COMMENTS: 21
Time to End the Cold War: Why I'm Defying my Government and Visiting Cuba
Sign up to stay up to date on the latest World headlines via email.
The Berlin Wall fell in 1989. The Soviet Union collapsed shortly thereafter. The Central American Civil wars are over. The cold war is long dead, yet the United States still enforces a relic of that cold war with an economic embargo against Cuba. With a new administration in the White House ushering in a era of renewed diplomacy and international cooperation, isn’t it about time for the U.S. to do what most other countries around the world have done and normalize relations with its largest Caribbean neighbor?
This year marks the 40th anniversary of Americans defying what is now a half-century-old embargo. In the next few weeks I will join over 250 Americans traveling to Cuba. When we return on August 3rd, we will defy the ban on American citizens visiting Cuba. By doing this we hope to draw attention to what is now an outmoded, outdated and irrelevant blockade of the island nation. We want to convince the Obama administration that now is the time to get rid of the travel ban and embargo.
During last year’s presidential campaign, Barack Obama said he was willing to sit down with Cuban leaders without preconditions. Hopes were high for the change that Obama had promised during his campaign for the White House. He has, however, been slow to implement any significant policy shift towards Cuba since taking office, worrying those eager to see a new relationship with the island nation.
This is why we are challenging federal travel restrictions and protesting the slow pace of change. We are glad that the Obama Administration now allows Cuban Americans to visit their relatives much more easily and send remittances back to Cuba. But what about the rest of us?
Cuba is often so vilified by politicians and the media in the U.S. that we often forget what it actually has to offer in the way of travel, education and culture. Cuba provides tremendous free medical and other educational opportunities for people from around the world. On a cultural level, Cuban music is one of the most vibrant and innovative forms in the world. Cuba is bursting with history and culture that has been preserved in ways that many other Latin American nations have lost. Finally Cuba can give us some ecological lessons, as it is one of the more innovative and green economies in the world. This policy not only hurts Cubans everyday, it also prevents Americans from better knowing our largest Caribbean neighbor.
We all had high hopes on January 21, but those hopes are eroding. I will be traveling with Diego Iniguez-Lopez a Cuban American who voted for Obama. He said, “I expected him to rescind the excesses of the Bush policies immediately. I applaud the small steps we have seen but he hasn’t gone far enough to address the embargo and how it affects the Cuban people and our ability to travel there.” Iniguez-Lopez has traveled to Cuba legally in the past, but he, like me, decided to defy the law this year.
Pastors for Peace, another group organizing a travel challenge of Cuba, says a full removal of the blockade on Cuba is essential. “The blockade of Cuba is one of the most nonsensical aspects of U.S. foreign policy,” said Reverend Lucius Walker founder of the Harlem-based IFCO/Pastors for Peace. “Now that we have a sensible president we have reason to believe that the policies will change-- but we are not waiting for that. We, like all good Americans, are moving ahead with our people-to-people foreign policy between U.S. and Cuba.” This year marks the 20th year that Pastors for Peace have challenged the U.S. embargo by delivering humanitarian aid to Cuba.
Instead of fading away over time various American administrations have strengthened anti-Cuba policies. In 1996 the embargo was strengthened by the Helms-Burton Act, which extended its remit to foreign business. Penalties can be imposed on other countries that trade with Cuban industries linked to expropriations of former U.S. companies. “These cold war policies remain in place due to the great influence of the Cuban-exile community in South Florida,” said Bob Guild of Marazul Charters who has helped organize travel to the island for over 30 years. Indeed the Bush administration tightened the screws on Cuba and groups organizing travel to Cuba in the past few years in an effort to curry favor with the Cuban-exiles, without realizing that opposition to the embargo is growing within the Cuban American community.
President Obama isn’t it about time for your administration to take a clear-eyed objective view of U.S. Cuban relations and unilaterally end the travel ban, the embargo and finally normalize relations between the two nations? Isn’t this the change we can believe in and hope for?
Stay up to date with the latest World headlines via email
Comments are closed-
Comments are closed-
Posted by: The_Curmudgeon on Aug 3, 2009 5:03 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In fact, thousands of Americans defy the travel ban every year, flying to Habana or the resorts at Veraderro by going through Toronto, Montreal, Nassau or Mexico City - nations whose governments always have had a real world policy regarding Cuba so there are regularly scheduled flights. The Cuban government is quite accomodating, doing its best to not leave telltale signs of the tourist's visit in their passport.
Enjoy your trip. As an American who has made several trips to Cuba, I can tell you it is a beautiful island and the Cuban people are warm, friendly and inviting. It's one of the rare places on earth where Americans are welcomed with open arms.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: njoy Your Trip
Posted by: sam3
Comments are closed-
Posted by: tony_opmoc on Aug 3, 2009 6:02 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We did however meet some Americans as my wife was determined to go sky diving from 10,000 feet as did a couple of American girls (the men had more sense). The old WWII Russian aeroplane really struggled to take off, and crashed a couple of weeks after we came home.
We thought Varadero was pretty boring, because its on a peninsular cut off from the rest of Cuba, and the only locals you will encounter are those that had passed security checks and had jobs in the hotels. It's not really Cuba at all, and could be any sanitised tourist resort anywhere in the world.
Havana though was totally fascinating, and all the people we met were really welcoming. The girl who did our 8 year old daughter's hair braiding though was somewhat worried about being arrested by the police and I thought why on earth should this be illegal?
We also went to Cayo Largo which is a beautiful small Cuban island with excellent diving/snorkelling and even nudist beaches
Overall, I think Cuba has gained more than its lost by the US economic sanctions. Its largely succeeded in protecting its own culture from US corruption. It feels a very safe place to be, with very low crime rates. And the vast majority of its tourists are effectively sectioned off in their posh holiday camp / prison of Varadero, so as they don't corrupt the local culture too much.
The real way to see Cuba is to speak Spanish and travel independently.
In my view almost the entire point of travel is to meet ordinary people in their own culture.
Tony
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: We visited Cuba about 10 years ago and met lots of Canadians
Posted by: The_Curmudgeon
Comments are closed-
Posted by: howardadoughty on Aug 3, 2009 7:52 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
For years, I chalked up enduring US resistance to open diplomatic and trade relations with Cuba to atavistic Cold War paranoia, sustained by the disproportionate influence of Cuban exiles in Southern Florida and the overall utility of right-wing bluff and bluster across the nation. After all, being "anti-commie" has rarely lost an American politician votes, and not only in the environs of Miami.
The Cubans who left their homeland in the wake of Castro's revolution are, however, getting a little long in the tooth. Remember: it was half a century ago. So, what's the problem with normalizing relations with Cuba today?
The first thing to be made clear is that US antipathy to the island nation has nothing to do with communism per se. The US once denied China's very existance and now embraces the "yellow peril" as its putative partner and chief creditor. And, let's not forget, Lou Dobbs says that the place should be known as "Communist China" and he should know.
No, US intransigence about Cuba has mainly to do with American hegemony in the Western Hemisphere. It does not matter if American material interests are threatened by communist, socialist, liberal or, for that matter "traditional" or even "conservative" individuals and institutions. Ideology is irrelevant when national interests are at stake. Hence: the murder of Archbishop Romero and the rape and killing of the Maryknoll nuns (El Salvador, 1980).
At least since the US started the Spanish-American War and captured such prized real estate and Puerto Rico, the Philippines and, of course, Cuba, American business, diplomatic and military interests have insisted that American investment be protected above all and that dissent be neutralized if possible and crushed if necessary.
So, even moderately progressive and tentatively nationalistic parties and social movements have been brutally suppressed, often with overt US support and always with covert US approval. Hence: Guatemala, 1954; the Dominican Republic, 1965; Chile, 1973 and numerous other invasions, occupations, military "training" and arms aid up to and including Ronald Reagan's violation of American as well as international law in backing the infamous "Contras" in Nicaragua.
Communism? Cold War? No, nothing so ideologically pure, but something just as simple is at issue: the US has hampered democratic reform and either directly assisted or indirectly aided and abetted the suppression and even the assassination of anyone who would limit or could be suspected of wanting to curtail US domination of the region. Hence: Honduras, 2009.
What is fearsome about all of this is not so much President Obama's reluctance to enter into a constructive relationship with the last western nation to resist its forced isolation from America, but the perception of being "soft" on anyone who is headed in the "wrong direction."
Washington worries that forging constructive and mutually beneficial links with Raul Castro and his associates would embolden other "bogeymen" such as Evo Morales and the much-hated Hugo Chavez. It would, they fear, not be seen as a sign of mental recovery by the United States but as encouragement for "leftists" in Argentina, Brazil, Ecuador, Peru and so on. This would not do!
As long as this mentality prevails, I worry that the Central American "civil wars" and other instances of "unrest" are merely on hiatus, and that the US, fearing challenges to its imperial might, will be up to its old tricks as soon as it extracts itself from the mire of the Middle East ... which may be Latin America's one significant (if only temporary) saving grace.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Latin America: Civil Wars on Hiatus?
Posted by: sowles
» Sir, why don't you move to Cuba or Venezuela?
Posted by: Unrepentant Heretic
» RE: Sir, why don't you move to Cuba or Venezuela?
Posted by: Don_Algon
» RE: Sir, why don't you move to Cuba or Venezuela?
Posted by: sam3
Comments are closed-
Posted by: sowles on Aug 3, 2009 8:43 AM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: FIDELWATCHER
Posted by: cplot
» RE: FIDELWATCHER
Posted by: willymack
» RE: FIDELWATCHER
Posted by: motamanx6
» and open trade with China is ok how again?
Posted by: Bearzerker
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Garvagh on Aug 3, 2009 10:44 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Childish US policy toward Cuba needs dumping
Posted by: willymack
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Arlene on Aug 3, 2009 4:55 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I noticed the flights to Havana when I was in Merida a few years ago and my amiga told me that Americans were welcome in Cuba despite the embargo. I think the best way to end the embargo is for Americans to disregard it and force the government's hand. Courageous Afro-Americans defied Jim Crow to win civil rights.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: bettyn on Aug 3, 2009 8:01 PM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hell, we plan to go to China in the next year or two, also. What's the damned difference? At least no one's trying to stop us from going there. DUMP THIS POLICY NOW! (Also, my husband wants to smoke a REAL Monte Cristo or Cohiba before he dies.)
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: itouch backup on Aug 6, 2009 8:36 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: boay on Aug 24, 2009 6:44 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Comments are closed-
Posted by: The_Curmudgeon on Aug 3, 2009 5:03 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In fact, thousands of Americans defy the travel ban every year, flying to Habana or the resorts at Veraderro by going through Toronto, Montreal, Nassau or Mexico City - nations whose governments always have had a real world policy regarding Cuba so there are regularly scheduled flights. The Cuban government is quite accomodating, doing its best to not leave telltale signs of the tourist's visit in their passport.
Enjoy your trip. As an American who has made several trips to Cuba, I can tell you it is a beautiful island and the Cuban people are warm, friendly and inviting. It's one of the rare places on earth where Americans are welcomed with open arms.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: njoy Your Trip
Posted by: sam3
Comments are closed-
Posted by: tony_opmoc on Aug 3, 2009 6:02 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We did however meet some Americans as my wife was determined to go sky diving from 10,000 feet as did a couple of American girls (the men had more sense). The old WWII Russian aeroplane really struggled to take off, and crashed a couple of weeks after we came home.
We thought Varadero was pretty boring, because its on a peninsular cut off from the rest of Cuba, and the only locals you will encounter are those that had passed security checks and had jobs in the hotels. It's not really Cuba at all, and could be any sanitised tourist resort anywhere in the world.
Havana though was totally fascinating, and all the people we met were really welcoming. The girl who did our 8 year old daughter's hair braiding though was somewhat worried about being arrested by the police and I thought why on earth should this be illegal?
We also went to Cayo Largo which is a beautiful small Cuban island with excellent diving/snorkelling and even nudist beaches
Overall, I think Cuba has gained more than its lost by the US economic sanctions. Its largely succeeded in protecting its own culture from US corruption. It feels a very safe place to be, with very low crime rates. And the vast majority of its tourists are effectively sectioned off in their posh holiday camp / prison of Varadero, so as they don't corrupt the local culture too much.
The real way to see Cuba is to speak Spanish and travel independently.
In my view almost the entire point of travel is to meet ordinary people in their own culture.
Tony
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: We visited Cuba about 10 years ago and met lots of Canadians
Posted by: The_Curmudgeon
Comments are closed-
Posted by: howardadoughty on Aug 3, 2009 7:52 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
For years, I chalked up enduring US resistance to open diplomatic and trade relations with Cuba to atavistic Cold War paranoia, sustained by the disproportionate influence of Cuban exiles in Southern Florida and the overall utility of right-wing bluff and bluster across the nation. After all, being "anti-commie" has rarely lost an American politician votes, and not only in the environs of Miami.
The Cubans who left their homeland in the wake of Castro's revolution are, however, getting a little long in the tooth. Remember: it was half a century ago. So, what's the problem with normalizing relations with Cuba today?
The first thing to be made clear is that US antipathy to the island nation has nothing to do with communism per se. The US once denied China's very existance and now embraces the "yellow peril" as its putative partner and chief creditor. And, let's not forget, Lou Dobbs says that the place should be known as "Communist China" and he should know.
No, US intransigence about Cuba has mainly to do with American hegemony in the Western Hemisphere. It does not matter if American material interests are threatened by communist, socialist, liberal or, for that matter "traditional" or even "conservative" individuals and institutions. Ideology is irrelevant when national interests are at stake. Hence: the murder of Archbishop Romero and the rape and killing of the Maryknoll nuns (El Salvador, 1980).
At least since the US started the Spanish-American War and captured such prized real estate and Puerto Rico, the Philippines and, of course, Cuba, American business, diplomatic and military interests have insisted that American investment be protected above all and that dissent be neutralized if possible and crushed if necessary.
So, even moderately progressive and tentatively nationalistic parties and social movements have been brutally suppressed, often with overt US support and always with covert US approval. Hence: Guatemala, 1954; the Dominican Republic, 1965; Chile, 1973 and numerous other invasions, occupations, military "training" and arms aid up to and including Ronald Reagan's violation of American as well as international law in backing the infamous "Contras" in Nicaragua.
Communism? Cold War? No, nothing so ideologically pure, but something just as simple is at issue: the US has hampered democratic reform and either directly assisted or indirectly aided and abetted the suppression and even the assassination of anyone who would limit or could be suspected of wanting to curtail US domination of the region. Hence: Honduras, 2009.
What is fearsome about all of this is not so much President Obama's reluctance to enter into a constructive relationship with the last western nation to resist its forced isolation from America, but the perception of being "soft" on anyone who is headed in the "wrong direction."
Washington worries that forging constructive and mutually beneficial links with Raul Castro and his associates would embolden other "bogeymen" such as Evo Morales and the much-hated Hugo Chavez. It would, they fear, not be seen as a sign of mental recovery by the United States but as encouragement for "leftists" in Argentina, Brazil, Ecuador, Peru and so on. This would not do!
As long as this mentality prevails, I worry that the Central American "civil wars" and other instances of "unrest" are merely on hiatus, and that the US, fearing challenges to its imperial might, will be up to its old tricks as soon as it extracts itself from the mire of the Middle East ... which may be Latin America's one significant (if only temporary) saving grace.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Latin America: Civil Wars on Hiatus?
Posted by: sowles
» Sir, why don't you move to Cuba or Venezuela?
Posted by: Unrepentant Heretic
» RE: Sir, why don't you move to Cuba or Venezuela?
Posted by: Don_Algon
» RE: Sir, why don't you move to Cuba or Venezuela?
Posted by: sam3
Comments are closed-
Posted by: sowles on Aug 3, 2009 8:43 AM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: FIDELWATCHER
Posted by: cplot
» RE: FIDELWATCHER
Posted by: willymack
» RE: FIDELWATCHER
Posted by: motamanx6
» and open trade with China is ok how again?
Posted by: Bearzerker
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Garvagh on Aug 3, 2009 10:44 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Childish US policy toward Cuba needs dumping
Posted by: willymack
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Arlene on Aug 3, 2009 4:55 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I noticed the flights to Havana when I was in Merida a few years ago and my amiga told me that Americans were welcome in Cuba despite the embargo. I think the best way to end the embargo is for Americans to disregard it and force the government's hand. Courageous Afro-Americans defied Jim Crow to win civil rights.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: bettyn on Aug 3, 2009 8:01 PM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hell, we plan to go to China in the next year or two, also. What's the damned difference? At least no one's trying to stop us from going there. DUMP THIS POLICY NOW! (Also, my husband wants to smoke a REAL Monte Cristo or Cohiba before he dies.)
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: itouch backup on Aug 6, 2009 8:36 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: boay on Aug 24, 2009 6:44 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Vancouver's Games Will Be the Gayest Olympics Ever
Beer Battles: Workers in Belgium Take on Brewing Giant
White "Savior-Afflicted" Christians, Black Haitian Babies: This Won't End Well




