Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Wearing War's Numbers

By Cindy Sheehan, AlterNet. Posted February 7, 2006.


As a former math teacher, I know that many people have an unreasonable fear of numbers, and the number of our war dead in Iraq is very fear-inducing.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

The now famous black shirt with white lettering that I was wearing on Jan. 31 to the State of the Union Address originally read: 2,000 dead. How many more? That shirt was made by Veterans for Peace on the occasion of the 2,000th U.S. soldier killed in Iraq. That tragic number was reached on Sept. 25, 2005.

About four months later, on the morning of Jan. 31, before my fellow peace activist and partner in patriotic dissent, Ann Wright, and I set out for our day's adventures, Ann put masking tape over the zeroes in the 2,000 and wrote: 242. Thus changing the number to 2,242, which was the upsetting casualty total for that day.

Before I set out for my fateful trip to the Capitol building, we discovered that the number had sorrowfully risen to 2,245. While Ann and I were giving the People's State of the Union Address that afternoon with Rep. John Conyers, courageous Rep. Lynn Woolsey and Katrina rights activist Malik Rahim, three more American families were sent into a tailspin of loss, grief and despair from which they will never fully recover.

The number on my shirt was changed to 2,245. Two thousand, two hundred and forty-five dead. How many more?

As of Jan. 31, at least 2,245 North American families had paid the ultimate price for this administration's stupid and careless policies in Iraq. Thousands upon thousands of our young men and women have been wounded, some grievously, for the arrogance of empire. Innumerable Iraqis have been slaughtered for just going about their lives that day and for the heartless and supercilious policy of "fighting them over there so we don't have to fight them over here."

On Sunday in Philadelphia, City of Brotherly Love, I attended an awards ceremony for the Shalom Peace Center where I was given an award for being a prophetic voice. But, that's not the important thing. The important thing is that one of my friends and biggest supporters brought some masking tape and a marker, and many of the attendees were wearing about four inches of tape with the number 2,250.

That means five more angels were sent to an early grave since Tuesday, five more mothers were unjustly and needlessly given a life's sentence of pain, five more fathers will be beginning an odyssey of mostly silent heartache: countless families ruined for our country's preemptive foreign policy against imaginary enemies. I believe that whether one supports the wars of aggression of the malicious empire that is taking away our civil liberties as it is sending our young people off to kill and be killed, or whether one opposes preemptive murder, we should all be honoring our children who have given their lives nobly for such an ignoble cause.

Numbers frighten people.

The number of crosses that the Veterans for Peace put up each Sunday on some California beaches scares the living daylights out of the people who support George and his murderous policies. These people claim that the VFP are making a political statement and want the numbers to go away and not disturb them. Being confronted with numbers, faces and reality is too much for some people. As a former math teacher, I know that many people have an unreasonable fear of numbers. The number of our war dead in Iraq is very fear-inducing. I know numbers are very alarming, especially when there is no logical reason for them.

We know George Bush went AWOL from his dangerous 'Nam duty in the Alabama Air National Guard. I suppose he was fighting them in Alabama so they wouldn't have to fight them in Massachusetts. We know George Bush did not have the tiniest bit of the courage of our troops when he wouldn't meet me face to face on his adoptive turf of Crawford, Texas. Now the world knows that he doesn't even have the fortitude to face a T-shirt.

As humans, we all know that it is very hard to face one's mistakes, especially when undeserving people have paid a horrible toll for that foolishness. But what am I talking about? From failures in his business life to compound harmful and inexcusable failures in his public life, George Bush has never even admitted a mistake, let alone faced one.

Well, it's time George faced this mistake and is somehow made to feel intense shame for the biggest mistake of his miserable mistake-filled life. I call on people that are for peace and justice to wear the number on their chests every day … near their hearts. To honor our dead, but to also confront the ones who are waging this war, and supporting the wagers of death, but who won't risk their own flesh and blood for the crimes against humanity that are perpetrated on a daily basis.

I implore everyone in the United States to remember that each number in the grisly count represents a living, breathing, wonderful, loving and indispensable member of a family, community and our nation. They are not just numbers. They were human beings before they were exploited for oil and greed.

Wear the number for our dead. Wear the number for their families. Wear the number for our wounded. Wear the number for our children still in harm's way whose confusion about the mission is growing and who only want to come home. Wear the number for people who will be in the way of the future wars of aggression that the war criminals in D.C. are already planning. Wear it for the people of Iraq who only want us to go away. Wear the number for peace.

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

Cindy Sheehan is the founder and president of Gold Star Families for Peace and author of "Not One More Mother's Child." To find the number each day go to: iCasualties.org.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from World! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Ever heard of the Iranian Oil Bourse?
Posted by: Colin on Feb 7, 2006 5:14 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Nope, probably not. This post has nothing to do with the article but I thought seeing as it was about dead people it seemed appropriate.

I'm pissed off with Alternet and the crap that has been their coverage on Iran. In truth, it's been non-existent, despite the fact, since January, the US has started gearing up for war again.

I actually wrote to them to ask about this. I'm still waiting for a reply two weeks later. So, I've done some research to show myself I'm not crazy. I did a search for 'Iran' on all articles since 01/01/2006. This is a breakdown of what you get:

COLUMN: The Iran Crisis -- "Diplomacy" as Missile Launch Pad
Normon Solomon
6/2/06
About Iran. Weak on politics (see for yourself)

BLOG: Hamas and Iran
Evan Derkacz
3/2/06
A poem

ARTICLE?: Checking the President
Gail Russell Chaddock
1/2/06
About the Patroit Act. Iran-Contra Affair mentioned once (1987)

ARTICLE: Dead Man Talking
Joshua Holland
1/02/2006
About the SOU Address. Iran mentioned once – ‘Axis of Evil’

ARTICLE: State of The Union – Slices and Diced
Think Progress
01/02/2006
About the SOU Address. One section on Iran. Coverage in context of Iraq + Bush.

ARTICLE: Our State of Disunity
Tom Englehardt
31/01/2006
About SOU Address. 5 mentions of Iran – all general.

BLOG: U.S. Hearts Iran
Evan Derkacz
30/01/2006
About homophobia in US + Iran

ARTICLE: Is A Civil War in Iraq Inevitable?
Robert Dreyfuss
25/01/2006
About Iraq. Three mentions of Iran. In context of an Iraqi Shiite uprising.

ARTICLE: The Real Story of John Walker Lindh
Frank Lindh
24/01/2006
About John. Iranian border mentioned once.

BLOG: About that Iranian menace …
Joshua Holland
23/01/2006
Yay! About Iran. Boo! Misses out economics. Posted as blog so hardly anyone seems to read it.

BLOG: USAid: "Iraq out of control"
Lindsay Beyerstein
19/01/2006
About Iraq. Iran mentioned once.

BLOG:There is no "Iran question"
Lindsay Beyerstein
19/01/2006
Response to another reader saying US won’t attack Iran. Beyerstein says: ‘Anyone who seriously entertains the possibility of invading Iran is just playing along with the Republican's political theater.’ Couldn’t you have said the same about Iraq? Where did that get us?

ARTICLE: The Military Recruiter's Lament
Scott Ritter
18/01/2006
About the fact no-one wants to be a GI baby killer no more. Iran mentioned once.

ARTICLE: Chomsky: 'There Is No War On Terror'
Geov Parrish
14/01/2006
Q. About Iraq. Chomsky answers with reference to Iran.

ARTICLE: Iran, Blogging Against the Regime
Alex Alper, Laura Barcella
14/01/2006
About internet use in Iran.

ARTICLE: The World Through a Looking Glass
David Shariatmadari
14/01/2006
History essay. The authors father comes from – wait you guessed it.

ARTICLE: Don't Blame Israel
Stephen Zunes
14/01/2006
About Israel. Iranian links mentioned on 3 occasions.

ARTICLE: Civil War Looms; Media Yawns
Arianna Huffington
13/01/2006
About Sunni/Shiite tensions. Iran mentioned once.

ARTICLE: When 'Freedom' Equals Fascism
Mark Ames
13/01/2006
About NGO’s and fascism. Iran mentioned once.

ARTICLE: 2006: The Year of Oil Collapse?
James Howard Kunstler
11/01/2006
About oil. Iran mentioned 3 times.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: I'm pissed off with Alternet Posted by: AlienSlave
Part 2
Posted by: Colin on Feb 7, 2006 5:16 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
BLOG: Those Bush's just love terrorists …
Joshua Holland
07/01/2006
About hypocritical American’s.

COLUMN: Israel's Future Leader?
Norman Solomon
06/01/2006
About Israel. Iran talked about in context of Israel.

ARTICLE: Eighties Surveillance Revival
Peter Dale Scott
05/01/2006
About wiretapping. Iran mentioned once – Iran/Contra affair.

ARTICLE: The Scoop from 'State of War'
Jan Frel
05/01/2006
About NSA wiretapping. Iran mentioned 4 times – all about their nuke bombs (which don’t exist yet).

ARTICLE: Excerpt: Feet to the Fire
Kristina Borjesson, John Walcott
02/01/2006
About the media. 6 mentions in interview. No deep analysis.

So let’s look back and tally up.

Articles about Iran: 0
Columns about Iran: 1
Blogs about Iran: 1
Mentions of Iran/Contra affair (in 1987): 2

What’s going on? I can understand why people might still want to talk about Iraq given the mess it’s in. But surely talking about – and therefore potentially preventing the next Iraq – should come out even higher on the list. Why has there not been one major article on the politics of the Iran situation, the hypocrisy of US/UK nuclear threats, the legality of their developing nuclear fuel (and I could go on)?

According to their blurb, Alternet is ‘designed to serve as your "online helper," leading individuals, policy professionals and journalists alike to sources for information and insight.’

Some help when you don’t even cover the big stories. Make no mistake – Iraq, simply because of it’s position, could never descend the world into WW3. Iran and it’s position actually could.

Oh, and about the Iranian Oil Bourse – try these:

http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Global_Economy/GH26Dj01.html

http://www.energybulletin.net/7707.html

http://www.gold-eagle.com/editorials_05/petrov011606pv.html

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Iran Posted by: Iconoclast421
» RE: Part 2 Posted by: IanA
» RE: Part 2 Posted by: dlf
» RE: Iran Posted by: IanA
» RE: Iran Posted by: Colin
» RE: Part 2 Posted by: Jan Frel
» AlterNet on Iran Posted by: IanA
WHY NOT THE WOUNDED?
Posted by: AlienSlave on Feb 7, 2006 7:25 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Cindy why don't you add the numbers of wounded, and those of the allied forces killed and wounded. 3000 KIA is not a bad number. Insensitive people can knock it off as simple as traffic deaths. You need to put out a fuller picture of the senseless price paid in young lives before you will be able to move the dull minds in my district. I can’t even get them to see the young children sent back home wounded and disabled.
AlienSlave

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: WHY NOT THE WOUNDED? Posted by: Longdream
Alien, read it this time...
Posted by: rockpicker on Feb 7, 2006 8:46 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
and think about what Colin is saying. I, too, am frustrated with the media coverage of Iran. There is a very nasty situation developing between Russia, China, US, Israel, E. U. and Iran, and, as we have come to expect, the US press has done its very best to keep the American public "dumbed down."

http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/CLA410A.html

For some pertinent background info on the subject, check out this link to an article written by William Clark in Oct., 2004. The significance of Iran's imminent bourse opening, and American reaction to it, can hardly be overstated. Few realize that it was similar actions by Saddam that brought down the wrath of Bushco on his house. It wasn't WMD. Nor was it about oil, really. It was about money.

And now Iran is threatening to change the way oil is traded on the world market. Starts in March. Wouldn't you like to know a little more about that?

I want to know what Seymour Hersch and some of these other folks out there on recon are thinking.

Not to in any way put down Cindy. I think she's the only REAL leader we've got, and I will be ordering my tee shirt today. And I will be wearing it. The whole country needs to don the shirt and wear it proudly, in solidarity with ourselves. Let's take back this country, one tee shirt at a time.

But let's avoid doing to Iran what we did to Iraq. Because Iran won't be a cakewalk.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Braveheart, Cindy
Posted by: pattymara on Feb 7, 2006 8:56 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm wearing the number of our dead on a pink paper pinned over my heart. Every day recently I've been replacing it with a new number. On my door is the daily number of dead (how many more?) plus the number of diagnosed Iraq vet's post traumatic stress disorder cases (19,000 officially). More numbers: our wounded.

More numbers, if there was a count: Iraq civilians, (ranging from 30,000 to over 100,000). All our children.

All done in our name. How can we allow one more dime to add to the horror?

I'm with you, Cindy, brave one, dear heart.

PattyMara

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

National Black T-shirt Day
Posted by: Smiggsy on Feb 7, 2006 11:08 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Someone in the US should organise a publicised "day" of mourning specifically to remember the Iraq war dead total - exactly the same way other awareness groups do days to help their cause (ie cancer research & so on) to remind all of the common massess of the unfolding debarcle, help family victims, as well as to mourn the number of dead US soldiers generated from the Iraq war experience.

Make a national organised day when everyone wears the same shirt to work or school or where ever in the community - with the death total clearly displayed on it. That should boost the national debate of war deaths instantly overnight - & if only to give the issue a much needed boost of wide spread publicity. Those who don't support & wear the shirt, or speak out in GWBush's defense on the day should be labelled "unpatriotic"

Proceeds from the sale of the printed black t-shirts should be given to help the families who are now the victims of war deaths or perhaps the injured returned soldiers. Don't forget to print a small USA flag on it as well.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

1,000,000 is a really scary number!
Posted by: ScottP on Feb 7, 2006 12:04 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That's my wild guess for the number of people in Iraq who were either killed (100K?), permanently disabled (200K?), or have an immediate family member in one of the previous 2 categories. So we have created about a million mortal enemies in the GOP re-election/reward the robber barons campaign. Now that's a boon to national security!

Cindy, the tape and number idea is a great one! I'll be making up some myself (with the better established US dead number du jour).

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

silenced majority
Posted by: Holland on Feb 7, 2006 10:52 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In my view, Cindy Sheehan is the voice of the silenced majority. But with voices like hers, the majority won't stay silent for ever. Whilst the Emperor does a good job with shamelessly wearing no clothes, the people manifest a clearer eye for the ugly, naked truth, that with His delusional poses He Himself discloses. Though there is a major crisis going on, it isn't all bad: crisis is Ancient Greek for change... of the general perception, learning to see what lies more and more exposed. Ignorance. Fear. Prejudice. Slaughter. The Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse now.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

War vs. Vendetta
Posted by: fire_farie2000 on Feb 8, 2006 4:15 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I agree that the war in Iraq is ridiculous. It needs to end, and it needs to end now.

I just found out, literally a few mintues ago, that my friend's boyfriend is being sent to fight. He just signed up for the military, and has had less than a week of training! That can't be legal. And if it is, its just wrong. No 18 year old should be sent to their death like that, which is just what it is: suicide. And its not just one guy. Its an entire squad, which is around 200 people.

I've decided to write my own article about the war and my friend's plight to submit to my school's newspaper. Hopefully larger papers will accept it as well. I'm also hoping to find a way to spread the word across the country for people to write to their state's representatives. Although, I don't know how effective that would be, at least its something. And if those old farts are worried about being

Oh, and I'm interested in making myself one of those shirts for myself, but I'm curious as to where I can find the accurate death count...If its even really possible to find an "accurate" death count. You never know what the government is lying about....

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

War criminals?
Posted by: jimlup on Feb 12, 2006 4:47 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If we read the Nuremburg principles and Geneva conventions we are left with one troubling fact: These people were all war criminals.

While we gain some political leverage by tracking their deaths: I, for one, fell no sorrow.

How many innocent Iraqi's have died as a result of this immoral power grab? Oh, I forgot, that's off the table of discussion even in the so called "peace" community.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bil
Posted by: Bil on Dec 31, 2006 9:42 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
new1
new2
new3
new4

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]