Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Sarah Palin, the Neocons & Howard Dean Love the War in Afghanistan

By Jeremy Scahill, Rebel Reports. Posted September 8, 2009.


As the war worsens and support plunges, an alliance of neocons and some partisan Democrats is supporting the White House.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

The neoconservative Project for a New American Century laid much of the groundwork for the foreign policy of the Bush administration. Its members received important postings in the White House, Department of Defense and other institutions. But what is seldom mentioned is that PNAC achieved its first great political victory during the Clinton administration when PNAC pushed Clinton to sign the Iraq Liberation Act of 1998. In January 1998, the group wrote to Clinton: "[Y]ou have an opportunity to chart a clear and determined course for meeting this threat. We urge you to seize that opportunity, and to enunciate a new strategy that would secure the interests of the U.S. and our friends and allies around the world. That strategy should aim, above all, at the removal of Saddam Hussein's regime from power." The Iraq Liberation Act, backed overwhelmingly by Democrats and Republicans and signed by Clinton, made regime change in Iraq official U.S. policy and set the course for the eventual invasion and occupation.

PNAC recently re-branded itself under the new name of the Foreign Policy Initiative. The three major figures behind FPI are well-known neocons William Kristol, Robert Kagan and Dan Senor. "The United States remains the world's indispensable nation," the group’s mission statement reads -- "indispensable to international peace, security, and stability, and indispensable to safe-guarding and advancing the ideals and principles we hold dear."

On September 7, the FPI sent a letter to President Obama about Afghanistan, eerily similar to the one PNAC sent Clinton calling for regime change in Iraq in 1998. It praises Obama's escalation in Afghanistan before calling on him to expand the war even further:

You've called Afghanistan an "international security challenge of the highest order," and stated that "the safety of people around the world is at stake." Last month you told a convention of veterans, "Those who attacked America on 9/11 are plotting to do so again. If left unchecked, the Taliban insurgency will mean an even larger safe haven from which al Qaeda would plot to kill more Americans. So this is not only a war worth fighting. This is fundamental to the defense of our people."

We fully agree with those sentiments. We congratulate you on the leadership you demonstrated earlier this year when you decided to deploy approximately 21,000 additional troops and several thousand civilian experts ...

Since the announcement of your administration's new strategy, we have been troubled by calls for a drawdown of American forces in Afghanistan and a growing sense of defeatism about the war ... There is no middle course. Incrementally committing fewer troops than required would be a grave mistake and may well lead to American defeat.  We will not support half-measures that repeat the errors of the past.

The list of signators to the FPI letter is a predictable cast of neocon characters who somehow make a living showing how little they know about so much. But there are some new names. Perhaps most comical among them: Sarah Palin, that famed foreign policy visionary. If Palin could see Russia from her backyard, she clearly missed the part where the Red Army got chased back to the Motherland after being defeated in Afghanistan.

With recent polls indicating that the American people are increasingly questioning the US presence in Afghanistan and leading conservatives like George Will saying it's "time to get out of Afghanistan," the White House is desperate to find support for its deteriorating war. What is emerging is a sort of neocon alliance with some partisan Democrats backing the White House. The Center for American Progress has teamed up with neocons at public forums supporting the war (and FPI has promoted these events) and has put out pro-war reports supporting the surge in Afghanistan. On Fox News Sunday -- hosted by Dick Cheney's little BFF, Chris Wallace -- Howard Dean fumbled his way through a defense of Obama's Afghan war policy (and went so low as to use neocon talking points about the war being for women's rights) and found himself in agreement with a table of discredited right-wingers, including Newt Gingrich:


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: neocons, iraq, afghanistan, howard dean, bill clinton, william kristol, sarah palin, foreign policy initiative, dan senor, iraq liberation act, robert kagan

Jeremy Scahill, an independent journalist who reports frequently for the national radio and TV program Democracy Now!, has spent extensive time reporting from Iraq and Yugoslavia. He is currently a Puffin Writing Fellow at The Nation Institute. Scahill is the author of Blackwater: The Rise of the World's Most Powerful Mercenary Army. His writing and reporting is available at RebelReports.com.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from World! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Add another name to the list...
Posted by: laoma on Sep 8, 2009 9:54 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sold Out!!

WTF Dean. You were becoming one of the voices with integrity working in the background. And now this? You're back to square one, and may you never leave.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Money poorly spent
Posted by: LillianB on Sep 8, 2009 3:39 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Can't we find a better use for $100 billion a year ? Like a soldier said, "I don't even know why we're here".

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Don't forget...... Posted by: MausMasher54
» You Forgot Something, Genius Posted by: Sgellero
» The money is well spent Posted by: bonapartist
Laugh Fucking Riot!!!
Posted by: Augustus_818 on Sep 9, 2009 12:44 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
HAHAHAHA! I love how Dean got all tongue-tied on that "I -- guess --- I'm the left ... liberal? uhhhhhhh ..."

OOPPS! Politics and war makes for strange bedfellows. Now that I think about it, it's not so goddamn funny knowing that a few thousand more people are going to die because of these poiliticians decisions. What is it gonna take before people start withdrawing their support for these people?

And don't nobody give me any shit that Obama's cleaning up Bush's mess either. These Left-Right charlatans are in it up to their eyeballs both.

Jeremy, job well done as usual!:)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Laugh Fucking Riot!!! Posted by: lively56
» RE: Laugh Fucking Riot!!! Posted by: lively56
Thank you Mr. Scahill. You would make an excellent president. :)
Posted by: JenniferBedingfield on Sep 9, 2009 5:06 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
At least Mr. Scahill all along has been totally non-partisan and honest about who's mucking up foreign policy. Obama made his intentions against Afghanistan clear last year on the campaign trail. Until the Republicans and Democrats can accept the idea of pols with better attitudes and ideas towards foreign policy ala Paul, Gravel, Kucinich, etc..., the people lose and the neocons win.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

moodotv
Posted by: Moodotv on Sep 9, 2009 5:08 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Obama and Dean agree "Look, we can't win this war militarily."
You quoted that! It is true. We must find some other ways to deal with the perceived problems.
War is not the answer.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bomb bomb bomb Iran!
Posted by: Llama11 on Sep 9, 2009 5:57 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Look at a map of military bases in the Middle East? What are we surrounding? I wish they would start the draft, then all of us in the anti-war crowd might actually get fired up and really do something. Oh well, back to watching Real Chance of Love.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Yeah, I'm spamming
Posted by: ETSpoon on Sep 9, 2009 6:03 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I don't want to hear a peep...a whimper...a squawk...or a squeak out of any of you when the Taliban march into downtown Kabul, round-up a bunch of women and begin murdering them for the television cameras in the soccer stadium for imagined offenses to the Qur'an, a book no one can read much less understand. Once again an Abrahamic religion rears its ugly head.

Remember this headline Alternet headline from April 14 this year:Taliban Gunmen Murder Leading Afghan Women's Rights Activist? Or this one from July 21, also this year:Protecting the Rights of Afghan Women is AlterNet's Top Take Action Campaign This Week?

I don't want to hear or read one word about how terrible the Taliban is because these turbaned punks, many of whom are the sons of our old mujahideen buddies from twenty years ago, stop little Afghan girls from going to school.

Remember this Altnet.org posting from May 13 of this year: 90 Afghan Schoolgirls Poisoned in 'Taliban Gas Attack'?

And I especially don't what to hear one word of surprise or shock or indignation when our fighting soldiers and Marines march off those airliners and up to the TV cameras and tell the world, they could have finished the "job" (that "job" being to kill as many Afghans as humanly possible) if the politicians and "liberals" hadn't stabbed them in the back!

Believe me, we will hear interviews echoing those sentiments from returning G.I.s and Marines once some one pulls the plug on this thing in Afghanistan. Why? Because this is an All Volunteer Force, the bastard child of anti-Vietnam war activists and Richard Nixon, midwifed by free market Jesus, Milton J. Friedman. Our men and women in uniform are there because they want to be there. Never mind if some kid from the slums is there because of economic necessity. Just don't take my son to be a soldier, he's got to finish his degree in business administration.

Many returning vets may be ungrateful because President Obama or the Congress or whomever pulled their sorry asses out of Afghan quagmire is because they were doing "God's" work killing and/or converting heathen Muslims. Remember this Alternet.org article from April 21, 2007 Birth of the Christian Soldier: How Evangelicals Infiltrated the American Military, by Michael L. Weinstein and David Seay, Thomas Dunne Books? Or how about this news story from Agence France Presse from February 13, 2008 US military accused of harboring fundamentalism. Or This one from Democracy Now! from May of this year: “The Crusade for a Christian Military”: Are US Forces Trying to Convert Afghans to Christianity?

Won't that be just great. A bunch of pissed off ex-Marine, ex-paratrooper snake-handlers and holy rollers ready, willing and able to convert the country to their twisted "Taliban" version of Christianity by force if necessary. Quite frankly, I think I'd rather we funnel off these armed and dangerous Jesus-loving pinheads off to fight and die, especially die, in a pointless war in a foreign land than hand them jobs in our civilian police departments.

Whatever the out-come in Afghanistan, it will not be pretty. But a percipitious withdrawal, say within 90 days, will have even uglier repercussions domestically.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Yeah, I'm spamming Posted by: masthead
Americans are doing what they do best: murder, plunder, destruction of environment
Posted by: PakiBoy on Sep 9, 2009 6:31 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This isn't anything new. The savage progeny of the barbarians that committed the worst recorded genocide in human history is doing what it does best.

America runs on war. And Americans are blood-thirsty savages that can't get enough of it. Ask anyone from the Southern Hemisphere, Middle East, Far East etc etc…

Do you know what is common among these countries (and it is only a partial list): China, Cambodia, Laos, Vietnam, Nicaragua, Chile, Philippines, Iran, Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Korean Peninsula? They have all experienced American savagery.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Who are the Barbarians? Posted by: Sgellero
Women safer with Taliban in charge...
Posted by: Prinzowhales on Sep 9, 2009 6:56 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It may not be pleasant news for 'womyn' and others, but that is the sad state of affairs in Afghanistan, where reality is just not very fashionable. Under the warlords, women were raped and killed with abandon. No one was safe. The Taliban besides kicking opium production to the curb, provided a much needed order, in which people could live. Strange ways, strange times for Americans who are quite comfortable with rape and sexual assault and overflowing jails and want to transplant their indulgence lifestyle to those who are not fortunate enough to be Americans.

Before you condemn the Taliban ask yourself why the people support them and hate the US... in Okinawa...look at the dead and raped women of Iraq--among our own contractors and armed forces.

There is no real concern for women's rights in our drive to steal Afghan freedom and resources. We saw that in the reaction of NOW to Slick Willy's treatment of women...including the sex for drugs with an underage girl in a state office building while Slick was governor which was brought out in trial testimony in Arkansas...It was 'politic' for NOW to ignore it. Curiously, these trained dogs of the pseudo Left are relatively silent on the state of women's rights in Saudi Arabia...I'm sure if the Oligarchy dropped a bit of Kibble in their bowls they would be bearing their fangs for war in Saudi to rescue their 'sisters'. The silence is truly deafening from these quarters regarding their 'sisters' in Iraq, where piles of them have been killed 'collaterally' not to mention being raped, tortured and otherwise abused by our lusty 'warriors'...even gunned down while carrying children for the general amusement of these 'heroes.' (War is not just throwing puppies off cliffs and machinegunning automobiles that could be suspicious if you have a very vivid imagination.)

Of course Howard Dean supports war! He did not win his leadership positions in the Democratic Party for oposing Demopublican policy. These are 'team players', these Democrats...you do want to be part of 'Team O'bomb'em,' don't you? Then just SHUT UP! and march along in lockstep behind Fearless Leader, 'Howler' Dean, Nazi Pe-lousy, Sarah Palin, Lieberman, McCain and Clinton. You put 'em in there, America!...God love you...nobody else does.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Gov. Howard Dean is NOT a Right-Wing Neo-Con
Posted by: nobyjingo on Sep 9, 2009 7:34 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Gov. Howard Dean is who rallied the liberal roots so that democracy wasn't completely lost, and notified the world that there is a Right-Wing to the Democratic Party that he opposed, so I fail to agree with anything against Gov. Howard Dean, as from Gov. Dean's actions Gov. Dean's interest has the best interest of the nation as a whole, or there wouldn't be a democratic president at all. As long as Gov. Howard Dean stands by President Obama, I will stand by President Obama, and besides, the only other choice is the Right-Wing Conservative EXTREMIST Republicans and we know beyond a shadow of a doubt that we NEVER want them in power again, as they ARE the EXTREMISTS that caused the economic, environmental, corporatist, etc. problems in the United States to begin with.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

liar liar pants on fire
Posted by: Nuanced on Sep 9, 2009 9:09 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I read the article twice and found no evidence that Howard Dean "loves" the war in Afghanistan. Alternet should not be putting misleading titles on articles.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Clueless
Posted by: Sgellero on Sep 9, 2009 10:10 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And no mention Of Osama and his thousands of troops dedicated to killing Americans. And this is about oil?

We can buy oil anywhere.

This is about killing the enemy.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Clueless indeed! Posted by: PakiBoy
Before
Posted by: teon6 on Sep 14, 2009 7:33 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Before you condemn the Taliban ask yourself why the people support them and hate the US... in Okinawa...look at the dead and raped women of Iraq--among our own contractors and armed forces.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

We fully agree
Posted by: teon6 on Sep 14, 2009 7:43 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We fully agree with those sentiments. We congratulate you on the leadership you demonstrated earlier this year when you decided to deploy approximately 21,000 additional тексты песен слова песен glee season 1 glee subtitles music lyrics seropol5 troops and several thousand civilian experts

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement