Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

With Global Capitalism Exposed as a Sham, All the Global Elite Have Left Is Pure Force

By Chris Hedges, Truthdig. Posted September 22, 2009.


Delegates from the world's wealthiest nations gather this week for G-20, walled off from protesters by a National Guard combat battalion recently returned from Iraq.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

The rage of the disposed is fracturing the country, dividing it into camps that are unmoored from the political mainstream. Movements are building on the ends of the political spectrum that have lost faith in the mechanisms of democratic change. You can't blame them. But unless we on the left move quickly this rage will be captured by a virulent and racist right wing, one that seeks a disturbing proto-fascism. 

Every day counts. Every deferral of protest hurts. We should, if we have the time and the ability, make our way to Pittsburgh for the meeting of the G-20 this week rather than do what the power elite is hoping we will do-stay home. Complacency comes at a horrible price.

"The leaders of the G-20 are meeting to try and salvage their power and money after everything that has gone wrong," said Benedicto Martinez Orozco, co-president of the Mexican Frente Autentico del Trabajo (FAT), who is in Pittsburgh for the protests. "This is what this meeting is about."

The draconian security measures put in place to silence dissent in Pittsburgh are disproportionate to any actual security concern. They are a response not to a real threat, but to the fear gripping the established centers of power. The power elite grasps, even if we do not, the massive fraud and theft being undertaken to save a criminal class on Wall Street and international speculators of the kinds who were executed in other periods of human history. They know the awful cost this plundering of state treasuries will impose on workers, who will become a permanent underclass. And they also know that once this is clear to the rest of us, rebellion will no longer be a foreign concept. 

The delegates to the G-20, the gathering of the world's wealthiest nations, will consequently be protected by a National Guard combat battalion, recently returned from Iraq. The battalion will shut down the area around the city center, man checkpoints and patrol the streets in combat gear. Pittsburgh has augmented the city's police force of 1,000 with an additional 3,000 officers. Helicopters have begun to buzz gatherings in city parks, buses driven to Pittsburgh to provide food to protesters have been impounded, activists have been detained, and permits to camp in the city parks have been denied. Web sites belonging to resistance groups have been hacked and trashed, and many groups suspect that they have been infiltrated and that their phones and e-mail accounts are being monitored. 

Larry Holmes, an organizer from New York City, stood outside a tent encampment on land owned by the Monumental Baptist Church in the city's Hill District. He is one of the leaders of the Bail Out the People Movement. Holmes, a longtime labor activist, on Sunday led a march on the convention center by unemployed people calling for jobs. He will coordinate more protests during the week. 

"It is de facto martial law," he said, "and the real effort to subvert the work of those protesting has yet to begin. But voting only gets you so far. There are often not many choices in an election. When you build democratic movements around the war or unemployment you get a more authentic expression of democracy. It is more organic. It makes a difference. History has taught us this."

Our global economy, like our political system, has been hijacked by a tiny oligarchy, composed mostly of wealthy white men who serve corporations. They have pledged or raised a staggering $18 trillion, looted largely from state treasuries, to prop up banks and other financial institutions that engaged in suicidal acts of speculation and ruined the world economy. They have formulated trade deals so corporations can speculate across borders with currency, food and natural resources even as, according to the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) of the United Nations, 1.02 billion people on the planet struggle with hunger. Globalization has obliterated the ability of many poor countries to protect food staples such as corn, rice, beans and wheat with subsidies or taxes on imported staples. The abolishment of these protections has permitted the giant mechanized farms to wipe out tens of millions of small farmers-2 million in Mexico alone-bankrupting many and driving them off their land. Those who could once feed themselves can no longer find enough food, and the wealthiest governments use institutions such as the International Monetary Fund, the World Bank and the World Trade Organization like pit bulls to establish economic supremacy. There is little that most governments seem able to do to fight back.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: capitalism, corporations, free trade, protests, g20, pittsburgh

Chris Hedges writes a regular column for Truthdig.com. Hedges graduated from Harvard Divinity School and was

for nearly two decades a foreign correspondent for The New York Times. He

is the author of many books, including: War Is A Force That Gives Us Meaning, What Every Person Should Know About War, and American Fascists: The Christian Right and the War on America.  His most recent book is Empire of Illusion: The End of Literacy and the Triumph of Spectacle. .

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from World! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Sleeping Giant
Posted by: InsertNameHere on Sep 22, 2009 12:37 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Democracy was never perfect. Only through organized militant labour during times of upheaval was the stage set for the working masses to gain an equitable share in the wealth of the nation.

Some labor organizations were cozy with industry's monied classes from the get go, working to subvert strikes. They used to respond with clubs, tear gas and bullets. Sicking the National Guard on the protesting masses goes all the way back to the 30s era labor upheavals.

The owners feared united labor that was empowered by members because they knew it was a force to be reckoned with. There will be no new deals. Corporate friendly unions are not unions at all. They are tools of capital. Get rid of them.

Once you are united through labor, as a single unit, they will fear you. It doesn't stop at the company barganing table. United labor could be the most formidable political force on the landscape since the Religous Right. Racial divisions have divided brothers and sisters and dreams of utopia have kept people in debt bondage for generations. Unite! You are a sleeping giant!

The heroes of labor struggle of the earlier generations weren't fooled by red baiting. Don't beg for scraps at the feet of globalism, take what your labor paid has paid for, and generations before you.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Great Comment! Posted by: zola77
» KENT STATE anyone? Katrina? Posted by: vspoils
» You are just flat-out wrong. Posted by: brunowe
» Correction. Posted by: GuitarBill
» I couldn't agree more... Posted by: vspoils
Obama made his decision to sell out his soul to the elite!
Posted by: Jay Randal on Sep 22, 2009 12:46 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Pres. Obama at some time in his life decided he would do anything to snag the title as President. Unfortunately he took money from Wall Street and other corporate industries to win the presidency. He was purchased by them and now is required to do their bidding. He no longer can do anything for We the People.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» They didn't. Posted by: brunowe
Are We Paying Attention?
Posted by: mmckinl on Sep 22, 2009 1:05 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"The rage of the disposed is fracturing the country, dividing it into camps that are unmoored from the political mainstream. Movements are building on the ends of the political spectrum that have lost faith in the mechanisms of democratic change. You can't blame them. But unless we on the left move quickly this rage will be captured by a virulent and racist right wing, one that seeks a disturbing proto-fascism."

~ Chris Hedges

The fact is the "Tea Baggers" have one thing very right.

The is something very, very wrong with our governance.


Trillions for the banksters that caused the financial crisis. Foreclosures, bankruptcies and pink slips for the people.

Trillions more for War. Unnecessary, unwinable and immoral wars that they tell us will never end. No money for single payer health care, jobs, education, cities ...

Free trade for the corporatocracy. Freedom to be homeless for 1 million children, freedom to go hungry for tens of millions, at the end of every month.

The fight is not left or right ... the fight is to take our government back from elites whose only goal is more power and more wealth to the exclusion of everything and everybody else.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

G-20 Protest Reasons & Links
Posted by: nihilozero on Sep 22, 2009 1:46 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
With the G-20 Meeting of International Finance Ministers & Central Bank Governors fast approaching (Sept. 24-25, 2009 in Pittsburgh Pennsylvania), I thought it would be a good idea to collect some of the best article links, images, and videos to counter the typical corporate media perspective on mass protests. I hope you enjoy these links and welcome any additional recommendations for the list. #g20 #protest

G-20 Protest Reasons & LINKS

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Is it worth trying to pitch this to the teabaggers?
Posted by: HeroesAll on Sep 22, 2009 2:22 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
After all, they're all against excessive taxes and government controls, yes? In real terms, this is exactly what they were claiming to protest against.

Sadly, I'm not sure that they're likely to see that - they'll probably sit back and cry "Damn communist fascist hippies".

Sadly too, not sure whether the appearance of the teabagger contingent would destroy the credibility of the protesters, given that everyone with more than 3 brain cells knows they've been set up and goaded by right wing vested interests.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Ideologocial Right and Left have the same IDEA...
Posted by: lupuslefou on Sep 22, 2009 2:44 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...but they see differing patterns. The same boogey man haunts our sleep.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It's a right-wing world!
Posted by: Perry Logan on Sep 22, 2009 3:04 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What a triumph for modern-day conservatism! We got to see how well right-wing ideas worked!

Let's see...

More people than ever are poor. More people than ever are starving. More people than ever are slaves. World terrorism is at an all-time high. Nation after nation has been gutted. Once-robust economies lie bleeding on the pavement. Climate change rages out of control. There are islands of plastic in the ocean. War crimes are allowed to fester. New Orleans is gone. The water is fetid with chemicals. Americans are insanely overweight. Our troops return home, wounded and shattered. Psychotics rule the airwaves. The infant mortality rate continues to soar, as more and more babies choose death over life in a right-wing world.

Other than these and a few other minor matters, the whole corporate hegemony thing has worked out just fine.

I am, however, Sad About the Young

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What??? Its the G-20??? Alternet, I thought it was the religious right and those wing nuts doing it
Posted by: CynicI on Sep 22, 2009 3:10 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
... how nice. Sooo, alternet finally decides to tell us what IS REALLY GOING ON AND WHO THE CULPRITS ARE...WELL, THANK YOU. No wonder the trolls have been such a pain in the A.. this week, trying so hard to stir things up.
Must have been frustrating as all get out.

All these things that happened to the Mexican and south American farmers, forclosures, and in India, suicide and Monsanto and their seed scandels in every single country resulting in these poor people committing suicide, selling their wives to feed their children and what Diebold executives did to 15 year old girls in that country are still not in jail for that piece of corporate PERVERSION. These things are the result of IMF ECONOMIC HITMEN SENT TO THIRD WORLD COUNTRIES TO RAPE AND PILLAGE THEIR STRUGGLING ECONOMIES. Now they are in place and doing it here.

Its horrific, what these people at the G-20 have done. AND NOW YOU WANT DEMONSTRATIONS when its too late to be effective for that kind of response??? Read this by Claire Wolfe.

Preparing for civil unrest

I have a suggestion. Why not continue the responses that occurred over a 48 hour period this last week???

Four Apparent Suicides/Deaths in 48 Hours – CEO-Financiers

I think that is why the G-20 is REALLY meeting! I also think these "APPARENT suicides" are the only truly impactful events that can make a difference with minimal damage to resistance.

And demonstrations, IF THEY TURN VIOLENT(don't forget Blackwater can work here as well as it does in Iraq and afghanistan for starting up sh*t), would result in OFFICIAL MARTIAL LAW and solve their problem. No, I believe also all the hate mongering didn't work to pit one American against another, so our anger is NOT REDIRECTED AS IT WAS SUPPOSE TO BE. Thus it is still forcused on them.

The ONLY way they were ever going to get away with all this was if the population was substantially reduced or immobilized LIKE WITH SERIOUS LIFE THREATENING ILLNESS, (Oh, dear, I guess that didn't work either- swine flu didn't spread like it was suppose to) or at war with itself. (Civil war as a result of the left hating the right and vice versa)... Gee, its ashame when a good plan doesn't come together huh? Maybe you should have had some of us at your meeting, who knows what great things can come from working together where EVERYBODY WINS, instead of you robber barons.

Rememeber Jay Rockefellers clarion call on C-Span waving his arms "THE INTERNET HAS RUINED EVERYTHING, It should never have been created." To see an arrogant powerful man doing that meant the FEAR had finally been turned around on them. It was clear something had to happen for them to feel safe and if all the manipulation and propoganda didn't work, then force was and is the only thing left.

I SUSPECT THAT IS WHAT THEY ARE DISCUSSING. Either that or maybe implement that good ole fashion stand by...NUKE WORLD WAR. One or the other.

And I think these are the reasons they are here.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Four suicides? - not nearly enough Posted by: photon's feather
» no shit Posted by: clresu
Global “Capitalism” DOES NOT EXIST –> FASCISM RULES
Posted by: Mister_PsyOps on Sep 22, 2009 3:17 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
“Our global economy, like our political system, has been hijacked by a tiny oligarchy, composed mostly of wealthy white men who serve corporations.”

Before I go further, a quick disclaimer: I don’t pretend to say “capitalism” is a wonderful system only that IT DOES NOT EXIST on the planet in any real way.

Most sane people that have studied history and geo-politics understand that our world had indeed been essentially “hijacked” by “a tiny oligarchy” . But that does NOT describe “capitalism” that – by definition – requires real competition, real open markets and (usually) valid democracy to operate.

What we have is the corporate hijack of government which spells FASCISM and has since before 1913 when the U.S. economy was taken over by a snake oil private bank monopoly sting better known as the “Federal Reserve” Corp. (not federal, no reserves).

Control the creation and distribution of money and you control everything.

Pretending that “capitalism” is the culprit only begs for useless “cures” like bigger government that is already a servant of Fascist corporate crime and criminals. NOTICE: It is no accident that by far the key planks of an autocrat Communist Manifesto are: 1) control of banking 2) control of media 3) control of education

Sound familiar? By the way, “communism” never existed. Bolshevik Soviet Russia was a crude Fascist state, originally funded and empowered by western Fascists.

Corporate media labels are worse than meaningless decoys. This is about concentration of power in criminal hands. What is needed is honest government under authentic checks and balances.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Two Additional Observations
Posted by: drricklippin on Sep 22, 2009 4:01 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Don't underestimate the power of the internet in exposing all of this through democratizing information

The most important issue in most of these nations including the US is verifiable election reform to wring out the money influence in elections

Dr. Rick Lippin
Southampton,Pa

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» More Utopian Dreams Posted by: ChicagoWay
Obama Is Pawn of FED
Posted by: 911FalseFlag on Sep 22, 2009 4:26 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Of course he knows about the scam called the Federal Reserve Bank and the other private central bankers to control the printing of money in most developed countries in the world. He has been chosen by them many years ago to be their pawn at this crucial time in the history of the world.

If you are interested, go to www.911insidejob.net with there are many articles and videos on Federal Reserve Bank and how they control.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» %^) Posted by: GuitarBill
THANK YOU ALTERNET FOR CHRIS HEDGES
Posted by: smf1403 on Sep 22, 2009 4:50 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
ALTERNET: PLEASE CONTINUE WITH ARTICLES FROM TRUTH-TELLERS LIKE CHRIS HEDGES.
HE IS RIGHT THAT "Complacency comes at a horrible price."
THE PRESS, (INCLUDING ALTERNET'S RECENT ONSLAUGHT OF ARTICLES FRAMING OBAMA AS THE VICTIM AND REPUBLICANS AS THE OPPRESSOR), HAS FAILED THE PEOPLE.
OBAMA IS ONE OF THEM, AN ELITIST IN POWER NOW ALONG WITH THE DEMOCRATIC MAJORITY IN CONGRESS.
WHAT HAVE THE DEMOCRATS ACCOMPLISHED WITH ALL THIS POWER?
MORE WAR (FUNDING FOR IRAQ AND AFGHANISTAN)
MORE WELFARE FOR THE RICH (BANKS, INSURANCE COMPANIES)
MORE JOB LOSS (NAFTA, WTO)
LACK OF SINGLE-PAYER HEALTHCARE (PUBLIC OPTION IS A MANDATE FOR INSURANCE COMPANIES FORCING ALL PEOPLE TO BUY INSURANCE)
ALL UNDER OBAMA'S POWER AND THE DEMOCRATIC MAJORITY IN CONGRESS.

AND THE G-20 IS ALL ABOUT THE ELITISTS MAKING MORE MONEY OFF OTHER PEOPLE'S SUFFERING AND THE THEFT OF OTHER COUNTRIES' RESOURCES.

THE ENEMY IS OURSELVES FOR CONTINUING TO VOTE FOR THE SMOOTH-TALKING PRETTY FACES.
"I WOULD RATHER VOTE FOR WHAT I WANT AND NOT GET IT THAN VOTE FOR WHAT I DON'T WANT AND GET IT" -- EUGENE DEBS
SEND MONEY AND SUPPORT TO DENNIS KUCINICH. HE HAS CONSISTENTLY AND TIRELESSLY VOTED AND SPOKEN UP FOR THE PEOPLE.
NOW STAND UP AND VOTE FOR HIM (FOR US).

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

By Accident or Design?
Posted by: tony_opmoc on Sep 22, 2009 5:21 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The financial train wreck, appeared to be an accident that only a few predicted, and the full implications of it have yet to hit the vast majority - the ones that still have an income and enough food to eat.

Most people still believe that elected politicians in Governments have responsibility and control of events, when the reality is that most have absolutely no real power whatsoever to change anything - and are merely actors or puppets on a stage.

So if you take the view, as I do that unelected, extremely rich and powerful people are the ones really in control of the Global economy, then have recent events happenned by accident or incompetence, or have they been deliberately planned?

The Global economy itself cannot be taken in isolation from other factors affecting human, animal and plant life.

There is absolutely no doubt, that the media is very closely controlled by the same powers that control governments and politicians.

A picture is therefore being painted of a Worldview that most people will believe to be true, even where there is very clear evidence to the contrary.

I think we are heading for a complete and total catastrophe, that has been deliberately planned by exceedingly evil people.

These people may not believe they are evil, and may think they are acting in what they think are the best interests of the human race and the planet.

The reality though is very different.

If not stopped, we are likely to see a complete collapse of civilisation - life as we know it.

I believe that this has been the planned agenda for a considerable period.

It will result in mass genocide - Billions will die.

Guess who said this-

“Each year the World Economic Forum convenes in Davos, Switzerland. Hundreds of CEO’s, prime ministers, finance ministers, and leading academics gather each February to attend meetings and set the economic agendas for the year ahead.

“What if a small group of these world leaders were to conclude that the principle risk to the earth comes from the actions of the rich countries? And if the world is to survive, those rich countries would have to sign an agreement reducing their impact on the environment? Will they do it? Will the rich countries agree to reduce their impact on the environment? Will they agree to save the earth?

“The group’s conclusions is ‘no.’ The rich countries won’t do it. They won’t change. So, in order to save the planet, the group decides: Isn’t the only hope for the planet that the industrialized civilization collapse? Isn’t it our responsibility to bring that about?”

Most on here probably think this guy is a hero.

Welcome back to the Stone Age if you are one of the 5% who survive the cull.

Tony

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Deliberately planned? Posted by: zigy
Capitalism is STILL your best friend
Posted by: SteveA on Sep 22, 2009 6:10 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Capitalism has eased more misery and engendered more comfort than any other system in world history. But what began to concern me more and more were the clear signs of rot and decadence germinating within American society -- a rot and decadence that was no longer the consequence of liberalism but was the actual agenda of contemporary liberalism. And the more contemporary, the more candid and radical was this agenda. – Irving Kristol

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» FDR, Socialism Posted by: clresu
Marx vindicated
Posted by: zooeyhall on Sep 22, 2009 6:50 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This was all predicted by Marx 150 years ago.

Things are going EXACTLY as he said they would: the inconsistencies and greed inherent in capitalism, the increasing economic and social distress it would cause, the reaction of the people, and the repression of the ruling classes.

They have disparaged his name, persecuted and murdered his followers, but everything he predicted is coming true.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Marx lives in D.C. Posted by: SteveA
» RE: Marx lives in D.C. Posted by: ChicagoWay
» Thanks For Proving My Point Posted by: ChicagoWay
» RE: Marx lives in D.C. Posted by: photon's feather
» RE: Marx vindicated Posted by: halg
» that's what I meant Posted by: zooeyhall
Uh, in case you hadn't noticed, they have a lot more than just force
Posted by: leafsong1 on Sep 22, 2009 7:20 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
They have MONEY. The power of money will stay on their side until the preponderance of FORCE is on ours. Don't badmouth brute force; violence is now our only hope of victory.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Down brutus force, down! Posted by: halg
» Yep... that is what Mao said too Posted by: ChicagoWay
» Goodness... you sound dangerous Posted by: ChicagoWay
Brute Force and MSM
Posted by: Gravitas on Sep 22, 2009 7:52 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sadly they also have some very sophisticated propaganda techniques. They have so dumbed down the masses, especially in the U.S. that they can still exert a great deal of control without force. Just get a celebrity to say something and sheeple will follow. Not to mention all the other fun and games they pull. Some people are waking up, but there are far too many who still talk about nonsense like the Kanye West thing instead of why the bankers got those bonuses. I wish this were not true, but it is.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

BA
Posted by: mnstra on Sep 22, 2009 7:53 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
we knew that is was only a matter of time before the elite would turn combat units onto the American people. Iraq is the training ground for these so called citizen solders. make no mistake. The elite will use everything at its disposal to keep their power including turning national guard in to a band of murders like Kent state.Only this time the killing will be planned.........

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: BA Posted by: EncinoM
» RE: BA Posted by: kogwonton
» RE: BA Posted by: EncinoM
» RE: BA Posted by: kogwonton
» RE: BA Posted by: EncinoM
Wow
Posted by: WoodoMomo on Sep 22, 2009 7:57 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Its about high time someone called it for waht it was! LOL

RT
Online Anonymity when it Counts

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Moral authority..........
Posted by: Spiritgirl on Sep 22, 2009 8:38 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I agree with the author, and he is correct in his assessment regarding the anger of the people. The vacuum of real leadership by progressives in engaging an angry and frightened populace needs to be addressed. It's not the narrow issues, it is the broader issues of graft and greed by rich old white guys in service to themselves and the corporate oligarchy on a scale that has surpassed whatever the mafia did. It is not just the suffering of the poor, the elderly, it is middle-class people that are working harder and making less, it is an education system that is failing our children, it is nations that can no longer feed themselves, it is health-care or lack of access to it, it is homelessness, and evictions for people because of the "speculation" of others, it is morally bankrupt politicians that take the corporate money and then change the rules for the benefit of their corporate donors!

This anger is being harnessed by the right, to their own detriment! For when these sleeping people awaken, there will be a raging fire that the right will be unable to contain coming for them. Voting for President Obama is not enough! We the people, in order to protect not just "the union", but to protect ourselves, must awaken, march, write, and demonstrate against the perverseness that we have allowed "our government to become"! We all have to account, and so must they - because if we allow the oligarchy to go unchecked not just this nation, but the world has only begun to suffer from what will come!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» I hope you're right. Posted by: clresu
TAKE YOUR FINGER OFF THE CAPS LOCK
Posted by: halg on Sep 22, 2009 8:50 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
(thanks)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This jerk is spamming multiple threads.... n/m
Posted by: Paul_C on Sep 22, 2009 12:31 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Looks like another international action center front
Posted by: noalternative on Sep 22, 2009 9:08 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
group. I am refering to bailout the people. Oh well, at some point an authentic popular movement will come along, that maybe I'll consider getting involved in!

http://bailoutpeople.org/conveners.shtml

if you get involved with this group expect to be diverted to defenses of stalin and mumia, and not actual calls to bailout the people.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

vivre la révolution
Posted by: Rusty Shackleford on Sep 22, 2009 10:20 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What we need in this country, (and indeed around the world), is another French revolution.

Trust me on this... these people aren't going to play by the real rules. They made their OWN rules. There IS NO WAY to "beat them at their own game," i.e. use diplomacy and bureaucracy and legal practice and petition, etc to get what we want. THERE IS NO WAY.

I've never been one to see war or violence as inevitable, but at this point, I think it is. It's not a matter of, "oh, well, we didn't know we were causing so much suffering," or "oh, well, you put up a fair fight and you won." No. They're not going to give in. They're not going to lose at the very game they rigged. They know what they're doing, and they're glad their doing it.

I promise each and every one of you reading this, they WILL NOT STOP. There were bubbles before the housing market, and there are going to be bubbles after it. There will be more bailouts in the future. More recessions, more "recoveries," also known as jobless recoveries.

It's a never-ending cycle, people. The table is tilted folks, the game is rigged, to paraphrase George Carlin.

I guarantee you that there will NOT be real, firm change until the people in this country rise up against their governments and the corporations that control them.

Why is it that average people can't run for public office? Because you have to be born into that system, or have connections. There's no other way in. It's a fixed system.

What we need now is another French revolution. These corporate pigs live in huge mansions, and control everything we do. I predict that unless actual VIOLENCE takes place, there won't be any real change. Heads are gonna roll, and if they don't, we'll never get anywhere.

Because even boycotting Walmart isn't going to help. Other people will still shop there. You have to shut things down at the source. You can't just keep holding up a sign made with a ruler, a poster board, and markers that you bought from inside the store.

I for one would sleep better at night, knowing that my tax money went to help out my fellow citizens via healthcare, or unemployment, etc, rather than knowing it went into the pocket of a bank CEO who didn't need it, let alone all that he owns as it is.

I'm not advocating violence. Hell, I don't even advocate gun ownership. I just think that unless people revolt with force, that these corporatists aren't going to change. Violence and intimidation seem to be the only things they understand.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Posted by: mnstra
They learned their lesson in Seattle in 1999
Posted by: frantic1971 on Sep 22, 2009 10:30 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The World Oligarchy learned its lesson at the WTO protests in Seattle in 1999, when--incredibly--a mass protest actually shut-down the goings on.

They are determined to NEVER let something like this happen again! Thus the overkill at Pittsburg.

I remember watching it on a tv where I was working. One of the company VP's (the son-in-law of the CEO) was virtually frothing at the mouth about the "wreckers" and "idiots" --as he called them--who had the audacity to DARE to challenge the wonders of rampant Globalization.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» The VP was right... Posted by: EncinoM
» Shhhhh... don't tell 'em that... Posted by: ChicagoWay
We could all learn from history - if it was taught in school :.?
Posted by: stellabloo on Sep 22, 2009 11:50 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Most of us assume that the corporate state, global trade and class warfare are recent developments, traceable to Bushco, maybe Reagan or even as far back as Nixon. Many of us don't remember the 50's (or even the 60's) and what we imagine is a mash of Happy Days and Grease, a golden age of black-and-white prosperity. As I have been discovering, that image couldn't be further from the truth.

Sigmund Freud researched the unconscious desires of the human psyche, the desire to be powerful or attractive, the desire to belong or to influence. Then along came Freud's nephew, the infamous Dr. Edward Bernays.

From Noam Chomsky's foreword to Bernays 1928 classic PR manual "Propaganda"

" ... This huge public relations industry, which is a U.S. invention and a monstrous industry, came out of the first World War. The leading figures were people in the Creel Commission. In fact, the main one, Edward Bernays, comes right out of the Creel Commission. He has a book that came out right afterwards called Propaganda. The term "propaganda," incidentally, did not have negative connotations in those days. It was during the second World War that the term became taboo because it was connected with Germany, and all those bad things. But in this period, the term propaganda just meant information or something like that. So he wrote a book called Propaganda around 1925, and it starts off by saying he is applying the lessons of the first World War. The propaganda system of the first World War and this commission that he was part of showed, he says, it is possible to "regiment the public mind every bit as much as an army regiments their bodies." These new techniques of regimentation of minds, he said, had to be used by the intelligent minorities in order to make sure that the slobs stay on the right course. We can do it now because we have these new techniques.

"This is the main manual of the public relations industry. Bernays is kind of the guru. He was an authentic Roosevelt/Kennedy liberal. He also engineered the public relations effort behind the U.S.-backed coup which overthrew the democratic government of Guatemala.

"His major coup, the one that really propelled him into fame in the late 1920s, was getting women to smoke. Women didn't smoke in those days and he ran huge campaigns for Chesterfield. You know all the techniques—models and movie stars with cigarettes coming out of their mouths and that kind of thing. He got enormous praise for that. So he became a leading figure of the industry, and his book was the real manual."

So much for the old-fashioned notions, that 100 years ago our leaders were nobler, our ethics were stronger, and people had more sense. The sad truth is that we have all been manipulated for these last 100 years in a policy of Divide and Conquer. The evil Hun with his handlebar mustache. The swarthy terrorist lving only to kill westerners. Obsession with unnatural and unhealthy beauty for women, the exaggeration and misrepresentation of black and hispanic crime in the news, the hero who relies on "toughness" and brawn rather than intelligence, these are all basic elements of a gossamer corporate reality fashioned from a purposeful but unbelievably short-sighted conspiracy of greed.

(I say "short-sighted" as we are all now drowning in our own consumer waste, but evil being what it is, the successfully selfish care only about power, prestige, and their own private villa in the sun - not the grandkids.)

The Truman Show? We are all living in our own reality tv show, where Hannah Montana sings about the joy of shopping and the War in Iraq is a glorious victory for democracy.

The Matrix? Ditto. And high time we opted for the red pill :.?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

OUR NATION NEEDS TO A DEEP CLEANSING
Posted by: drricklippin on Sep 22, 2009 11:55 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We need deep and systemic ELECTION REFORM.

The whole nation needs a long hot bath and a long hot shower from the immoral filth that has accumulated on most of us.

Dr.Rick Lippin
Southampton,Pa

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Robert Scheer has called Chris Hedges "If not the greatest, one of the...
Posted by: zigy on Sep 22, 2009 1:11 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
greatest journalists alive", but this article is sadly lacking in analysis, depth, and scope. The initial premise that this "financial crises" is all some big mistake is highly questionable; there is evidence that it has not only been engineered, but had been decades in the making. Legislation rewarding outsourceing of jobs dates back (I believe) to the late 1960s. Changes in the tax code increasingly burdened the middle class in the 1980s and 90s. The repeal of the Glass-Steagell Act in 1999, the punitive changes to the Federal Bankruptcy Act in 2005, Greenspan's inflation of the housing bubble with unprecedently low interests rates, and the massive Ponzi scheme that the housing market was turned into after deregulation all reveal a decades long pattern of intentional and increasing oppression and immiseration of the middle and lower classes in America.

Hedges also states that these economic "elites" are "inept" and "blundering". That hardley seems to be the case. They have managed to implement a police state apparatus under the Bush administration with (apparently)detention (some would call them concentration) camps on U.S. soil. and with battle tested U.S. soldiers (under Northcom)now statationed on U.S. soil with people who oppose the direction the government takes e.g. turning over trillions of tax-payer dollars to private international bankers, being labeled as "enemy combatants" and "enemies of the state". And, of course Obama will continue Bush'es policy of non-disclosure of charges adding anticipatory arrests for what the state thinks you MIGHT do. Inept and incompetent? Think again, Mr. Hedges.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Protest at Town Hall vs Protest at G-7
Posted by: Lloydmillerus on Sep 22, 2009 7:02 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Ah, now I see!

Violent protest is fine at G-7.

Angry confrontation of representatives at a Town Hall is a no no.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Dr. rick - you're quite right but where do we begin??????
Posted by: blurider on Sep 22, 2009 1:46 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It appears that under the present laws and procedural requirements we are stuck with reliance on the Congress that benefits from the status quo, to give us the reform we need. A few have campaigned with election reform as part of their platforms but either they didn't get elected (the usual outcome I think) or they forgot that element of their platforms upon election!

Very few, when elected to the Congress stick very long to their former ideals and the few that have, have always met with unfortunate 'accidents'!

To my way of thinking it must be much broader than 'election reform' alone - in fact, I for one am more 'threatened' by lobbying and campaign finance laws than by the actual electoral process. I started out assuming you meant the same thing but perhaps your concern is with the integrity of the vote gathering and counting process?

I believe that alongside improving that process we need campaign finance reform, and serious lobbying reform. It would appear that right now the courts are inclined to move us in the opposite direction taking corporations seriously as 'persons' with U S civil rights and the freedom to dump all the money they can afford, into future campaigns! The country actually needs the exact opposite - all the money out of campaigns a long with the 'ownership' of our administrations and congressional leadership - even our courts and their interpretation of the Constitution.

How exactly, could we institute a process of swift and sure election reform, campaign finance reform and lobbying reform that circumvented our reliance on the 'opposition' (our 'public servants') to give us the objective we require?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A World Without Money??
Posted by: Noah_Scape on Sep 22, 2009 10:55 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think you are right about the economy never recovering. Not in it's present form, which pretty much means it is all going to be defunt and replaced with something.... BETTER?

I have long dreamed of a world without money. I think it could work... people just do their jobs, whatever needs doing, and there will be food, cars, houses, energy, schools, health care, etc. Why do we need MONEY to keep all those things going? Are we not mature enough to just do what need doing without "keeping track"? It seems childish... I bet it would seem childish to an alien if one came here and saw how we do things.

One of the good parts of a world without money is that greed will not be tolerated... if someone hoards "wealth", in whatever forms that takes, others will see it and the wealthy person will be shamed instead of exhaulted as they are now. Greed will be seen as the destructive and shamefull thing it really is. Capitalism uses greed as incentive, and greed turned out to be what caused this mess.

A world without money will mean egalitarianism - we are all equals. We are born that way - it is another basic premise that we are supposed to be following, but that capitalism takes away.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Are you over age 20 ?? Posted by: ChicagoWay
We need to Replace or Radically Alter the Capitalist System Now!!
Posted by: yellow on Sep 24, 2009 2:14 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
At the phase of late capitalism in which we currently find ourselves, a phase which many apologists for the system are calling the "Great Moderation" to avoid acknowledging the system's long term decline, bubbles are an essential part of the maintenance of the system. Capital is rapidly amassed and absorbed into financial markets with little of the underlying real economy to support it. Speculative activity expands these bubbles until they burst and trillions in paper and real wealth is destroyed. The entire economy goes into a downward spiral until capitalists find it profitable to reinvest having destroyed sufficient capital to lower equity prices and production costs. The later is called a deflation which generally brings on a depression. In the recovery phase, which often requires a strong external stimulus, the economy is concentrated in fewer hands through a flurry of mergers and acquisitions, an ongoing trend in capitalism, and the cycle repeats itself. The problem is that more and more misery is produced with each cycle. In addition, the entire system becomes more unstable.

May I suggest that this system be replaced by one that places human need over corporate greed. At the very least we need a political system that is less subserviant to capital so that pro-working class agenda such as public investment, social welfare policies such as unemployment insurance, universal health insurance and public assistance and a committment to full employment is possible.

We know that stalinist bureacratic centralism is a failure. We now also know that US free market capitalism is a failure as well. The global financial collapse of 2008 showed this as well as mass emigration away from east european countries that adopted free market reforms too thoroughly and too quickly. Neo-Liberalism clearly failed in that part of the world as well. Let's have Keynesian social democracy instead.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

important action this week big time
Posted by: kwoods on Sep 25, 2009 1:11 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
everyone, just go to this site

theflucase.com

and then tell everyone you know about this site.

This is an action alert. excuse me if it is not perfectly appropriate, but when you see site, you will be like me, on fire.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Each year the World Economic
Posted by: fredtowson on Oct 11, 2009 11:48 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
“Each year the World Economic Forum convenes in Davos, Switzerland. Hundreds of CEO’s, prime ministers, finance ministers, and leading academics gather each February to attend meetings and set the economic agendas for the year ahead.

“What if a small group of these world leaders were to conclude that the principle risk to the earth comes from the actions of the rich countries? And if the world is to survive, those rich countries would have to sign an agreement reducing their impact on the environment? Will they do it? Will the rich countries agree to reduce their impact on the environment? Will they agree to save the earth?

“The group’s conclusions is ‘no.’ The rich countries won’t do it. They won’t change. So, in order to save the planet, the group decides: Isn’t the only hope for the desperate housewives s06e03 subtitles великий сфикс гизы остров гонконг seropol5 planet that the industrialized civilization collapse? Isn’t it our responsibility to bring that about?”

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Yes, that's true
Posted by: rrrbert on Oct 20, 2009 7:12 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement