Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Pakistan to Allow U.S. Military Ops in Exchange for Aid

By Syed Saleem Shahzad, Asia Times. Posted September 28, 2009.


It will be difficult and dangerous to take on the Taliban and al-Qaeda inside Pakistan in a struggle in which there are no guarantees of success.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

NEW YORK - United States President Barack Obama, co-chairing with British Prime Minister Gordon Brown the first summit meeting of the Friends of Democratic Pakistan, on Thursday announced that the US Senate had unanimously passed the Kerry-Lugar bill, authorizing $1.5 billion in economic assistance for Pakistan annually over five years. 

This amount, which is triple what Pakistan has been receiving, in addition to the several billions of dollars Pakistan receives annually in other military and non-military aid. 

In response, it appears that Pakistan's political leaders have consented to military operations against militants and al-Qaeda in the North Waziristan and South Waziristan tribal areas on the border with Afghanistan

Although the military has recently conducted successful operations in other trouble spots in the tribal areas, such as Swat, Islamabad has been reluctant to commit fully to engagement in the Waziristans, where the Pakistan Taliban and their al-Qaeda allies have a strong foothold and from where militants fuel the insurgency in Afghanistan

Pakistan's Foreign Minister Shah Mehmud Qureshi, flanked by Richard Holbrooke, the US special envoy for Pakistan and Afghanistan, and Sir Sherard Cowper-Coles, Britain's special envoy for Pakistan and Afghanistan, gave a briefing after the summit meeting. 

He said the gathering, which included 26 countries and international organizations, had unanimously declared military operations against the Taliban in the Malakand area a success, adding that Pakistan would follow a similar model in the tribal areas - a clear hint that the government had agreed to send armed forces into the Waziristans. 

While Pakistani President Asif Ali Zardari is ostensibly in New York for the United Nations General Assembly gathering, on the sidelines and in other interaction he has been well feted by the Obama administration as the person who can best further US interests in Pakistan and Afghanistan - as much as Pakistan's army chief General Ashfaq Parvez Kiani does and former president General Pervez Musharraf did. 

Zardari will also be pleased with the Friends of Democratic Pakistan meeting, at which members acknowledged Pakistan's economic difficulties and institutions like the World Bank and the Asian Development Bank vowed to immediately undertake water and energy related projects for the country. 

"If you go through the history of US aid, you would not find a parallel of such an aid package as the Kerry-Lugar bill," Holbrooke said, saying it was "a very important step forward". The bill points to Pakistan as a critical friend and ally and notes the profound sacrifices it has made in the "war on terror". The money provided by the bill will be used to fund a wide range of development projects, from schools and infrastructure to the judicial system. 

The language of the version that was approved in the senate - it is now to go before the Democrat-controlled House of Representatives where it is expected to pass easily - was less stringent than the original. Specific references to India as well as to Abdul Qadeer Khan, the disgraced "father" of Pakistan's nuclear weapons program, were eliminated. 

The earlier version had wanted to make Pakistan give access to Khan and other scientists involved in nuclear proliferation. It also had urged Pakistan to coordinate its activities against terrorism with India. In the revised version, it only wants Pakistan to liaise with neighboring countries. 

Earlier, General Stanley McChrystal, the top US military commander for Afghanistan, said in a report that India's political and economic influence was increasing in Afghanistan, including significant development efforts and financial investment. 

The report said the Afghan government was perceived by Islamabad to be pro-Indian. "While Indian activities largely benefit the Afghan people, increasing Indian influence in Afghanistan is likely to exacerbate regional tensions and encourage Pakistani counter-measures in Afghanistan or India," said the report. 

The bill also contains a waiver for every condition that is imposed on Pakistan, but now this can be granted by the secretary of state, not the president as earlier proposed. None of the conditions can set in motion automatic sanctions. 

The bill underlines the importance of supporting Pakistan's national security needs in its ongoing counter-insurgency battle and in improving its border security, while requiring the government to demonstrate a sustained effort to combat extremist groups and show progress towards defeating them. 

Foreign Minister Qureshi told Asia Times Online that a detailed package for the capacity enhancement of the Pakistani armed forces had been agreed on. However, he clarified that it only involved modern counter-insurgency equipment and training programs

Pakistan has got what it wanted. The onus now rests with Zardari to deliver. This will be the most difficult and dangerous part, to take on the Taliban and al-Qaeda inside Pakistan in a struggle in which there are no guarantees of success. 


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: pakistan, u.s., taliban, aid

Asia New Online correspondent

through GlobalVision News Network

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from World! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
tribal war
Posted by: colinsyme on Sep 28, 2009 5:04 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
l fear that ops like this while they might be successful in the short term, will create, in the long long term an unstable Pakistan and add to the list of future training grounds for terrorists. Every wedding party that is bombed with the resulting civillian casualties will act as a recruiting sergeant for friends, relatives and fellow tribesmen of those affected.

We need to engage in a more positive manner in these countries and get away from "war on Muslims" as they perceive this war. l am not a war-like person but lf l put myself in their position l am sure that l would see America as an enemy and not a force for peace and democracy.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

For Pete's sake, leave 'em alone!
Posted by: willymack on Sep 28, 2009 9:51 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How about doing some problem solving in our OWN country, and leaving the rest of the world to itself?
If we want to win the hearts and minds of others, let's set a good example HERE, starting with some REAL, not-for-profit health care.
The money saved from a cessation of intervention in other nations will more than pay for it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: For Pete's sake, leave 'em alone! Posted by: tim_s_eb@yahoo.com
Price of innocent lives
Posted by: chomsky on Sep 28, 2009 1:01 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So the USA is now paying Pakistan so it can go in and kill whomever they want. This will without doubt include many innocent Pakistani civilians. I guess money really can buy anything.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Osama said his goal was to bankrupt the US through perpetual war
Posted by: AngryWhiteFemale on Sep 29, 2009 3:17 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It looks like he's getting it. Al-Qaeda is an international operation but the Taliban want to be left alone in their tribal areas, so why are we wasting time going after them?

I heard an analogy somewhere that the Taliban is like a hotel and al-Qaeda a bad guest and that we should not conflate the two.

I agree with willymack regarding health care and solving our own problems here. Unfortunately, you cannot have an empire and a democracy at the same time.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement