WORLD  
comments_image -

Will Afghan Election Results Spark Violence?

With the Afghan election only days away, many government officials are expressing concern about fraud and post-election unrest.
 
 
LIKE THIS ARTICLE ?
Join our mailing list:

Sign up to stay up to date on the latest World headlines via email.

 
 
 
 

As Afghanistan prepares for a elections this week, it is faced with the twin specters of an escalating insurgency and the threat of post-ballot political unrest.

A major suicide bombing rocked the capital, Kabul, on Saturday, August 15, killing at least ten and injuring 100 more. Fighting has broken out in various regions around the country, a rocket attack has closed the airport in Herat, and candidates are starting to cancel campaign appearances for fear of assassination attempts.

With concerns over low voter turnout and widespread fraud plaguing the process, many are beginning to question whether the presidential and provincial council elections on August 20 will have any legitimacy among the population.

And remarks by some senior members of the presidential candidates’ campaigns, notably from a representative of one of the main challengers, have raised the possibility of mass protests if the results are seen as having been rigged.

The first of the warnings signals came in a late July interview in The National, a newspaper based in the United Arab Emirates, UAE, with the campaign manager for leading presidential contender Dr Abdullah Abdullah told a reporter that his faction would not recognize the re-election of the incumbent president Hamed Karzai.

“We will not accept it,” Abdul Satar Murad told the newspaper. “[Karzai] cannot win unless he resorts to large-scale corruption. So we will not accept that. The nation is not voting for him. He only gets votes through his governors and by corruption.”

Karzai is the clear favorite in the poll, and is almost certain to secure another term in office. The only serious question is whether Abdullah can pull enough votes to deprive the president of a first-round victory.

In 2004, Karzai easily triumphed over a field of 17 challengers, gaining 54 per cent of the vote on election day. According to the constitution, if no candidate received more than 50 per cent of the vote, the top two will face off in a second round.

The possibility of a runoff has appeared more likely in recent weeks. Officials from the Independent Election Commission, IEC, have said privately that the campaign will continue for “a few more months”, and two recent opinion polls suggest that Karzai does not command the voting strength to gain a first-round win.

But Abdullah’s camp has put up an unexpectedly strong showing, and, according to Murad, will be prepared to protest if things do not go their way.

”There will be a big demonstration,” he told The National. “[There will be] street demonstrations, and it will turn bad. The country will land in the middle of a crisis.”

But the major candidates, including Abdullah himself, have backed away from any threat of violence.

“We look to the stability of Afghanistan as a necessity for every move and change,” Abdullah told the media shortly after the interview in The National. “We will never do anything under any circumstances which threatens stability in Afghanistan.”

Ashraf Ghani Ahmadzai, another top presidential contender, told IWPR in early June that Afghans “would not take any attempt to steal the election lying down”, but his campaign manager, Ajmal Abedi, has insisted his people would not resort to any attempt to foment violent protests.

“We strongly oppose post-election violence,” Abedi said. “Maybe there will be fraud during the elections, but we should be patient, and not go towards violence. We should solve the issue through legal channels.”

Karzai’s campaign dismisses any allegations of attempted fraud, and says that such rumors are circulated to serve certain candidates’ political interests.

submit to reddit

-
Email
Print
Share
LIKED THIS ARTICLE? JOIN OUR EMAIL LIST
Stay up to date with the latest World headlines via email
Alternet Special Coverage - Occupy Wall Street
Advertisement
Most Read
Most Emailed
Most Discussed
On REDDIT
On DIGG
 
loading most read content ..
Advertisement
Employers Have Had to Provide Birth Control Coverage Since 2000

By Joan McCarter | Daily Kos

 
 
Who Cares What The Bishops Think? Old Catholic Guys Do.

By Sara Robinson | Alternet

 
 
Coup in Maldives Threatens Ousted President Mohamed Nasheed, a Leading Voice for Island States Threatened by Global Warming

By Amy Goodman | Democracy Now!

 
 
Finally! Trader Joe's Signs on to Fair Food Agreement for Farm Workers

By Tara Lohan | AlterNet

 
 
The Inside Scoop on the Budding Romance Between Walmart and Monsanto

By Maria Tchijov | Food and Water Watch

 
 
North Carolina Considering Amendment That Would Roll Back the Rights of Both Gay and Straight Couples

By Jonathan Weiler | Independent Weekly

 
 
Ellen Degeneres Strikes Back at Anti-Gay Bigots Who Are Boycotting JC Penney Because She's Their New Spokesperson

By Lauren Kelley | AlterNet

 
 
Unbelievable: Man Beats Wife, Judge Orders Him to Take Her Out to Red Lobster and the Bowling Alley

By Melissa McEwan | Shakesville

 
 
Activists Gathering at Apple Stores Around the World Today to Protest Awful Treatment of Chinese Workers

By Lauren Kelley | AlterNet

 
 
Today's Mortgage Settlement: Mega-Banks Got a Slap on the Wrist for Trampling the Law (We Probably Don't Even Know the Half of It)

By Robert Borosage | Campaign for America's Future

 
 
 
Reverend Billy Talen
 
 
 
loading ...
POWERED BY DIGG'S USERS
 
[ page served from web 2 ]