Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Birthday Bashed

By Michael Blanding, AlterNet. Posted June 16, 2005.


The Army's lavish 230th birthday celebration looked like a thinly veiled attempt to recruit more bodies during a time when Americans are increasingly viewing the Iraq war as a mistake.
Birthday Bashed
Birthday Bashed
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

In 1775, George Washington arrived in Cambridge, Massachusetts, to take charge of a ragtag band of brothers who went on to liberate the colonies from the British. On Tuesday, the US Army was back on Cambridge Common to try and recapture some of that lost glory.

The gathering -- featuring a brass band, a color guard and military re-enactors -- was ostensibly the main event in a nationwide 230th birthday celebration to honor Army veterans. To several hundred protesters who arrived to crash the party, however, it looked like a thinly veiled attempt to recruit more bodies during a time when the Army has missed its recruiting goals for four months straight and Americans are increasingly viewing the Iraq war as a mistake.

"The Army has a right to celebrate its birthday," said Vietnam veteran and Veterans for Peace member Winston Warfield, "but this is a military circus."

Most of the displays were clearly calculated to appeal to a younger audience. The event began with four members of a parachute team jumping from a Blackhawk helicopter 4,000 feet above the crowd. Around the common, kids in baseball caps and teens in basketball jerseys gawked at grenade launchers and military vehicles, including a brightly painted "Super Hum-Vee" and an Army truck filled with video games.

Holding a pro-war rally in Cambridge signals a new level of aggression -- or desperation -- for the Army, akin to staging an peace march on the parade ground at West Point. Nicknamed the "People's Republic" for its left-leaning politics, Cambridge ranks with Berkeley and Madison in its anti-war fervor. Many of those who came out to demonstrate decried the Army's use of the city's image for an event they did not find out about until a week before it happened.

"It's interesting that there was no attempt to hold a birthday celebration for the 225th or 220th anniversary," said resident Phyllis Gately, "but now that we are in the midst of a war they come into the People's Republic and flex their muscles."

Many students also came out to protest in an area known for its academic institutions. "Not only is this area strongly against the war," said Alison Ramer, a 19-year-old student from nearby Lesley College, "but this is an area for students and young people who are directly being targeted by recruiters." Ramer came with the youth group Boston Mobilization, which fielded white T-shirts hand-lettered in red with the words "You Can't Bribe Us To Die" on the front and "You Can't Bribe Us To Kill" on the back. (The army recently inked a $100 million advertising contract and upped its signing bonuses to a maximum of $20,000.)

The speakers on the stage, which included Acting Undersecretary of the Army Raymond DuBois, lost no opportunity to sweeten the pot with patriotic comparisons. "We stand at the very spot where the United States all-volunteer army gathered to march and expel the British from Boston in 1775," said DuBois. "There are modern-day enemies of freedom who did not want Afghanistan and Iraq to have the same ideals that were begun right here."

Whenever the microphone fell silent, however, the crowd was treated to chants seeking to remind them that Washington's army of liberation has become Bush's army of torture and occupation. As the parachute team landed on a baseball field, the backstop was lined with protesters chanting, "Abu Ghraib, Guantanamo, U.S. torture has got to go."

During DuBois' remarks, protesters standing within a cordon of black uniformed police officers near the stage chanted "No blood for oil, U.S. off Iraqi soil." As Cambridge Mayor Michael Sullivan laid a wreath at the base of a military monument, they completely drowned out the sound of a lone trumpeter playing "Taps" with chants of "Bush is still lying, soldiers are still dying."


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

Michael Blanding is a freelance writer living in Boston.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from World! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Iraq is Arabic for Vietnam
Posted by: thx1138 on Jun 16, 2005 5:00 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
At the beginning of the Vietnam War, in the early sixties, the numbers of protesters were actually similar if not smaller than todays early days of the Iraq War and Occupation. Public opinion, if it's done honestly by corporate media, which it is not, would probably read much higher than the 60% percent who say "we shouldn't be there", or "it's been a mistake."
Let's see how things go if the Neocons and the Pentagon succumbs to Israels insistence that we continue fighting it's enemies so it can continue it's apartheid policies in Palestine and invade Iran, reinstitue a draft, and send not only young males, but young females to serve while the wealthy and the rich find loopholes for their kids to aviod their so-called "patriotic duty." Where are the Bush children? Any onf them from the entire family serve in uniform? Hmmm. Makes one wonder...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

ACLU of Massachusetts Condemns Arrest of Peaceful Protesters
Posted by: nanobubble on Jun 16, 2005 6:24 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
" ACLU of Massachusetts Condemns Arrest of Peaceful Protesters on Cambridge Common
by Justin M
Email: just1pin (nospam) ureach.com (unverified!) 15 Jun 2005
CAMBRIDGE, MA - The American Civil Liberties Union of Massachusetts condemns the arrests today of peaceful protesters by Cambridge police officers during an event on the Cambridge Common to mark the founding of the United States Army. The organization also criticized the police for forcing people to move into a "pen" if they were expressing views critical of U.S. policies.
...
According to witnesses, people wishing to leave the pen were forced by police to leave the Common. Observers said that one man who was simply holding a sign was made to move and the police also forced photographers from the area if they looked like protesters."
full article

Shout-out to Pat!
Peace in the middle east
-Nanobubble

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

All Too Obvious
Posted by: nakis on Jun 16, 2005 9:00 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The 230th Anniversay?
I agree with the author that the Army does deserve to celebrate anniversaries but the 230th?
In a time where enlistment numbers are significantly low?

It's like giving that stadium a military name. They are selling the military as a product. Not patriotism. The enlistment numbers show that even bonus's and educational help do not outweigh the peoples recognition that enlistment isn't about patriotic duty (or even a way out of poverty) but about being a corporate hitman.
No offense to those in the military. I support our military. It's just the people who order our military around I stand in opposition to and why they send our soldiers into danger.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

RELUCTANT WARRIORS, VICTIMS OF VOUCHERS
Posted by: Betsy L. Angert on Jun 16, 2005 9:30 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Dear Michael Blanding . . .

This is disquieting as are all recent military actions, at least to me!

The use of verbiage and image to persuade is pervasive under King George II. The Pentagon trumpets as the President does.

Recruiting those that are reluctant to serve is costly, as is war. The price we are paying for this ill-advised, foolhardy, and self-imposed war is outrageous. Lives, limbs, reason, and respect are lost.

I recently wrote two pieces on recruitment. I invite you to please visit my words and share your thoughts.

The first missive discusses the reasons for recruitment shortfalls.
RELUCTANT WARRIORS, RECRUITMENT SHORTFALLS ©

The second looks at the idea of a Volunteer Armed Service and questions this truth.
VOLUNTEER ARMED FORCES OR VICTIMS OF VOUCHERS©

Be-Think
Betsy L. Angert

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Being a soldier doesn't make you a hero
Posted by: crz53 on Jun 16, 2005 11:57 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I should preface this by saying that going into the military has never interested me. I've had a number of family members serve in the Army and the Marines.

That being said, I'd like to throw out a radical question that will, no doubt, offend some people here. Why aren't progressives demanding that every soldier in Iraq be held accountable for his or her role in this abomination. If the war in Iraq is truly an unjust, immoral war of aggression (which it is), then why aren't we saying to every person involved, from Rummy on down to the privates in Fallujah - "What you are doing is not heroic, it is wrong".

I understand that these people took an oath to be loyal soldiers. But there are times where doing what is right means not honoring an oath. I don't accept the argument that they are just following orders. No one owns your body but yourself. Soldiers can disobey. Granted, they might be thrown in jail, they might be kicked out of the military dishonorably. One could argue that both scenarios are morally superior to being an accomplice to war crimes. I think that anyone involved in the illegal war of aggression in Iraq is doing just that.

I also understand that most of the soldiers in Iraq probabaly joined the military with no intentions of killing civilians or even going to Iraq. That makes no difference. No matter how noble or honorable their motives going in, you can't separate the people from their actions. The fact of the matter is that the war in Iraq is both illegal and immoral; and any one involved with it is a guilty party, not a hero.

I don't support American soldiers in Iraq because I don't support their actions there. It is impossible to seperate one from the other. Don't misunderstand me, I wish them no harm, and I want them to come home safely and quickly. But I cannot support them in what they are doing in Iraq.

I realize that this goes completely against the conventional wisdom that regards all American soldiers as heros. I think that's bullshit. Everyone has a choice to do what is right or to do what is wrong. Soldiers are no more exempt from that decision that anyone else. Unless we can stop separating soldiers from war and people from their actions, progressives will never be able form a truly articulate and effective response to the warmonger's call to "Support our troops".
- Mike Lorenz

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Feel the Love
Posted by: Campesino on Jun 17, 2005 9:57 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You can just feel the love for our military in this article and these comments

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Feel the Love Posted by: nanobubble
» RE: Feel the Love Posted by: girleagle1
Our Militaary Protects us
Posted by: girleagle1 on Jun 18, 2005 6:03 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What is it about being a liberal that makes you all hate the military? Why don't you all see that without the military our entire way of life would be constantly under attack? Muslims hate us and attacked us, they have declared a holy war against us, so when we fight back to defend the attacks of 911 is that so bad? Our heroes in uniform are protecting your freedom, the very freedom you abuse by shouting down people who disagree with you. Maybe you should have your freedom taken away while the rest of us defend it for you with our support for the war against terrorism, maybe then you will appreciate it. While you are standing around on the common yelling at the Army celebrating it's 230th year anniverary you are giving support to the Arab insurgents plotting to kill the sons and daughters of your countrymen. What is wrong with you that you can't support the Army while it defend you? For once, you liberals should stand up for our American way of life, for our Judeo-Christian values, for God and if that means that we go to war and alot of Arabs die to protect our freedom as we also spread Freedom and Democracy to them then so what. Those are the ones who want to hlep Osama Bin Laden kill Americans anyway.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Our Militaary Protects us Posted by: girleagle1
» RE: Our Militaary Protects us Posted by: bonapartist
» RE: Our Militaary Protects us Posted by: bonapartist
» RE: Our Militaary Protects us Posted by: WhatNow?
» RE: Our Militaary Protects us Posted by: girleagle1
» RE: Our Militaary Protects us Posted by: bonapartist
» Genocide in Iraq? Posted by: bonapartist
» RE: Genocide in Iraq? Posted by: gaspass
» Civilized Warfare Posted by: crz53
» RE: Civilized Warfare Posted by: gaspass
» RE: Genocide in Iraq? Posted by: gopbarfbag
» RE: Genocide in Iraq? Posted by: bonapartist