Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

The Video Shell Oil Desperately Doesn't Want You to See

By Han Shan, Huffington Post. Posted May 26, 2009.


Business as usual: Shell is trying to suppress the truth.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

For over thirteen years, multinational oil giant Royal Dutch Shell has done everything in its power to stop a trial from taking place at which the company must answer to charges that it colluded with the Nigerian military to commit serious human rights abuses to quell peaceful resistance to its operations in the Niger Delta region called Ogoni, including conspiring to bring about the conviction and execution of Ogoni leader Ken Saro-Wiwa and eight of his colleagues.

On Tuesday, there was a last-minute announcement that the trial is postponed with no new date given but it is expected to commence soon, and the plaintiffs -- Ogoni villagers and family members of people who were killed -- will finally have their day in court.

There has been a flurry of media attention as the lawyers prepare for battle in the courtroom. However, some of the most interesting events are happening behind-the-scenes in the lead up to the trial. They show that Shell continues to do everything in its power to keep the truth from coming out.

On May 12, Shell's lawyers filed a motion opposing the admission of prominent human rights attorney Paul Hoffman to serve as trial counsel for the plaintiffs.
[download PDF of the document]

As standard procedure for a trial of this kind, Hoffman had filed a "pro hac vice" application with the court. The Latin pro hac vice is a legal term meaning "for this occasion," and refers to the lawyer being granted permission to serve in a state where he or she may not hold a law license. In this case, California-based Hoffman was filing to represent the plaintiffs in federal court in New York.

In the motion by Shell's lawyers to oppose Hoffman as counsel, they explain how seriously they take it:

"Defendants' counsel have over 70 years of experience among us, and none of the three of us has ever had occasion to oppose a pro hac vice application."

So why was Shell opposing Hoffman's participation in the trial?

"However, here the website maintained by Mr. Hoffman's firm... contains an announcement that Mr. Hoffman will be one of the lead trial lawyers in this matter, along with a link to plaintiffs' "campaign video" that we have previously raised with the Court." [Emphasis added]

It goes on to conclude:

"posting of that link...is, in our view, inconsistent with counsel's obligations under the Canon 7 of the New York Lawyer's Code of Professional Responsibility, Ethical Consideration 7-33, and Disciplinary Rune 7-107."

Well, the court disagreed.

In the 'Minute Entry" of the court proceedings from May 18, the court rules against Shell's motion to deny Paul Hoffman's participation in the trial: "All pro hac vice applications are granted for the purposes of this case. The Court finds that statements made by plaintiff's counsel did not violate Rule 3.6 of New York Professional Conduct."

But then it goes on to say: "However, plaintiff's counsel must remove the video from the website."

Soon after those court proceedings, the video disappeared from the WiwavShell.org website, maintained by the Center for Constitutional Rights and EarthRights International, the two organizations who have been the plaintiffs' main co-counsel in the case.

I don't know how often or how vigorously Shell has complained about this video, but they have. And they take it so seriously that three lawyers with "over 70 years of experience" filed their first motion opposing an opposing counsel's pro hac vice application over it.

So what's the big deal? Well, you be the judge. Click on the image to watch it:

2009-05-26-movie_image.jpg

Note: I should disclose, as I did when I was on Democracy Now! recently, that I am a producer with Rikshaw Films and helped produce the video when I was working with the plaintiffs' attorneys (I no longer do).

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: human rights, corporate crime, nigeria, shell oil, world news, earthrights international, ken saro-wiwa, royal dutch shell

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from World! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
This comment has been removed from the site due to non-compliance with AlterNet's community policies.
Unless 'The View' cows are in the video, how bad can it be?
Posted by: Daito on May 27, 2009 5:30 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
These oil guys could behead a baby on TV in prime time and no one would change their driving habits. Its the world we live in for now.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Evil triumphs because we let it...
Posted by: keystone999 on May 28, 2009 2:03 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When we use petroleum (or other resources) without concerning ourselves about where it came from - we not only condone these atrocities, we become unwitting collaborators. Global corporations get away with these abuses all the time. Nigeria is only one example of the collusion that goes on between corporate interests and oppressive military dictatorships. How can we pretend to be civilized? Shouldn't a nation's natural resources be for the benefit of all its people?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Corporate Monarchies
Posted by: Tomasi on May 28, 2009 6:31 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Monarchies of old have left the governance of people to puppets and are continuing to rape the land, and accumulate wealth.

Shell = ROYAL DUTCH oil Company. where do you think the money & the power came from?

A Monarchy that transitioned out of running a country and focussed on running a financial empire.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Charge Shell with war crimes!
Posted by: theblackgeorgecarlin on May 28, 2009 9:48 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Charge Shell with war crimes! Posted by: Sister_Lauren
» running your car on hemp oil... Posted by: undrgrndgirl
It's The Corporations and Their Cartels
Posted by: FoonTheElder on May 29, 2009 6:45 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's not the commodities, it's the corrupt cartels and monopolies that control it. The same corportations and cartels are trying to monopolize any viable alternative to oil.

It's the big corporations and their corrupt partners that need to be controlled. Using less oil is not going to change anything if they are still allowed to dominate all energy areas as they control the prices and supplies.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Accomplices
Posted by: login@bugmenot.com on May 29, 2009 9:28 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's time we got off oil and gas and got our energy from wind and solar.

My next car will be an electric. I can't continue being an accomplice to atrocities committed against other human beings.

Shame on world governments and the US government for not doing anything against Shell all the while claiming hiding behind human rights abuses in justifying their imperialism to colonize foreign nations like Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Accomplices Posted by: fma7
Desperate? Don't make me laugh
Posted by: willymack on May 29, 2009 10:11 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Shell or any other oil company will treat the legitimate complaints of anyone who differs from their psychotic greed and hideous pollution as annoying insects to be swatted away by any and all means necessary. Anyone curious to know what the end result of unfettered capitalism is need look no further than the oil companies. Like what you see? Closer to home, and once upon a time, another oil company crashed a supertanker, the Exxon Valdez on the rocks in Prince William Sound, resulting in the spilling of millions of gallons of crude oil, killing fish, sea otters, aquatic birds, seals, and other wildlife in a once pristine body of water. Not only did Exxon not properly clean the mess up, but to this date has not given the people whose livleyhoods and lives they ruined not one thin dime in compensation, even though ordered by a court to do so. The original award was something like seven billion dollars, but subsequently reduced, even though that amount represents far less then Exxon's "earnings" for a quarter. The ONLY solution to such power and heartless arrogance is seizure of those companies and impoundment of all their assets. Fat chance of that happening.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement