Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

While the U.S. Dilly Dallies on Honduras, We Continue to Support a Right-Wing Thug in Colombia

By Liliana Segura, AlterNet. Posted July 2, 2009.


Alvaro Uribe could be re-elected through just the type of referendum the ousted Manuel Zelaya has been accused of trying to carry out.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

With all eyes suddenly on Honduras over the expulsion of President Manuel Zelaya, few were paying attention when President Barack Obama quietly met with Colombian president and staunch U.S. ally Alvaro Uribe this week.

Protests over the coup in Tegucigalpa were met with spurious claims that the left-leaning "Mel" Zelaya was seeking an illegal re-election bid through a revamping of the Honduran Constitution. Meanwhile, at the White House, Uribe found himself dodging questions about re-election plans of his own.

Uribe knows something about changing a constitution to stay in office. In 2004, his powerful supporters in the Colombian Congress passed legislation to amend the 1991 constitution in order to allow the popular president to seek a second four-year term. Though controversial, the new law was upheld by the country's Supreme Court, and in 2006, Uribe won the presidential election in a landslide.

Now, Uribe is poised to do it again. While he has acted coy and evasive when asked whether he wants to extend his presidency -- a political cartoon in the weekly Semana recently showed Uribe calling a third term "inconvenient" while adding "but if the pueblo demands it, I will sacrifice myself" -- his allies in Congress have been working to pass legislation to grant him a third presidential run, through just the type of voter referendum Zelaya has been inaccurately accused of trying to carry out. The referendum would ask Colombians to vote on yet another constitutional amendment to allow presidents to run for a third term. Given Uribe's overwhelming approval rating, such a measure could turn out well for him.

It's an alarming prospect. Since Uribe's first re-election, reports have surfaced that members of Congress were bribed by his administration to vote for his re-election bid. The accusations add to a mind-boggling litany of charges against Uribe, whose government has been linked to right-wing paramilitaries for years -- and whose military continues to kill innocent civilians and then dress up their corpses as FARC guerillas.

Add to that a series of intelligence scandals -- including a wiretapping probe targeting politicians and journalists -- and one would think it might be time to distance the U.S. from the man George W. Bush liked to call "mi amigo."

Yet Obama greeted Uribe warmly at the White House this week, praising him for his "diligence and courage" and speaking optimistically about the passage of a free trade agreement -- a measure presidential-candidate Obama opposed on human rights grounds.

When a journalist asked about Uribe's potential re-election bid, Obama was diplomatic. "We know that our experience in the United States is that two terms works for us," he said, adding that he had advised Uribe that one of our "most revered" presidents, George Washington, had stepped down after two terms, despite being in a position to stay in power. But, he added, "each country, I think, has to make these decisions on their own."

For his part, Uribe assured reporters that "our democratic institutions are totally solid," at which point Obama added, to some laughter:

"… The other thing I should say is that if I were to serve two terms, I'm fairly confident that I would not have the 70 percent approval rating that President Uribe has."

With Zelaya in Washington this week, there are calls for the Obama administration to cut off aid to Honduras as a way to pressure the newly installed Roberto Micheletti to return him to power. (Currently, the State Department has requested $68.2 million in aid for fiscal year 2010 -- an increase of $25 million from this year -- for military, development and health aid.) For Honduras, the second- or third-poorest nation in the Western hemisphere, the impact would be severe.

Colombia, meanwhile, has for years been the largest recipient of U.S. aid in the region -- $6 billion, mostly thanks to the "war on drugs." While the Obama administration has spoken of scaling back military dollars in favor of development funds, Obama's meeting with Uribe this week inspired little confidence that any future aid will be contingent on a real improvement on Colombia's human rights record.

"I commended President Uribe on the progress that has been made in human rights in Colombia and dealing with the killings of labor leaders there," Obama said on Monday. In reality, a report by the International Trade Union Confederation this month shows that "Colombia remains the world's deadliest country for labor organizers, with 49 killed last year, up from 39 in 2007 but down from 78 in 2006," according to the Associated Press.

While the Obama administration is right to consider denying economic aid to the coup government in Honduras, the crimes and human rights violations in Colombia under Uribe should have sparked such action years ago.

As Uribe's allies in Bogota continue to pave the way toward a third presidential term, the Obama administration would do well to stop praising him and reconsider who, exactly, its allies should be in Latin America.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: barack obama, colombia, war on drugs, alvaro uribe, honduras, Manuel Zelaya, honduras coup

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from World! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
This comment has been removed from the site due to non-compliance with AlterNet's community policies.
I concur
Posted by: brunowe on Jul 2, 2009 2:54 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Uribe's attempt to go for a third term is a trend towards authoritarianism. The idea that one is the only political figure who is capable is making progress and effectively serving the country is antithetical to democracy, and suggests the ego of an autocrat (re Chavez).

Despite Uribe's considerable popularity, a presidential system depends on checks and balances among the branches, and his perpetuation in power would undermine that.

Fortunately, the legislation that would allow Uribe to run for a third term hasn't passed yet, pending reconciliation of the bills passed by the two legislative chambers, and Obama needs to be more proactive.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

morgan1
Posted by: morgan1 on Jul 2, 2009 5:26 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The jury is still out on how much of a hand the US had in the Honduran coup, but the WH fingerprints are all over it. As for Colombia, the US has an ally there as long as our money keeps rolling in--The Drug War is a failure and all those billions spent to end it should have been piled high and set on fire for all the good it has done. Obama beating the drum for Uribe is nothing new. He is merely another President who cares little for real democracy, social gains for people, or rule of law. I am sure if Pincochet were alive and in power, Obama would be embracing him and telling everyone what a great person and leader the man was. As for Honduras, the US will want someone in place to be an ally and not an enemy so if Zelaya cannot be reasoned with, he will be out and the US will suddenly embrace the ones trained by the US for this very thing: Overthrow, terrorism, and coup.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: morgan1 Posted by: O'do
» RE: morgan1 Posted by: Erin
Is that such a surprise?
Posted by: wagner on Jul 2, 2009 5:44 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It’s not Obama, it is traditional U.S. policy to create and to support dictators. For balance we support the left-wing thugs in China. I voted for Obama in the hope, that he would live up to his campaign promises. I do not know how to vote (if at all) next time.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

O'd
Posted by: O'do on Jul 2, 2009 6:04 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In my reply to Morgan1 I said our country does not produce leaders; we had one, Dennis Kucinich but the Democrats never caught on. Now we realize we blindly voted "family values" again, not that Dennis was lacking any. We are awash in cute, but we need real smarts over in Washington. Stay awake, America, or we will go down the drain. The time has come to fight hard, why do we just sit here?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: O'd Posted by: Sir Jim
Authoritarians are all alike
Posted by: aahpat on Jul 2, 2009 8:35 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Yet Obama greeted Uribe warmly at the White House this week, praising him for his "diligence and courage..."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Columbia, the gem of two oceans
Posted by: willymack on Jul 2, 2009 9:16 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Could there be a connection between our support of Columbian thugs and the drug trade? Naaaaaaah!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The TRADE Act is a good way to fight back
Posted by: orftc on Jul 2, 2009 9:38 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is hugely discouraging that President Obama's main allies in Latin America seem to be the right-wing governments in Colombia and Mexico.

One positive bit of news though: just last week, 108 Members of Congress cosponsored the TRADE Act, comprehensive trade reform legislation supported by a wide range labor, environmental, family farm, consumer and human rights organizations. The large number of cosponsors sends a strong message to the president that trying to move forward with the Colombia FTA would carry a real political cost.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

who cares
Posted by: progressive-life on Jul 2, 2009 11:04 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
they replaced a left wing radical along the lines of Chavez with a radical of their own liking!

Let their own people deal with it . When will America wake up and realize it's non of our business!!!!!!

You dont see them asking we dump Obama for bringing the US to the brink of financial ruin!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: who cares Posted by: JSquercia
» RE: who cares Posted by: motamanx6
the coup against Zelaya was justified
Posted by: ozonehole on Jul 2, 2009 6:45 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I don't want to pretend to be an expert on Honduras - I'm not. But this trend in Latin America (and elsewhere) for presidents changing the constitution so they can enjoy a second (and third, fourth, fifth...lifetime) term is dangerous.

Almost every Latin American country put a one-term limit (six years) on their presidents in the 1980s after suffering from brutal right-wing governments run by a general who was subsequently "elected" president-for-life.

The one-term limit is a good idea. It sucks that many of the Latin American presidents who are changing the constitutions of their respective countries to become president-for-life are left-wing. I actually supported Hugo Chavez until he decided to change the constitution.

I have the feeling that the author of this article is mainly upset when it's a right-wing president (ie Alvaro Uribe in Colombia) extending his term, but it's OK for left-wingers to do it.

The fact is, it's wrong, no matter who does it. Any president who attempts it should be tossed straight out of office and a new election should be held.

So kudos to the Hondurans. But I hope when they have their next election, it will be free and fair, and the left-wing will have a chance. By the way, Zelaya was a right-winger who suddenly decided he was a left-winger - I'm not really sure what to make of his politics. I haven't been to Honduras, and don't want to pretend to know if the current caretaker president (and let's hope he leaves office in 6 months as promised) is better or worse than Zelaya.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE:That is what We do. Posted by: Changling
Once again we see Obama following a neocon blueprint for foreign policy
Posted by: Paul_C on Jul 2, 2009 8:44 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Whatever is good for US corporations must be good for America.

That is his working philosophy in a nutshell.

If you agree with that then you will love Bush, I mean Obama!

It is true what they are saying:

Obama is, in fact, Bush!

Ebony and Ivory working together in perfect harmony...!

peace,
Paul

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Since World War II...
Posted by: buzzsaw on Jul 3, 2009 12:08 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
can anyone name a single right wing dictator that the US hasn't backed?

buzzsaw-just wondering...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Since World War II... Posted by: Changling
Latin America
Posted by: Jaffe on Jul 3, 2009 4:43 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Even as the US cannot distinguish Taliban from Al-Qaeda from non-combatant Muslim, they can't come close to sorting out what is going on in Latin America.

Who in the administration could pinpoint Honduras on a map before the recent coup?

As soon as the Obama camp catches up to Central America and what actually happened in Honduras, they will doubtless support the right-wing coup.

In the '80s Reagan reinforced tyranny in Central America; at the same time his administration had Nicaraguan Contras sell crack cocaine in the US to support Iran in its war against Iraq.

Can we expect a similar kind of moronic opportunism from Obama and his people?

Absolutely.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Zelaya was organizing a NON-binding referendum: That was legal.
Posted by: ZPaul on Jul 4, 2009 11:46 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
He originally wanted to have a binding one, but the Supreme Court overruled that as it went against the Constitution (which was written up in 1982 by outgoing members of the dictatorship and elite rich). He then said: OK, a NON-binding one then. That's when the army came in with guns. The 1982 Constitution is specifically written to protect the rich elite and to maintain power in the military, where the elite and some graduates of the School of Americas have significant representation. What Zelaya was finally going to do was legal. However, obviously, the rich elite were quite afraid of what the results would be. So what did they do? We've already seen that for ourselves. Are we going to look the other way now and remain silent? I hope not, because if we do, this problem will come back to us.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What human rights?
Posted by: thedevil666 on Jul 4, 2009 6:58 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Obama makes me angrier every day. How can he praise the human rights record of a president who is embroiled in a scandal involving the deception and later murder of homeless and poor people in the name of the war against left-wing rebels. The army would then dress them as rebels so the officers involved could receive promotions. If this happened in the U.S. there would be impeachments of every politician involved. At least, I hope this is so. I was already cynical but Obama has driven my cynicism to new heights.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This comment has been removed from the site due to non-compliance with AlterNet's community policies.
adolensent years
Posted by: ruruben on Jul 7, 2009 1:50 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
MKV to AVI ,Professionally convert your mkv files to avi format, other popular video and audio format supported

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Maniac
Posted by: mlwentworth on Jul 7, 2009 7:58 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I visited Honduras in 1983 as part of a non-governmental delegation to investigate what was going on in that country, especially in relation to the contra war against the Sandinista government. Tegucilgalpa was an armed camp - groups of miitary at every major intersection with guns including submachine guns. Unlike in Nicaragua, the people of Honduras were terrified of their police/military. People engaged in attempts to improve the lot of the poor like teaching them to read were “disappeared.” The CIA had built a major listening station there, along with building roads so that our troops could move quickly about the country and had made the harbor of their major port deeper so that it could accommodate large vessels, etc., etc. You get the picture — Honduras is a military outpost for the US. Zelayah was trying to improve the conditions of the people - building schools in villages where none existed, raising the minimum wage, providing a pension for the elderly, etc.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement