WORLD  
comments_image -

"Chilling": Colombian President Alvaro Uribe's Spying Program Targeted Judges and Journalists

The U.S. should carry out it's own investigation into whether tax dollars went towards the illegal spying program by one of its major Latin American allies.
 
Colombian President Alvaro Uribe waves to journalists after casting his vote during the legislative elections, in Bogota, on March 14. Conservatives were on track to preserving their majority in Colombia's congress, early election results showed Monday, reassuring supporters of Uribe's hard line against leftist rebels.
Photo Credit: AFP - Rodrigo Arangua
 
 
LIKE THIS ARTICLE ?
Join our mailing list:

Sign up to stay up to date on the latest World headlines via email.

 
 
 
 

As Colombian President Alvaro Uribe finishes his second term, the shield of invincibility that once protected him seems to be wearing thin. Not only was he denied the possibility of a third term, but human rights scandals and a resurgence of violence in the country are finally beginning to taint his reputation. Now evidence has emerged that appears to confirm the Uribe administration's involvement in yet another rights-violating policy: spying on and persecuting journalists, Supreme Court Justices and human rights defenders. 

 

During the trial of five current and former functionaries of the Departamento Administrativo de Seguridad (DAS, the intelligence agency that reports directly to the president) accused of illegally spying on journalists, Supreme Court justices, and human rights defenders, an investigator from the Attorney General's office presented detailed evidence that the illegal surveillance of the Supreme Court  was directed from no less than the Casa de Nariño (Colombia's White House), despite the administration's constant denials of responsibility.  

 

Among the evidence presented by the investigator last Saturday was a folder labeled "President Uribe," used by DAS agents to collect documents of "special interest" to the president, as well as transcriptions of private meetings and sessions of the high court that were clandestinely recorded by the intelligence agency. Evidence also included witness' descriptions of secret meetings in which DAS functionaries were delegated tasks for spying on the Justices. The witnesses named several high-level presidential advisors who participated in many of these meetings. 

 

A particular focus of the surveillance, it seems, were the Justices' positions on Uribe's second reelection, which was recently struck down by the court. During presentation of evidence, the investigator questioned how the DAS knew about the Justice's opinions about the reelection as far back as August of 2002 -- without illegal surveillance, that is. The evidence also included documentation of surveillance and persecution of outspoken journalist Hollman Morris. Later that day, opposition politician and presidential candidate Gustavo Petro declared that evidence will soon be released to demonstrate that Uribe ordered "systematic persecution" against himself and his family.

"Chilling" is how the Organization of American States Special Rapporteur for Freedom of Expression, Catalina Botero, described DAS persecution of journalists like Claudia Duque, who received threats that her daughter would be chopped to pieces. “It is very difficult to maintain that there is freedom of expression in a country in which the state intelligence agency has functionaries that practice systematic espionage, stigmatization and death threats against the people who are doing the heroic labor of reporting on what is happening in the country,” she declared.  

 

The government, of course, has denied responsibility. In a radio interview Uribe himself swore his innocence, saying "You can say that I am saying this under oath to you, and all the Colombian public: This is a government that does not resort to playing dirty. This is a government that does things directly. That stuff about ordering people's wires tapped is outside the way of thinking and acting of this government."

 

The Supreme Court Justices aren't convinced, however. The President of the Court, Jaime Arrubla, compared the surveillance to Watergate. "Heads, including that of the President, rolled in the U.S. for infiltrating a political party... here it is much worse because the privacy of the Supreme Court, the highest court in the country, has been infiltrated."

submit to reddit

-
Email
Print
Share
LIKED THIS ARTICLE? JOIN OUR EMAIL LIST
Stay up to date with the latest World headlines via email
Alternet Special Coverage - Occupy Wall Street
Advertisement
Most Read
Most Emailed
Most Discussed
On REDDIT
On DIGG
 
loading most read content ..
Advertisement
At GOP Debate, CNN Sucks Up to Candidates, Letting Racism and Misogyny Slide

By Adele M. Stan | AlterNet

 
 
Will the Supreme Court Outlaw Affirmative Action in Higher Education?

By Victor Goode | Colorlines

 
 
Tonight, Watch the Premiere of Nat Geo's New Series "American Weed"

By Staff | AlterNet

 
 
NYPD, Big Brother? New Document Shows Shocking Reach of the NYPD's Secret Surveillance of Muslims

By Kristen Gwynne | AlterNet

 
 
Update: Governor Comes Out Against Trans-Vaginal Ultrasound Provision in Virginia

By Sarah Seltzer | AlterNet

 
 
Obama Plans to Slash Corporate Tax Rate And Close Loopholes: Why It May Not Work

By Sarah Seltzer | AlterNet

 
 
Santorum's "Satan Warning" Speech: How Will It Play?

By Jed Lewison | Daily Kos

 
 
The Challenge to Status Quo Economics Everybody is Talking About

By Lynn Parramore | AlterNet

 
 
Virginia Governor Backs Off ‘State-Sponsored Rape’ Ultrasound Bill, Promises To ‘Review’ Measure

By Amanda Peterson Beadle | Think Progress

 
 
Mitt Romney's Most Robotic Speech Ever

By Sarah Seltzer | AlterNet

 
 
 
WhoWhatWhy.com
 
 
 
 
loading ...
POWERED BY DIGG'S USERS
 
[ page served from web 1 ]