Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Was It "Pirates" or Israeli Intelligence That Intercepted a Ship Loaded with Russian Defense Missiles?

By Richard Silverstein, Tikun Olam. Posted September 15, 2009.


Russian and Israeli sources say the cargo ship Arctic Sea was carrying Russia's most sophisticated air-defense system system, which could protect Iranian facilities from attack.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

A few days ago, in a blog post, I translated portions of an Israeli news story about the Arctic Sea affair which, along with a Time magazine report surmised that Israeli intelligence had intercepted or been involved in the interception of the ship, the Arctic Sea, while it was carrying Russian missiles destined for either Iran or Hezbollah.

Several readers, whose opinions I trust, dismissed these theories as improbable for various reasons. But it appears they are quite likely to be wrong, and the original story is likely to be correct.

Read the posted link above for the background on the original, strange, mysterious story about the ship Arctic Sea. What has happened since is that Russian and Israeli sources have contended that the Arctic Sea was carrying not just any Russian missile, but the nation's most sophisticated S-300 system, which could protect Iran's nuclear facilities from Israeli attack:

News reports over the weekend, citing military sources in Israel and Russia, said the Arctic Sea had been loaded with S-300 missiles at the Kaliningrad naval port without the Kremlin's knowledge.

I repeat a question I asked in my earlier post: How could the Russian government not have known a cargo of its most precious military technology was being loaded in its own naval port? I would surmise that elements of the Russian military and shady arms dealers must have been in cahoots to bring this kind of complex caper off:

Earlier this month, Mikhail Voitenko, a Russian journalist who specializes in maritime reporting, fled abroad after he said he received threats for his reporting that [the] ship was likely being used by corrupt officials to carry weapons. Voitenko broke the story of the ship's initial "disappearance" from the Baltic Sea.

Adding flesh to the story is a BBC report that Israeli intelligence confirms its involvement in the Arctic Sea adventure:

Israel was linked to the interception of the missing cargo ship Arctic Sea last month, a senior figure close to Israeli intelligence has told the BBC. The source said Israel had told Moscow it knew the ship was secretly carrying a Russian air-defense system for Iran …

The Israeli source told the BBC that the piracy story was a cover and that Israel told Moscow it was giving officials time to stop the shipment before making the matter public …

Could it be a coincidence that Israeli President Shimon Peres made a hastily scheduled trip to Moscow the day after the ship was freed? That was when Peres made the rather astonishing statement that an Iranian bomb was like a "flying death camp."

When I first wrote about this, I could only speculate about what he went to talk to the Russians about. But now it becomes clearer, as the S-300 is the single most-feared weapons system the Russians could provide the Iranians. Israel has made loud and clear in every way possible that it does not want Russia to sell it to Iran.

The fact that country almost managed to secure the system surreptitiously would have provided Peres quite a bit to talk about. And if indeed the Russian leadership did not know what was happening in Kaliningrad, then it might have been eager to explain to the Israelis how this little caper got as far along as it did.

Another little matter that would have interested the Russians is how the Mossad knew about this shipment, while the Kremlin was asleep at the switch.

Further, Yediot Achronot broke the story of a "secret" trip by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to Moscow on Monday.

If Israel does attack Iran (which it clearly wants to do), it doesn't want to lose half its pilots doing so. With this technology, Iran would not only harden its targets, it would inflict serious damage on the Israeli air force. I would contend that if Israel does not seriously contemplate attacking Iran, then these missiles should not be as big a matter for Israel as they appear to be.

One of the more humorous aspects of this story is the Russian foreign minister imploring the world media to keep their powder dry and not jump to any conclusions:

"All will become transparent, and I hope that everyone will be convinced that the rumors you refer to are absolutely groundless," [Sergey] Lavrov told reporters.

Given the Russian aspiration toward the ideal of full transparency and democracy, I'd say the chances of anyone trusting Lavrov's promise are about slim to none.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: iran, israel, russia, arctic sea

Richard Silverstein blogs at Tikun Olam, on Israeli-Arab peace.  He also writes for the Guardian’s Comment is Free blog and lives in Seattle.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from World! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Israel moves to another Planet
Posted by: weathered on Sep 15, 2009 1:50 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
and the World breaks out in a true Peace & far greater happiness.

If Israel had even a modicum of honor, integrity and goodwill they'd nothing to fear.

Israel is its own worst enemy. Enjoy

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Richard Silverstein
Posted by: login@bugmenot.com on Sep 15, 2009 2:23 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
While international intrigue and espionage is rather fascinating - I'll admit - the story here is not the alleged arms shipment to Iran, but rather the fact that the pirates violated Sweden's territorial waters, hijacked a ship and its crew at gun point and most likely worked for an Israeli organization all the while Israel hypocritically continues to attain advanced military hardware from the United States. It then goes on to use such hardware in contradiction with international law and in some cases even US law - as was the case with White Phosphorus usage on Gaza's civilians.

From my perspective, the entire affair boils down to Israeli chutzpah where Israel's leaders fly to Moscow to contain, control, manipulate and pressure its leadership, despite it all being non of Israel's business.

It seems national sovereignty is only recognized when it suits Israel, and as we have seen over the last few years, the US.

And at the end of the day, let's assume that shipment was indeed destined for Iran, so what? Don't they have a legitimate right to defend themselves from an Israeli attack?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: ichard Silverstein Posted by: praedor
» The central truth of Israel Posted by: wisegalah
» Iran has a right to exist Posted by: Freedomrider
Possible
Posted by: bonapartist on Sep 15, 2009 2:44 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Israel has a long history of operating outside its boundries and accross the world. Most of those actiosn were very succesful, remember for example Operation Entebbe in Uganda.

Israel is an anomaly and thus a libaility. It is a small country with very limited resources and small population and yet it wields the power far above its power and cability. This mostly due to full support of US, shaking but still a superpower, and connections made by jewish lobbys.

In this case it would be perfectly plausable that Israel decided to violate Swedish and Russian soverignity. It is futile though, little Israel can pull the Russian bear by the tail only so many times and with big daddy US tied up elswhere this will just rack another enemy to the Israel.

Personally I expect that US will start weakening its international operations due to shortage of fund druing the next decade or so, Israel then will either have to learn to play nice and behave like little country it is or it will be eradicated by throng of enemies. And I doubt even nuclear warhead (existing ubt in limited supply) would alter that. Nuke Cairo and Damascus and every Arab in the world, as well as every muslim and many others will have a perfect reason to blot the Israel off the map.

As for Russian weapons and Iran, there is no secret they are tacit allies with Russia providing covert support. I doubt huge Russian military industry lacks weaposn for another shpiment. Live and learn, you can bet next shpiment will be guarded by everything from border watch to ceremonial guard.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The most dangerous aspect of this article is that
Posted by: EncinoM on Sep 15, 2009 5:29 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The russina government may not be in control of its military.

While the normal Israel basher will comment, they are over looking this potential storm. Russia still has nukes and advanced weapons. Corruption within the highest levels of the officer corps seems rapant.

Or worse the government itself is corrupt and ignoring UN sanctions against Iran.

For the Israel bashers, if the next shippmentcontains warheads or missiles that directly threaten Israel, should Israel sit back and do nothing?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Oh look, shills are out in force Posted by: bonapartist
Someone needs to take a geography lesson
Posted by: Lese Majeste on Sep 15, 2009 9:22 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why not mention the obvious in regards to the alleged smuggling of Russian S-300 anti-aircraft missiles to Iran: Why take the long and dangerous route?

If someone in Russia wanted to smuggle some items to Iran, why go to all the trouble of moving them to a Finnish port, loading them onto a ship, then plying the Baltic, then the North Sea, then the Mediterranean to Algiers. From there, they'd have to go on a dangerous 5,000 mile land journey across N. Africa to the Horn, where'd they'd have to be loaded again onto a ship that would have to cross the Persian Gulf that has so many US Navy ships that it needs a traffic cop.

Why not just use that backyard Russian lake known as the Caspian Sea?

This smuggling/hijack story makes no sense, unless it's being used to feed the same 'Echo Chamber' that was instrumental in selling the Iraq invasion to gullible Americans, running at full blast. Only this time around, trying to find that Niger 'yellowcake' story that has sticking power is proving to be a daunting task, so we'll just keep tossing stuff on the wall and see what sticks.

Looks like Judith Miller is still plying her trade.

But I could be wrong, after all Israel has proven time and again to have an impeccable record when it comes to telling the truth, right?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Excellent points! Posted by: bonapartist
Russia opposes an insane Israeli attack on Iran
Posted by: Garvagh on Sep 15, 2009 10:54 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sergie Lavrov is well-informed and clear-thinking, which is more than can be said about a number of high-level US officials dealing with the Middle East. The Russians oppose any nuclear weapons being obtained or developed by Iran. Lavrov says Iran can help bring stability to Iraq and Afghanistan, and the failure of the US to seek such help is mute testimony to a serious inability to think clearly about the Middle East and south Asia.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Did Israel plant false documents to libel Iran?
Posted by: Garvagh on Sep 15, 2009 10:58 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Iran and the IAEA have not been allowed to see the original documents or computers that have been used by the US and Israel to create the impression Iran is actually secretly developing nuclear weapons. Why is this? Why should the "defendant" not be allowed to examine "evidence" used against that defendant?
Did Mossad plant the bogus evidence, and this is a secret the US and Israel want to keep from being known?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What if...
Posted by: Tachyon on Sep 15, 2009 11:09 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...Russia used this ship as a decoy knowing that Israel would try and stop the shipment?

The actual missiles could of been shipped via the Caspian Sea (or via another route) on another ship that we don't even know about.

If this is the case, then the Israelis and their operatives fell for the decoy and intercepted the wrong ship.

I think this scenario is entirely plausible.

or

Does anyone know if it would be possible to transport these missiles on a submarine? Could you replace the standard nuclear missiles with the S-300's and then offload them somewhere?

We might just find out if and when Israel launches air raids on Iran's nuclear facilities.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It could only have been a derelict Israeli Pirate ship -----
Posted by: symcokid on Sep 15, 2009 2:52 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
trying to incite Iran and crying "wolf" to the world that they are about to be wiped out by something bigger and badder than their own illegal arsenal of nuclear bombs scattered throughout their occupied lands and at DIMONA.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

don't bother with evidence
Posted by: guns4everyone on Sep 15, 2009 5:33 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This article is just blather on about what could be, in Silverstein's delusional universe, and ergo must be. no need for actual evidence.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

m2ts converter
Posted by: yiranfanpeixi on Sep 15, 2009 6:41 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement