Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Al Qaeda's Golden Opportunity

By Fawaz A. Gerges, AlterNet. Posted October 11, 2005.


The continued occupation of Iraq has been a godsend for the otherwise troubled terrorist network.
Al Qaeda's Golden Opportunity
Al Qaeda's Golden Opportunity
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

The American-led invasion and occupation of Iraq has provided Al Qaeda with a new lease on life, a second generation of recruits and fighters, and a powerful outlet to expand its ideological outreach activities to Muslims worldwide. Statements by Al Qaeda top chiefs, including bin Laden, Zawahiri, Zarqawi and Seif al-Adl, portray the unfolding confrontation in Iraq as a "golden and unique opportunity" for the global jihad movement to engage and defeat the United States and spread the conflict into neighboring Arab states in Syria, Lebanon and the Palestine-Israeli theater.

The global war is not going well for bin Laden, and Iraq enabled him to convince his jihadist followers that Al Qaeda is still alive and kicking despite suffering crippling operational setbacks in Afghanistan, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Yemen and elsewhere.

Several points should be highlighted. First, it is difficult to accurately assess the precise military strength and weight of Al Qaeda in Iraq in relation to various components of the Iraqi insurgency. The Iraqi resistance is highly complex, diverse and decentralized, with a broad spectrum of ideological orientations and perspectives. Although a consesus exists that the overwhelming number of fighters are home-grown Iraqis (more than 90 percent) inspired by nationalist and religious sentiments, foreign fighters reportedly play a bigger role than their miniscule size because of their spectacular suicide bombings against Iraqi security forces, Shiites and Sunni Kurds.

A related point is that while American and Iraqi authorities estimate the number of Arab fighters under Zarqawi around a 1,000, his biographer, who has access to Zarqawi's inner circle, claims that the latter has built a force of at least 5,000 full-time fighters bolstered by a vigorous network of 20,000 homegrown supporters.

The numbers vary wildly and cannot be authenticated accurately but one point must be reiterated: the number of foreign militants represents a small percentage -- perhaps one in 10 -- of the total indigenous Iraqi fighters. Nonetheless, Al Qaeda in Iraq has proved to be deadly effective and has become a power to be reckoned with.

A related point is that the expansion of the American "war on terror," particularly the invasion and occupation of Iraq, radicalized a large segment of Iraqi society and Arab public opinion and played directly into the hands of Al Qaeda and other militants. "Our policies in the Middle East fuel Islamic resentment," U.S. Vice Admiral Lowell E. Jacoby, director of the Defense Intelligence Agency, told the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence in 2005.

Far from hammering a deadly nail in the coffin of terror, as Bush had stated, Iraq appears to have become a recruiting tool, if not yet a recruiting ground, for militant jihadist causes and anti-American voices. A consensus exists among American, European, and Arab analysts (and the American intelligence community) that Iraq has replaced Afghanistan as the training ground for the next or second generation of "professionalized" jihadis and that it provides them with the opportunity to enhance their technical skills.

A new classified assessment by the Central Intelligence Agency says that Iraq may prove to be an even more effective training ground for militants than Afghanistan was in Al Qaeda's early days, because it is serving as a real-world laboratory for urban combat. A small group of Arab fighters trained in Iraq has already made its violent debut in Kuwait and Saudi Arabia.

Iraq is slowly and gradually replacing other theaters as a forward base for the new jihad. Today, a large concentration of active jihadis exists in Iraq, not in Afghanistan, Pakistan, Yemen or Saudi Arabia. According to a 2005 report by the National Intelligence Council, the CIA director's think tank: "The al-Qa'ida membership that was distinguished by having trained in Afghanistan will gradually dissipate, to be replaced in part by the dispersion of the experienced survivors of the conflict in Iraq." This report took a year to produce and includes the analysis of 1000 U.S. and foreign specialists, and represents the conclusion of American intelligence, which cannot be dismissed as politically and ideologically biased and antiwar.

The crisis, including increasing civilian casualties, the horror of the abuse of the Iraqi prisoners, and the cultural clash between occupier and occupied, is a welcome development for bin Laden and his associates, who have exploited it to justify their global jihad against America and its allies. The American war in Iraq was a god-sent opportunity for bin Laden and Zawahiri.

America's imperial endeavor has given them a new opening to make inroads, if not into mainstream Arab hearts and minds, into a large pool of outraged Muslims from the Middle East and elsewhere, including uprooted, young, European-born Muslims, who want to resist what they perceive as the U.S.-British onslaught on their coreligionists.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

Fawaz A. Gerges is the author of "The Far Enemy: Why Jihad Went Global." He holds the Christian A. Johnson Chair in International Affairs and Middle Eastern Studies at Sarah Lawrence College.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from World! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Intelligence
Posted by: Captainmagic on Oct 11, 2005 4:30 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Well thank you for that and you would have to also know that the rest of the intelligent world knows this is common dogf@*k.....but the war is not on terror is it......its about old double cross and the "deal for oil was with us" (daddy) gone wrong....so here we come, and we will use all our resourse to get it......and we don't really care how we do it simply because we can......and your so gullible that you will swollow anything I say.....and as any good soldier will tell you....one of the first rules of combat is to get your enemy to come to you......so they pulled you in and instead of building, you bludgeoned and they have won.....simple really......but the neocons are not going to give up their chances and they honest to goodness don't give a rats a@$*e about you or how it looks.......there is just too much at stake for them......and after all just who are you anyway.......eh! Here's lookin at ya.... P.S. How much does a super base cost?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Intelligence Posted by: bqtrain
Don't forget that Iraq isn't the only one
Posted by: maxpayne on Oct 11, 2005 6:21 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The reality is that insurgents in Iraq have given the Taliban new resources and skills which is why they along with the war lords in Afganistan are actually getting back what they lost in 2001 and let's not forget that save the earthquake, terrorism in Kashmir hasn't abated. Going to war with Iraq has only enabled terrorists in Afghanistan, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Yemen and elsewhere to actually recover despite the defunding. I know it's hard to believe that the jihadists are actually gained power despite their financial loss but it's no different from the current Bush/Limbaughian Republicans, despite their falling ratings in the polls, actually gaining power instead of losing it because more voters aren't bold enough to hold the neocons accountable for all the damage they've done to America just like Bush and GOP have no real plan to help America win the war on terror but instead use it as another "wedge" issue.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Said it before, Say it again---Please enlighten me
Posted by: cyclone on Oct 11, 2005 8:11 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think I am becoming George Boosh. I have said it before and I'll say it again.

THE ONLY THINGS that the war in Iraq have accomplished are demolishing a soverign nations citizens, killing a couple-three thousand American soldiers, destroying what little worldwide good will that we had, and, most importantly, GIVING THE FUCKING TERRORISTS A COUNTRY TO WORK OUT OF.

Now, if someone can find something positive in any of that, please enlighten me.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

"Mission Accomplished!"
Posted by: monkeywrench on Oct 11, 2005 9:10 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
For President Bush's need to keep americans in fear and himself in power (oh, just make us safe, Mr. President!) by breathing new life into Al Qaeda with his invasion of Iraq, Bush can now truly say: "Mission Accomplished."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

we all know it was never about terrorism
Posted by: nebgirl on Oct 11, 2005 9:35 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
great article. we all know it was never about terrorism. it has always been about oil and power. they used fear to get the american people to go along with it. now some americans are finally realizing the truth but the damage has been done.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bush deliberately set up Iraq as a training camp for terrorists
Posted by: badkitty on Oct 11, 2005 10:09 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm so angry about this subject I really couldn't read this article. I know that in theory we are looking for oil, but not much seems to be coming out. But from the first day of the invasion, I was convinced that Bush and the neocons wanted to give terrorists, including Al Quaeda, a place where they could practice, and even better, practice against live US troops and their weapons. If this is not so, why didn't we seal the borders? Or secure the arms dumps? I could go on and on about the incompetence of our government and military, but I'll just say, impeach now! Disband the Department of Defense, whose mission appears to endanger the United States of America. I know I sound like a nut case, but I am so angry...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bush instigated the whole damn war
Posted by: Envi on Oct 11, 2005 2:13 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If it weren't for Bush's big fat moronic mouth saying he planned to invade Iraq (the "Downing Street Memos") and therefore Al Queda territory PRE 9/11, they would never have come over here and done the 9/11 attack on U.S. "THEY" have ears everywhere, just as we do. I have always been of the opinion that Bush instigated those attacks, nothing has changed my mind, it only gets confirmed time and time again with every article I read. I HATE that man and his crooked shithead henchman administration as well as his marketeer, the traitorious doughboy Karl Rove. In the words of our prophet Pat Robertson, BUSH needs to be "taken out", as does his Veep, Chaney the war-mongerer. (Remember...that can mean many things...) Those who voted for these power-hungry assholes should be embarrassed of their own decision making, they fell for it...now they must pay, unfortunately, we all must pay.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

stupid
Posted by: aedwards on Oct 11, 2005 3:23 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What would you have done about the terrorist attacks on 9/11? Let them go on the assumtion the al Queda was losing power anyway?
Even if 9/11 never happened why would you allow the human rights violation that we know were going on to continue? Is it ok to allow rape rooms and genocide to go on when we can stop it.
I don't condone the way the government has made it a policy of lying to the people but this war had to happen. Diplomacy wasn't working. This was our only alternative.
As for the comment that this war was all about the oil, your almost right. Oil had a lot to do with it. America consumes more oil everyday then any other country on the planet and the amount continues to increase. Oil is the United States lifeblood. People that hate western culture control our lifeblood.

He who controls the oil controls the world. Better us then them.

Aedwardsone@yahoo.com

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: stupid Posted by: matty
» what!? Posted by: LG
» RE: what!? Posted by: LMNOP
» RE: stupid Posted by: Jayzer
» "This war had to happen" Yes, stupid ... Posted by: AdamSelene11726
» RE: stupid Posted by: ezermeno
This is the most collosal screw-up...
Posted by: sgtmartin1 on Oct 11, 2005 3:33 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
by a president in my lifetime.

Ike was in charge when I came on the scene by the way.

IMO, what makes a screw-up collosal is when a choice is made despite several better alternatives being on the table.

That's the mark of a fool. I can be forgiving when unforeseen circumstance arises--but even I expected this was going to happen and trust me, I'm not well sourced.

W's presidency has reached its apex. People are increasing angry and worried that the man is up to the job.

Today on EWM, the Muse ponders a better, braver America.
You can’t call it terror if you’re not afraid of it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]