COMMENTS: 98
Progressive Leaders Pan Obama's Decision for More War in Afghanistan -- 10 Reactions
Sign up to stay up to date on the latest World headlines via email.
President Obama's speech announcing a troop escalation in Afghanistan did not go over well with many progressives. As soon as his intentions to send tens of thousands more troops became clear, dozens of progressive leaders and writers -- including many former prominent Obama supporters -- voiced their concerns in newspapers, on the radio and on the Internet. The following is a sampling of their responses:
1. Tom Hayden writes for The Nation:
"It's time to strip the Obama sticker off my car. Obama's escalation in Afghanistan is the last in a string of disappointments. His flip-flopping acceptance of the military coup in Honduras has squandered the trust of Latin America. His Wall Street bailout leaves the poor, the unemployed, minorities and college students on their own. And now comes the Afghanistan-Pakistan decision to escalate the stalemate, which risks his domestic agenda, his Democratic base, and possibly even his presidency."
2. Laura Flanders writes on GritTV,
"...for those who’d thought they’d voted for the death of the Bush Doctrine. Sorry. Bush/Cheney live on in the new president’s embrace of the idea that the U.S. has a right, not only to respond to attacks, but also to deploy men and women in anticipation of them."
3. Jim Hightower used his most recent column to warn:
"Obama has been taken over by the military industrial hawks and national security theorists who play war games with other people's lives and money. I had hoped Obama might be a more forceful leader who would reject the same old interventionist mindset of those who profit from permanent war. But his newly announced Afghan policy shows he is not that leader."
Hightower says that just because we've lost Obama on this issue, it's not over; that we as citizens...
"...have both a moral and patriotic duty to reach out to others to inform, organize and mobilize our grassroots objections, taking common sense to high places. Also, look to leaders in Congress who are standing up against Obama's war and finally beginning to reassert the legislative branch's constitutional responsibility to oversee and direct military policy. For example, Rep. Jim McGovern is pushing for a specific, congressionally mandated exit strategy; Rep. Barbara Lee wants to use Congress' control of the public purse strings to stop Obama's escalation; and Rep. David Obey is calling for a war tax on the richest Americans to put any escalation on-budget, rather than on a credit card for China to finance and future generations to pay."
4. Black Agenda Report editor Glen Ford compares Obama's delivery to how George Bush might have given the speech:
"Barack Obama's oratorical skills have turned on him, revealing, as George Bush’s low-grade delivery never could, the perfect incoherence of the current American imperial project in South Asia. Bush’s verbal eccentricities served to muddy his entire message, leaving the observer wondering what was more ridiculous, the speechmaker or the speech. There is no such confusion when Obama is on the mic. His flawless delivery of superbly structured sentences provides no distractions, requiring the brain to examine the content – the policy in question – on its actual merits. The conclusion comes quickly: the U.S. imperial enterprise in Afghanistan and Pakistan is doomed, as well as evil.
Stay up to date with the latest World headlines via email
Comments are closed-
Posted by: mmckinl on Dec 4, 2009 12:30 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Yes, Alternet, and here is more to add, its coming out now all over the place, check this out this
Posted by: Prophit0
» Obama the front man!
Posted by: bigbrother
Comments are closed-
Posted by: November2010 on Dec 4, 2009 12:52 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: SUCKERS!
Posted by: Southernman
» No we are not..... that is pure delusional rantings.... what we need is a 3rd party...
Posted by: Prophit0
» Newsflash Southernman
Posted by: 2dogarage
» RE: SUCKERS!
Posted by: aussidawg
» RE: SUCKERS!
Posted by: aussidawg
» RE: SUCKERS!
Posted by: osd
» RE: SUCKERS!
Posted by: Derk
» Honest post.... but voting through fear always ends in a mistake.
Posted by: Prophit0
» YEAH! We're gonna WIN!! btw
Posted by: HalEBurton
» Right on, this time, third party is going to win, if Dennis does not get the nomination...
Posted by: Prophit0
» RE: SUCKERS!
Posted by: Richard House
» RE: SUCKERS!
Posted by: suzisrealtor
Comments are closed-
Posted by: richholland on Dec 4, 2009 1:17 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Yeah, look what I just found... unbelievable, its how they are getting around the fed audit bill if
Posted by: Prophit0
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Tescoliatprole on Dec 4, 2009 1:19 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When Obama got elected I had an uneasy feeling of deja vu; this because here in Britain we saw exactly the same thing with Blair's arrival. An enormous feeling of relief that we'd got rid of the loonies. "Things can only get better" was the slogan. After a year Blair looked as though he'd been brainwashed. Now Obama's getting that same look about him. Blair turned out to be Imperialism's new poodle. Folk in the US had better get used to calling their new Pres "Barky".
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Some of us knew
Posted by: 2dogarage
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Col. Jackleg on Dec 4, 2009 2:02 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Perry Logan on Dec 4, 2009 3:16 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Obama's supporters are furious at him because he finally kept one of his promises.
So much for the theory that progressives are smart. ;)
The Merchant Who Thought He Was God
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Not true and you know it. He promised to do Afghanistan TO FIND BIN LADEN...
Posted by: Prophit0
» It is always wonderful to read the take of
Posted by: HalEBurton
» RE: IRONY ALERT!
Posted by: Richard House
Comments are closed-
Posted by: warrior woman on Dec 4, 2009 3:53 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
For example, the military accounts for over 50% of our federal government. FOX continually rails that govt is bad, inefficient, too big, yada yada yada. But, to get to the real answers you have to delve into the budget and look at how the federal dollar is distributed. The afghan war chest pays at least 10% in bribes to warlords. In addition, the vast majority of those employed overseas in the private contractor ranks are foreigners. Of those, they are paid minimally according to US standards yet like princes according to their own country's standards of labor. What that means then, is that a vast amount of our war assessments are going to the very few who run the companies overseas. Many of those are also foreign companies.
So, while I agree the govt has grown too large, I believe it is because we have issued private contracts on virtually everything. Where we have laws to enforce, we do not have enforcers whether it be the Treasury, FDA, EPA, FAA, what have you.
I encourage you to take a look at these articles and websites to learn more of where our money is being spent. Then, I would encourage you to consider what is "the public good"? Is it education, transportation, healthcare, social and economic security? What is it and what are we all willing to assess ourselves to ensure that we have such things?
The military has already spent roughly $2.7 billion on construction over the past three fiscal years. Now, if its request is approved as part of the fiscal 2010 defense appropriations bill, it would spend another $1.3 billion on more than 100 projects at 40 sites across the country, according to a Senate report on the legislation.” Military Seeks $1.3 Billion For Projects in Afghanistan www.washingtonpost.com/
o Paying Peter to Kill Paul and How the US Funds the Taliban
By Aram Roston This article appeared in the November 30, 2009 edition of The Nation.
http://www.thenation.com/ note the following payments which are but a tip of the iceberg: “US military officials in Kabul estimate that a minimum of 10 percent of the Pentagon's logistics contracts--hundreds of millions of dollars--consists of payments to insurgents.”
o “"requires untangling two threads. The first is the insider dealing that determines who wins and who loses in Afghan business, and the second is the troubling mechanism by which "private security" ensures that the US supply convoys traveling these ancient trade routes aren't ambushed by insurgents.”
o “Each of the military's six trucking contracts was bumped up to $360 million, or a total of nearly $2.2 billion. Put it in this perspective: this single two-year effort to hire Afghan trucks and truckers was worth 10 percent of the annual Afghan gross domestic product.”
o IRAQ? Truckloads of money sent and eventually reported missing????
In 2014 or Bust, The Pentagon's Building Boom in Afghanistan Indicates a Long War Ahead By Nick Turse: http://www.tomdispatch.com/ “To handle the influx of troops already being dispatched by the Obama administration (with more expected once the president decides on his long-term war plans) "new dormitories" are going up at Bagram, according to David Axe of the Washington Times. The base's population will also increase ..the MILCON Bagram Theatre Internment Facility (TIF) currently being built at a cost of $60 million by a team of more than 1,000 Filipinos, Indians, Sri Lankans, and Afghans. When completed, it will consist of 19 buildings and 16 guard towers designed to hold more than 1,000 de tainees...
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» This war is also about massive and record breaking drug production....
Posted by: Prophit0
Comments are closed-
Posted by: warrior woman on Dec 4, 2009 3:55 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
o In October, defense contractor AECOM Technology signed a $78 million, 6-month extension contract with the Army to "provide general-support maintenance as well as the operation of maintenance facilities, living quarters and offices at two U.S. military bases as well as forward operating bases and satellite locations"
o In July, under an existing LOGCAP IV contract, scandal-tainted defense contractor DynCorp International, along with partners CH2M Hill and Taos Industries, received a one year $643.5 million order to "provide existing bases within the Afghanistan South AOR [area of responsibility] with operations and maintenance support, including but not limited to: facilities management, electrical power, water, sewage and waste management, laundry operations, food services and transportation motor pool operations," as well as "construction services for additional sites." With an eye to the future, the Pentagon has included four one-year options in the contract which, if taken up, would be worth an estimated $5.8 billion.”
o New Baghdad Airport Security Contractor Has Major Bagagge — By Daniel Schulman | Tue November 17, 2009 5:00 AM PST http://www.motherjones.com/
THis topped the cake the other day: War Fraud Whistleblowers Under Wraps
Monday 30 November 2009
by: Dina Rasor,
http://www.truthout.org/1130094
"In fiscal year 2009, health care fraud recoveries reached $1.6 billion, two-thirds of the year's total. The Department of Health and Human Services reaped the biggest recoveries, largely attributable to its Medicare and Medicaid programs. Recoveries were also made by the Office of Personnel Management, which administers the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program, the Department of Defense for its TRICARE insurance program and the Department of Veterans Affairs, among others.
"The largest health care recoveries came from the pharmaceutical and medical device industries, which accounted for $866.7 million in settlements, including Aventis Pharmaceuticals Inc., Bayer HealthCare LLC, Eli Lilly & Company and Quest Diagnostics Inc. and its subsidiary, Nichols Institute Diagnostics Inc. In addition to federal recoveries, these pharmaceutical and medical device fraud cases returned $402 million to state Medicaid programs."
Note that corporations have 3/4 of the medicare fraud recovered, not the lazy, no good PEOPLE, ya know.
This was a bit better: 'If it is to be fought, it ought to be paid for'
By Walter Pincus December 1, 2009
http://www.washingtonpost.com/ "One irony of the debate that Obey hopes to encourage is that many opponents to increasing the Afghan commitment support the surcharge to pay for it, while many backers of the Afghan strategy -- if they mention costs -- propose domestic spending cuts rather than new taxes."
Check out BusinessWeek's article this week on Wall St vs America. Contracts that will suck the last drops out of cities, counties and education while wall st walks away with the money and no new legislation.
4 Videos: Congressman Kucinich In the News On Afghanistan http://kucinich.us/index.php?option=com
_content&task=view&id=2847&Itemid=2#MSNBC
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Israel wants you to think it is all about oil
Posted by: wiscorad
» Great post, this is exactly why I like coming here.... thanks Warrior woman.
Posted by: Prophit0
Comments are closed-
Posted by: photon's feather on Dec 4, 2009 4:26 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
trillions for Wall Street pirates,
and the headlines at the New York Times this morning:
"Obama Tackles Jobless Woes,
but Warns of Limited Funds."
Hmmn... Would that qualify as change?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Yes, and the Bankers are now saying they need another bail out for $800 billion.....over their dead
Posted by: Prophit0
Comments are closed-
Posted by: SufiLizard on Dec 4, 2009 4:27 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And no, I didn't think Obama would be some flawless savior, but I had hoped for more than this.
I've unsubscribed from OFA newsletters (and MoveOn.org too for that matter) and I've de-friended Obama on Facebook. I took the bumper sticker off my car a while ago.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Now, some real actions:
Posted by: oregoncharles
» ...and Never, Never Vote DP again!
Posted by: logansafi
Comments are closed-
Posted by: keystone999 on Dec 4, 2009 4:35 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Any money spent in Afghanistan is either going to War Profiteers or into the pockets of a few corrupt politicians. I heard yesterday on NPR that 70% of every dollar spent on aid and rebuilding will end up being squandered on bribes or stolen outright.
Democrat or Republican, by the time anyone arrives in DC they are owned and will "dance with the one what brung 'em". Big business saw that the public was sick of the GOP and spent their money buying Democrats. Just another reason why we need to restrict lobbying, stop corporate personhood, impose term limits and simplify Senate procedures to reflect democratic principles.
All politicians will talk about values and patriotism and they have the least amoung us. We currently live in a nation where we have spent 8-10 times more on war than education (see DOD spending vs Department of Education). Our family values include allowing human beings to be "cost centers" for Insurance companies and Big Pharma, letting Goldman Sachs keep the highest bonus pool in their 140 year history after helping to destroy the world's economy. Our government has bankrolled Wall Street gambling with my tax dollars while my elderly parents retirement account lost 40% (all AAA securities, too). Our family values include keeping us in a state of perpetual war while allowing those who profit from it to keep all their ill gotten gains. Wall Street in excited about the 8% increase in productivity and the jobless recovery.
According to the GAO, in 2006 72% of American households earned $58,000. per year or less - now that the economy has tanked - has anyone got a clue what the numbers are? Congress DID vote yesterday to keep the Bush's estate tax break for millionaires (3.5M per individual or .23% of the population) at 45%, it was due to go back to 55% on estates of $1Mill. It's nice that they can take care of themselves, at least. G-d, if you are listening - we need a Tsunami along the Potomac.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Your absolutely right about the graft and briberies and kickbacks.....
Posted by: Prophit0
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Purple Girl on Dec 4, 2009 4:36 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's infuriating enough to listen to the same dumbass Mf'ers who got US into these mess spew their BS opinions, but listening to the Left continue their Whine fest is no less.
Ok all you big Talkers on the Left- lets see what you are really made of, prove the hypothesis that conflict can be resolved through peaceful means. Advocate, recruit, enlist and volunteer for the opportunity to Prove yourselves, and your ascertain, right in Afghanistan.
Military 'Hawks' and War Dogs Don't believe us because they haven't seen it for themselves. Forget reciting numerous examples throughout history- they don't read history, so they don't comtemplate it's wisedom. Or they disregard it as irrelevant.Or worse hope to replicate it even when blatantly disasterous, for short term gains.
The Surprise from the Right should not be about Obama granting more troops, it should be the reaction of the Left by stepping up to heed the Call for Civilian 'troops'. You want to prove not only that diplomacy works, but so does Humanitarism, Start helping build the Civilian Corp.
We are in the Majority lets show them how it's done. We've been screaming 'Stop the Wars' for 40 yrs, We have to prove the superior alternative.
Otherwise our credo, or claims are as hollow as those who claim they follow 'the Word of Christ'. Ethics and Morals are a tangible thing- evidenced by our deeds.
So you want to kill two 'hawks' with one stone (War dogs and the hell bent 'Holier than thou' crowd). Start Walking. Prove peaceful means give a Better 'return' than armed conflict and that Morality is not the sole property of any religious doctrine.
Progess requires work, not words. With bitching being the least effective because it serves no real use and solves absolutely nothing.If you are not willing to invest some blood, sweat and tears into making progress away from the Status quo, then the military means will always be held in higher regard.Heros will always be those who weild weaponry, not aid.
Is the Anti War Left so blind they can't see this huge opportunity to prove our point, thus redeeming the correctness of the Liberal ideology? Or is it the fear of having to actually put some skin in the game, that they too only focus on armed troop levels- up or down?
No one bothers to ask how many do we have over their building cultural bridges, not to mention actual ones? Why is there no outrage the US is only being represented by the Military? Gee I wonder why the US is considered an imperialistic invader, instead of the 'helping hand'- because they are more often greeted with a high powered weapon, not a handshake.
A True Progressive, a person who still dreams that one day War will be obsolete, would be pushing the Obama admin on how they intend to increase the civilian presence in Afgahnistan.
Other HUGE benefit- Jobs for Americans across professional and industrial lines.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Or worse, this is intentional for empire building and fascist one world government.
Posted by: Prophit0
» Damn, I forgot again to give you the name of the book, "The Grand Chessboard: American Primacy and..
Posted by: Prophit0
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Erin on Dec 4, 2009 5:06 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: laborlou on Dec 4, 2009 5:45 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» No, no, & no!
Posted by: JohnTruth2001
» Yes, that was the noble purpose to fight the nazis, FOR THE DUPED AMERICAN SOLDIERS WHO LIVES WERE
Posted by: Prophit0
» RE: Points Well Taken, But...
Posted by: christianslayer1955
» The Unluckiest of Passengers
Posted by: sunnywater
Comments are closed-
Posted by: citizenjoe on Dec 4, 2009 5:48 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Erin on Dec 4, 2009 5:55 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: smf1403 on Dec 4, 2009 6:20 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"That only through a view that’s rooted in people, rooted in human kindness,...would a country open itself up.. That not until human basic needs are addressed and human dignity upheld...bring about human liberty".
Only when the anger, the blind hatred of others not like us, ends, and the sickness of hollow greed is contained, will we find peace.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Right now, its the sickness of hollow greed that is motivating all of this.
Posted by: Prophit0
Comments are closed-
Posted by: JohnTruth2001 on Dec 4, 2009 6:36 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Yup, and I just checked: Military indust comp are loaded with ex pentagon...
Posted by: Prophit0
Comments are closed-
Posted by: AlteredStates on Dec 4, 2009 6:59 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How many more disappointments can his supporters take? The ranks are thinning, and pretty soon he my be the last man standing - except for all the advisors he has surrounded himself with.
I think the job is getting to him. He is in way over his head in spite of his presumed intellect and sterling education. After taking what seemed to be a never ending string of delays on how many more troops he was going to send to Afghanistan, he finally settled on just about what McCrystal wanted in the first place, with perhaps, more troops to be deployed later.
I hear that Obama is smoking a lot more and hitting the bottle quite a bit. Oh great, now we have a chain smoking, alcoholic in the White House who knows how to pronounce "nuclear".
Aaaa, Mr. President, do you remember us, the American people? We don't have to "defeat" a rag tag, illiterate, dope dealing, "army" that trains on monkey bars, to make America safe from another 9-11, do we?
McCrystal tells us that we have to train the Afghan army and teach them how to shoot a rifle and march in a straight line before we can leave. Why is such training necessary? The Taliban and Al Qaeda have managed to train themselves without the U.S. and, they have been doing a pretty good job of kicking our ass over the last eight years. So, what is our mission? Are we supposed to clean up the corrupt and dysfunctional government of President Karzia? Are we there to stop the flow of heroin out if the country? If so, then, we would have to arrest the president's brother, because he is the biggest drug dealer in all of Afghanistan and perhaps the world.
Afghanistan is nearly the poorest country in the world. They don't have an infrastructure of any kind. The government doesn't provide any services to its' people. They don't trust Karzai or the U.S. installed government. And, you can be sure, that, after we leave, it will be over thrown.
Mr. President, you are making the biggest mistake of your life and you and George W. Bush will go down in history as our worst presidents. And to think, they gave you the Nobel Peace Prize.
What a pity, because we had such high hopes for you and you were supposed to be the one man who could undo all the damage that George W. Bush had done to this country. Yes, you are our first black President, but you are acting more like white trash; something that we, in America, all hate.
It isn't too late. You could reverse course and save us the heartbreak of watching the long lines of dead soldiers that will surely be returning home; not to mention the waste of hundreds of billions of our hard earned tax dollars that could have been used for a more noble cause. It is truly up to you.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: maxpayne on Dec 4, 2009 7:02 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ron heringhauser on Dec 4, 2009 7:25 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: 9/11 and the endless wars on terrorism
Posted by: AlteredStates
» RE: 9/11 and the endless wars on terrorism/Right On
Posted by: ron heringhauser
Comments are closed-
Posted by: greenferret on Dec 4, 2009 7:43 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Green Party is the only national party committed to ending the permanent war state. Greens don't accept corporate money, so they can be accountable only to voters. Green Parties worldwide are based on the principles of peace, social justice, grassroots democracy and sustainability. Sound like something you can get behind? Then get active with the Green Party today.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Can you guarantee that party has not been taken over by neocons?
Posted by: Prophit0
» Neocons have taken over...
Posted by: greenferret
» Yeah, I heard that about the Libertarian party last time and a Bush operative won their nomination.
Posted by: Prophit0
» To the best of my knowledge
Posted by: greenferret
» I'm going to seriously check out the Greens. I'm not going to support a candidate again...
Posted by: Prinzowhales
Comments are closed-
Posted by: picket on Dec 4, 2009 8:04 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
For Ages Strong Leaders went on Retreats. The Pomp and Circumstance of the Presidential Office is awesome BUT....
Barry has chosen Policies that the majority did not vote for. Now the voices of those that elected him are blocked. Many USA Presidents have gone down in history as failures. It is time for him to stop being a Senator and become a Strong Independent Leader... A President !!!!!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» First he needs the courage to do all of that. Its the last thing left...
Posted by: Prophit0
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Richardsievert on Dec 4, 2009 8:27 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Prinzowhales on Dec 4, 2009 9:07 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sure, there are a lot of morons in the world watching FOX...but what were the rest watching--and reading?
http://original.antiwar.com/justin/2009/12/03/o bamas-war-the-reaction/
Did you know that the Obamanoids and the Neo-Scum sat down together to celebrate the Obama policies?
Now the entire pseudo-Left from the NATION on is busy trying to restore its credibility for leading you down the garden path to support Goldman Sachs' Washington office manager at the White House?
Did you know that in Australia, a Goldman-Sachs leader in the LIBERAL!! Party lost a vote on supporting the Climate Change BS? Do you beleive that the words "Goldman Sachs" and "Liberal" should even go together? If so, you are probably the kind of Liberal that Mussolini had in mind when he quipped that 'a Fascist is just a scared Liberal.'
If you go to Rense.com you'll find the Bloomberg article...loading too slow for me to wait to post a link, sorry.
Its time for real change!
TROOPS HOME NOW! DOWN WITH THE DEMOPUBLICAN REGIME!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Great informative post, Prince... thanks.
Posted by: Prophit0
Comments are closed-
Posted by: WhatNow? on Dec 4, 2009 9:15 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Man, you're pathetic. I used to really admire you. One of the few people I can think of that would disappoint me more for supporting obomber would have been David Dellinger. I doubt Dave would have bought into obomber's bullshit. Matt Gonzalez laid it out pretty clear several months before the election who obomber might be and what he had done or hadn't done in the past. Mike Gravel showed what war mongering scum most of the democratic candidates were including obomber in the first "debate". After they all did their best bush jr. impersonations Gravel screamed, "these people frighten me!" I understood his sentiment. My thoughts were ,"these people are begging to the incinerate the entire world."
Damn Tom, Humphrey deserved your support more than obomber! What happened to you Tom? Do you have Alzheimer's? Did you take too much of the brown acid? I could never imagine you would have supported obomber. I sometimes wish mcabre would have "won" the s election. At least then the right wingers couldn't blame a "socialist" or a "progressive" for all the problems we now face without looking even more dishonest than they already do . Mcabre's selection would have done more to discredit right wing ideology and propaganda than obomber will ever do. Obomber's accused of being a centrist or a liberal but he's a bigger right winger than clitton was. He might end up making Nixon look like a good liberal in comparison.
Shame on you Tom! I hope you recover soon.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: I used to really admire you.
Posted by: Sister_Lauren
» Your right about those debates and when I heard them I knew they were not running for our votes...
Posted by: Prophit0
» RE: Your right about those debates and when I heard them I knew they were not running for our votes...
Posted by: Prinzowhales
» Yup, the high price of speaking truth to power indeed.
Posted by: Prophit0
Comments are closed-
Posted by: theblackgeorgecarlin on Dec 4, 2009 10:16 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Defenestrator on Dec 4, 2009 10:30 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I oppose the policy but I can't pretend to be surprised- I actually listened to the words he was saying during the campaign instead of projecting my hopes and dreams onto him.
This is why Democrats can be worse than Republicans- they pursue extremely similar policies in regards to empire but a lot of activists let their guards down when a Democrat is in power.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Defenestrator on Dec 4, 2009 10:43 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Aug 1, 2007 Remarks of Senator Obama: "The War We Need To Win"
"I did not oppose all wars, I said. I was a strong supporter of the war in Afghanistan... It is time to turn the page. When I am President, we will wage the war that has to be won, with a comprehensive strategy with five elements: getting out of Iraq and on to the right battlefield in Afghanistan and Pakistan... Ending the war (in Iraq) will help isolate al Qaeda and give Iraqis the incentive and opportunity to take them out. It will also allow us to direct badly needed resources to Afghanistan. Our troops have fought valiantly there, but Iraq has deprived them of the support they need and deserve. As a result, parts of Afghanistan are falling into the hands of the Taliban, and a mix of terrorism, drugs, and corruption threatens to overwhelm the country. As President, I would deploy at least two additional brigades to Afghanistan to re-enforce our counter-terrorism operations and support NATO's efforts against the Taliban. As we step up our commitment, our European friends must do the same, and without the burdensome restrictions that have hampered NATO's efforts. We must also put more of an Afghan face on security by improving the training and equipping of the Afghan Army and Police, and including Afghan soldiers in U.S. and NATO operations. "
Barack Obama's Acceptance Speech:
"When John McCain said we could just muddle through in Afghanistan, I argued for more resources and more troops to finish the fight against the terrorists who actually attacked us on 9/11, and made clear that we must take out Osama bin Laden and his lieutenants if we have them in our sights. You know, John McCain likes to say that he'll follow bin Laden to the gates of Hell, but he won't even follow him to the cave where he lives."
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Defenestrator on Dec 4, 2009 10:44 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Aug 1, 2007 Remarks of Senator Obama: "The War We Need To Win"
"I did not oppose all wars, I said. I was a strong supporter of the war in Afghanistan... It is time to turn the page. When I am President, we will wage the war that has to be won, with a comprehensive strategy with five elements: getting out of Iraq and on to the right battlefield in Afghanistan and Pakistan... Ending the war (in Iraq) will help isolate al Qaeda and give Iraqis the incentive and opportunity to take them out. It will also allow us to direct badly needed resources to Afghanistan. Our troops have fought valiantly there, but Iraq has deprived them of the support they need and deserve. As a result, parts of Afghanistan are falling into the hands of the Taliban, and a mix of terrorism, drugs, and corruption threatens to overwhelm the country. As President, I would deploy at least two additional brigades to Afghanistan to re-enforce our counter-terrorism operations and support NATO's efforts against the Taliban. As we step up our commitment, our European friends must do the same, and without the burdensome restrictions that have hampered NATO's efforts. We must also put more of an Afghan face on security by improving the training and equipping of the Afghan Army and Police, and including Afghan soldiers in U.S. and NATO operations. "
Barack Obama's Acceptance Speech:
"When John McCain said we could just muddle through in Afghanistan, I argued for more resources and more troops to finish the fight against the terrorists who actually attacked us on 9/11, and made clear that we must take out Osama bin Laden and his lieutenants if we have them in our sights. You know, John McCain likes to say that he'll follow bin Laden to the gates of Hell, but he won't even follow him to the cave where he lives."
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Apologies for the double post, server problems
Posted by: Defenestrator
Comments are closed-
Posted by: BDHellmann on Dec 4, 2009 10:45 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
One of the other comments here urges action: I wish he'd said how he thinks we can organize to do it.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: wormfarmer on Dec 4, 2009 11:16 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
my impression of Barak Obama was one of hope, change, hopefully a little independence of
thought and deed. I was ready to extend time and patience for the transition of President. This is not working, as I concluded with the team of economic advisors, Summers, Giethner, Volker, keeping,but shuffling, the same military advisors, Gates, Patraeous, etc......., maintaining the same aggressive stance in the middle east, giving the future of succeeding generations to thieves and con men, letting corporations have their way with our society. I have not seen any hope or change from this administration, just the same corporate controlled domination of the populace,
keeping control of the masses.
Now we are moving our military presence into Afghanistan, soon Pakistan, I was hoping to see something other than an embracing of the status quo, but then I remembered that our country elected a corporate candidate. I would hope that by this time the population would
have awakened to the corporate shenanigans that have been so redundant throughout this country's history, but then I thought about the collective attention span of America.
The time is ripe for us to stop the political complicit behavior, to adopt the Ralph Nader suggestion of a 1/10 of one percent tax on all stock transactions, to stop the sacrificing of this country's future to the perpetraitors of economic collapse.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: tazdelaney on Dec 4, 2009 9:38 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
why anyone bought into this uncle tom corporatist hack, i don't know. he, like the vast majority of dems, voted in lockstep with the bush cabal on all war funding, patriot axe, military commissions act and corporate-communist bush tax cuts for the rich and the 'bailouts' and guarantees. when did we ever see obama at an antiwar rally or really speaking out on torture. obama neither wrote nor sponsored any significant bills in his 4 years in senate before starting his run for the white house. obama told us all on 60 Minutes right before his inauguration that "we don't stand for torture' then 2 days later authorized the continuation of CIA's rendition program ofoutsourced torture worldwide,with numbers far larger than just gitmo, which is still open, too. obama intends the indefinite occupation of resource-colony iraq with 50,000 troops and 100,000 merce goons and has expanded afpak into yemen and uzbek, as is now coming out.
i realized i couldn't vote for obama (not for mccain, either, of course), early on in his campaign when fox news bill oreiley cornered him about the obama family minister and friend, who said, "america has always been and remains based upon racist genocide." obama replied, quote, "no good american believes those things he says." well, since the extermination of 90% of the 18-20 million natives who in 1500 livedin what is now called america... and the killing of 8 million africans in the process of bringing 10 million slaves to america... are both historically undeniable facts... that makes obama a holocaust-denier. i saw that if he would turncoat like this in public under such as oreiley's tactics; he would turn on anyone, everyone in equally cowardly fashion.
folks should take of their rose-colored glasses and see what really is; not what they wish was there. obamabush, the obomber obummer is one more war criminal and corporatist dupe cut from the same cloth as bush-cheney/clinton/bush/reagan/nixon/LBJ in our government of, by and for oligarch garbage that urgently needs to be taken out, as it stinks.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: more
Posted by: DaBear
Comments are closed-
Posted by: PaulK on Dec 4, 2009 11:47 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What's wrong with teaching Afghans how to be death squads?
1. It's immoral to have millions of people murdered or driven out of their home countries. By the way, they come to the United States.
2. Isn't that exactly how we always get into Mideast trouble in the first place? Jimmy Carter abandoned his human rights crusade to go stick up for the Shah of Iran. Didn't that one work out well?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: xbj on Dec 4, 2009 12:38 PM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: DaBear on Dec 4, 2009 1:29 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A healthy dose of cynicism back in the campaign might have actually produced a real shift (by electing a third party candidate instead of the Hope-Change scam-machine's candidate). But that bitter pill remains just that, bitter. Can we finally get busy to stop this latest madness and take an oath of disobedience in the next election: to this time finally vote Green/Indie instead of this guy, even if the Right wing puts up the neo-Nazi they're sure to put up?
I don't ever want to hear one "progressive" among the clan ever again giving us the business that if we don't vote x we'll get fascist y. Well, look what happened. Y'all voted for x to avoid y and you got who... a good lookin' Y! Basta!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Yup, we voted for "style" over substance..... time we voted principles
Posted by: Prophit0
» RE: Another to add as number 11
Posted by: badkitty
» oh, ye of little faith
Posted by: belteshazzar
Comments are closed-
Posted by: tony_opmoc on Dec 4, 2009 6:20 PM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I Thought What She Said Was Completely Wonderful And I Thought She Looked Lovely - A Real Firey Woman Telling AMERICA How Her Husband Was Going To End Fear...
She Was Far Better Than Him
What The Fuck Is Wrong With Him Since He Got Elected..
He Started Firing Blanks About Ending TORTURE, and Closing Down Guantanamo Bay...
And We all Saw Him at West Point
Some Bastard Has Stuck a Geat Big Knob Up His Arse...
Michelle it Is Now Up To You Girl
To Do The Right Thing
You Find Out Whoever This Arsehole Is Who Is Controlling Your Husband...
And I Really Don't Have To Explain It To You
You Just Be Yourself and Use Your Power as a Woman To Protect Your Husband and The World
I Know You Can Do It Girl
Sure It Takes Courage - But Neither of You Are Short In That Department
Love & Peace,
Tony
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: rac on Dec 4, 2009 6:42 PM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Absolutely mindless comment
Posted by: ladmeaux
Comments are closed-
Posted by: bettyn on Dec 4, 2009 8:11 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Today's Democrats, with a few notable exceptions, are simply Republican-lite. We really don't have much choice. The corporatocracy always gets its way....and it's destroying our nation for its own greedy purposes.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» You have lots of choices, you just didn't make them--in 2008 alone, you had...
Posted by: Prinzowhales
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Raytan on Dec 5, 2009 5:29 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In fact, I'm not actually going to vote in any election, ever again, unless I'm forced to at gunpoint (and then the elections will obviously be invalid). I refuse to legitimize this regime that is called "The United States Government." It's not my government. Nobody has the right to rule me without my consent, end of story.
Fuck the CIA, fuck the NSA, fuck Homeland Security, fuck the IRS, fuck this government, and especially fuck the Federal Reserve. If everyone working in these insitutions... well, I don't want to get in anymore trouble than I probably already will for even thinking these thoughts in this era of Thought Police, so I'll just stop there.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» If you stay home, they win.
Posted by: Prinzowhales
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ladmeaux on Dec 5, 2009 8:04 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: gucci on Dec 10, 2009 10:00 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: mxcm428 on Dec 22, 2009 4:44 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Links of London Necklaces Szabo Links of London Earrings wanted Links of London Rings a vaginal Links of London Chain delivery and Links of London Pendants argued with hospital executives
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
On Anniversary of Iraq Invasion, Time to Rethink Anti-War Activism
The Timing Is Ripe for Obama to Make Demands on Israel to Settle for Peace
Juarez Prison Celebrates International Women's Day With Lurid "Captive Beauty" Pageant




