Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

40,000 More U.S. Soldiers in Afghanistan Won't Solve Its 40% Unemployment Rate

By Jodie Evans, AlterNet. Posted October 8, 2009.


Afghan Parliament member Roshanak Wardak speaks out: Most of the women do not want more troops -- they need support to sustain their lives.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Returning from my 10-day trip to Afghanistan, I pause. The United States has spent a quarter of a trillion dollars in eight years of military action: what have we achieved?

Most of the country is in worse condition, the bordering countries are less stable and death fills the air.

According to the United Nations, Afghanistan is ranked 181 out of 182 countries for human development indices. Life expectancy has fallen to 43 years since the U.S. invasion. Forty percent of the population is unemployed, and 42 percent live on less than $1 a day.

Codepink went to Afghanistan to hear what the women there thought about the push for more troops. We spoke with journalists, doctors, activists, NGOs, members of government and average Afghan women.

Most of the women do not want more troops: they need support to sustain their lives. They want the U.S. investment to reflect what is needed to bring peace. They need investment in the people of Afghanistan.

For eight years, the United States has pursued a policy that has clearly failed. We have exacerbated the poverty and suffering in Afghanistan, and they are no more safe than they were. American funds and initiatives continue to support a situation that fuels insurgency instead of a sustainable culture.

In truth, 90 percent of U.S. funding to Afghanistan is used for military; only approximately 10 percent has been used for any kind of development.

Our vision for the future must focus on what Afghans want in their own nation, not so different from what we want for ourselves -- education, jobs, health care, infrastructure and security. Afghan women want us to send doctors, teachers, engineers and business leaders, not more soldiers.

Member of Parliament and gynecologist Dr. Roshanak Wardak speaks about the situation in her province. As people who care about sustainable development, we must do all we can to stop another surge. We need to stand with the women of Afghanistan for development, not troops.

Take action now -- Tell President Barack Obama that you stand with the women of Afghanistan -- sign the petition: Sending 40,000 more U.S. troops would be disastrous for Afghan women and children.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: troops, soldiers, afghanistan, occupation, code pink, jodie evans, dr. roshanak wardak

Jodie Evans is a co-founder of Codepink: Women For Peace.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from World! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Who cares what Afghan women want?
Posted by: The Antichrist on Oct 9, 2009 1:45 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What do Americans want? For the majority, I’d say an end to this ignorance.

How did we go from “Bring our enemies to justice or bring justice to our enemies”, to “Building a brighter tomorrow for little mohammad” and "what do Afghan women want”.

“If your quarry goes to ground, leave no ground to go to”.

You do not exterminate an enemy by feeding their children. You exterminate an enemy by orphaning their children.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» You really are an ass. Posted by: photon's feather
And for this continued catastrophic insanity...
Posted by: photon's feather on Oct 9, 2009 5:12 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
a group of equally insane Norwegians decided that Obama should get the Nobel Peace Prize?!

Ah, well, I suppose if Kissinger can win it, few people would not qualify.

Is the awarding of this prize intended as irony?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Bizarre Posted by: leafsong1
Blaming America
Posted by: melpol on Oct 9, 2009 6:17 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Foreigners are often blamed for the problems of a nation. The majority of people in Afghanistan are poverty stricken and angry about it. Having American soldiers walking around with rifles amongst them is not a good idea. It would be best for the soldiers to leave so Afghans will stop blaming Americans for their problems.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Dropping the 'Golden parachuters' into Afghanistan
Posted by: Purple Girl on Oct 9, 2009 7:24 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Instead of 40,000 more Troops how about 40,000 Fortune 500 Top brass?
They love to claim that although they lost and stole trillions, their talent alone exempts them from prosecution or even salary caps.
Prove it....Actually Create a viable Economy in Afghanistan.
If finance and industry are the engines to progress and prosperity- Afghanistan is a great plateform to prove that ascertain. Like a Lab Experiment to prove their hypothesis.If 'industry' (as opposed to intellectual curiosity) is the only thing that has moved humanity forward then it should be proveable with this Clan based,pre industrialized society.
These Titans of Industry should be prosecuted for Embezzlement, Fraud, Racketeering, Conspiracy and the economic collapse they caused- Economic Treason would encompass the totality of their crimes.
So heres their choice- help Afghanis's build an economy,instilling a sense of national interest, thus identity or Face the punishment of your High Crimes. "Parachuters" can think of it like their own romanticized story about joining the French Foreign Legions.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

40% UNEMPLOYMENT?
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Oct 9, 2009 3:31 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
At what point in Afganistan's history did they NOT have high unemployment? Was it always our responsibility? ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

what is this nonsense
Posted by: nonknown101 on Oct 11, 2009 3:10 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
unemployment in afghanistan is not unusual, why is this nonsense here??
and what moron says their woman want us out? one being threatened by a talibani with a gun at her head??

the woman of afghanistan just started teaching their children how to read and some clown here quotes a talibani slave woman, and under Taliban rule no woman work, they live off their family or starve, really sounds like the women in afghanistan want that!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Pentagon has a 25 year plan to reduce Afghan unemployment
Posted by: Lese Majeste on Oct 12, 2009 5:45 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
by killing several million Afghan's, which will seriously reduce the rate of unemployment.

This decades long plan will also emply millions more, by burying their dead and giving work to others rebuilding their bombed out villages and hovels.

We'll also need several hundred thousand to grow those Wall Street poppies and harvest the opium.

Now heap praise and glory on you White 'Massa!'

Signed

'Bobbie' Gates
Sec'y of War

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

nu mindset
Posted by: nimrod on Oct 12, 2009 10:11 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Obviously from some of the comments I have read,we as a species still have a long way to go before we can call ourselves civilized, from one readers comment he talks about orphaning children,when will learn history most valuable lesson that wars and violence don't solve anything?. 40,000 more troops will not solve a high unemployment rate, the Taliban and alquieda will flourish and more Americans will die in a foreign land, more sinceless civilian deaths due to human error , more reason for alquieda to gain popularity.
I ask where is the logic to continue violence?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

''OUR' vision for 'THEIR' future?'
Posted by: Prinzowhales on Oct 12, 2009 7:08 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What was America's 'vision' for Detroit? What was it for America's prison population? What was it for its homelessness...its illiteracy... it sorry-assed medical care?...

What was America's 'vision' for Goldman Sachs?
What was it for Halliburton? What was it for Citigroup? People stupid enought to tolerate a government that supports these crooks while putting their brothers and sisters out on the streets, out of a job and leaving them in despair...shouldn't trust themselves to have a vision for anyone else...not even themselves.

America needs to look at what is going on in America...where many Americans can't find their own states on a map much less Afghanistan.

TROOPS HOME NOW! DOWN WITH THE WASHINGTON REGIME! RESTORE THE REPUBLIC, DESTROY THE FED!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement