Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

The Hummer: America's Favorite Wasteful Toy Has Moved to the Land of Mao

By Jim Hightower, AlterNet. Posted June 12, 2009.


China now owns one of the West's most decadent consumer products.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

If you want to be seen as a flag-flying, macho American, you've got to have the right ride -- and nothing says swaggering hedonism and outta-my-way arrogance quite like a Hummer.

Yes, it's a high-dollar, gas-guzzling symbol of excess, but hey, that's the point! As the founder of a Hummer support group once snarled, "Those who deface a Hummer in words or deed deface the American flag and what it stands for."

Actually, I thought the flag stood for liberty and justice for all, but that's now just a quibble, because Hummer no longer flies the red, white and blue. It's turned commie! General Motors has quietly sold its Hummer division to the Sichuan Tengzhong Heavy Industrial Machinery Co., a construction and equipment conglomerate in the bicycle-pedaling People's Republic of China.

The land of Mao, who vehemently denounced the material and moral decadence of the West, now owns one of the West's most decadent consumer products. Though the Hummer's Chinese name is "Han Ma," the marketing concept for this humongous armored chunk of ostentatious testosterone remains the same. Han Ma means "fierce horse."

It's a brave new car world we now live in. GM, a remnant of its former self, is essentially owned by the U.S. government, Chrysler is coming under Italian control, and both Jaguar and Land Rover are in the hands of India's Tata Motors.

So, who's going to be King of the Highway in the good ol' USA? Maybe Geely. Gee-who? Geely Automobile, one of China's largest auto manufacturers. Along with such other Chinese giants as BYD and Chery Automobile, Geely has big designs on the American market. Never heard of them? Well, get ready to greet the ascendant star in the vehicular universe: China.

Here's a surprising fact to ponder: This year, it's projected that China will overtake Japan as the world's largest automobile producer. It already tops U.S. carmakers in sales.

As the chairman of Daimler, Germany's top auto company, bluntly acknowledged in January, "The center of gravity is moving eastward." Well, the East is also moving westward, as some of China's largest companies expect to start putting their cars into the U.S. market as early as a year from now. Also, as the Hummer purchase shows, Chinese executives have been kicking the tires of Detroit's ailing companies, shopping for bargains.

China's sudden surge to the top is no accident. While American auto honchos and economic policymakers stayed mired for years in the old business model of ever-bigger, expensive, fuel-gulping, unreliable vehicles, China's industrial and political leaders have been planning for and investing in smaller, well-built, fuel-sipping cars.

Part of its plan was to lure such foreign makers as GM into joint ventures. The foreigners, seeking the short-term gain of China's cheap labor, willingly delivered their technology and managerial know-how to the Chinese, who used both to modernize their own industry and leapfrog into mass production for both domestic and export markets. Indeed, with the Hummer purchase, China gets all the technology, a Western dealership network and a developed brand.

Meanwhile, China's real push is into cleaner-energy vehicles. While Barack Obama made a big show in May of announcing that U.S. car companies will be required to make vehicles that average 35.5 miles per gallon by 2016, the average vehicle in China already surpasses that. And, to up the ante, only one week after the president's big announcement, China said that its vehicles will average 42 miles per gallon by 2015.

In addition, China has gotten the jump on reaching the next level of fuel economy. Its BYD company (which includes American finance guru Warren Buffet as an investor) is now producing a mass-market plug-in electric car -- an advance that is well ahead of the Chevrolet Volt plug-in that GM has been developing and hopes to bring to market late next year.

Assuming, of course, that China does not buy Chevrolet before then.

To find out more about Jim Hightower, and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2009 CREATORS SYNDICATE INC.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: china, economy, auto industry, communism, financial crisis, hummer

Jim Hightower is a national radio commentator, writer, public speaker, and author of the new book, "Swim Against the Current: Even a Dead Fish Can Go With the Flow." (Wiley, March 2008) He publishes the monthly "Hightower Lowdown," co-edited by Phillip Frazer.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from World! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
The Hummer is not just a wasteful toy.
Posted by: Longdream on Jun 12, 2009 1:01 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's the armored transport vehicle used by our ground troops.

That's the chief reason we should be uncomfortable about it's manufacture in the land that brought us lead-painted cribs and poisoned dog food.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» "...armored..."? Posted by: xvictor
» RE: "...armored..."? Posted by: donl51
The Hummers we sent to Iraq weren't armored either
Posted by: bouyant on Jun 12, 2009 3:01 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
at least in the beginning. Rumsfeld lied and said we couldn't produce armored ones fast enough but the company said WTF you didn't ask, we could have.
Soon we will no longer have the capacity to produce weapons or military gear. Our enemies no longer need to fight us, they just Free Market us into submission.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

China will be owing GM as well.
Posted by: donnal on Jun 12, 2009 5:28 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
To settle the rising debt with China, Goverment Motors will also be sold to the Chinese. The one silver lining in the sale will be the unions then will be shown the door as dealerships and bond holders were.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Anyone that makes you pay for a hummer...
Posted by: ShrubtheWarcriminal on Jun 12, 2009 5:38 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...should go out of business.

The owners of Hummers have been blowing the environment and the rest of the economy for years.

I wonder how the good ol' boys will feel about now supporting the Chinese flag...probably as much feeling as they put into Amerikkka.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Ooooh, those "sinful" hummer owners.
Posted by: ABetterFuture on Jun 12, 2009 5:47 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We get it. You associate big cars with the the the...DEVIL!!!!

Now get a cause, or a clue. Our republican-begun, democrat endorsed perpetual war and the projected ten-fold increase in our debt will drown us well before we end up in hell for the cars we drive.

Speaking of which, why no comment on all the early 80's, late '70's hoopties, and the later cars with their catalytic converters ripped out that you see meandering around the city? They're by far bigger polluters than well-maintained hummers, but I guess that doesn't jive with what's really important. Silly pollution, wars, debt, and whatnot. Nope, preach on about them thar biggie cars, brutha'.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Flat heads and fat heads... Posted by: ABetterFuture
» Guess who owns a Hummer? Posted by: lupuslefou
On the one hand the Chinese name, Han Ma...
Posted by: sausage on Jun 12, 2009 6:32 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
or "Fierce Horse", is a better name than the original GM name, Hummer, a slang euphemism for fellatio, a blow job.

On the other hand, the Chinese consumer wanting this bloated piece of shit on wheels coupled with the fact that an obscure Chinese heavy-equipment manufacturer wants to buy the nameplate shows that stupid, redneckedness is not confined to the United States.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Define "Wasteful" Hightower. I can
Posted by: theBike45 on Jun 12, 2009 6:46 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why Hightower believes the Hummer is either wasteful or a toy is pretty funny considering that he has championed the cause of useless windmills/solar plants in the past and probably present as well. And rejected nuclear power as "too expensive." Well, the time has come to educate the brainless Mr Hightower about the economic fatcs of energy production. I can imagine no more wasteful means of producing same than solar and wind, two Hightoer favorites. The Chinese are currently building one new gigawatt nuclear plant every 2 months. This will continue for at least the next 21 years. It's taken California 6 years to START building their first solar thermal plant, which they also lie about - claiming it will produce 1310 megawatts. It will, as any non-California-non-airhead knows, produce less than 350 MWs. Cost? $3 billion per gigawatt (rated) according to Brightsource's CEO, an unreliable loudmouth named Woolard, who Alternet champion's as yet another Earth savior. Let's see, now. That solar thermal "gigawatt plant" will have to be built three times to actually produce the gigawatt that a $5 billion gigawatt nuclear plant can produce 24/7.
You also need complete duplication of the solar plant for backup with some reliable power. You also need to rebuilt those three solar plants three times in the next 60 years to equal the nuclear plant's lifespan. By my reckoning, that makes th cost of solar thermal
roughly $30+ billion dollars, as opposed to the $5 billion for nuclear, which can produce at a cost of 5 cents per kilowatthour. Woolard claims 15 cents, not counting the 5 cents subsidies. but that won't likely happen, certainly not when inflation boosts the costs of those future two plants and add in the costs that he is hiding for the backup power. Let's estimate 30 cents total per kilowatthour, or 6 times the cost of nuclear. And that nuclear price includes EVERYTHING - waste storage, decommissioning costs (which Brightsource thoughtfully 'forgot')and fuel. And fule costs are trivial - less than .4 cents per kilowatthour. They can double or triple and still have little effect. OK Hightower, please explain your past recommendations for that "cheap" alternative energy.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Being a known... Posted by: Pirate1
Boycott Hummers
Posted by: SackofWoe0 on Jun 12, 2009 7:05 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Of course they are preparing for war and need those Hummers. Wake up America!!!!!!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Boycott Hummers Posted by: Dak
» RE: Boycott Hummers Posted by: joeocho88
The Hummers won't last long in China. Here's why.
Posted by: maxpayne on Jun 12, 2009 7:29 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
China needs plenty of light sweet crude oil to keep spoonfeeding this sorry ass nation all its plastics built from slave labor and don't expect Obama to cancel his darling Klinton's China PNTR either. Hummers guzzle up more gas and since that would mean tightening the oil supplies even more, the Hummers will take the same fading they took here in the US but only faster because the Chinese are not as dumb as we think.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

too funny
Posted by: grkjr on Jun 12, 2009 7:46 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As most of the owners of these truck/cars are likely to be conservative/right wing/neocons... who are far from socialist supporters, let alone communist supporters... What will they do when they must send money to china.. :) will these be abandoned in the streets?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

look at reality, folks,
Posted by: shikejian on Jun 12, 2009 7:59 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
No one in China wants the Hummer. It's not selling. It's a bust. How do I know and you not? I'm here!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: look at reality, folks, Posted by: maxpayne
» RE: look at reality, folks, Posted by: mnstra
» Why do they want it? Posted by: Dixie Dawg
BA
Posted by: mnstra on Jun 12, 2009 8:10 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Very good article Jim.Yes when it comes down to dollars and cents. we are all capitalist bedfellows. What must China be thinking about acquiring this piece of shit Hummer? They want to conquer the world and will need these things to ride around in what is left of the American road system to keep order so that their Beijing elite can keep getting fatter on what is left of Americas wealth. The middle class wealth not the American elite wealth, however.
Regards.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

If China is going to make Hummers...
Posted by: beastfan on Jun 12, 2009 9:35 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
then it will be even more of a piece of crap than it was when it was made here.

Who wants to guess which part of this monstrosity will fall off onto the highway first? Axle? engine? Hammer and sickle hood ornament?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Oh The Irony of This Whole Situation
Posted by: Dak on Jun 12, 2009 11:23 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Here we have our ALL-Amurikan Hummer macho owners
not only driving junk for a high price, but now they're owned by China...CHINA!!! The antipathy of all red-blooded Amurikan MEN!!!
What joy! What amazing turn-abouts!
From now on, I would love to put a McCain/Palin sticker on the back of every Hummer I see.
What glee! ROFLMBO!
Dakotahgeo

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Screw 'em
Posted by: willymack on Jun 12, 2009 11:35 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When I was growing up, I began to see cars produced in other countries. Other than their exotic appearance, I could see that they were smaller, and therefore, lighter than the boiler-plate monstrosities made in Detroit. In 1962, I bought a brand-new Volkswagen bug with a sliding soft top. The fit and finish of this "cheap" car were so good, that when I got inside it, I had to open a window a little so that I could easily close the door. The first time I drove one, I ran up onto the sidewalk turning a corner. There was absolutely NO slop in the steering, which was something unheard of even in a Caddilac. The manual transmission was buttery-smooth, and the car was FUN to drive. While Detroit was slumbering, the Europeans and the Japaneese developed rack and pinion steering, radial tires, disc brakes, and fuel efficient engines, among other things. As was typical with Detroit, they continued to market clunkers, even though the writing was on the wall. They'd largely eliminated competition here at home by reducing literally hundreds of competing companies to the Big Three, and in their arrogance, believed they'd NEVER be challenged by the superior products finding their way from overseas.
American automakers are NOT good people, and never were. Any loyalty to them has long been squandered by their adamant refusal to improve their product to the point overseas manufactors did. Even cheap safety devices like seatbelts were fought tooth and nail by these cretins,and seatbelts didn't make an appearance until Detroit was FORCED to put them in their vehicles by the government. So much for Detroit's loving concern for its customers.
Detroit deserves neither our loyalty nor concern over their sad fate. They brought it on themselves, so screw 'em.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Screw 'em Posted by: donl51
HO HUM
Posted by: sirios on Jun 12, 2009 12:15 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When GM bought the rights to build the Hummer, they turned it into a wimpy run of the mill SUV. One of the most important distinctions between a hummer and an SUV was the incredible suspension. GM kept the facade and gutted the heavy duty mechanical parts, inflated the price and reaped substantial profits. To be blunt, GM turned it into a piece of shit. I am betting that the Chinese will further deteriorate the quality.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Most Moonbats have no Clue about GM Cannibalization Posted by: SeattlePackedSnowandCollidedCars
America, Made in China
Posted by: caprious7 on Jun 12, 2009 1:39 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I try to support American made products but what really is made in America? By selling our companies to other countries, we turn over our technology and the inner workings of our companies. I would never had bought a HUMMER, but now that the HUMMER will probably be more like a YUGO, they won't be on the roads for long.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

ABBADABBADOO
Posted by: sowles on Jun 12, 2009 1:41 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Obviously the Chinese (PLA) bought the Hummer for its military use.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: ABBADABBADOO Posted by: donl51
These are companies NOT government
Posted by: adamskiinasia on Jun 13, 2009 12:11 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why is it when it comes to China we assume because its 'Communist' then its government must be the one doing EVERYTHING ? On almost every comment people think CHINA as in the CCP or even the PLA (military) are the ones buying stock. Come on people !!

These are aggressive, forward thinking companies not unlike the Japanese (Datsun, Toyota and Honda) that arrived on American shores 40 years ago.

So stop with the network news by-lines of "The Chinese, have ...." pretty please. Its grating. I lived in China and believe me. There is nothing to fear from their government, everything to fear (if you are a sleepy do-nothing western company mired in bad management) from its very aggressive and innovative business culture. For the consumer, dont look to the west for plug-ins. It will be the push from the east to be sure.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bwahahahahahahah! The Hummer in China... I give it's popularity one road-trip to Mongolia
Posted by: DaBear on Jun 13, 2009 3:03 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If you've ever seen "Long Way Round" with Charlie Boorman and Ewan MacGregor you'd realized that the Hummer is doomed to failure with just one one trip to Mongolia (or any rural area within China for that matter).

The Hummer is so frakkin' heavy it can't pull itself out of a stream crossing or over a log. There's videos all over YouTube showing this fatal flaw (in the civie version). It's classic Amerikaaner auto industry FAIL. Good luck to the idiot Chinese who have the stoopid to buy this piece of shit.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Payback Is A...
Posted by: dumdumboy on Jun 16, 2009 7:34 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This alone almost makes-up for all of the cheap plastic goods they've unloaded onto our shores over the years.

Mebbe in the future the Chinese will complain about everything they buy having a "Made in USA" tag on it...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Hummer given away
Posted by: uncleeddie on Jun 17, 2009 3:50 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Correction the Hummer division was given away with the so called bail out of GM. Much of the money will be given to China and Brazil GM. Of course China will not be cutting their CO2 emissions - that's for the slaves in the once developed world. Don't let that bother you too though because man made global warming is a hoax designed to enslave the idiots. They know you will believe it because you believed so called free trade would benefit you. Even after all our manufacturing is gone people will still believe that craziness but they will be so worried the earth (that is cooling)is close to "the tipping point" they won't care they are third world slaves.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement