Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

An Army of (No) One

By Nicholas Turse, Tomdispatch.com. Posted July 14, 2005.


A closer look at the military's attempts to recruit soldiers on the Internet shows how desperately the armed forces need warm bodies.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

It's been a tough year for the U.S. military. But you wouldn't know it from the Internet, now increasingly packed with slick, non-military looking websites of every sort that are lying in wait for curious teens (or their exasperated parents) who might be surfing by. On the ground, the military may be bogged down in a seemingly interminable mission that was supposedly "accomplished" back on May 1, 2003, but on the Web it's still a be-all-that-you-can-be world of advanced career choices, peaceful pursuits, and risk-free excitement.

While there has been a wave of news reports recently on the Pentagon's problems putting together an all-volunteer military, or even a functioning officer corps, from an increasingly reluctant public, military officials are ahead of the media in one regard. They know where the future troops they need are. Hint: They're not reading newspapers or watching the nightly prime-time news, but they are surfing the web, looking for entertainment, information, fun, and perhaps even a future.

In addition to raising the maximum enlistment age, no longer dismissing new recruits out of hand for "drug abuse, alcohol, poor fitness and pregnancy," allowing those with criminal records in, and employing such measures as hefty $20,000 sign-up bonuses (with talk of proposed future bonuses of up to $40,000, along with $50,000 worth of "mortgage assistance") to coerce the cash-strapped to enlist in the all-volunteer military, one of the military's favorite methods of bolstering the rolls is targeting the young -- specifically teens -- to fill the ranks.

What the military truly values is green teens. Not surprisingly, the Pentagon pays companies like Teenage Research Unlimited (TRU), which claims it offers its "clients virtually unlimited methods for researching teens," to get inside kids' heads. It was also recently revealed that the Department of Defense (DoD), with the aid of a private marketing firm, BeNow, has created a database of twelve million youngsters, some only 16 years of age, as part of a program to identify potential recruits. Armed with "names, birth dates, addresses, Social Security numbers, individuals' e-mail addresses, ethnicity, telephone numbers, students' grade-point averages, field of academic study and other data," the Pentagon now has far better ways and means of accurately targeting teens.

(Military) Culture JAMRS

BeNow and TRU, however, are just two of a number of private contractors working through JAMRS -- the Pentagon's "program for joint marketing communications and market research and studies" -- to fill the ranks of our increasingly-less-eager-to-volunteer military. JAMRS claims that it's only developing "public programs [to] help broaden people's understanding of Military Service as a career option." However, it also hires firms to engage in all sorts of not-for-public-consumption studies that are meant to "help bolster the effectiveness of all the Services' recruiting and retention efforts." Put another way, behind the scenes the military is in a frantic search for weak points in the public's growing resistance to joining the armed services. Some of this is impossible to learn about because access to the studies via the JAMRS web portal is restricted. Should you visit and inquire about examining their research, you are told in no uncertain terms that "access is currently limited to certain types of users" -- none of which are you.

What we do know, however, is that JAMRS is currently focusing on the following areas of interest in an attempt to bolster the all-volunteer military:

  • Hispanic Barriers to Enlistment: a project to "identify the factors contributing to under-representation of Hispanic youth among military accessions" and "inform future strategies for increasing Hispanic representation among the branches of the Military."
  • College Drop Outs/Stop Outs Study: a project "aimed to gain a better understanding of what drives college students to... 'drop out' and determine how the Services can capitalize on this group of individuals (ages 18-24)."
  • Mothers' Attitude Study: "This study gauges the target audience's (270 mothers of 10th- and 11th-grade youth) attitudes toward the Military and enlistment."


During the Vietnam War, Hispanics took disproportionate numbers of casualties and similar disparities have been reported in Iraq. JAMRS, apparently, is looking to make certain that this military tradition is maintained. Additionally, eyebrows ought to be raised over a Pentagon that is looking at ways to influence the mothers of teens to send their sons and daughters off to war and at a military eager to study what it takes to get kids to "drop out" of school and how the military might then scoop them up. Perhaps the most intriguing line of research, however, is the "Moral Waiver Study" whose seemingly benign goal is "to better define relationships between pre-Service behaviors and subsequent Service success." What the JAMRS informational page doesn't make clear, but what might be better explained in the password-protected section of the site, is that a "moral character waiver" is the means by which potential recruits with criminal records are allowed to enlist in the U.S. military.

Future Shock

Another of JAMRS' partners is Mullen Advertising which "works with JAMRS on an array of marketing communications, planning, and strategic initiatives. This work includes public-facing, influencer-focused joint offline and online advertising campaigns." One Mullen effort is the very unmilitary-sounding MyFuture.com. It's a slick website with information on such topics as living on your own, writing a cover letter, or finding a job and includes tips on dressing for success. ("Take extra time to look great.") Without the usual tell-tale ".mil" domain name, MyFuture offers what seems like civilian career advice (albeit with some military images sprinkled throughout). You can, for instance, take its Work Interest Quiz in order to discover if you should "go to college or look for a job." However, the more you explore, the more you see that the site is really about steering youngsters towards the armed forces. For example, when you take that quiz, you are prompted to ask your school guidance counselor "about taking the ASVAB Career Exploration Program if you'd like to know more about your aptitudes, values, and interests..." Not mentioned is that the ASVAB is actually the Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery -- a test developed during the Vietnam War as "the admissions and placement test for the US military."

When I took the quiz I was told: "Based on your responses to the activities listed, here are the work styles that may be appropriate for you: Investigative [and] Artistic." To follow up on my investigative aptitude, MyFuture.com offered eight civilian career suggestions, ranging from veterinarian to meteorologist. It also recommended eight military counterparts including Law Enforcement and Security Specialist. For my artistic aptitude, MyFuture suggested that I "may like activities that: 'Allow [me] to be creative [and] Let [me] work according to [my] own rules.'" Apparently, there are eight military jobs that will allow me to stretch my imagination and do just what I want, artistically speaking. Who knew, for example, that the perfect move for an artistic, freethinker would be joining an organization based on authority and conformity -- and then becoming a "Food Service Specialist"?

MyFuture.com claims that its "website is provided as a public service," while the JAMRS site refers to it as a "public site for potential military candidates to discover more about career opportunities appropriate for their interests." Of course, it's really an effort to recruit kids.

Tomorrow's Military, Today?

Another Mullen Advertising-created site is aimed at a different population. Like MyFuture, Today'sMilitary.com is a polished-looking site that lacks a ".mil" in its web address, but instead of targeting teens, the website announces that it "seeks to educate parents and other adults about the opportunities and benefits available to young people in the Military today." In JAMRS-speak that means it's a "public site targeted at influencers."

Today'sMilitary.com is filled with information on financial incentives available to those who join the military and webpages devoted to "what it's like" to be in the armed forces and how the military can "turn young diamonds in the rough into the finest force on the face of the earth." We learn that Army basic training is "[m]ore than just pushups and mess halls." In fact, quite the opposite of a torture test, it's actually a "nine-week-long journey of self-discovery." The Marines' boot camp comes across as an even more routine, though less introspective, affair with nary a mention of its rigors aside from "a final endurance test of teamwork." Scanning through the pages, we even learn that life in the military is not just "exciting, challenging and hugely rewarding," but that in their off-time, military folk "go for walks... and they even shop for antiques" (which may account for some of the antiquities that seem to go missing from Iraq).

Today's Military even takes the time to dispel "myths" like: "People in the Military are not compensated as well as private sector workers." According to Today's Military they are -- just don't tell it to the Marines who recently roughed up their highly-paid mercenary counterparts in Iraq. "One Marine gets me on the ground and puts his knee in my back. Then I hear another Marine say, 'How does it feel to make that contractor money now?'" So reported a former Marine now working in the war zone as a "private security contractor." Mercenaries in Iraq generally rake in $100,000 to $200,000 per year. Earlier this year, under pressure from Congress, the Pentagon announced that it, too, would start paying out this type of cash. One caveat -- you've got to be dead.

Such unpleasantries as death and combat go largely unmentioned on Today'sMilitary.com (or on any of the other sites mentioned in this article). In fact, the only such allusion is on a webpage that coaches parents on ways to push their children to consider the military. It instructs parents to "[e]ncourage them with subtle hints" to foster conversation on the subject and offers talking points to refute the possible trepidations of your own little potential enlistee about the armed forces. Among the "tough questions" a child might raise is a simple fact, driven home nightly on the news: "It's dangerous." Today's Military offers the following answer:

"There's no doubt that a military career isn't for everyone. But you and your young person may be surprised to learn that over 80 percent of military jobs are in non-combat operations... A military career is often what you make of it."

Tell that to non-combat troops like Jessica Lynch, the late Corporal Holly Charette (seen here delivering mail for the Marines) and her fellow fourteen casualties from a recent suicide car-bomb attack on a Marine Corps Civil Affairs team in Fallujah, or the large number of other troops in support roles who have found themselves directly in harm's way. As a Voice of America article recently put it, "Increasingly, there is a fine line between combat and non-combat jobs, especially in a place like Iraq, where there is no front line, and any unit can find itself in a firefight at any moment."

Assault and (Aptitude) Battery

Maj. Gen. Michael Rochelle, head of the Army Recruiting Command, recently stated, "Having access to 17- to 24-year-olds is very key to us. We would hope that every high school administrator would provide those lists [of student phone numbers and addresses] to us. They're terribly important for what we're trying to do." In the wake of the revelation of the Pentagon's massive new database of America's youth, Chief Pentagon spokesman Lawrence Di Rita claimed, "We are trying to use appropriate methods to make ourselves competitive in the marketplace for these kids who have a lot of choices." But as Nation magazine editor Katrina vanden Heuvel recently wrote in her Editor's Cut blog, it isn't just choices keeping the kids away:
"The debacle in Iraq has made recruiting an impossibly difficult job and recruiters are sinking to new lows in the face of growing pressure to fulfill monthly quotas as well as fierce opposition from parents who don't support the President's botched Iraq war mission."
One of the military's new lows brings us back to the subject of ASVAB and the methods of the Vietnam-era. Faced then with the need for expendable troops, Secretary of Defense Robert McNamara instituted an unholy coupling of the War on Poverty and the War in Vietnam -- Project 100,000. Project 100,000 called for the military, each year, to admit into service 100,000 men who had failed its qualifying exam. The program claimed that it would outfit those who failed to meet mental standards, men McNamara called the "subterranean poor," with an education and training that would be useful upon their return to civilian life. Instead of acquiring skills useful for the civilian job market, however, "McNamara's moron corps," as they came to be known within the military, were trained for combat at markedly elevated levels, were disproportionately sent to Vietnam, and had double the death rate of American forces as a whole.

Today, a desperate Pentagon seems to be following a strikingly similar path. As Eric Schmitt of the New York Times has written, the Army is increasingly turning to high-school dropouts, has already almost doubled last year's number of recruits scoring in the lowest level on the Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery and is "accepting hundreds of recruits in recent months who would have been rejected a year ago." Meanwhile, those who happen upon the Pentagon's ASVAB website will find another slick design, with few military trappings, no ".mil" web-address, and lots of objective career counseling. You have to troll around the site to discover in the fine print that it's offered as a "public service by the U.S. Department of Defense, Defense Manpower Data Center."

Like Today'sMilitary.com, the ASVAB site makes a pitch to parents, exhorting them to "[e]ncourage your teen to take the ASVAB." It also tries to influence teachers to "[i]ntegrat[e] the ASVAB Program Into the Classroom," even recommending that portions be "assigned as homework" to students.

Strapped for bodies, the Pentagon is putting on a full court press to fill the ranks. Its new package of promotion includes: big signing bonuses and drastically lowered standards; NASCAR, professional bull-riding, and Arena Football sponsorships; video games that double as recruiting tools; TV commercials that drip with seductive scenes of military glory or feature The Apprentice host Donald Trump; disingenuous career counseling websites; and an integrated "joint marketing communications and market research and studies" program actively engaged in measures to target Hispanics, "drop outs," and those with criminal records for military service. The Department of Defense, in short, is pulling out all the stops, sparing no expense, and spending at least $16,000 in promotional costs alone for each single soldier signed up.

Obviously the Pentagon wants recruits badly and cash-strapped teens represent one of the best chances to fill uniforms. The military clearly thinks that America's youth couldn't really pass your basic intelligence test. Its websites downplay danger and its slick TV commercials show bloodless scenes of adventure and heroism that don't square with images (and news) now coming home from Iraq to anybody's neighborhood. From hiccupping recruitment rates, it's clear, however, that America's teens already know these ads and websites are missing a few critical elements -- scenes of American troops acting as foreign occupiers, killing civilians, torturing detainees, fanning the flames of discontent, and failing to deliver basic safety or security not just for Iraqis but for their own troops.

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

Nick Turse works in the Department of Epidemiology at Columbia University. He writes for the Los Angeles Times, the Village Voice and regularly for Tomdispatch on the military-corporate complex and the homeland security state.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from World! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Maj. Gen. Michael Rochelle Should Take A Turn
Posted by: raian_sumisu on Jul 14, 2005 1:07 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Instead of researching ways to influence 17-24 year olds to drop out of school and go play russian roulette with IEDs in Iraq, the military should set up a program where military bureaucrats are recycled through the ranks. Give Maj. Gen. Michael Rochelle a vacation by sending him for a round of security patrols in the Sunni Triangle. While we're at it, how about enlisting everyone who's ever put a "Support Our Troops" magnet on their car and think that by doing so they're really "supporting our troops." A majority of Americans are now realizing that our government's choice to invade Iraq had ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to do with Saddam Hussein or Iraq. The rest have kept morally satisfied by hiding behind bumper stickers and not thinking of the consequences of our government's choice to invade Iraq.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A new moral low
Posted by: kgs1947 on Jul 14, 2005 3:56 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Information contained in this article just goes to prove how morally depraved our nation is becoming under the current political and military 'leadership'. What is terribly frightening also is the fact that, if these men of low ethical standards or naivete are being recruited, then we are undermining our own military's integrity. We are inviting more scandals of military disregard for human rights and humane behaviors. We are inviting and inciting more violence and hatred inside and outside of our own country. When these men return, if they return, they will like prisoners who were never helped to change their lives. They will come out more "damaged" than going in. This is a sad commentary of the lack of moral infrastructure of our nation today.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Restricted options for killers
Posted by: rotsky on Jul 14, 2005 4:53 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I took a look at myfuture.com. This told me that a career in the military is a 'higher calling' and linked me to todaysmilitary.com. This has a list of possible careers, but none really attracted me. So I typed a few keywords into the search facility. Every time I tried, the results came up empty. Apparently, the site has no mention of 'killer', 'killing', 'murderer' or even 'death'. There was one hit for 'destruction' - but this was to do with the site's regular destruction of its own logs. Ah well, better look elsewhere for a career...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Restricted options for killers Posted by: bonapartist
» RE: estricted options for killers Posted by: sensitiveguy
» RE: estricted options for killers Posted by: sensitiveguy
RE: This is ridiculous
Posted by: lewis_medlock on Jul 14, 2005 5:24 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I dont think the use of the internet is at question.......all would agree that the net is a valuable tool for getting one's message out.

The military is just using slick web sites that are not what they appear to be to the casual observer.

Cloaking your recruiting website under 'feel good', high school guidance counselor type BS, while legal, just shows how bad things are for them.

Get a local newspaper....go to the job ads....look under firefighter...i bet you'll see an ad for it..its in my local paper all the time....doesnt mention firefighter in the navy on a ship.
Doesnt seem honest, does it? Used car dealers do the same.

Hypocrite...???
I dont think you get it.

lewis_medlock

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

RE: This is ridiculous
Posted by: lewis_medlock on Jul 14, 2005 5:26 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I dont think the use of the internet is at question.......all would agree that the net is a valuable tool for getting one's message out.

The military is just using slick web sites that are not what they appear to be to the casual observer.

Cloaking your recruiting website under 'feel good', high school guidance counselor type BS, while legal, just shows how bad things are for them.

Get a local newspaper....go to the job ads....look under firefighter...i bet you'll see an ad for it..its in my local paper all the time....doesnt mention firefighter in the navy on a ship.
Doesnt seem honest, does it? Used car dealers do the same.

Hypocrite...???
I dont think you get it.

lewis_medlock

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

paper tiger
Posted by: tiger on Jul 14, 2005 6:40 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
strange ,Americans overwhelming supported the assault on Iraq,and now do not want to send their children to fight.
Who do you think makes up the armed forces.Oh yeah.Other people children.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: paper tiger Posted by: invisibleparent
» RE: paper tiger Posted by: papergirl
» RE: paper tiger Posted by: lidos mom
The Truth Hurts Recruitment
Posted by: Sandra on Jul 14, 2005 7:56 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As long as the media continues to report on the casualities, the maimings, the killing of civilians, the torture in the military prisions, the lack of health and psychiatric care when veterans return home and military people and reservists being held on active duty and at risk past their times of service, kids and their parents will be innoculated against the military recruitment PR lies.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

9,000 Dead GIs In Iraq War?
Posted by: verite on Jul 14, 2005 8:54 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
9,000 Dead GIs In Iraq War?

( This will not include those who died back home from USUK DU, nor their aborted offspring. )

US Military Report: The High Death Rates Exposed

By Brian Harring

Domestic Intelligence Reporter
http://tbrnews.org/Archives/a1654.htm


The claim is that those wounded, who died while on flights to Germany or while in German hospitals, have NOT been counted in the Iraq dead totals!



June 2005



Pentagon Figures Don't Add Up

By Jim

7-13-5

linked text



Monstrous Lies Are Causing Christians

And Muslims To Kill Each Other

linked text
linked text



[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Put up or shut up
Posted by: Arkham42 on Jul 14, 2005 9:00 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As a 15 year Army vet (5 active, 10 with the Guard) and as one whose about to deploy to Afghanistan, my beef isn't about what the Pentagon is doing. No, my beef is what are all the good little children of all those people who have the support the troops stickers on there car are doing.

If folks out there support the war, then they damn well better be trying to get their kids to enlist. Otherwise it's just another form of NIMBY (Not in My Backyard). Okay when it's other people's lives that are sacrificed so you can feel all patriotic.

Plus, "staying the course" is all fine for the Pentagon who doesn't seem to care about the Guards MAIN mission; that of protecting our states. See 07/13/05 article about burning Montana. The Gaurd are State troops FIRST and our duty is to protect the lives and property over HERE, not to die for oil in Iraq.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Put up or shut up Posted by: HuckFinn
» RE: Put up or shut up Posted by: Sandra
» RE: Put up or shut up Posted by: HuckFinn
» RE: Put up or shut up Posted by: papergirl
» RE: Put up or shut up Posted by: Bluecat
recruiting priorities
Posted by: invisibleparent on Jul 14, 2005 11:22 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Frankly I think that all of the White House, Senate and House politicians, from the President on down should set an example for the rest of our country's youth and mandate that THEIR children all serve a mandatory tour of duty overseas, in a branch of the armed forces.

Until that happens, why should the rest of us send our children off to fight in a war that was started for reasons no one can really identify?

I think it is a very telling sign that the military traditionally targets the middle and lower income brackets...why pay the out of work poor unemployment benefits, or give the working poor food stamp assistance and affordable health care, when they could be sent off to fight Bush's war?

Gee, from the conservative standpoint, everybody* wins.

*everybody in the upper income brackets, that is.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

RE: recruiting priorities
Posted by: invisibleparent on Jul 14, 2005 11:29 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I forgot to mention that I have an 18 yr old daughter, who turned 18 in April. In less than 2 weeks, a recruited started calling herat our home. We laughed about it the first time it happened(her future career interests are fashion and dance), but when the phonecalls started coming once a week, even after she had said she was not interested the situation began to become alarming. It was after that that I discovered the clause in the "Patriot Act" that penalizes already struggling schools by with holds federal funding from schools that do not provide priviledged personal information on it's students to the Pentagon. It makes me sick, and ashamed to be an American.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: recruiting priorities Posted by: turbocrusher
Ruling Class vs the Nation
Posted by: NoPCZone on Jul 14, 2005 3:12 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Forget all that Working Class, Middle Class, Wealthy crap. There is a class of people who never serve and have never served and are hard-wired to the inside of both political parties. They make up the majority of the real decision makers in Washington.
When you don't have to go and know your kids are not going to have to go, it's really easy to go on a misadventure like the Iraq war. The additional contracts bring in more money to the usual list of companies and allow you to wheel and deal for fun and profit. While spending 100's of billions and sacrificing countless young lives, they profit and extend their influence and power.
The really sick thing is that these people who hide behind our Flag and words like Duty, Honor and Country think the rest of us are stupid sheep to be manipulated for their selfish pursuits. The REAL patriots, men and women who have made a career out of service to our country in the armed forces, are just pawns and obstacles for them. Take a look at how Gen. Eric Shinseki, former Army Chief of Staff, was dispatched when his Congressional testimony didn't line up with the wet dreams of the NeoCons.
To those who believe in and are serving/have served in a professional Army this is the most disturbing. The carefully restored professional Army repaired from post-Vietnam until now is being destroyed by people who have and share no stake in the expense of the war. Their wealth and progeny are well-secured from ever being touched.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

SanFranDuke
Posted by: SanFranDuke on Jul 14, 2005 8:59 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Personally, I'm proud of the intelligents that is being shown by our young people and their parents who are not buying the transparent ruses of the military. We never should have gone into Iraq. (I was telling my representatives in Washington this before we invaded.)

Seems to me that we are going to see real results to that, then retorical, question, "What would happen if they gave a war and nobody came?"

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: SanFranDuke Posted by: anton_fisk
An Army of (No) One
Posted by: hotlipsin61 on Jul 15, 2005 2:54 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Pity the poor military; can't replace its dwindling ranks, campuses are organizing anti-ROTC drives and often stories of soldiers going AWOL are seeping into the news-at least on the Internet.
Don't fall for those slick commercials. An "Army of One" is a lie. Our soldiers in Iraq toil under blistering and unrelenting heat for Bushitler.
Can we blame a teenager for not wanting to be a soldier? Who wants to go to a distant land and lose a limb-and your life? Who wants to return bitter, demented, diasabled, and mean?
The Army can screw you better than anyone.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: An Army of (No) One Posted by: turbocrusher
I Wonder Why
Posted by: paulaH on Jul 15, 2005 5:25 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hmmm, I wonder why no one wants to enlist.

1. Will get sent to fight in a war that's partly about revenge for the Prezdet's Daddy and mostly to make said Prezdet and his cronies bundles of money. Oh, and Daddy should get lots, too. Not to mention Bubba Jeb.

2. Will get the thrill of getting shot at without all the added burden of body armor and other protective gear. Your family will have to take out a second and third mortgage on their house so they can send you the things you need in order to fight this war because the government which sent you there feel making their corporate buddies richer to be more important than your own personal safety.

3. While you're over there fighting for the members of the Bush Administration's financial freedom, they're back here cutting your veteran benefits.

4. If you do happen to get maimed in the war, you're not sure whether or not that VA hospital near you will still be open for your use.

Golly gee. I don't understand why no one is enlisting.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: I Wonder Why Posted by: bornxeyed
The main danger is an all volunteer milatary...
Posted by: outsidea on Jul 16, 2005 1:04 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is amusing to see that the military recruiters are having such a rough time filling their quotas and have to stoop so low to get anyone at all. However, what is not amusing is that the current administration and those Democrats that are colluding with them to stay the course are not so amusing. If our elected reps. in the Senate and House continue in this folly, and the American people continue to hunker down and hope that it dont rain on them then they will get the professional military they need...highly paid, highly skilled and sucking up critical money needed here at home for serious civil needs. For those few who do try to resist why there will be the new improved Patriot Act, with you can be sure will be furnished with adendums when needed to appropriatly discipline untrustworthy elements that seek to assemble or commit non-violent civil disobedience. Please remember here, merely proclaiming to be non-violent is useless. Without civil-disobedience who cares? And for those who care to dare...well they have little "demonstation areas" just for us...far enough away from "critical areas" or important persons, political or other. We have already seen a preview of all this in the herding away anti-Bush demontrators and anti-war demonstraters from public view.

So, what will we have here...an all volunteer military, estranged from civil society, AND what about all these highly paid contractors over in Iraq and Afghanistan (and who knows where else?) that will form another malevolent force for civil society to deal with?

So...what to do? Get ready to fight...and soon. By that I mean both street heat (through massive acts of non-violent civil disobedience ) and ballot heat which wont succeed without massive acts or civil disobedience in the street and perhaps more creativly in other places as well.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

When we all cared
Posted by: JonathanL on Aug 3, 2005 7:17 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am in the military now and have been for the last 8 and some years.

I have to say how proud I am to be able to fight in our military and how proud I am of those who serve in our military today. Regardless of what bush says or does I am proud of my brothers and sisters over there willing to die for the opinion of others.

I have to say this though when are we going to start raising our children to stand for those that cannot stand for them selves. To fight for the under dog. I think that is where we are going wrong.

Everyone wants the peace but no one wants to fight for it and even if their worriors go to war they wont even support them!

What a selfish society we live in! We are becoming worse than what we like to call animals. I have never seen a lion turn on another lion just because it could or becuase it had a different opinion.

But look at us we fight while those who are fighting becasue that is what they do for us are in a time of need.

Can we focus on thier needs until they come home and focus on the rest of this mess later.

Yes there are trees and then there is a forest what are we really looking at?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement