Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Is Obama's New Afghan Commander a Violator of the Geneva Conventions?

By Tom Hayden, TheNation.com. Posted May 20, 2009.


Allegations emerge that Gen. Stanley McChrystal oversaw secret prisons that violated human rights laws.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

According to reliable intelligence sources in Washington, General Stanley McChrystal, slated to become the top American commander in Afghanistan, directed an entity known as the Terrorist Screen Center (TSC) in Iraq in 2003, which held Iraqi suspects in secret facilities in violation of the Geneva Conventions requirement that the Red Cross have access to all detainees.

The TSC existed before the Abu Ghraib prison scandal exploded in 2004, during a period when the United States, as an occupying power, fell under the Geneva obligation to provide Red Cross access.

McChrystal's appointment could be threatened if an investigation establishes his direction over the secret facilities. Under international law, delayed access for the Red Cross can be justified only due to a "military necessity," such as extreme battlefield conditions, a far different scenario from detaining and interrogating prisoners in secret locations.

McChrystal has been reprimanded by the Pentagon before. A 2007 Pentagon investigation found McChrystal responsible for falsifying a claim that blamed the 2004 death of Army Ranger Pat Tillman on "devastating enemy fire." Tillman died of friendly fire.

In addition, Bob Woodward's 2008 book The War Within describes McChrystal as responsible for running a "top secret" 2006 program of extra-judicial killings of alleged Iraqi insurgents. Nearly all of McChrystal's five-year tenure in Iraq was spent in clandestine operations.

***

Ed. Note: The following article by Gareth Porter from IPS offers background on McChrystal's troubling military career.

US choice hardly McChrystal clear
By Gareth Porter, IPS News

  WASHINGTON - The choice of Lieutenant General Stanley McChrystal to become the new United States commander in Afghanistan has been hailed by Defense Secretary Robert Gates and national news media as ushering in a new unconventional approach to counter-insurgency.

But McChrystal's background sends a very different message from the one claimed by Gates and the news media. His long specialization in counter-terrorism operations suggests an officer who is likely to have more interest in targeted killings than in the kind of politically sensitive counter-insurgency program that the Barack Obama administration has said it intends to carry out.

In announcing the extraordinary firing of General David McKiernan and the nomination of McChrystal to replace him, Gates said that the mission in Afghanistan "requires new thinking and new approaches by our military leaders" and praised McChrystal for his "unique skill set in counter-insurgency".

Media reporting on the choice of McChrystal simply echoed the Pentagon's line. The Washington Post said his selection "marks the continued ascendancy of officers who have pressed for the use of counter-insurgency tactics, in Iraq and Afghanistan, that are markedly different from the Army's traditional doctrine".

The New York Times cited unnamed "Defense Department officials" in reporting, "His success in using intelligence and firepower to track and kill insurgents, and his training in unconventional warfare that emphasizes the need to protect the population, made him the best choice for the command in Afghanistan."


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: obama, afghanistan, geneva conventions, geneva conventions, mcchrystal

Tom Hayden was a leader of the student, civil rights, peace and environmental movements of the 1960s. He served 18 years in the California legislature, where he chaired labor, higher education and natural resources committees. He is the author of ten books, including "Street Wars" (New Press, 2004). He is a professor at Occidental College, Los Angeles, and was a visiting fellow at Harvard's Institute of Politics last fall.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from World! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
As long as Likud infects
Posted by: weathered on May 20, 2009 3:50 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
the oval office, America's standing will diminish, financially, physically, emotionally and spiritually.

Its no wonder we're suffering from low self-esteem.

'show me who you walk with and I'll tell you what you are...'

Please free US from the bondage of Israel, its not a relationship, its extortion and its made America very sick.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» 'your fault' ? Posted by: weathered
Tom, don't you realize that because 9/11 was a lie, the entire WAR in Afghanistan is a crime?
Posted by: pfgetty on May 21, 2009 3:07 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Afghanistan War began because of 9/11.
They told us the perpetrators who attacked us were organized in Afghanistan, and we would have to go there and remake the country to ensure that this never happened again.

But they were NOT the perpetrators. Our own government was. 9/11 was an inside job.

Don't you know this Tom???
How could you not. The evidence is so glaring. We have PROOF that the official story is a lie. How can you not know that?

The buildings at the WTC were brought down via controlled demolition using nanothermite, which could only have been produced by the US military. It was found in the dust samples from the WTC collapse site. There is no other explanation for this nanothermite. If you don't understand the connection here, you need to study up some more, Tom, before you embarrass yourself anymore. You are a jounalist with wide fame, and yet I can see so easily what you can't.

Or maybe you are self censoring about 9/11. Why, I don't know.
But Alternet has been doing that for eight years. In all that time, never once have we seen an indepth article about the massive amount of evidence showing 9/11 to be an inside job. Not once! Instead we have had several articles used to discredit the 9/11 truth movement, or confuse the readers about the issue.

Are YOU part of the conspiracy, Tom, with Alternet, to keep this information from the public?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» What top site was that? Posted by: LeftWright
janet marsh
Posted by: kennybent on May 21, 2009 5:52 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
All you have to know about where this once wonderful and respected
country is going is to look at all the appointees that BO has foisted
upon the American people. Not one of them is known to be honest and for all of me, I cannot understand any so called president going into
the direction that he is going.

We are now a full fledged Fascist/Communist nation. How the American people cannot see this is beyond any sane person's comprehension.

Where are our "Pattons" "MacArthurs" and other fantastic generals?
They are out there, but, BO does not want anyone that will step on
his toes. When this once great country goes down for the number
ten count I can just hear every Democrat saying " Why didn't you
tell me?" Personally, I think that everyone is too lazy to look into
this terrible tragedy.

Waterboarding? My God in Heaven. Did we not put the Germans and Japanese on trial for torture that they did? So many Americans say that
torture is okay. Well, if it is okay for us to torture, It is okay for the enemy to torture my son/daughter and also your son/daughter. Tell me, when the shoe is on the other foot and one of yours is being tortured, will you
still claim that it is okay? Yeah! I bet.

Secret prisons are a thing to be very afraid of. I know that Israel has them, but, that does not mean that we should. Americans should be above such atrocities. Do you not agree?

janet



Not

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: janet marsh Posted by: Aquinas
Do Bears S___ in the Woods?
Posted by: oregoncharles on May 21, 2009 9:06 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Is the Pope Catholic?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Let's keep it simple
Posted by: willymack on May 21, 2009 9:35 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Politicians here have rendered the illegal brutalization of Iraq and Afghanistan into a hopeless mish-mash of phony justifications, tribal complexities, and apocryphal villians, while murdering and maiming innocent and helpless civilians for fun and profit. Let's simplify this a bit, shall we?
If we begin at the beginning, that would be the fraudulent 2000 "election", in which victory was illegally stolen from the REAL winner of that farce. If we can agree that the 2000 debacle WAS illegal, doesn't it follow that everything that ensued from Jan 20th, 2001 on was also illegal? In my opinion, a good case for election fraud can be made, if only our elected officials had the guts and determination to pursue it. This would greatly simplify things by focusing on this one crime, and could well put the bushies away for life, all by itself. What do YOU think?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Let's keep it simple Posted by: leafsong1
So he's a murderer
Posted by: robert.noll on May 21, 2009 9:40 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So he murdered Iraqi patriots that were defending their homes from the mongrel invaders. What else is new?
Meet the new boss...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Is Obama's New Afghan Commander a Violator of the Geneva Conventions?
Posted by: Zimbly on May 21, 2009 1:38 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Noooooooo..he wouldn't do anything like that ...would he???
However if there are "complications" I can always call upon John Yoo to help me with some "legal word work arounds".....

Meanwhile enjoy our new Darth Vader, I am sure he will be just as efficient and ruthless :)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

ANSWER: "YES"
Posted by: BlueBerry PickN on May 21, 2009 2:41 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
next question


how many FUCKING TIMES does an American have to TELL YOU they're not engaging in corruption, warcrimes & theft


BEFORE YOU GIVE UP & BELIEVE THEM so they'll just shut up trying to justify why they're 'really engaging in HOPE'


Americans:
...so dumb...
they perpetually mistake their Constitution & the Bible as the ONLY handbooks Nature had to offer our species.

while engaging in more 'pragmatic & justifiable' destruction than the Spanish Inquisition.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement