Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

How the Media Made -- and Killed -- Zarqawi

By Brian Shott, New America Media. Posted June 12, 2006.


Middle Eastern news outlets fed Zarqawi's public image as a fearless and indiscriminate killer -- but the truth is more complex.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

[Editor's Note: Jamal Dajani is the director of Middle Eastern programming at Link TV. Here, he looks at Arab media's news coverage of the lethal airstrike on Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, Al Qaeda's leader in Iraq.]

He was interviewed by Brian Shott, an editor at New America Media.


Brian Shott: You've had a busy day monitoring Arab and Western media. Any significant differences in coverage of this story so far?

Jamal Dajani: Early on, Arab media showed the gruesome pictures. On CNN they showed Zarqawi in death as if he were asleep. They didn't show him all bloodied; Arab television did.

BS: Do Arab commentators think Zarqawi's death will weaken the insurgency?

JD: Well, for example, you have (Dubai-based) Al-Arabiya Television, which is closely allied with the Saudi government. They always give a more favorable view of the war, and they are saying this is a major blow -- a major blow to Al Qaeda, to the terrorists, and a major signal to civilians that they can cooperate with the Iraqi government. This is what Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki told the Iraqi public, saying, "Don't be afraid; with your help we were able to nail him. And if you give us more information, we'll end the terrorism."

Other networks, such as (Qatar-based) Al Jazeera, have pointed to the similarities between this and the capture of Saddam Hussein. Yes, in the short term you may have some disarray among Al Qaeda. But at the end of the day, it's not going to end the resistance.

BS: Has Zarqawi's death at least left the foreign fighters in Iraq leaderless?

JD: Well, Al Qaeda has already announced on their Web site that they have appointed a successor, Abu al-Masri.

BS: What's been the most memorable Arab take on this situation so far, in your mind?

JD: I saw one very good discussion on Zarqawi on Al Jazeera. One analyst said that Zarqawi was created by the media and now he's been killed by the media. Meaning, what made him were those early beheading stories. He became this famous, or infamous, persona. And it got to him, he kind of liked that image, and in his last video he's walking around like Rambo with a gun. Because he came back into the arena, there may have been more of a push to capture him -- and there may have been more clues for those looking to kill him, because of the video.

BS: What about reports that he was betrayed?

JD: If you listen to Iraqi Prime Minister Malaki, he essentially thanked the public. If the government was able to work with some of the Sunni tribal leaders to give up Zarqawi, that's a shift in tactics and a major achievement. Zarqawi's base is not really Al Qaeda and the foreign fighters, it's really the Sunnis. He managed to hide between them, between those tribal areas. One analysis I've seen is that it's not a coincidence he got betrayed -- people got tired of his indiscriminate killing.

And another analysis, this one from an Egyptian analyst more to the left, is that now the strongest spy agency in Iraq is coming from Iran, and this might be an Iranian gift to the United States. After all, Zarqawi had killed indiscriminately, but he's really been hitting Shiites hard. And of course Iran has strong ties with Iraqi's Shiite population.

BS: Are Arab commentators surprised that Zarqawi was killed?

The opposite. It was a major surprise that he managed to stay alive for three years. Because he was not a popular guy. He never made a clear mission statement about attacking, say, only American convoys. He attacked everyone. Police, the students, foreigners, locals, everyone.

BS: So what took coalition forces and the Iraqi government so long to find him?

JD: The argument here is about the complexity of Iraq. That you cannot just come in with 150,000 troops and you're going to control the area. At the end of the day, you need an Iraqi, someone who knows the terrain, the language. The Americans can maybe go and surround a town and destroy it, but they don't have the informers, the knowledge from within. And so Arab media is asking what's next after Zarqawi -- he's only one of thousands in the formula of Iraq.

BS: What other questions are Arab media raising about the killing?

JD: There is some talk about the timing. Is this a gift from God to the Americans to bury the Haditha massacre? How will Haditha play out a few weeks down the line? Will it come back, or will the Americans get a kind of "get out of jail free" card? There's some speculation that after Haditha, Americans put their minds together and said, "We've got to do something quick."

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

Brian Shott is an editor at Pacific News Service.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from World! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
We'll find another dark-skinned demon
Posted by: dainin on Jun 12, 2006 3:40 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When Bush-Laden and Al-Zar-Kerry are long gone, we'll find other dark-skinned demons to keep this crazy story going.

The basest of instincts drives this false war on terrorism. And we are the terrorists.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Even more slowly... Posted by: dainin
"We've got to do something quick."
Posted by: wawa on Jun 12, 2006 4:46 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"We've got to do something quick."

Yeah, WAKE UP!!!

Until the root of terrorism is addressed the cycle of violence will continue.

No matter who wears the uniform, or how noble they believe their cause, anytime an innocent is caught in the crossfire they know TERROR!

We are all DOING SOMETHING on WAWA

I have been forbidden by AlterNet to leave WAWA's address, but google "WAWA BLOG" for we have built it, will you come???

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Marines & Murtha
Posted by: derfb1 on Jun 12, 2006 5:48 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Murtha is going into old age less than gracefuly--he needs a shrink. Looks like the Marines were NOT out of control in Iraq. In fact one of them accused by Murtha has just been promoted to Staff Sgt. down in San Diego at Camp Pendelton.

I notice this BLOG has been quiet all morning about the so called murder of civilians.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Marines & Murtha Posted by: dancingcloud
» Do you HONESTLY believe... Posted by: fool-on-the-hill
» RE: Marines & Murtha Posted by: feller
» RE: Marines & Murtha Posted by: stevieb
Sanitized media for American viewing
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on Jun 12, 2006 6:44 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Jamal Dajani: Early on, Arab media showed the gruesome pictures. On CNN they showed Zarqawi in death as if he were asleep. They didn't show him all bloodied; Arab television did."

That's CNN for you - don't show the sheep any blood, it makes them nervous and unpredictable. And now, we have a story about a little girl who dropped her ice cream cone, and look - a dog is eating it!

This must be one of John Rendon's talking points for media producers: "We want reality TV but with no blood, okay? Always have a little flag in the background, too."

Here's FOX News today:
"Was Saddam Hussein a security threat to the United States? Did the Iraqi dictator have connections to Al Qaeda or other terrorist ties? What happened to the weapons of mass destruction everyone believed were in his possession? Did Saddam move them? Did they ever exist?"

Lovely, in classic FOX fashion: "everyone believed were in his possession" - well, that's a blatant lie delivered as a piece of conventional wisdom. Way to slip it into the conversation, though. Goebbels would be proud.

At CNN/TimeWarner:
"It has been 39 months since the U.S. invaded Iraq, and after so many turned corners have led to dead ends, President Bush wisely shunned any predictions about how much good would come from the elimination of al Qaeda leader Abu Musab al-Zarqaw"

Ah yes, our wise president fails to predict the future... gee, thanks Time for telling us how "wise" he is...our wise and benevolent leader. Good use of emotion, very Norman Rockwell.

Fareed Zakaria at MSNBC has this gem:
"More troops in Baghdad is a good idea, but true security will need more than firepower. You've read all the cautions. This is not a turning point. Zarqawi's death is not a seismic event. He was not that brilliant or strategic. He will be replaced. Al Qaeda is just one of the many militias running rampant in Iraq. All true. And so, the violence continues."

Gosh, Mr. Zakaria - you left out the most important issue entirely - how will US interests manage to secure control over Iraqi oil, given this volatile situation? This appeals to the wannabe intellectual, though - good job, Friedman Jr.

ABC News has no less the five video clips relating to Zarqawi, and a story about a Haditha marine claiming he's innocent of any wrongdoing...coinicidence? Lovely wording:
"The President and his cabinet are converging on Camp David with a single goal in mind: hammering out a plan for victory in Iraq! ...'troop reduction is a possibility that has been considered but we don't expect that to happen... what we seek is stability'"...

The PR monkeys must have been up all night working on that drivel. Good use of active and passive voices - just beautiful.

CBSNews has a nice 'interactive' on Zarqawi, showing pictures of cheering troops, happy Iraqi ministers, GW Bush, remanants of a bombed house - but absolutely no blood or trauma - way to stay with the game plan - but the accompanying story was a bit heavy on facts, wasn't it?.

Now why hasn't CBS hasn't posted an 'interactive' for Haditha (sorry, these photos are too graphic for the home viewer, and we're supposed to be drumming up support for this war, you know).

Nice propaganda work, everyone. I'd suggest sending your PR teams to Iraq, though, for that added 'touch of realism'.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

he's sdokh
Posted by: TagsNOLA on Jun 12, 2006 6:49 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am not surprised that it took three years to find and exterminate this vermin. I am surprised he is not still alive. Like Bin Ladin, thugs like Al Zarqawi are worth more to the neo-Cons alive than dead. Evidently, the powers that be finally decided to bring down the curtain on this macabre side show. As for me, I am glad he is finally sdokh.

TagsNOLA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» The neo-cons needed a big story... Posted by: fool-on-the-hill
Why didn't we capture him???
Posted by: chaoslegs on Jun 12, 2006 8:23 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A pair of 500 lb bombs is far from subtle. And really reduced our chance of getting any intel from him on the insurgents.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Al-Zarqawi Dead (part 1)
Posted by: pelle_in_goal on Jun 12, 2006 8:24 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"First of all we have to understand how Al-Qaeda works. Al-Qaeda is funded and supported by many rich Saudi and Arab Sheikhs through a network of charities which is spread all over the world. In every country Al-Qaeda works with local groups which adhere to its ideology and aims. In Afghanistan it was the Taleban, in Iraq its Zarqawi's group, in Pakistan its Sipha-e-Sahaba, Lashkar-e-Jangvi, Jaish-e-Mohammed and many other jihadi outfits."

The author is Zafar Hashmi -- a frequent champion of the Coalition interventon and very pro-Shiite. Understandably, Zarqawi's assassination is welcome news to Hashmi if Abu Musab al-Zarqawi was actively supporting the Sunni insurgency. The Pentagon claimed Zaqawi was killed in a Sunni safe house near Baquba. Hey, that's good enough for me!

Since then, The Jerusalem Post reported on Sunday that al-Zarqawi had blown himself up -- along with 7 others -- in Kurdish Mosul. For all we know, he was making ends meet with a crystal meth lab. Either way, it looks like his only financial obligations were to pay the salaries of seven other terrorists.

Maybe he did die in Mosul and the remains were sent in several packing crates to Baquba. Who knows? Maybe The US Command was trying out its newly developed "time machine" for the first time.

What a ridiculous statement! Everybody knows the DOD has been using a time machine for years.

Since the fatal raid on al-Zarqawi, US troops have conducted at least 60 other raids inside the "Sunni Triangle" -- and very probably in Sunni border towns as well. Baquba is a known Sunni stronghold and has frequently been the target of raids and bombardment by US Forces and the newly trained Iraqi army.

A third possibility even comes to mind. Was al-Zarqawi's assassination more surredipitous than planned? I ask this for two reasons. One is the on-going Coalition military campaign against the Sunnis to force them into a Shiite-dominated government. The other has to do with al-Zarqawi's unusual alliance with Sunni forces in the first place.

If he was anything, al-Zarqawi was at best a "loose cannon" . A Jordanian by birth, he was a radical and militant opponent of King Hussein's government. He went to prison in Jordan around 1990 but later pardoned by the King Hussein's General Amnesty proclamation in 1994. After that he went into Iraqi Kurdistan, then eventually returned to Afghanistan. He had joined the last throes of the anti-Soviet war by the Mujahadeen but saw little military action. Allegedly he turned up again in Northern Iraq just prior to March, 2003.

At best, al-Zarqawi had a fragile -- and quite brief, as it turned out -- alliance with Osama bin Laden. Although supposedly training in Afghanistan, Zarqawi repeatedly put off "pledging allegiance" to bin Laden and al-Qaeda. The two men had different political philosophies. Al-Qaeda -- especially it's more extreme Wahabbi elements -- is anti-Shiite. Al-Zarqawi was supposedly a salafi (pan-Arabist) Muslim. The two did share a hatred of the secular Islamic governments in the Middle East. That may explain a temporary alliance. But we would have to interpret al-Qaeda rather differently if it had suddenly grew legs for supporting Baathists who'd just as soon make the new Iraqi government as secular as the old one.

Maybe "free lance" is a better description of Zarqawi. "Mercenary" might be an even more apt description. By the time he was killed his "movement" had little to do with the stated goals of al Qaeda. In realty, the only possible explanation of a thread to al Qaeda in the end was that al Qaeda and Zarqawi were hostile to the inevitable -- either a Shiite dominated Iraq -- or a weak confederation run by Infidels.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Al-Zarqawi Dead (part 2) Posted by: pelle_in_goal
....And The Beat Goes On....
Posted by: hotlipsin61 on Jun 12, 2006 10:14 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Leave it up to the media to anoint a figure larger than life in Al-Zarqawi. Yes, he was no saint, but his death will not halt the daily slaughter.
He might had a direct hand in the vicious deaths of many of his countrymen, but he wasn't alone. The various ethnic groups in Iraq all dislike one another, and it seems each group has a "leader" who is (or maybe) behind the killings. The Americans can't stop the violence and our presence exacerbates the problem further.
Juxtapose his death over Haditha and it seems we needed a story to forget about the innocent deaths in that city-a diversionary tactic.
So you can be assured the rebels already named someone to take his place. The bogeyman of the week was taken out by jets. People are dying everyday. The beat goes on. And on. And on.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» So many wrong ideas Posted by: HeroesAll
Language
Posted by: Sment on Jun 13, 2006 9:20 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There is an interesting point made in this interview, "At the end of the day, you need an Iraqi, someone who knows the terrain, the language. The Americans can maybe go and surround a town and destroy it, but they don't have the informers, the knowledge from within."

I bring this up not so much to ponder the hypothetical, but to hopefully start a wave that leads to military tactical reform. It has been said more than once that American troops obliviously walk right past insurgents and that the military presence is generally ignorant to the culture, the language, the terrain, the customs etc. (and please if anyone is in the military and can correctly explain what the average language and cultural training of our troops is, I would be greatful) I assume based on the sorts of quotes above that the cultural training is non-existant or slight it should come as no surprise that so little has been accomplished in three years. "They" gave "us" Saddam, and Zarqawi. Otherwise we have spent too much time walking right into roadside traps, check point car bombs, mistaken innocent casualties etc.

In brief: The war on terror, (and I feel silly even saying that phrase because it is meaningless spin)... The war against terrorist cells and individuals, must be faught through the trust and cooperation of the communities in which the terrorists live. The military must be able to communicate fluently both in language and social mores especially Islam.

Unless of course fighting terrorists is not what this thing is about in the first place...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

justoneguy
Posted by: justoneguy on Jun 16, 2006 9:36 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Has anyone suggested that the Al-Zarqawi was assassinated by Iraqi's and that the bombing was a cover to protect the assassins? The great bomb damage to property and others vs the relatively small physical damage to Al-Zarqawi begs the question.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» MSM not credibale Posted by: RoryB
» RE: MSM not credible Posted by: RoryB
opinion
Posted by: julio on Dec 1, 2006 7:28 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Bil
Posted by: Bil on Dec 31, 2006 9:46 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
new1
new2
new3
new4

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement