Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Regional Recruiting

By Mark Sappenfield, Christian Science Monitor. Posted July 20, 2005.


Indiana is among the mainly Midwestern and Southern states unaffected by the US Army's recruitment crisis.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

The recruiting crisis that has gradually spread to all quarters of the United States Army has not yet made it past the front door of the Indianapolis office of Sgt. 1st Class David Lacks.

Like every recruiter, he had heard the stories of how the Army National Guard again missed its quota last month and is now 23 percent off its annual target, of Army recruiters who scramble to meet their mission of two new soldiers a month.

But he has no time for them. From the moment he enters the office, he is a flurry of activity and optimism, fielding calls, bustling among files, and talking — always talking. This is a man who tried to recruit nurses when he was recently taken to the hospital with an arm injury. No long ago, he won a prize for signing up a dozen new National Guard members in 90 days.

His success, he says, comes from the counsel that the most difficult times call for the simplest remedies: desire and hard work. Yet it also echoes beyond Indiana and indicates that, as the war in Iraq continues, certain areas of the country are responding more eagerly to the call of military service than others.

To be sure, none of the trends is overly hopeful for the Army, which has been hit harder than the Air Force, Navy, or Marines. The Army, Army Reserve, and Army National Guard all look likely to miss their annual recruitment goals across the country, but statistics offer clear regional distinctions.

Recruiters and experts agree the distinctions are not based on patriotism, but the changing economic character of different regions of the country. The blue-collar jobs and culture most clearly connected with military service are vanishing from the Northeast, leaving recruiters there with a tougher sell, while others in the South and Midwest pick up the slack.

"Over the past two generations, the people the armed forces disproportionately recruit from have moved out of the Northeast," says Loren Thompson, a defense analyst with the Lexington Institute in Arlington, Va.

Statistics released by the Army and National Guard last week point to several trends across the 50 states:

Across all three sectors of the Army — the Army, Reserve, and Guard — states in the Midwest and Great Plains have had the smallest drop-off in recruiting. These states are currently meeting 86 percent of their National Guard recruiting goals — tops for any region of the country. For their part, the Army and Reserve set out a national goal, which is 80,000 troops for the Army this year. The last time the Army set an 80,000-troop goal was 2000, and the Midwest states are on a pace to hit 84 percent of their total from that year.

Far more new soldiers come from the South, however. The South still shoulders a disproportionate recruiting burden compared with the rest of the country; its recruits make up nearly 40 percent of the Army soldiers who have enlisted since the beginning of the fiscal year in October.

For the Army, at least, the Iraq war appears to have had little effect on recruiting in red states versus blue states. Recruiting is down by virtually the same amount in both areas -- at 73 percent of 2000 levels in red states and 72 percent in blue states. Red states, however, have produced 63 percent of the recruits enrolled since October, though they make up barely more than half the total US population.

All sectors of the Army place the lowest recruiting burden on the Northeast, where they expect the fewest number of recruits compared with the population. The Northeast remains the poorest-performing quarter of the nation. While the South is at 82 percent of its year-to-date National Guard mission, for example, the Northeast is at 70 percent.

It presents a dilemma for the military. "Do you look to overproduce in an area that is capable of doing it? How much do you back off from areas that have underproduced in the past?" says Doug Smith of Army Recruiting Command at Fort Knox, Ky.

As well, in a political atmosphere that has equated patriotism with support for the war in Iraq, regional recruiting is a topic fraught with dangers, and recruiters approach it carefully.

Those in states that have proved difficult for recruiters insist a lack of new enlistees does not mean a lack of love for country -- or even the military. In Vermont, which has experienced some of the greatest drop-offs in recruiting among the Army, Reserve, and Guard, Lt. Col. Darryl Ducharne of the Army National Guard says he has felt only support. "There's a lot of patriotism out there," he says.

Others say drawing a direct line between patriotism and recruitment rates would be misleading. The real link is economic. "It's not political philosophy. It has to do with why a military career would be appealing," says Mr. Thompson. "It is a step up for those that are disenfranchised, but not an attractive alternative for those who are already established in society."

For Sergeant Lacks, it has turned out to be nothing short of a calling. His life was not so different from those of the kids from the Indianapolis projects that he works to recruit — a broken home and the temptation of drugs and gangs. He still recalls sleeping in stairwells and the day his mother told him that she had no money for his college education.

Not long after, he was on a bus to Fort Benning in Georgia. Now, the roles have reversed. "I can take a kid who has nothing and give him direction," says Lacks.

On this day, Lacks coasts into a housing complex in the Guard's minivan to pick up one of the six recruits that he's close to enlisting. With his baseball cap tipped askew and outsized clothes hanging loosely from a lanky frame, the youngster is the image of urban America. But his attitude defies any stereotype. Around Lacks, he is courteous, deferential, even. Then again, Lacks has not come for just a signature. He has come to show how he can make the young man's life better.

There is always the hint of the sergeant in his voice, but he is as much counselor as commander. When the young man suggests he wants to play basketball, Lacks gently redirects the conversation." We can put you into college, but you're going to have to teach yourself how to jump. You need a Plan A, B, and C. If one doesn't work, then you go on to the next."

He asks the boy to write his plans down. The boy nods. He wants to be a mechanic. The Guard can get him into a technical school, Lacks responds. It is a recurring theme: The Guard is a way out.

Two generations ago, the Army was a way out for the children of factory workers and laborers in the Northeast. Now the upper echelons of the military are fretted with generals from the region. Today, blue-collar jobs have shifted out of the Northeast, and the rising generation of military leaders is increasingly coming from the American South.

Today, says Thompson, "there's no question that in place like the Carolinas and Mississippi, military service is not only respected but commonplace."

Yet even as the South continues to provide the most recruits, the Midwest has had slightly greater success in avoiding a drop-off in recruiting.

For example, the Minnesota Army National Guard is at 112 percent of its year-to-date goal, ranking No. 1 in the country. One reason is that the Minnesota Guard has had to work hard for its recruits because it lacked large bases, and therefore large numbers of troops who were likely to enter the Guard once they left the Army.

"Good old-fashioned hard work -- that's the thing that works the best," says recruiting commander Lt. Col. Dirk Kloss.

That philosophy, beyond region or political affiliation, he and others say, is the surest guarantor of recruiting success. It has certainly worked for Lacks. He has already won two trips -- one to Las Vegas and one to Hawaii -- for meeting recruiting goals. But even then he doesn't have an off button. In Las Vegas, he made four poolside recruiting calls.

"Some people don't work as hard as I do," he says. "But you've got to be constantly, constantly recruiting."

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

Mark Sappenfield is a staff writer at the Christian Science Monitor.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from World! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Direction
Posted by: bornxeyed on Jul 20, 2005 6:12 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"I can take a kid who has nothing and give him direction," says Lacks.

Direction is easy. Head east about 6000 miles, then hope for the best.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Direction Posted by: Jersey Devil
All this for Bush's war, eh?
Posted by: maxpayne on Jul 20, 2005 6:47 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I tell you, the same thing is happening here in my state of VA. Heavy advertising and marketing in poor and minority neighborhoods and schools whereas the affluent areas are totally left alone. When these guys and gals come back if at all, many will get over-angry if anyone criticizes Bush. For not getting a job, getting recruiting into the army even as the requirements are laxed in inexcusable.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Don't Die for Bush's Lies - Grow Up Instead
Posted by: nanobubble on Jul 20, 2005 6:58 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Your country needs you, blind republicans! If you support this war, you should be filling the ranks of the corpses being sent to die for lies - but America would be better off with some knowledge instead of another loaded rifle.

-An illegal occupation with no connection to Al-Qaeda - before we invaded.
-The billions of taxpayer dollars being wasted and laundered into Bush's corporate friends.
-Over ten thousand movies in Halliburton's movie library.
-Leaking the name of an undercover CIA agent because her husband pointed out that Bush was being a traitor and manipulating the country to support his illegal war.
-Bush had a direct hand in corrupting the Iraqi elections in a vain attempt to promote his murderer war criminal gangster friend, Iyad Allawi, but lost, and now a pro-Iran regieme is in charge of Iraq - oops!
-Did I mention torture? Depleted Uranium? Cutting veteran benefits? Military draft? Nuclear bomb development?

The laundry list of war crimes, treason and lies goes on. Just ask Rove or I.L.L. (Scooter) for a hint. Or Rice, Powell, Wolfowitz, Armitage, Cheney, Rumsfeld,..

How honorable. Time to go murder and die for the fortunate son and his mafia gangster buddies!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Starve the War Machine
Posted by: truthteller on Jul 20, 2005 7:35 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I've been suggesting this around to mixed reviews. I believe that those of us who know this Administration's military adventurism is wrong need to do all we can to discourage anyone considering military service not to join. We need to absolutely decimate the military's recruiting goals and make it impossible for the Bushies to carry on with their fascist ways. This will force the whole issue of a draft to the forefront and make the comfortable, middle-class, armchair warmongers realize that their friends and relatives may have to go off and fight in this insanity. We should dog military recruiters with protests and informational picket lines at every high school, shopping mall and any other venue they seek to recruit in. I do not believe this is unpatriotic or unsuportive of the military. It is possibly the only way to make the vast majority of Americans really wake-up to what is happening.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Starve the War Machine Posted by: HuckFinn
» RE: Starve the War Machine Posted by: truthteller
» RE: Starve the War Machine Posted by: mejsmith
» RE: Starve the War Machine Posted by: MausMasher
Be all that you can be
Posted by: LMNOP on Jul 20, 2005 8:22 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I no longer have even the slightest affection or compassion for the Earls and Billy Bobs of the red states who have empowered the present leadership. Let their children fight the war. They're the ones with all the flags and yellow ribbons dripping off of their '82 fairlanes '79 chargers, right next to the NASCAR sticker. And if they come home in a hefty bag, well, Darwin would understand. Be all that you can be, y'all.

I realize that I'm politically incorrect from a leftist perspective, that I should love all God's children and so on. But I don't. I see the hate in their eyes and I hear in their comments on hate radio, and I want to be rid of them. They have sold me out, and now they can all go chug down a Mountain Dew and then die in the desert. Yeehah! One nation, undivided my ass.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Be all that you can be Posted by: maxpayne
» RE: Be all that you can be Posted by: wanderer
» RE: Be all that you can be Posted by: bornxeyed
» RE: Be all that you can be Posted by: wanderer
» RE: Be all that you can be Posted by: bornxeyed
» RE: Be all that you can be Posted by: Hastur
» RE: Be all that you can be Posted by: spyderbaby
» Grumbler Posted by: grumbler
» RE: Grumbler Posted by: bornxeyed
» RE: Grumbler Posted by: LMNOP
» RE: Grumbler Posted by: bornxeyed
Head Start 1
Posted by: Unbowed on Jul 20, 2005 9:48 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Instead of funding programs to train young people to make a living, this government is funding the military to the tune of 400 billion a year. Take only 50 Billion of that to change our country remarkably by funding programs and our young people would not have to choose to go to war in order to have a future. Isn't there something wrong with this picture? But no…it makes sense to those in power. Who would join the army if we were all doing well? Not many would go to fight in this war would they?

Is this a "volunteer army" of men who choose the service because they want to go to war out of choice? Or an army of proud men who have few choices and therefore are compelled by this government to go to war in order to secure for themselves the life that there grandparents and parents have already sacrificed so much to give them.

We are taxed every day of our working lives. That’s fine. But why not spend the money on our children instead of weapons is all I ask. We spend about ten times more than all other nations combined on weapons. For crying out loud! What do we need all of it for? No one can compete with us in military strength. But as for taking care of our own people, it is appalling how little we spend in proportion to weapons. So we are spending all this to protect a way of life. Great. But for who? Who’s way of life? The poor bastard who has to go fight because he has no other choices, while his government takes money from the poor and gives it to the rich.
The government that then turns around and says it is a waste of our money to help give its people a better life. But not a waste to send our children off to wars of conquest in order to line the pockets of the very rich who will never serve a day fighting this war that they say is so necessary, so unavoidable. Show me the rich men in this army.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Assemblies Of God Church helps recruiting in my hometown.
Posted by: sausage on Jul 20, 2005 9:53 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The largest, wealthiest Assemblies Of God Church in my Midwestern city had a pro-military program June 26. I learned about this from a friend who's a member. He was so incensed by this pro-military-go-out-and-enlist "program," in leiu of a sermon, he got up and walked out.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Us
Posted by: robertjneal on Jul 20, 2005 12:16 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
At our green party events we sell a bumper sticker that says "Fight the rich, not their wars."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Us Posted by: maxpayne
» RE: Us Posted by: bornxeyed
» RE: Us oops Posted by: bornxeyed
Good on Alternet
Posted by: mousch on Jul 20, 2005 2:52 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Although Alternet is a site that traditionally is against the war, and publishes what it can to show how twisted the military and executive administration are becoming, they are big enough to publish this alongside it.
This is a true information source - that they will show us that, as much as we may hate what is happening, there are still real people out there doing these jobs who aren't the spawn of satan we sometimes believe them to be.
Good on you for showing this.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Good on Alternet Posted by: FlapJackSeven
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement