WORLD  
comments_imageCOMMENTS: 52

Obama's Blackwater? Chicago Mercenary Firm Gets Millions for Private "Security" in Israel and Iraq

Federal records obtained by AlterNet reveal a multi-million dollar contract for a private U.S. paramilitary force operating out of Jerusalem.
April 2, 2009  |  
 
 
LIKE THIS ARTICLE ?
Join our mailing list:

Sign up to stay up to date on the latest World headlines via email.

 
 
Advertisement
 

On the campaign trail, Barack Obama's advisers said he "can't rule out [and] won't rule out" using mercenary forces, like Blackwater. Now, it appears that the Obama administration has decided on its hired guns of choice: Triple Canopy, a Chicago company now based in Virginia. It may not have Blackwater's thuggish reputation, but Triple Canopy has its own bloody history in Iraq and a record of hiring mercenaries from countries with atrocious human rights records. What's more, Obama is not just using the company in Iraq, but also as a U.S.-government funded private security force in Israel/Palestine, operating out of Jerusalem.

Beginning May 7th, Triple Canopy will officially take over Xe/Blackwater's mega-contract with the U.S. State Department for guarding occupation officials in Iraq. It's sure to be a lucrative deal: Obama's Iraq plan will inevitably rely on an increased use of private contractors, including an army of mercenaries to protect his surge of diplomats operating out of the monstrous U.S. embassy in Baghdad.

The Iraq contract may come as no surprise. But according to federal contract records obtained by AlterNet, the Obama administration has also paid Triple Canopy millions of dollars to provide "security services" in Israel. In February and March, the Obama administration awarded a "delivery order" to Triple Canopy worth $5.5 million under State Department contract SAQMPD05F5528, which is labeled "PROTECTIVE SERVICES--ISRAEL." According to one government document, the contract is scheduled to run until September 2012. (Another document says September 2009.) The contract is classified as "SECURITY GUARDS AND PATROL SERVICES" in Israel. The total value of the contract was listed at $41,556,969.72. According to a January 2009 State Department document obtained by AlterNet labeled "Sensitive But Unclassified," the Triple Canopy contract is based out of Jerusalem.

According to federal records, the original arrangement with Triple Canopy in Israel appears to date back to at least September 2005 and has been renewed every year since. The company is operating under the State Department's Worldwide Personal Protection Program (WPPS), which provides for private security/military companies to operate on the U.S. government payroll in countries such as Afghanistan, Bosnia, Iraq, and Israel. Triple Canopy, according to an internal State Department report, also worked under the program in Haiti, though that task order is now listed as "closed." In State Department documents the WPPS program is described as a government initiative to protect U.S. officials as well as "certain foreign government high level officials whenever the need arises." The State Department spent some $2 billion on the WPPS program from 2005-2008.

Triple Canopy's Growing Footprint in Iraq

Triple Canopy is hardly new to the Iraq occupation. Founded in Chicago in 2003 by "U.S. Army Special Forces veterans," the company won its first Iraq contract in 2004. In 2005, with its business expanding, Triple Canopy relocated its corporate headquarters from Obama's home state to Herndon, Virginia, placing it much closer to the center of U.S. war contracting. (On several U.S. government contracts, however, including the Israel security contracts, its Lincolnshire, Illinois address is still used.) 

Along with Blackwater and DynCorp, Triple Canopy has had armed operatives deployed in Iraq on a major U.S. government contract since the early stages of the occupation. At one point during this arrangement, Blackwater was responsible for Baghdad (the largest share of the work), DynCorp covered northern Iraq and Triple Canopy southern Iraq. Triple Canopy also worked for KBR and other corporations. As of 2007, Triple Canopy had about 2,000 operatives in Iraq, but only 257 on the State Department contract. However, its new contract, which takes effect May 7, will greatly expand Triple Canopy's government presence in Iraq. (Meanwhile, Blackwater is scheduled to continue to work in Iraq under Obama through its aviation division and in Afghanistan, where it has security and counter-narcotics contracts. It also holds millions of dollars in other U.S. government contracts around the world and in the U.S. In February alone, the Obama administration paid Blackwater nearly $70 million in security contracts.) The Obama administration may have traded Blackwater for Triple Canopy in Iraq, but it is likely that some of Blackwater's operatives, too, will simply jump over to Triple Canopy to keep working as armed security guards for occupation officials.


Jeremy Scahill, an independent journalist who reports frequently for the national radio and TV program Democracy Now!, has spent extensive time reporting from Iraq and Yugoslavia. He is currently a Puffin Writing Fellow at The Nation Institute. Scahill is the author of Blackwater: The Rise of the World's Most Powerful Mercenary Army.
Email
Print
Share
Post on reddit
Post on stumbleupon
Post on facebook
Post on digg
Post on twitter
Post on delicious
LIKED THIS ARTICLE? JOIN OUR EMAIL LIST
Stay up to date with the latest World headlines via email


Comments are closed-

Betrayed Again
Posted by: BobBrrz on Apr 2, 2009 2:53 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why am I not surprised by this? The Democratic Party has consistently betrayed its own principles, and their constituents who believed in them, over and over again. Are we addicted to this gang of thieving murderers, like an abused spouse is addicted to the abuser? The Democrats offer nothing but a polite face on the same depredations and crimes of the Republicans. Vote for any party other that either of them.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Re: Betrayed Again - SPOT ON. Posted by: JenniferBedingfield
» RE: Betrayed Again Posted by: Urgelt
» no, bob... Posted by: undrgrndgirl
» RE: no, bob... Posted by: Endrael
» RE: Betrayed Again Posted by: luzmejor

Comments are closed-

Well, Barry kept his promises when he played KISSYFACE with AIPAC and Blackwater.
Posted by: JenniferBedingfield on Apr 2, 2009 3:25 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There is nothing to be surprised about in the way he's deceiving the public by pouring more amoral mercenaries into Iraq and Afghanistan even as he shifts troops from Iraq to Afghanistan and even Pakistan. Barry and his party are just as out of touch as the Republicans which is why I couldn't trust either of them myself. In fact, both parties made no bones about it and yet were rewarded for it while the others were unfairly punished.

And as Chicago politics is utterly corrupt making even St Louis look "clean" in pale comparison, what's more to expect? With the kind of neolibs and neocons the Chicago political machine has produced, I say the people of Chicago need to wake up and push for major reforms. The city and its surrounding suburbs are increasing in poverty and corruption as it is.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Having lived in Illinois Posted by: NYmediator

Comments are closed-

I too think the same of the democratic
Posted by: drfun on Apr 2, 2009 3:25 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"leadership" representing their citizen constituents and for many a year have voted 3rd party, which doesn't include Nader.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

BBC Documentary: The War Party ... Zionism, the Unspoken factor in Iraq War
Posted by: ExposeTheIsraelLobby on Apr 2, 2009 4:16 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Watch the BBC documentary "The War Party", part 1 of 5
youtube.com/watch?v=8vWZTTrceV8

Journalist Jim Lobe appears in the doc above, listen to his Antiwar.com Radio interviews here:
ScottHortonShow.com Archives - Jim Lobe (2003-09)

Listen to Philip Weiss discuss the War for Israel agenda:
antiwar.com/radio/2008/07/12/philip-weiss/
antiwar.com/radio/2009/03/18/philip-weiss-2/

philipweiss.org - blogging daily everything Neocon, Israel Lobby, Zionism

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Told you so
Posted by: Erin on Apr 2, 2009 4:38 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have been trying to warn the robot masses since before the election that Obama is just another shill for the 'powers that be'. I tried to reason with people that he is not who he says he is,but they bought all the lies he preached from his pulpit, and have mindlessly followed him. His actions speak volumes as to what his agenda really is. When you cast aside as not relavant, third party candidates who are not part of the "in crowd" you cut off your noses to spite your faces. After you all see what 4 years of lies, broken promises, and more mercenaries given free rein to kill, rape, and pillage in the name of the U.S. brings, maybe you all will finally join us in electing a third party candidate who you really can "believe in".

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Told you so Posted by: Benn_Miller
» WE'RE GETTING A SMOOTH TONGUE LICKIN' Posted by: americansheep
» mercenaries are people too Posted by: SeattlePackedSnowandCollidedCars

Comments are closed-

Private Military
Posted by: Tom Degan on Apr 2, 2009 4:47 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
America really needs to get out of the business of the raising of private armies. Think about it for a minute or two! Where in the constitution does it say that a private citizen can raise an army that could go off and shoot to kill anyone deemed unfit to live by whomever? In the Second Amendment to the Constitution (the one that the right wingers love to quote out of context) it talks about a "well regulated state militia". It is obvious that firms like Blackwater et.al. are barely regulated if at all.

It's only a matter of time that these private, un-Constitutional group of Brown Shirts take their act to your town. Remember, Hitler's Brown Shirts were not a military organization sanctioned by the government. They were a privately organized "Security Firm".

Something to think about, huh?

Lethal Nation

Tom Degan
Goshen, NY

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Private Military Posted by: Erin

Comments are closed-

syed salamah ali mahdi
Posted by: salamah on Apr 2, 2009 5:32 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You see, the problem with the American Empire is that it still remains a 'hybrid' empire with a 'Triumvirate' (Presidency, Congress/ the 'people and Judiciary) instead of a single Emperor, the President. Aspirants like Nixon and George W did try but fell short, each due to his 'pre-qualification' and both times because of the facts on the ground. For example, Nixon did not really have to hide the 'dirty' works either because he had not 'fathered' the dirty works or because the US Economy was sufficiently strong to pay openly for the dirty works being conducted abroad without the 'people' batting an eyelid because they were happy with the state of the US Economy. By the time of his re-election bid things started turning sour. He lost his bid for Imperial Presidency for resasons which do not require listing here. At the time Dubya filed his claim for an Imperial Presidency by arranging or making good use of 9/11, the US Economy inherited by him looked like a polished apple. He did not therefore, bother to check the apple from the inside or was prevented from doing so by the likes of (wilting) Dick Cheney, Dumsfeld, (roguish) Rove and other Zio-Neo imperialist nobility surrounding him/his 'familia'. At the sound of the first uproar by some amongst the 'people' against his usurped unlimited power to SPEND the 'people's' money as he wished, the said 'nobility' advised him to hide his 'squandering' within the allocations for Pentagon and CIA, which would not be easily obvious and hence, easier to justify than ever increasing payrolls for cannon fodder GI's and jumping costs for military hardware purchases in 'failing wars' in Afghanistan and Iraq. Then Dumsfeld and Zio-Wolfowitz came in with their Blackwater and Dyna Corp solutions. The rest is history! Now enter Obama! I believe he does want to do away with the Triumvorate but at the same time he does not want to abandon Empire. This may be the reason for what is being seen as his recurring policy vacillations. Mind you, it's neither easy nor comfortable to run an Empire through a Triumvirate. Two out of three have to give in, like what the Roman Triumvirate did with Augustus Caesar. And, this is not going to happen in the US any time soon. In my opinion Americans can wait for at least 3 decades before another aspirant for President Emperor shows up. Till then, Blackwater and their likes will continue to exist within Pentagon and CIA.
Finally my comment on the "Israeli Connection" is that it is the strangest Scratch-my-back-I-shall-scratch-yours type of connection. With Israel it is, Scratch-my-back-and-I-will pay-you-I-will-scratch-your-back-and-again-I-will-pay-you. The one getting paid both ways is Israel! Long live the Israeli Government of the United States. Yes, the one which is also misnomered as the Government of the United States of America.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Don't click the link . . .
Posted by: dustdevil on Apr 2, 2009 6:19 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
GuitarBill must be asleep at the wheel this morning. Computer geek would tell you this is an identity theft link.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

The real reasons this is happening is a great deal of our economy is tied to it.
Posted by: Benn_Miller on Apr 2, 2009 5:43 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I work for a company that's DoD related because out here in Shreveport, there's not a whole lot of other jobs that can relate to my skills set. Being a tech lead specialist, I can only expect to be rewarded by working in DoD while most other local businesses are unable to offer a well paying job. Don't get me wrong. The system does stink and while I've got a lot of benefits from all this, I too wouldn't mind giving EFCA and single payer a chance so that we all can catch up and heal some of the inequalities. What does this have to do with war contractors? Plenty. Send more war contractors into Iraq and the rest of us working with relation to DoD can get more projects and keep our jobs. I know this stinks but perhaps Obama's plans to put green jobs may help cut into this and just maybe we'll stop sending war contractors into Iraq as soon as folks such as myself can get a green job that rewards me for my IT and management skills.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Rahm I. Emanuel gets a woody
Posted by: weathered on Apr 2, 2009 6:09 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If its sneaky, snotty, selfish, remarkably arrogant and terribly deceitful, its Israel:Earth's little shop of horrors.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

IF You think this is a problem, then
Posted by: madmax427 on Apr 2, 2009 6:45 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I invite You to read two emails I posted on My website on April 1, 2009! The first one states the FACTS of Our problem clearly, consicely & quickly!

http://www.whatsyourlifeworth2.info

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

THE PERMANENT STATE OF WAR
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Apr 2, 2009 6:53 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The use of private "fighting armies" is the alternative to drafting young people and maintaining a bigger military than we have. It prevents indiscriminate use of troops in places like Iraq. If we had a draft, Iraq would never have happened. The case for invading Iraq could't be made. Bush went ahead with no regard for laws or the human cost to his folly. Paying private warriors avoids the messy need for congressional approval, not to mention the people. Just pay these people to do what they do best. The reasons are unimportant. I find it immoral. If a war is justified the poplulation will fight to defend their country. The private contractors will take the risk because the reward is great. They don't get bogged down with the minutia of annoying details like, "Why are we going there"?. War is immoral to begin with, but this strategy takes it several notches lower. I'm not sure what that's called. Thanks, ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Our Government Sucks
Posted by: nismx on Apr 2, 2009 6:55 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Let us review: First they allow corporations to poison us with chemicals for profit that they know cause cancer. They promote putting toxic industrial waste in our water supply "fluorosilicic acid" which is two-fold as it causes all kinds of health problems Plus factories can sell the waste instead of paying for it to be disposed of. They mandate vaccinations for our babies which destroys their immune system and causes all kinds of profitable health problems. The first shot is given within hours of delivery for a total of 22 before the first grade. They crash planes into buildings for the purpose of going to war for more profit. They steal money from us and make laws to make it legal. They fund and cause Wars all over the world, this also is two fold as they profit and reduce population at the same time. The so called "WAR ON TERROR" is a complete SCAM perfect for our Gov. as they have an excuse in invade countries and steal their oil and drugs. MORE PROFIT. Does anyone have any ideas to take back our country from these lying, stealing, cheating, murdering, raping, baby killing Demons from Hell that run the United States of America?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Obama has always been Pro-War, Pro-Empire
Posted by: chlamor on Apr 2, 2009 7:11 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There’s the matter of his actual policy and political record. If Obama is such (as many “progressives” seem to need to believe) an “antiwar” candidate, why has he offered so much substantive policy support to the criminal occupation and the broader imperial “war on terror” of which Bush says O.I.F. is a part? Here are some highlights from a summary of Obama’s U.S. Senate voting record:

“1/26/05: Obama voted to confirm Condoleezza Rice for Secretary of State. Rice was largely responsible…for the deaths of hundreds of thousands of innocent victims in unnecessary wars.

“2/01/05: Obama was part of a unanimous consent agreement not to filibuster the nomination of lawless torturer Alberto Gonzales as chief law enforcement officer of the United States (U.S. Attorney General).”

“2/15/05: Obama voted to confirm Michael Chertoff, a proponent of water-board torture... man behind the round-up of thousands of people of Middle-Eastern descent following 9/11. By Roll call 10.”

“4/21/05: Obama voted to make John ‘Death Squad’ Negroponte the National Intelligence Director. In Central America, John Negroponte was connected to death squads that murdered nuns and children in sizable quantities.

“4/21/05: Obama voted for HR 1268, war appropriations in the amount of approximately $81 billion. Much of this funding went to Blackwater USA and Halliburton and disappeared.

“10/07/05: Obama voted for HR2863, which appropriated $50 billion in new money for war.

“11/15/05: Obama voted for continued war, again. Roll call 326 was the vote on the Defense Authorization Act (S1042) which kept the war and war profiteering alive, restricted the right of habeas corpus and encouraged terrorism.

“12/21/05: Obama confirmed his support for war by voting for the Conference Report on the Defense Appropriations Act (HR 2863), Roll call 366, which provided more funding to Halliburton and Blackwater. ”

“5/2/06: Obama voted for money for more war by voting for cloture on HR 4939, the emergency funding to Halliburton, Blackwater and other war profiteers.

“5/4/06: Obama, again, voted to adopt HR4939: emergency funding to war profiteers.

“6/13/06: Obama voted to commend the armed services for a bombing that killed innocent people and children and reportedly resulted in the death of Abu Musab al-Zarqawi…

“6/15/06: Obama voted for the conference report on HR4939, a bill that gave warmongers more money to continue the killing and massacre of innocent people in Iraq.

“6/15/06: Obama, again, opposed withdrawal of the troops, by voting to table a motion to table a proposed amendment would have required the withdrawal of US. Armed Forces from Iraq and would have urged the convening of an Iraq summit.

“6/22/06: Obama voted against withdrawing the troops by opposing the Kerry Amendment (S. Amdt 4442 to S 2766) to the National Defense Authorization Act.

“6/22/06: Obama voted for cloture (the last effective chance to stop) on the National Defense Authorization Act (S 2766), which provided massive amounts of funding to defense contractors.

“6/22/06: Obama again voted for continued war by voting to pass the National Defense Authorization Act (S 2766) for continued war funding.

“9/29/06: Obama voted vote for the conference report on more funding for war, HR 5631.

“11/16/06: Obama voted for nuclear proliferation in voting to pass HR 5682, a bill to exempt the United States-India Nuclear Proliferation Act from requirements of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954.

“12/06/06: Obama voted to confirm pro-war Robert M. Gates to be Secretary of Defense. Gates is a supporter of Bush's policies of pre-emptive war and conquest of foreign countries.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

And the beat goes on
Posted by: willymack on Apr 2, 2009 8:03 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
President Obama is running out of good will and time in his bid to convince the American people that "change we can believe in" is still on track, and that his administration actually CARES about us. We're STILL pouring 10 billion a month into Iraq & Afghanistan with NO end in sight. Nothing meaningful is happening with health care. Crooks are still being rewarded for their evil deeds, ON OUR DIME, and the bushies aren't being investigated, let alone prosecuted. If Obama is biding his time, waiting for the perfect moment to regain our (apparently misplaced) faith in him, it certainly isn't visible from here.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Did they bid?
Posted by: Edansmommy on Apr 2, 2009 9:03 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Was this a no-bid contract, or were there other bidders?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

As pentagon contracts rise, investigations for fraud decline
Posted by: Defenestrator on Apr 2, 2009 9:04 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
New report from the Center For Public Integrity

“No one is minding the store,” said William G. Dupree, a former director of the Defense Criminal Investigative Service (DCIS), which investigates contracting fraud. “Someone needs to address that.”

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Obama's Blackwater? That's a lie!!
Posted by: jbowen43 on Apr 2, 2009 9:11 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Based on the FACTS of this story using the title "Obama's Blackwater?" is about as truthful as blaming President Obama for the current economic crisis or the Bush Wars.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

old news if you know your history
Posted by: we_need_Abe on Apr 2, 2009 9:54 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The use of hired guns to fight wars has been used throughout history by governments as a way to avoid needing the buy-in of the general population and by the private sector to attain a legal disconnect. For-hire Hessian soldiers were even used in the US revolutionary war. The British laugh at how the US makes a big deal about Blackwater, Triple Canopy, DynCorp etc. Private security firms and the use of outside militias (e.g., Ghurkas) have been used by them for at almost 300 years. There is one small difference between them and us. The Brits tend to go in low key and utilize locals rather than with a brigade of testosterone filled, tatooed yahoos from Delta force, SEALs and Special Forces (my apologies to those of you who actually have a brain and use it). The Brits admire the "salesmenship" of the Americans like Blackwater's Eric Prince but they do not agree with his methods.

With all that being said, the ONLY way that the future may differ from the past is for more of the masses to get informed, and to speak up. Passivity will only allow for the status quo to continue. Speak up or sit down and shut up.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

AFTERTHOUGHT:
Posted by: Tom Degan on Apr 2, 2009 10:10 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hey there, crime stoppers!

When you're done reading all of the great articles and comments on today's edition of AlterNet, have a look at the piece I wrote a year and a half ago on this very subject. Here's a link:

Bush and Cheney's Private Gestapo

Cheers!

Tom Degan

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

WRONG LINK ABOVE> HERE 'TIS:
Posted by: Tom Degan on Apr 2, 2009 10:15 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]

Comments are closed-

Et Tu Obama, Et Tu..?
Posted by: TJColatrella on Apr 2, 2009 10:46 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why remain in our military if you're highly trained when you can make double the money or more working for one of these private armies..?

Doesn't President Obama realize he is spending tax payer money to under mine our nations Military..?

Xe this group others are bleeding off many of our best trained most talented experienced troops..and we are paying often 4x's more for the service we would otherwise have for much less and with greater adherence to our military's great traditions...

Rome only became a great empire after it abandoned privately raised armies and had a professional army now we are going backwards privatizing our nations army so that wars conflict and security cost our Treasury even more..

"Et Tu" Barack..."Et Tu.."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Making conflict profitable is a sure way to get more conflict
Posted by: Garvagh on Apr 2, 2009 11:02 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How many private contractors are in Afghanistan these days? Is it 71,000? Billions upon billions of US taxpayer dollars are being pumped into the bank accounts of favored insiders, who naturally do not want the money bonanza to end. Why have Iran and Russia deal with Afghanistan, when there are billions to be made by US contractors if the US takes the lead, and keeps it, even though this obviously is not in the national interests of the US.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Glad to see everyone woke up about Lord O
Posted by: xbj on Apr 2, 2009 11:21 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Far too little, too late. We told you so.

Enjoy your new-found and richly-deserved disillusionment and apathy.

While this jerk grins at you like the clueless duped idiots you were.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Hold you Representatives Accountable
Posted by: wormfarmer on Apr 2, 2009 11:27 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As I watched with interest the state of our economy and status throughout the world,
my impression of Barak Obama was one of hope, change, hopefully a little independence of
thought and deed. I was ready to extend time and patience for the transition of President. This is not working, as I concluded with the team of economic advisers, Summers, Giethner, Volker,
keeping,but shuffelling, the same military advisers, Gates, Patraeous, etc......., maintaining the same aggressive stance in the middle east, giving the future of succeeding generations to thieves and con men, letting corporations have their way with our society.I have not seen any hope or change from this administration, just the same corporate controlled domination of the populace,
keeping control of the masses.
Now we are moving our military presence into Afghanistan, soon Pakistan, I was
hoping to see something other than an embracing of the status quo, but then I remembered that
our country elected a corporate candidate. I would hope that by this time the population would have awakened to the corporate shenanegans that have been so redundant throughout this
country's history, but then I thought about the collective attention span of America.
The time is ripe for us to stop the political complicit behavior, to adopt the Ralph Nader suggestion of a 1/10 of one percent tax on all stock transactions, to stop the sacrificing of this country's future to the perpetraitors of economic collapse.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

What's behind Schaill's Obama hatred?
Posted by: Hoosier84 on Apr 2, 2009 12:07 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Typical Scahillian attack on Barack Obama: Pointless, baseless and breathless.

-Doug Brooks

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

How do you fix it
Posted by: zbeckerd on Apr 2, 2009 12:12 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Currently the Obama Administration has decided to continue to use contractors to protect US civilian government functions.
This is always a dangerous proposition.

The problem with this and other past contracting is that you have multiple units operating independently of each other with no central command and control. I would refuse to operate in a world where there are independent operators with guns.
What TO DO???
A new model for contractor operations in a military theater. Military adoption of a ICS like theater of operations.

The US land management agencies and specifically fire suppression adopted the California Incident Command System (1984). Since that time it has been expanded for mandatory use by the entire US government emergency management.... Why because it works.

Under the ICS system there would only be one Commander in a area of operations. There would be a daily plan for all operations in the area. All units in the area would be briefed on the plan for that operational period. Everyone would have common communications. Under ICS the command of this operation would be a government employee (General). Any positions below that level can be persons who are qualified to do the work. Generally these people are active and retired government employees. The retired personnel are hired under a separate authority, but the essential fact is that while working they are Government employees.

Lower level functions such as firefighters (soldiers) are routinely contracted to work with government firefighters. They usually come with there own command (sqaud boss = sergeant? crew boss = Lieutenant?)

Higher level command is usually hired from a government entity, although less risky/smaller operations (type 3) can be fully contracted. Still they remain under government supervision at all times.

Leadership can and should include all of the Homeland Security paramilitray operations. This is a ideal method for these folds to get operational experience and for the military to have another source of available leader. It is important in this model to have everyone working in one organization with one command.

So bring back your retired seals, rangers, swat and policeman. Hire them as temporary government employees or contacted workers. But command must remain with a Incident Commander (General) and other leadership that is done by a public servant.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Blackwater...
Posted by: adp3d on Apr 2, 2009 9:18 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...was in New Orleans following Katrina "disarming" the citizens.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

And our mercenaries already in Afghanistan...
Posted by: wewokaokie on Apr 3, 2009 8:58 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Heard Scahill on this week's Democracy Now! mention they're there -- in some aerial capacity.
How many I don't know.
But add that figure -- when you find out -- to our 40,000 troops already there, the 'surge' and 'trainers' (another 31,000) plus the Pentagon's recent request for another 10,000.
Let's make sure we use the e-word in discussing -
or protesting -- this ESCALATION.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Anyone "surprised" by this, wasnt paying attteniton during teh campaign
Posted by: KDelphi5950 on Apr 3, 2009 11:23 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Maybe you were too busy chanting, "yes we can!";

tell me--whats the diff in drowning out those who disagree with "
U.S. A." vs. "yes we can"?!

It was infuriating to true liberals who had to watch.

Insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting a differetn result. Dems/GOP---Tweedledumb and Tweedledumbass

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Alternet Comments:

Comments are closed-

Betrayed Again
Posted by: BobBrrz on Apr 2, 2009 2:53 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why am I not surprised by this? The Democratic Party has consistently betrayed its own principles, and their constituents who believed in them, over and over again. Are we addicted to this gang of thieving murderers, like an abused spouse is addicted to the abuser? The Democrats offer nothing but a polite face on the same depredations and crimes of the Republicans. Vote for any party other that either of them.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Re: Betrayed Again - SPOT ON. Posted by: JenniferBedingfield
» RE: Betrayed Again Posted by: Urgelt
» no, bob... Posted by: undrgrndgirl
» RE: no, bob... Posted by: Endrael
» RE: Betrayed Again Posted by: luzmejor

Comments are closed-

Well, Barry kept his promises when he played KISSYFACE with AIPAC and Blackwater.
Posted by: JenniferBedingfield on Apr 2, 2009 3:25 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There is nothing to be surprised about in the way he's deceiving the public by pouring more amoral mercenaries into Iraq and Afghanistan even as he shifts troops from Iraq to Afghanistan and even Pakistan. Barry and his party are just as out of touch as the Republicans which is why I couldn't trust either of them myself. In fact, both parties made no bones about it and yet were rewarded for it while the others were unfairly punished.

And as Chicago politics is utterly corrupt making even St Louis look "clean" in pale comparison, what's more to expect? With the kind of neolibs and neocons the Chicago political machine has produced, I say the people of Chicago need to wake up and push for major reforms. The city and its surrounding suburbs are increasing in poverty and corruption as it is.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Having lived in Illinois Posted by: NYmediator

Comments are closed-

I too think the same of the democratic
Posted by: drfun on Apr 2, 2009 3:25 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"leadership" representing their citizen constituents and for many a year have voted 3rd party, which doesn't include Nader.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

BBC Documentary: The War Party ... Zionism, the Unspoken factor in Iraq War
Posted by: ExposeTheIsraelLobby on Apr 2, 2009 4:16 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Watch the BBC documentary "The War Party", part 1 of 5
youtube.com/watch?v=8vWZTTrceV8

Journalist Jim Lobe appears in the doc above, listen to his Antiwar.com Radio interviews here:
ScottHortonShow.com Archives - Jim Lobe (2003-09)

Listen to Philip Weiss discuss the War for Israel agenda:
antiwar.com/radio/2008/07/12/philip-weiss/
antiwar.com/radio/2009/03/18/philip-weiss-2/

philipweiss.org - blogging daily everything Neocon, Israel Lobby, Zionism

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Told you so
Posted by: Erin on Apr 2, 2009 4:38 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have been trying to warn the robot masses since before the election that Obama is just another shill for the 'powers that be'. I tried to reason with people that he is not who he says he is,but they bought all the lies he preached from his pulpit, and have mindlessly followed him. His actions speak volumes as to what his agenda really is. When you cast aside as not relavant, third party candidates who are not part of the "in crowd" you cut off your noses to spite your faces. After you all see what 4 years of lies, broken promises, and more mercenaries given free rein to kill, rape, and pillage in the name of the U.S. brings, maybe you all will finally join us in electing a third party candidate who you really can "believe in".

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Told you so Posted by: Benn_Miller
» WE'RE GETTING A SMOOTH TONGUE LICKIN' Posted by: americansheep
» mercenaries are people too Posted by: SeattlePackedSnowandCollidedCars

Comments are closed-

Private Military
Posted by: Tom Degan on Apr 2, 2009 4:47 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
America really needs to get out of the business of the raising of private armies. Think about it for a minute or two! Where in the constitution does it say that a private citizen can raise an army that could go off and shoot to kill anyone deemed unfit to live by whomever? In the Second Amendment to the Constitution (the one that the right wingers love to quote out of context) it talks about a "well regulated state militia". It is obvious that firms like Blackwater et.al. are barely regulated if at all.

It's only a matter of time that these private, un-Constitutional group of Brown Shirts take their act to your town. Remember, Hitler's Brown Shirts were not a military organization sanctioned by the government. They were a privately organized "Security Firm".

Something to think about, huh?

Lethal Nation

Tom Degan
Goshen, NY

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Private Military Posted by: Erin

Comments are closed-

syed salamah ali mahdi
Posted by: salamah on Apr 2, 2009 5:32 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You see, the problem with the American Empire is that it still remains a 'hybrid' empire with a 'Triumvirate' (Presidency, Congress/ the 'people and Judiciary) instead of a single Emperor, the President. Aspirants like Nixon and George W did try but fell short, each due to his 'pre-qualification' and both times because of the facts on the ground. For example, Nixon did not really have to hide the 'dirty' works either because he had not 'fathered' the dirty works or because the US Economy was sufficiently strong to pay openly for the dirty works being conducted abroad without the 'people' batting an eyelid because they were happy with the state of the US Economy. By the time of his re-election bid things started turning sour. He lost his bid for Imperial Presidency for resasons which do not require listing here. At the time Dubya filed his claim for an Imperial Presidency by arranging or making good use of 9/11, the US Economy inherited by him looked like a polished apple. He did not therefore, bother to check the apple from the inside or was prevented from doing so by the likes of (wilting) Dick Cheney, Dumsfeld, (roguish) Rove and other Zio-Neo imperialist nobility surrounding him/his 'familia'. At the sound of the first uproar by some amongst the 'people' against his usurped unlimited power to SPEND the 'people's' money as he wished, the said 'nobility' advised him to hide his 'squandering' within the allocations for Pentagon and CIA, which would not be easily obvious and hence, easier to justify than ever increasing payrolls for cannon fodder GI's and jumping costs for military hardware purchases in 'failing wars' in Afghanistan and Iraq. Then Dumsfeld and Zio-Wolfowitz came in with their Blackwater and Dyna Corp solutions. The rest is history! Now enter Obama! I believe he does want to do away with the Triumvorate but at the same time he does not want to abandon Empire. This may be the reason for what is being seen as his recurring policy vacillations. Mind you, it's neither easy nor comfortable to run an Empire through a Triumvirate. Two out of three have to give in, like what the Roman Triumvirate did with Augustus Caesar. And, this is not going to happen in the US any time soon. In my opinion Americans can wait for at least 3 decades before another aspirant for President Emperor shows up. Till then, Blackwater and their likes will continue to exist within Pentagon and CIA.
Finally my comment on the "Israeli Connection" is that it is the strangest Scratch-my-back-I-shall-scratch-yours type of connection. With Israel it is, Scratch-my-back-and-I-will pay-you-I-will-scratch-your-back-and-again-I-will-pay-you. The one getting paid both ways is Israel! Long live the Israeli Government of the United States. Yes, the one which is also misnomered as the Government of the United States of America.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Don't click the link . . .
Posted by: dustdevil on Apr 2, 2009 6:19 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
GuitarBill must be asleep at the wheel this morning. Computer geek would tell you this is an identity theft link.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

The real reasons this is happening is a great deal of our economy is tied to it.
Posted by: Benn_Miller on Apr 2, 2009 5:43 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I work for a company that's DoD related because out here in Shreveport, there's not a whole lot of other jobs that can relate to my skills set. Being a tech lead specialist, I can only expect to be rewarded by working in DoD while most other local businesses are unable to offer a well paying job. Don't get me wrong. The system does stink and while I've got a lot of benefits from all this, I too wouldn't mind giving EFCA and single payer a chance so that we all can catch up and heal some of the inequalities. What does this have to do with war contractors? Plenty. Send more war contractors into Iraq and the rest of us working with relation to DoD can get more projects and keep our jobs. I know this stinks but perhaps Obama's plans to put green jobs may help cut into this and just maybe we'll stop sending war contractors into Iraq as soon as folks such as myself can get a green job that rewards me for my IT and management skills.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Rahm I. Emanuel gets a woody
Posted by: weathered on Apr 2, 2009 6:09 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If its sneaky, snotty, selfish, remarkably arrogant and terribly deceitful, its Israel:Earth's little shop of horrors.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

IF You think this is a problem, then
Posted by: madmax427 on Apr 2, 2009 6:45 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I invite You to read two emails I posted on My website on April 1, 2009! The first one states the FACTS of Our problem clearly, consicely & quickly!

http://www.whatsyourlifeworth2.info

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

THE PERMANENT STATE OF WAR
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Apr 2, 2009 6:53 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The use of private "fighting armies" is the alternative to drafting young people and maintaining a bigger military than we have. It prevents indiscriminate use of troops in places like Iraq. If we had a draft, Iraq would never have happened. The case for invading Iraq could't be made. Bush went ahead with no regard for laws or the human cost to his folly. Paying private warriors avoids the messy need for congressional approval, not to mention the people. Just pay these people to do what they do best. The reasons are unimportant. I find it immoral. If a war is justified the poplulation will fight to defend their country. The private contractors will take the risk because the reward is great. They don't get bogged down with the minutia of annoying details like, "Why are we going there"?. War is immoral to begin with, but this strategy takes it several notches lower. I'm not sure what that's called. Thanks, ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Our Government Sucks
Posted by: nismx on Apr 2, 2009 6:55 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Let us review: First they allow corporations to poison us with chemicals for profit that they know cause cancer. They promote putting toxic industrial waste in our water supply "fluorosilicic acid" which is two-fold as it causes all kinds of health problems Plus factories can sell the waste instead of paying for it to be disposed of. They mandate vaccinations for our babies which destroys their immune system and causes all kinds of profitable health problems. The first shot is given within hours of delivery for a total of 22 before the first grade. They crash planes into buildings for the purpose of going to war for more profit. They steal money from us and make laws to make it legal. They fund and cause Wars all over the world, this also is two fold as they profit and reduce population at the same time. The so called "WAR ON TERROR" is a complete SCAM perfect for our Gov. as they have an excuse in invade countries and steal their oil and drugs. MORE PROFIT. Does anyone have any ideas to take back our country from these lying, stealing, cheating, murdering, raping, baby killing Demons from Hell that run the United States of America?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Obama has always been Pro-War, Pro-Empire
Posted by: chlamor on Apr 2, 2009 7:11 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There’s the matter of his actual policy and political record. If Obama is such (as many “progressives” seem to need to believe) an “antiwar” candidate, why has he offered so much substantive policy support to the criminal occupation and the broader imperial “war on terror” of which Bush says O.I.F. is a part? Here are some highlights from a summary of Obama’s U.S. Senate voting record:

“1/26/05: Obama voted to confirm Condoleezza Rice for Secretary of State. Rice was largely responsible…for the deaths of hundreds of thousands of innocent victims in unnecessary wars.

“2/01/05: Obama was part of a unanimous consent agreement not to filibuster the nomination of lawless torturer Alberto Gonzales as chief law enforcement officer of the United States (U.S. Attorney General).”

“2/15/05: Obama voted to confirm Michael Chertoff, a proponent of water-board torture... man behind the round-up of thousands of people of Middle-Eastern descent following 9/11. By Roll call 10.”

“4/21/05: Obama voted to make John ‘Death Squad’ Negroponte the National Intelligence Director. In Central America, John Negroponte was connected to death squads that murdered nuns and children in sizable quantities.

“4/21/05: Obama voted for HR 1268, war appropriations in the amount of approximately $81 billion. Much of this funding went to Blackwater USA and Halliburton and disappeared.

“10/07/05: Obama voted for HR2863, which appropriated $50 billion in new money for war.

“11/15/05: Obama voted for continued war, again. Roll call 326 was the vote on the Defense Authorization Act (S1042) which kept the war and war profiteering alive, restricted the right of habeas corpus and encouraged terrorism.

“12/21/05: Obama confirmed his support for war by voting for the Conference Report on the Defense Appropriations Act (HR 2863), Roll call 366, which provided more funding to Halliburton and Blackwater. ”

“5/2/06: Obama voted for money for more war by voting for cloture on HR 4939, the emergency funding to Halliburton, Blackwater and other war profiteers.

“5/4/06: Obama, again, voted to adopt HR4939: emergency funding to war profiteers.

“6/13/06: Obama voted to commend the armed services for a bombing that killed innocent people and children and reportedly resulted in the death of Abu Musab al-Zarqawi…

“6/15/06: Obama voted for the conference report on HR4939, a bill that gave warmongers more money to continue the killing and massacre of innocent people in Iraq.

“6/15/06: Obama, again, opposed withdrawal of the troops, by voting to table a motion to table a proposed amendment would have required the withdrawal of US. Armed Forces from Iraq and would have urged the convening of an Iraq summit.

“6/22/06: Obama voted against withdrawing the troops by opposing the Kerry Amendment (S. Amdt 4442 to S 2766) to the National Defense Authorization Act.

“6/22/06: Obama voted for cloture (the last effective chance to stop) on the National Defense Authorization Act (S 2766), which provided massive amounts of funding to defense contractors.

“6/22/06: Obama again voted for continued war by voting to pass the National Defense Authorization Act (S 2766) for continued war funding.

“9/29/06: Obama voted vote for the conference report on more funding for war, HR 5631.

“11/16/06: Obama voted for nuclear proliferation in voting to pass HR 5682, a bill to exempt the United States-India Nuclear Proliferation Act from requirements of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954.

“12/06/06: Obama voted to confirm pro-war Robert M. Gates to be Secretary of Defense. Gates is a supporter of Bush's policies of pre-emptive war and conquest of foreign countries.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

And the beat goes on
Posted by: willymack on Apr 2, 2009 8:03 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
President Obama is running out of good will and time in his bid to convince the American people that "change we can believe in" is still on track, and that his administration actually CARES about us. We're STILL pouring 10 billion a month into Iraq & Afghanistan with NO end in sight. Nothing meaningful is happening with health care. Crooks are still being rewarded for their evil deeds, ON OUR DIME, and the bushies aren't being investigated, let alone prosecuted. If Obama is biding his time, waiting for the perfect moment to regain our (apparently misplaced) faith in him, it certainly isn't visible from here.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Did they bid?
Posted by: Edansmommy on Apr 2, 2009 9:03 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Was this a no-bid contract, or were there other bidders?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

As pentagon contracts rise, investigations for fraud decline
Posted by: Defenestrator on Apr 2, 2009 9:04 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
New report from the Center For Public Integrity

“No one is minding the store,” said William G. Dupree, a former director of the Defense Criminal Investigative Service (DCIS), which investigates contracting fraud. “Someone needs to address that.”

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Obama's Blackwater? That's a lie!!
Posted by: jbowen43 on Apr 2, 2009 9:11 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Based on the FACTS of this story using the title "Obama's Blackwater?" is about as truthful as blaming President Obama for the current economic crisis or the Bush Wars.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

old news if you know your history
Posted by: we_need_Abe on Apr 2, 2009 9:54 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The use of hired guns to fight wars has been used throughout history by governments as a way to avoid needing the buy-in of the general population and by the private sector to attain a legal disconnect. For-hire Hessian soldiers were even used in the US revolutionary war. The British laugh at how the US makes a big deal about Blackwater, Triple Canopy, DynCorp etc. Private security firms and the use of outside militias (e.g., Ghurkas) have been used by them for at almost 300 years. There is one small difference between them and us. The Brits tend to go in low key and utilize locals rather than with a brigade of testosterone filled, tatooed yahoos from Delta force, SEALs and Special Forces (my apologies to those of you who actually have a brain and use it). The Brits admire the "salesmenship" of the Americans like Blackwater's Eric Prince but they do not agree with his methods.

With all that being said, the ONLY way that the future may differ from the past is for more of the masses to get informed, and to speak up. Passivity will only allow for the status quo to continue. Speak up or sit down and shut up.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

AFTERTHOUGHT:
Posted by: Tom Degan on Apr 2, 2009 10:10 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hey there, crime stoppers!

When you're done reading all of the great articles and comments on today's edition of AlterNet, have a look at the piece I wrote a year and a half ago on this very subject. Here's a link:

Bush and Cheney's Private Gestapo

Cheers!

Tom Degan

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

WRONG LINK ABOVE> HERE 'TIS:
Posted by: Tom Degan on Apr 2, 2009 10:15 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]

Comments are closed-

Et Tu Obama, Et Tu..?
Posted by: TJColatrella on Apr 2, 2009 10:46 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why remain in our military if you're highly trained when you can make double the money or more working for one of these private armies..?

Doesn't President Obama realize he is spending tax payer money to under mine our nations Military..?

Xe this group others are bleeding off many of our best trained most talented experienced troops..and we are paying often 4x's more for the service we would otherwise have for much less and with greater adherence to our military's great traditions...

Rome only became a great empire after it abandoned privately raised armies and had a professional army now we are going backwards privatizing our nations army so that wars conflict and security cost our Treasury even more..

"Et Tu" Barack..."Et Tu.."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Making conflict profitable is a sure way to get more conflict
Posted by: Garvagh on Apr 2, 2009 11:02 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How many private contractors are in Afghanistan these days? Is it 71,000? Billions upon billions of US taxpayer dollars are being pumped into the bank accounts of favored insiders, who naturally do not want the money bonanza to end. Why have Iran and Russia deal with Afghanistan, when there are billions to be made by US contractors if the US takes the lead, and keeps it, even though this obviously is not in the national interests of the US.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Glad to see everyone woke up about Lord O
Posted by: xbj on Apr 2, 2009 11:21 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Far too little, too late. We told you so.

Enjoy your new-found and richly-deserved disillusionment and apathy.

While this jerk grins at you like the clueless duped idiots you were.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Hold you Representatives Accountable
Posted by: wormfarmer on Apr 2, 2009 11:27 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As I watched with interest the state of our economy and status throughout the world,
my impression of Barak Obama was one of hope, change, hopefully a little independence of
thought and deed. I was ready to extend time and patience for the transition of President. This is not working, as I concluded with the team of economic advisers, Summers, Giethner, Volker,
keeping,but shuffelling, the same military advisers, Gates, Patraeous, etc......., maintaining the same aggressive stance in the middle east, giving the future of succeeding generations to thieves and con men, letting corporations have their way with our society.I have not seen any hope or change from this administration, just the same corporate controlled domination of the populace,
keeping control of the masses.
Now we are moving our military presence into Afghanistan, soon Pakistan, I was
hoping to see something other than an embracing of the status quo, but then I remembered that
our country elected a corporate candidate. I would hope that by this time the population would have awakened to the corporate shenanegans that have been so redundant throughout this
country's history, but then I thought about the collective attention span of America.
The time is ripe for us to stop the political complicit behavior, to adopt the Ralph Nader suggestion of a 1/10 of one percent tax on all stock transactions, to stop the sacrificing of this country's future to the perpetraitors of economic collapse.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

What's behind Schaill's Obama hatred?
Posted by: Hoosier84 on Apr 2, 2009 12:07 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Typical Scahillian attack on Barack Obama: Pointless, baseless and breathless.

-Doug Brooks

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

How do you fix it
Posted by: zbeckerd on Apr 2, 2009 12:12 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Currently the Obama Administration has decided to continue to use contractors to protect US civilian government functions.
This is always a dangerous proposition.

The problem with this and other past contracting is that you have multiple units operating independently of each other with no central command and control. I would refuse to operate in a world where there are independent operators with guns.
What TO DO???
A new model for contractor operations in a military theater. Military adoption of a ICS like theater of operations.

The US land management agencies and specifically fire suppression adopted the California Incident Command System (1984). Since that time it has been expanded for mandatory use by the entire US government emergency management.... Why because it works.

Under the ICS system there would only be one Commander in a area of operations. There would be a daily plan for all operations in the area. All units in the area would be briefed on the plan for that operational period. Everyone would have common communications. Under ICS the command of this operation would be a government employee (General). Any positions below that level can be persons who are qualified to do the work. Generally these people are active and retired government employees. The retired personnel are hired under a separate authority, but the essential fact is that while working they are Government employees.

Lower level functions such as firefighters (soldiers) are routinely contracted to work with government firefighters. They usually come with there own command (sqaud boss = sergeant? crew boss = Lieutenant?)

Higher level command is usually hired from a government entity, although less risky/smaller operations (type 3) can be fully contracted. Still they remain under government supervision at all times.

Leadership can and should include all of the Homeland Security paramilitray operations. This is a ideal method for these folds to get operational experience and for the military to have another source of available leader. It is important in this model to have everyone working in one organization with one command.

So bring back your retired seals, rangers, swat and policeman. Hire them as temporary government employees or contacted workers. But command must remain with a Incident Commander (General) and other leadership that is done by a public servant.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Blackwater...
Posted by: adp3d on Apr 2, 2009 9:18 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...was in New Orleans following Katrina "disarming" the citizens.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

And our mercenaries already in Afghanistan...
Posted by: wewokaokie on Apr 3, 2009 8:58 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Heard Scahill on this week's Democracy Now! mention they're there -- in some aerial capacity.
How many I don't know.
But add that figure -- when you find out -- to our 40,000 troops already there, the 'surge' and 'trainers' (another 31,000) plus the Pentagon's recent request for another 10,000.
Let's make sure we use the e-word in discussing -
or protesting -- this ESCALATION.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Anyone "surprised" by this, wasnt paying attteniton during teh campaign
Posted by: KDelphi5950 on Apr 3, 2009 11:23 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Maybe you were too busy chanting, "yes we can!";

tell me--whats the diff in drowning out those who disagree with "
U.S. A." vs. "yes we can"?!

It was infuriating to true liberals who had to watch.

Insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting a differetn result. Dems/GOP---Tweedledumb and Tweedledumbass

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

 
Advertisement
From The Blog
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Most Read
Most Emailed
Most Discussed
On REDDIT
On DIGG
 
loading ...
POWERED BY DIGG'S USERS