Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

President Obama, Why Did You Pay Blackwater $70 Million in February?

By Jeremy Scahill, AlterNet. Posted March 17, 2009.


Obama may keep the company on the government payroll months after its Iraq contract expires. Not bad for a firm supposedly going down in flames.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

For those already outraged at the AIG bonus scandal, here is a fact that should add more fuel to the fire: The Obama administration has paid the mercenary firm formerly known as Blackwater nearly $70 million to operate in Iraq and, according to The Washington Times, may keep the company on the payroll months past the official expiration of its Iraq contract in May. I reviewed Blackwater's recent transactions with the Obama State Department and discovered a $45 million payment to Blackwater on February 4, 2009 for "protective services-Iraq." It is described as a "funding action only." Here is the interesting part: The estimated "Ultimate Completion Date" is 5/07/2011.

The Washington Times (as described below) reported on a $22 million payment to Blackwater on February 2. Combined with the $45 million payment I discovered, that's nearly $67 million in 72 hours. Not bad for a company supposedly going down in flames.

With the U.S. economy in shambles and millions of Americans struggling to make ends meet and keep their homes, Obama and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton need to explain to U.S. taxpayers how they justify these mega-payments to a scandal-plagued mercenary company. (At the very least, someone should ask Robert Gibbs about it).

It has been widely reported that the Bush administration's preferred mercenary company, which recently renamed itself Xe, will soon be leaving Iraq. That news came early this year after the State Department, under immense public pressure, announced it would not renew the company's lucrative deal to act as the private paramilitary force for senior U.S. occupation officials. The Iraqi government has said it wants the company to leave Iraq and says it has revoked the company's operating license. The Obama administration continues to use Blackwater in Afghanistan and the company has extensive domestic training contracts with the military and law enforcement agencies inside the borders of the U.S.

Earlier this week, The Washington Post reported that some of Blackwater's armed operatives may simply be rehired by two other US mercenary firms that are expected to take over Blackwater's work in Iraq under the Obama administration: Triple Canopy and DynCorp. Now, The Washington Times reports that the State Department has signed contracts with Blackwater that appear to extend the company's presence in Iraq at least until September 2009.

According to the paper:

"On Feb. 2, a department spokesman was asked whether officials planned to renew one of Blackwater's contracts past May. The spokesman, Robert Wood, said the department had told Blackwater 'we did not plan to renew the company's existing task force orders for protective security details in Iraq.'

"But records available through a federal procurement database show that on that same day, the State Department approved a $22.2 million contract modification for Blackwater 'security personnel' in Iraq, with a job completion date of Sept. 3, 2009."

"Why would you continue to use Blackwater when the Iraqi government has banned the highly controversial company and there are other choices?" said Melanie Sloan, executive director of the nonpartisan Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington.

State Department spokesman Noel Clay told The Washington Times the contract modification involves aviation services. "The place of performance is Iraq, but it is totally different than the Baghdad one that expires in May," he said. Sloan called the State Department's explanation of the Feb. 2 deal a "parsing of words" and said "they should just be straight with us." Xe spokeswoman Anne Tyrell declined to comment on the status of the company's work in Iraq or the Feb. 2 contract modification. She said the company was aware that the State Department had indicated that it did not plan to renew its contracts in Iraq but that Xe officials had not received specific information about leaving the country. "We're following their direction," she said.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: barack obama, blackwater, mercenaries, hillary clinton, washington post, washington times, state department, erik prince, dyncorp, xe, triple canopy

Jeremy Scahill, an independent journalist who reports frequently for the national radio and TV program Democracy Now!, has spent extensive time reporting from Iraq and Yugoslavia. He is currently a Puffin Writing Fellow at The Nation Institute. Scahill is the author of Blackwater: The Rise of the World's Most Powerful Mercenary Army.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from World! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Don't blame any of this on Obama
Posted by: SuicideBomber on Mar 18, 2009 12:24 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Once again, this is the work of the racist Zionists pushing President Obama into this and turning President Obama into some kind of Neocon.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Don't blame any of this on Obama Posted by: losingmyliberties
Bills, Bills, and more Bills
Posted by: Jonalist on Mar 18, 2009 2:20 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If it is not Blackwater that is being bailed out then it is whom Blackwater owes money to and you know they must owe someone money else they would not have received $22 million payment on February 2, ombined with the $45 million payment on February 4, 2009 to be nearly $67 million in 72 hours, then perhaps more if there is more to pay but it looks like its done.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Obama
Posted by: Brother Tim on Mar 18, 2009 2:27 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
just hasn't fully 'come out of the closet' yet.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Obama Posted by: peacefullaim1
» RE: Obama Posted by: Erin
» RE: Obama Posted by: kungfuma
Keep the pressure on!
Posted by: saadasim on Mar 18, 2009 3:06 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We, the people, must keep the pressure on our leaders and media. Thank you Scahill for your constant investigative journalism.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Why not try and answer the question?
Posted by: gunboat diplomat on Mar 18, 2009 3:21 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So, the fact is that an additional $70 million went to Blackwater - but how much went in total to private military contractors in Iraq last year?

As of 2005, the situation was that (frontline, pbs):

"Private military contractors comprise the second largest "force" in Iraq, far outnumbering all non-U.S. forces combined. There are as many as 100,000 civilian contractors and approximately 20,000 private security forces"

Blackwater is just a weird little sideshow - a convenient punching bag, while the real contractor is KBR:

"KBR has 50,000 employees in Iraq and Kuwait that run U.S. military supply lines and operate U.S. military bases. KBR is also the largest contractor in Iraq, providing the Army with $11.84 billion dollars in services since 2002."

That's about $4 billion a year to KBR. This change in policy came when Dick Cheney was in the Bush Sr. Administration, but it was continued full force under Clinton, who assigned KBR to build bases in Kosovo (Camp Bondsteel, still there, an integral component of the Nabucco gas pipeline project, just another section of the global oil protection apparatus).

KBR is mostly civilian support - what the Army itself used to do using enlisted soldiers at half the cost. Blackwater is part of the security forces, but why the myopic focus by Scahill on Blackwater? Why not pay attention to who still is in Iraq?

"Private Warriors" also explores a very different kind of contractor -- the private world of security teams that work for firms like Blackwater, Aegis, and Erinys. They provide armed protection for U.S. government officials, government offices, military installations and even military commanders.

PBS left out their most important role in Iraq, however - as components of the Oil Protection Force. Bet you haven't read much about that, have you? Why not? Maybe all the fuss over Blackwater is just a distraction technique - because the real problem is at the Pentagon.

What is the general public's inclination when they hear "Pentagon"?

Pentagon: the symbol of a bloated military-industrial complex, the home of eager brown-nosed lackeys looking for perches on corporate boards, the single largest source of waste and fraud in the U.S. budget - yeah, that's what those SECRET clearances are really all about.

The Pentagon is a relic of Cold War era thinking, both in its overall structure and in it's institutionalized mentality - it's also a big fat target, as 9/11 showed, a glory piece, the home of exquisite uniforms, grace, dignity, and other assorted bullshit.

My suggestion for the Pentagon? Let's take those KBR contractors from Iraq and have them put their majic touch on a Pentagon rewiring job, starting in the gyms and showers - and don't worry, Walter Reed is waiting to accept any electrocution victims - you can even get money for retraining for a new career after your crippling injury.

Once a few generals get zapped in the showers, they might start rethinking their cost-plus no-bid contracting procedures, perhaps...

But that won't come from the military. It'll come from the realization that sane budgeting involves the elimination of the sacred cow: defense budget appropriations will not be the first consideration.

That's why they call it the Iron Triangle: Congress makes the defense appropriations, the President signs off on them after consultation with the Pentagon, and the private contractors keep dumping 1% of their take into political campaigns each year.

The bigger they are, the harder they fall - my bet is that the government is going to be forced to renationalize much of the privatized contractors - we can imagine GM going under; can we imagine Lockheed, KBR and Booz Hamilton going under as well?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Surprise!
Posted by: Revolutionary (Direct) Democracy on Mar 18, 2009 4:59 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Barack Obama is nothing but a "kinder, gentler" George W. Bush.


FREE AMERICA

REVOLUTIONARY (DIRECT) DEMOCRACY

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Surprise! Posted by: Erin
Don't Gut The Military Liberals
Posted by: SeattlePackedSnowandCollidedCars on Mar 18, 2009 5:20 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The "Blackwaters" of the world will always be around. They have always been around and they are around even more because what is the 1st thing you guys wanna cut... The Defense Budget however Liberals never analyze the "unattended consequences" of there actions and try to shut people like me up.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Why do liberals want to shut you up? Posted by: KeepsonTickn
» RE: Don't Gut The Military Liberals Posted by: wrinklemomma
Follow the money
Posted by: 2thepoint on Mar 18, 2009 5:33 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So we are outraged at Blackwater and another administration is paying them for security. Who's security?

I've pointed this out before when Obama suggested he'd get rid of Blackwater in Iraq. What happens if he decises to shut them down. Does anyone know the level of expertise and armament they possess. Does anyone think they can actually stage an assassination in this country or hold a president hostage to a "contract".

It may be a loony conspiracy theory, then again, it may not be!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Follow the money Posted by: jenko
Blackwater is the final straw that made me oppose gun control !
Posted by: JenniferBedingfield on Mar 18, 2009 5:58 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Given that our two parties are in bed with corporate fascists, I'm seriously considering that we really do need to be armed. Reasonable gun control might have been fine but with the economic depression getting worse year after year this decade alone and with the way the corporate elites and the pols are trading bribes and hush money like mad all the while leaving the rest of us to rot and giving us the middle finger, all I can say is fuck it !

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» mercenaries are people too Posted by: SeattlePackedSnowandCollidedCars
» RE: mercenaries are people too Posted by: dustdevil
Obama is the newest empty suit working on behalf of The Empire
Posted by: chlamor on Mar 18, 2009 6:25 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Although Mr. Obama can be seen as a definite fraud and someone who talks out of both sides of his mouth, much of his campaign rhetoric was so vague, so CIA-like in style and scope, that he now claims and quite often, that his message meant other things than what you heard said. Deconstructing his “change message” speeches, one can clearly see the vagueness and cryptic language used. He was often imprecise on exactly what he would change, opting to say the obvious, of not continuing the same failed policies of his predecessor, and then saying how he would keep some programs/policies and eliminate others. Typical political bullshit. His so-called opposition to the war in Iraq is/was a sham and has been all along. In many cases, however, one could very well argue that Obama is not actually a hypocrite on Iraq and other issues working on behalf of the American empire. Just because Obama criticized the Bush administration's war on Iraq, he never brought out the fact that it was a criminal war and violated crimes against humanity. Obama has an administration full of Neocon-connected advocates as well as pro-war cabinet members. Obama's so-called opposition to the war on Iraq was not reflected in his Senate voting record, in which he voted for additional war supplementals over and over again, in order to continue financing that illegal invasion.

As Jeremy Scahill wrote in his article titled, "Obama's Mercenary Position," from the Nation magazine, on February 27, 2008:


"A senior foreign policy adviser to leading Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama has told The Nation that if elected Obama will not "rule out" using private security companies like Blackwater Worldwide in Iraq. The adviser also said that Obama does not plan to sign on to legislation that seeks to ban the use of these forces in US war zones by January 2009, when a new President will be sworn in. Obama's campaign says that instead he will focus on bringing accountability to these forces while increasing funding for the State Department's Bureau of Diplomatic Security, the agency that employs Blackwater and other private security contractors."

We were told repeatedly during the campaign that Obama was right on the premiere foreign policy issue of our day – the Iraq war. "Six years ago, I stood up and opposed this war at a time when it was politically risky to do so," Obama said in his September debate against John McCain. "Senator McCain and President Bush had a very different judgment." What does it say that, with 130 members of the House and 23 in the Senate who voted against the war, Obama chooses to hire Democrats who made the same judgement as Bush and McCain?

I guess it does not matter any longer. Where have the real men gone to any more? Obama's campaign speeches were full of bullshit and misleading, yet, vague "promises," and the bogus-assed theme of "change" throughout was more of the same crap Americans like to hear, from their newest teen idol, or fancy dancer from "Dancing with Stars" and other moronic TV programs. Obama is a fine entertainer out of the Hollywood connected-Defense Department of the USA. Obama certainly is not John McCain nor George W. Bush. Yet, Obama is certainly the newest empty suit working on behalf of Captain Jack and the American Empire Project.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

You ask why? Because Obama is the house negro doing the bidding of his
Posted by: MeyravLevine on Mar 18, 2009 6:38 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
masters.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

WHY NOT ASK HIM
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Mar 18, 2009 7:28 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Stay with me here. Maybe it's the last of their contract agreement with Bush & Co. We're all a little nuts over money these days for good reason. But some bills come due and have to be paid. I don't like Blackwater either. They're overpaid crooks and have drained our defense budget for too long. But it might very well be a legitimate debt. Obama will be paying Bush's bills for a long time to come. ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

triple canopy and dyncorp?
Posted by: somegirl on Mar 18, 2009 8:10 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
does anyone think these companies are any better than blackwater? they've just got less brand recognition, but they're as dirty.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The more Obama keeps throwing money like that, the more I say MORE TAX CUTS ! MORE TAX CUTS !
Posted by: FLYING DOOFUS on Mar 18, 2009 8:13 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I mean why should our taxpayer money go to them. He has no morality in rewarding criminals such as Blackwater. Either put our money to sound use or give it back to us and let us be our own heros !

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Patience, please
Posted by: J- on Mar 18, 2009 8:26 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Barack Obama cannot by himself, nor even with his entire staff, undo the workings of eights years of Cheney/Bush in eight weeks.

Let's keep the light shining on the things we don't like, but the amount of criticism being leveled at this still brand new administration is unwarranted.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

well probably cause
Posted by: mrmystery on Mar 18, 2009 9:27 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
probably because we owed them that much due to our contract and what their being paid to do in Iraq. I assume that their pretty tangled in Iraq dealings right now and we need time to take over the responsibilities that bush contracted them to do.

What's with this rush to blame barack for stuff? Why can't you critics just be a bit patient and realize that change takes time if we want to change responsibly?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Blackwater going down in flames?
Posted by: monkeywrench on Mar 18, 2009 10:13 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Let's make sure we understand one of the basic Laws of Washington: a company with a government contract, especialy a Pentagon contract, never, ever, ever, goes down in flames. It is only taxpayers who get burned.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The "wars that shouldn't have been
Posted by: willymack on Mar 18, 2009 11:07 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Let's go back to the beginning, shall we?
Iraq and afghanistan were attacked, and continue to be brutalized on the basis of dirty, evil lies, spewed by dirty, evil cretins.
These "wars' are therefore, ILLEGAL.
The ONLY way to make this situation anywhere near right is to IMMEDIATELY AND PERMANENTLY withdraw from both countries, bilgewater included.
Not only should bilgewater NOT be given another dime, but they should be prosecuted for war crimes alongside the bushie thugs.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

HR 1388 Forced labor for all citizens called "the gift act"
Posted by: LillianB on Mar 18, 2009 11:30 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If HR 1388 passes all citizens will be forced to join National civilian community corps. All ages must attend including seniors and small children. We are on the way to enslavement in our own country. Better question congress before it's too late...this bill is moving quickly and quietly towards being law. We've been tricked.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Not at the top of my list
Posted by: we_need_Abe on Mar 18, 2009 12:08 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That firm of mouth breathing miscreants known as Backwater aren't at the top of my list of problems for Obama to tackle but they should still be terminated. Hey, they like to kill things, maybe they can put a contract out on themselves!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Boddy Men and US Military Complex
Posted by: ndelaney on Mar 19, 2009 7:09 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Just what the United States needs, another boggy man and another war. We still haven't found the last boggy man and it has cost us how much? But it just goes to show to what extent the U.S. military complex will go to maintain its financial glut in America. The biggest threat to this country has less to do with Iran than the U.S. military corporate empire.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Re: the last straw
Posted by: mexobserver on Mar 20, 2009 6:40 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That both your main political parties are in bed with Fascists doesn't mean that you have to go armed and end up a Fascist yourself.
USAmericans are Fasc-inating: anger and fear turn them into what they are mad at and afraid of. There are a valuable few who try to think with a cold objective yet compassionate mind toward their community and the world, and come up with activism for real accountability, activism for leaders to really respect and guarantee, and real-ize what the UN recognized just in 2001: Economic, social, cultural and environmental rights. Up to now, democracy à l'Américaine, offers only some civil and political rights. That is NOT what a REAL democracy should be. Perhaps most of the people don't understand what these words mean: First seek the kingdom of God and His/Her Justice, the rest will come along naturally. That was what the authentic prophet said in essence, you know better, you are a Christian country. I am just a Gnostic. :)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

On withdrawing responsibly from Afghanistan
Posted by: cplot on Mar 21, 2009 5:09 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I still say the only responsible way to withdraw from Afghanistan is to involve the UN and UN peacekeeper missions. The claims that we need to remain in Afghanistan to fix the mess we created is the standard propaganda we've heard every time the US military creates a mess around the World.

I found a quote from Richard Perle from 1987 where he gave the Soviet Union some advice on how to responsibly withdraw from Afghanistan.

“It's not very complicated. [The USSR] arrived in a matter of days on Christmas eve in 1979; they could be home by Christmas eve, if they decided to leave Afghanistan and let the Afghans decide their own future people. If you [The USSR] leave, the problem of support to the Mujahadeen solves itself.” - Richard Perle (Archive footage rebroadcast in The Power of Nightmares: The Rise of the Politics of Fear 1987)

I'm sure if you asked Richard Perle today if the same thing applied to the US he would deny it. However, this just shows the duplicity of the propaganda. We're not doing Iraq or Afghanistan any favors by prolonging our occupation. We would do them both a favor by inviting UN peacekeeping missions into each country and ending the US occupation within days or weeks rather than years or never.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Ironic Meaning of "Xe"
Posted by: fstaheli on Apr 4, 2009 12:26 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is ironic but perhaps not coincidental that Blackwater changed its name to "Xe". Xe is the symbol for the element Xenon, a colorless, odorless gas, as well as having its derivation from the Greek, meaning "foreign or strange".

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement