WORLD  
comments_image -

Obama Will Announce 34,000-Troop Escalation in Afghanistan 'Within Days'

Obama faces a U.S. public sharply divided on the war and calls from some Democratic allies to set a flexible timetable for withdrawal.
 
 
 
LIKE THIS ARTICLE ?
Join our mailing list:

Sign up to stay up to date on the latest World headlines via email.

 
 
 
 

WASHINGTON (AFP) - U.S. President Barack Obama will announce a history-shaping decision "within days" on whether to escalate the war in Afghanistan with tens of thousands more troops, the White House said Tuesday.

Aides declined to comment on news reports that Obama would use a prime-time speech Tuesday to unveil plans to try to turn the worsening conflict around by ordering some 34,000 more U.S. soldiers to the strife-torn country.

Obama faces a U.S. public sharply divided on the war and calls from some Democratic allies to set a flexible timetable for withdrawal eight years after U.S.-led forces invaded Afghanistan after the September 11, 2001 attacks.

After months of deliberations, under fire from Republican foes for "dithering" on a decision, Obama held his ninth and final strategy session with top commanders and national security aides for two hours late Monday.

"After completing a rigorous final meeting, President Obama has the information he wants and needs to make his decision and he will announce that decision within days," White House spokesman Robert Gibbs said.

Obama has been weighing requests from his handpicked Afghan war commander, General Stanley McChrystal, to send up to 40,000 more troops, even as resurgent Islamist fighters have made 2009 the deadliest year for U.S. and allied forces.

The U.S. president, who came to office vowing victory in what he described as a war neglected by predecessor George W. Bush, could also announce a shift in how, and where, U.S. and allied troops and trainers operate.

The United States has some 68,000 troops in Afghanistan, battling the Taliban Islamist militia and its Al-Qaeda allies in a bloody conflict that some worry may be destabilizing the country's nuclear-armed neighbor, Pakistan.

NATO allies, whose contributions bring foreign forces in Afghanistan to about 110,000, was expected to take up the question of sending more troops at upcoming gatherings of the military alliance December 3-4 and on December 7.

A high-level U.S. team briefed NATO allies in Brussels "two weeks ago" and "most of our key allies have a very good idea of where we are headed, even if a final decision isn't (yet) made," said a U.S. administration official.

Britain has pushed NATO to contribute another 5,000 troops, but a NATO military commander warned Tuesday against expecting "many real reinforcements," saying the alliance might choose to extend a temporary deployment of several thousand troops that provided security during Afghan elections in August.

That disputed political contest ultimately resulted in another five-year term for Afghan President Hamid Karzai, who faces intense pressure from Washington to battle corruption and deliver key services.

The top U.S. military commander, Admiral Michael Mullen, warned in September that he considered the Afghan government's credibility problems at home to be a menace "equal to the threat from the Taliban."

Roughly half of Americans support sending tens of thousands more troops to Afghanistan, while just 45 percent say they are in favor of the war, according to a new opinion poll released by CNN.

Obama faces pressure in the U.S. Congress from Republicans foes who favor escalation and accuse him of "dithering" and from Democratic allies who see the war's cost as sucking hundreds of billions from much-needed projects at home.

A handful of senior Democratic lawmakers have proposed creating a special tax, chiefly on high-income earners, to pay for the war, while one Democratic senator, Russell Feingold, has pushed for a flexible withdrawal timetable.

Some Democrats fret privately that Obama's time in office could be defined by a decision to escalate an inherited and increasingly unpopular conflict, as the Vietnam War ultimately ate away at Lyndon Johnson's presidency.

submit to reddit

-
Email
Print
Share
LIKED THIS ARTICLE? JOIN OUR EMAIL LIST
Stay up to date with the latest World headlines via email
Advertisement
Most Read
Most Emailed
Most Discussed
On REDDIT
On DIGG
 
loading most read content ..
Advertisement
Republican NLRB Member Accused of Leaks to Romney Campaign Resigns

By Laura Clawson | Daily Kos Labor

 
 
Record 45% of Iraq and Afghanistan Vets Have Filed for Disability

By Muriel Kane | Raw Story

 
 
President Obama's Memorial Day Address: "Honoring Those Who Made the Ultimate Sacrifice"

By Julianne Escobedo Shepherd | AlterNet

 
 
"Tubes": What the Internet is Made Of

By Laura Miller | Salon

 
 
Students at Stuyvesant Take Issue With Sexist Dress Code

By Jill F | Feministe

 
 
Chris Hayes on Memorial Day: Glamorizing and Justifying War with the Term "Hero"

By Julianne Escobedo Shepherd | AlterNet

 
 
Cory Booker vs. Philly Mayor Michael Nutter on Mitt Romney

By BooMan | Booman Tribune

 
 
How Florida Governor Rick Scott Could Steal The Election For Mitt Romney

By Judd Legum | ThinkProgress

 
 
Renowned Economist Simon Johnson Calls for a National Safety Board for Finance Ticking Time Bomb

By Lynn Parramore | AlterNet

 
 
Veterans' Gap

By Ed Kilgore | Washington Monthly

 
 
 
 
 
loading ...
POWERED BY DIGG'S USERS
 
[ page served from web 2 ]