Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Shocking Scenarios: Rapid Economic Contraction May Lead to New Wars and Radicalized Politics

By Arun Gupta, Indypendent. Posted April 6, 2009.


Economic contraction could provoke: confrontation between U.S. and China or an unraveling of the European Union.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

As the global economy heads for its first annual decline since WWII and the biggest decline in trade in 80 years, more and more commentators are using the term depression to describe the vertiginous economic collapse.

The rate of the decline is astonishing. Nouriel Roubini, a.k.a. “Dr. Doom,” writes, “The scale and speed of synchronized global economic contraction is really unprecedented (at least since the Great Depression), with a free fall of GDP, income, consumption, industrial production, employment, exports, imports, residential investment and, more ominously, capital expenditures around the world.”

During the Great Depression the global economy fragmented, leading to the rise of competing power blocs. Eventually, fascist Germany and imperial Japan launched wars of conquest for new markets and lands because they lacked the territorial and trade outlets possessed by the United States, England and the Soviet Union.

This crisis is at an early stage, but the process of global fragmentation has already begun, which means a greater likelihood of interstate military conflict. With the fading of the “war on terror” as the central U.S. battleground, China will probably return as the pre-eminent peril in the minds of the U.S. economic and political elite.

Recently, a sea-going confrontation and China’s lecturing the United States over debt indicates how the powers are skirmishing over military and economic interests.

CHINA RISING

China is using the economic crisis as an opportunity by dipping into its gargantuan cash reserves to stoke demand with a two year stimulus plan of $586 billion, which amounts to 14 percent of its annual gross domestic product, versus the Obama plan, which at $797 billion is less than 6 percent of U.S. GDP.

China is focusing on improving its industrial competitiveness, but has yet to address its minimal social welfare spending, which provides greater stimulus than infrastructure spending and spurs demand by allowing the Chinese to lower their high savings rate.

The bigger problem is the Asian economic model may be finished, with exports declining 33 percent in South Korea, where exports account for 60 percent of GDP, and 46 percent in Japan. Industrial output has dropped 43 percent in Taiwan. With consumer demand and business investment collapsing worldwide, countries can no longer export their way to recovery (a policy known as export-oriented industrialization).

These export drops are showing up in China, where imports have declined significantly. It plays a critical intermediary role in the global economy. Walden Bello describes China’s economy as the “overwhelming driver of export growth in Taiwan and the Philippines and the majority buyer of products from Japan, South Korea, Malaysia and Australia.”

Even if China can spur domestic demand,  it’s not a long-term solution. Production can’t survive on internal demand alone, and prioritizing domestic manufacturing over foreign trade inevitably devolves into “beggar-thy-neighbor” economic warfare.

EUROPE’S SWAN SONG?

This is precisely what’s happening in the 27-member European Union, where “peripheral states such as Latvia, Bulgaria and even Ireland have been brutally whipsawed from an era of heady growth to shockingly fast decline,” according to the Wall Street Journal.

The crisis threatens to unravel the post-Cold War economic order in which the West administered “shock therapy” to former Soviet Bloc countries by restructuring them along neoliberal lines. Twenty years ago, Soviet Bloc populations largely accepted the shock therapy with passivity, disoriented by the rapid collapse of Communism.

Peter Gowan, author of The Global Gamble, argues that the Western-imposed shock therapy in the early 1990s bankrupted and privatized East Europe’s industrial enterprises and dismantled the region’s integrated economy, known as Comecon. This paved the way for unsustainable bubbles in housing and construction, foreign credit and capital flows, low-wage manufacturing and remittances.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: trade, economic crisis

Arun Gupta is a founding editor of The Indypendent newspaper. He is writing a book on the decline of American Empire for Haymarket Books.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from World! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
One currency/One goverment
Posted by: weathered on Apr 6, 2009 12:55 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
free US from AIPAC its extortion.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Sorry, this comment has been removed from the system.
» RE: No name-calling, yellow. Posted by: AngryWhiteFemale
» RE: No name-calling, yellow. Posted by: johnwinthrop
» RE: No name-calling, yellow. Posted by: crazy carlos
I don't care what happens
Posted by: Perry Logan on Apr 7, 2009 2:50 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
just as long as the bankers are OK.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» OBAMA is a SLAVE Posted by: lorado
So basicly...
Posted by: Captainmagic on Apr 7, 2009 5:22 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Most countries if not all are endeavoring to trade their way out of difficulties they share and amerika is exporting ..... what....oh that's right. When the chips are down they export bombs and terror...hang on a minute . No that's not quite right is it. Since when have they needed for the chips to be down to bomb and butcher.....

Sorry gang but the runs are well and truly documented and are on the board. So with a bit of luck with the global warming, all it's garbage should float back and build up on it's shores....well, Oh, OK so that's already happening.


just how it is..is all!

Over to you Tom

Captain OUT

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Optimism?
Posted by: Cew on Apr 7, 2009 8:01 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The future is often not as predictable as historians, economists, scientists, and even alternet journalists expect. For ecample, it seems that nobody saw this economic crisis coming, or if they did, they were for some reason unable to give people a heads up.

That being said, I think it would be wise if we could give the predictions game a rest and begin to use our minds to solve problems. None of us are helplessly observing the world unfold; all of us are responsible for making the future.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Optimism? Posted by: VZEQICVA
» RE: Optimism? Posted by: bhopkins13
The Bolshies had their shot
Posted by: johnwinthrop on Apr 7, 2009 4:45 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's not 1917. It might be 1933, when the hyper inflation unleashed by the Obama Summers Cabal and its cohorts in London hits the world commodities markets, including oil.

Aren't you sorry you didn't go hunting with your dad?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Back on the hamster wheel
Posted by: westomoon on Apr 8, 2009 6:34 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
... the International Monetary Fund (IMF) is planning to double its $250 billion fund “to fight the financial crisis in emerging markets,” according to the Financial Times. ... [snip} ... international institutions like the IMF that enforce neoliberal policies are implementing a new phase of structural adjustment programs that will make weaker economies pay for the excesses of Western capital.

And President Obama has just pledged another $1 trillion in US public funds to give to the IMF to prop up developing countries. "Weaker economies" will certainly be bled in the long run, but for now, it sounds like it's the American taxpayer who's being expected to pay for the "excesses of Western capital".

So... the American consumer, whose individual deficit spending fueled the global boom economy until we staggered and fell under the load, will now be replaced by the American taxpayer, who will pay for the collective US debt that will restore the "globalized"neoliberal world economy to health. And then in the long run, we taxpayers will also be bled to pay yet a third time for the excesses that beggared us personally in the first place, and collectively in the second -- while a handful of people keep and add to the wealth they've amassed by engineering those "excesses of Western capital". Sure, that makes sense.

Since our ultra-wealthy pay only token taxes, sounds like it's you and me who are being expected to jump back onto the hamster wheel and power the economy that has so enriched so few all over the world. O brave new world.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Oh, BS! Posted by: westomoon
BTW the Soviet Union didn't fall it was pushed, GDP was 3.2% in 1991-2 it was stil growing
Posted by: RR#1 on Apr 9, 2009 7:46 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
so how that could indicate an economic failure I do not know. It was a capitalist counter-revolution-sold out by the envious apparatichiks who wanted the same sort of luxurious life-stlye as their western counterparts. We now know how they managed that! And the people did not want capitalism, they wanted a Swedish style socialism. Only the spoiled brats children of the party members pushed the freaking state over with alot of outside help aI might add. Aren't we all proud of Ronnie Rayguns now?
I mourned the loss of that state. Literally.
Yours Ironically,
RR

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Hey U folks have had lot's of victories, they just don't make the news
Posted by: RR#1 on Apr 9, 2009 8:01 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Republican Windows and Doors was the most recent on the day Blagovich got arrested ( timely eh) I think, how about your janitors that managed to unionize out in California? How many people know of other examples where strikers or union organizers won the battle of the day ( Seattle was magnificent). I think a roll-call is needed so that people can see actual examples where capital didn't get it's ungodly way for a change. Even the tax on the bonuses was a victory of sorts from your own bourgeois parliament legislature whatever you call it.
Cheer UP! History really is on our side!
Cheers,
RR

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement