Brotherhood and for the principle that radical Islamism is preferable to secular socialism whenever possible.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

IT PAYS TO EXPLORE FOR YOURSELF!
Posted by: chanceny on Jan 11, 2007 1:23 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'M THINKIN THAT JUST MAYBE A BUSH CRONY WAS TAPPED TO TRAVEL TO THE MIDDLE EAST AND REPORT HIS FINDINS BACK TO W SO HE COULD THEN BE INFORMED WITH ENOUGH 'GRAVITY' TO DO HIS DUE DECIDIN. W NEVER COULD GET THE GUMPTION TO GET HIS PASSORT AND GIVE A LOOK-SEE FOR HIS OWN DAMNED SELF. ME THINKS HE GOT HIS SUNNI/SHIA INFO STRAIGHT FROM GOMER PYLE. MAYBE, HAD HE SENT ONE OF POPPY'S GUYS, HE'D NEVER HAVE UNDERESTIMATED THE DEPTHS OF HELL HE WAS ABOUT TO UNLEASH. UGLY AMERICAN PRESIDENT!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Scholarship
Posted by: Keokuk on Jan 11, 2007 1:42 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
“In The Tourist Gaze: Leisure and Travel in Contemporary Societies (1990), for example, sociologist John Urry quotes scholar Jonathan Culler, who noted that tourists are ‘semioticians reading the landscape for signifiers of certain pre-established notions.’”

And what does this jargon-laden bit of pseudo-scholarship actually mean? Simply this: that tourists tend to look for what they expect to find. In fact, we all tend to do this, whether we are traveling in a foreign land or reading our morning newspaper.

Perhaps a more interesting question to consider would be whether scholarship resides in insight or in the language used to dress up whatever one has to say. Right now I’m tending toward the latter possibility, but maybe that’s because it’s what I’ve come to expect.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Scholarship Posted by: HeroesAll
You forgot to mention...
Posted by: Aussie Kim on Jan 11, 2007 7:00 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...he died a virgin who was frustrated, yet fascinated, by Western women.


(But I have to agree with him about salted watermelon - EW!!! Whatta dreadful concept. Watermelon lollipops covered in hardened chilli powder is bad enough...crazy Mexicans...) ;)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Al Qaeda's Godfather was, and still IS, Poppy Bush and Crew
Posted by: xbj on Jan 11, 2007 9:15 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
AKA the CIAl Qaeda.

With bin Laden as its phony leader, taking his walking orders DIRECTLY from George Herbert Walker Bush and his crew, Baker, Cheney, Rumsfeld, and the recently demoted Rove.

Not to say that there aren't any real fundamentalist islamic terrorists in the ranks, but they're patsies and dupes, living a lie until Bush needs them again. Amongst a bunch of non-fundamentalist Saudis and Egyptians, and a handful of Mossad masuerading as Islamic terrorists.

You know, the kind that gamble in Las Vegas, paw strippers, screw whores, get drunk in bars, and gamble on Abramoff's casino ship before flying planes into skyscrapers going to Allah and all those virgins...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Go read a book Posted by: Boomerang
» RE: Go read a book Posted by: xbj
» RE: Go read a book Posted by: xbj
» RE: Go read a book Posted by: ng1944
» RE: Go read a book Posted by: xbj
insightful article
Posted by: Omyma on Jan 11, 2007 9:56 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Excellent article, great insights. It's important to be able to see things from both sides, and I hope this gets read by people other than those who already agree with his point of view.
Re tourism: Does one cross a line from "tourism" to "resident" when one works for a living in a foreign country? I always thought so, but am no sociologist. However, I lived in foreign countries, because I had to work to live in them; contrasted with groups of tourists who had their agenda all worked out ahead of time. When you have to work in a country, it has a way of integrating you with the people relatively quickly - those virtual strings no longer being attached, and suddenly the "foreigner" becomes "co-worker", and you have to find a way to be "one of us."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This is an excellent, excellent article.
Posted by: Boomerang on Jan 12, 2007 10:32 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As someone who studies the Middle East and especially the Islamic resurgence, this is an incredibly well-written, insightful article. I'm surprised that we can continue to jabber on about the Middle East on a daily basis with so much ignorance of the people and culture that live there. It's very, very sad, the epitome of what Said wrote about, and it's nice to see someone point this out, address that it goes both ways, and state that its harmful in both situations.

Qutb's influence was mammoth, but he only saw what he wanted to see, and it's a shame that his accounts and writings account for so much of the intellectual underpinnings of so much of the Islamist movement.

I could write a huge comment about this article, but I don't want to write some enormous novel, so I'll just restrict myself to saying that it's a good article, exceptionally well-written, and I hope Alternet features more articles like it in the future.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Adam Curtis
Posted by: insulaparadigm on Jan 14, 2007 12:16 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Also touched on Qutb's visit to the US in his excellent documentary for the BBC the power of nightmares.
THe documentary compares his role with that of Leo Strauss in forming the ideas of the neocons in this country. makes a good case and both men seem similar in their dislike in the decline or spiritual failure in America.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]